e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 001-15891
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-1724239 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
211 Carnegie Center Princeton, New Jersey
|
|
08540 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(609) 524-4500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to
be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes þ No
o
As of October 28, 2009, there were 256,409,300 shares of common stock outstanding, par value
$0.01 per share.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Index
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The words believes,
projects, anticipates, plans, expects, intends, estimates and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause NRGs actual results,
performance and achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
These factors, risks and uncertainties include the factors described under Risks Factors Related to
NRG Energy, Inc. in Part I, Item 1A, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A, of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 including the following:
|
|
|
General economic conditions, changes in the wholesale power markets and fluctuations in
the cost of fuel; |
|
|
|
|
Volatile power supply costs and demand for power; |
|
|
|
|
Hazards customary to the power production industry and power generation operations such
as fuel and electricity price volatility, unusual weather conditions, catastrophic
weather-related or other damage to facilities, unscheduled generation outages, maintenance
or repairs, unanticipated changes to fuel supply costs or availability due to higher
demand, shortages, transportation problems or other developments, environmental incidents,
or electric transmission or gas pipeline system constraints and the possibility that NRG
may not have adequate insurance to cover losses as a result of such hazards; |
|
|
|
|
The effectiveness of NRGs risk management policies and procedures, and the ability of
NRGs counterparties to satisfy their financial commitments; |
|
|
|
|
Counterparties collateral demands and other factors affecting NRGs liquidity position
and financial condition; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to operate its businesses efficiently, manage capital expenditures and
costs tightly, and generate earnings and cash flows from its asset-based businesses in
relation to its debt and other obligations; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to enter into contracts to sell power and procure fuel on acceptable terms
and prices; |
|
|
|
|
The liquidity and competitiveness of wholesale markets for energy commodities; |
|
|
|
|
Government regulation, including compliance with regulatory requirements and changes in
market rules, rates, tariffs and environmental laws and increased regulation of carbon
dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions; |
|
|
|
|
Price mitigation strategies and other market structures employed by ISOs or RTOs that
result in a failure to adequately compensate NRGs generation units for all of its costs; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to borrow additional funds and access capital markets, as well as NRGs
substantial indebtedness and the possibility that NRG may incur additional indebtedness
going forward; |
|
|
|
|
Operating and financial restrictions placed on NRG and its subsidiaries that are
contained in the indentures governing NRGs outstanding notes, in NRGs Senior Credit
Facility, and in debt and other agreements of certain of NRG subsidiaries and project
affiliates generally; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to implement its RepoweringNRG strategy of developing and building new
power generation facilities, including new nuclear, wind and solar projects; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to implement its econrg strategy of finding ways to meet the challenges of
climate change, clean air and protecting natural resources while taking advantage of
business opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to implement its FORNRG strategy of increasing the return on invested
capital through operational performance improvements and a range of initiatives at plants
and corporate offices to reduce costs or generate revenue; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to achieve its strategy of regularly returning capital to shareholders;
and |
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to successfully integrate and manage any acquired companies. |
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made, and NRG undertakes no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors that could cause NRGs
actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should not be construed as exhaustive.
3
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the
meanings indicated below:
|
|
|
APB
|
|
Accounting Principles Board |
|
|
|
ASC
|
|
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which the FASB has
established as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
ASU
|
|
Accounting Standards Updates updates to the ASC |
|
|
|
Baseload capacity
|
|
Electric power generation capacity normally expected to serve
loads on an around-the-clock basis throughout the calendar year |
|
|
|
BACT
|
|
Best Available Control Technology |
|
|
|
BTA
|
|
Best Technology Available |
|
|
|
BTU
|
|
British Thermal Unit |
|
|
|
CAA
|
|
Clean Air Act |
|
|
|
CAGR
|
|
Compound annual growth rate |
|
|
|
CAIR
|
|
Clean Air Interstate Rule |
|
|
|
CAISO
|
|
California Independent System Operator |
|
|
|
Capital Allocation Plan
|
|
Share repurchase program |
|
|
|
Capital Allocation Program
|
|
NRGs plan of allocating capital between debt reduction,
reinvestment in the business, and share repurchases through the
Capital Allocation Plan |
|
|
|
CDWR
|
|
California Department of Water Resources |
|
|
|
C&I
|
|
Commercial, industrial and governmental/institutional |
|
|
|
CL&P
|
|
The Connecticut Light & Power Company |
|
|
|
CO2
|
|
Carbon dioxide |
|
|
|
CREZ
|
|
Competitive Renewable Energy Zones |
|
|
|
CS
|
|
Credit Suisse Group |
|
|
|
CSF I
|
|
NRG Common Stock Finance I LLC |
|
|
|
CSF II
|
|
NRG Common Stock Finance II LLC |
|
|
|
CSF CAGRs
|
|
Embedded derivatives within the CSF debt, individually referred
to as CSF I CAGR and CSF II CAGR |
|
|
|
CSF Debt
|
|
CSF I and CSF II issued notes and preferred interest,
individually referred to as CSF I Debt and CSF II Debt |
|
|
|
CSRA
|
|
Credit Sleeve Reimbursement Agreement with Merrill Lynch in
connection with acquisition of Reliant Energy, as hereinafter
defined |
|
|
|
DNREC
|
|
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control |
|
|
|
DPUC
|
|
Department of Public Utility Control |
|
|
|
EITF
|
|
Emerging Issues Task Force |
|
|
|
EPC
|
|
Engineering, Procurement and Construction |
|
|
|
ERCOT
|
|
Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the Independent System
Operator and the Regional Reliability Coordinator of the various
electricity systems within Texas |
|
|
|
ESPP
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
|
|
|
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
|
|
|
FERC
|
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
|
|
|
FSP
|
|
FASB Staff Position |
|
|
|
GHG
|
|
Greenhouse Gases |
4
|
|
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (continued) |
|
|
|
Heat Rate
|
|
A measure of thermal efficiency computed by dividing the total BTU content of the fuel
burned by the resulting kWhs generated. Heat rates can be expressed as either gross or
net heat rates, depending whether the electricity output measured is gross or net
generation and is generally expressed as BTU per net kWh. |
|
|
|
IGCC
|
|
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle |
|
|
|
IRS
|
|
Internal Revenue Service |
|
|
|
ISO
|
|
Independent System Operator, also referred to as Regional Transmission Organizations, or
RTO |
|
|
|
ISO-NE
|
|
ISO New England Inc. |
|
|
|
ITISA
|
|
Itiquira Energetica S.A. |
|
|
|
kV
|
|
Kilovolts |
|
|
|
kW
|
|
Kilowatts |
|
|
|
kWh
|
|
Kilowatt-hours |
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
London Inter-Bank Offer Rate |
|
|
|
Licensing Board
|
|
Atomic Licensing and Safety Board |
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
MACT
|
|
Maximum Achievable Control Technology |
|
|
|
Mass
|
|
Residential and small business |
|
|
|
MDPSC
|
|
Maryland Public Service Commission |
|
|
|
Merit Order
|
|
A term used for the ranking of power stations in order of ascending marginal cost |
|
|
|
MIBRAG
|
|
Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH |
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
Million British Thermal Units |
|
|
|
MRTU
|
|
Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade |
|
|
|
MVA
|
|
Megavolt-ampere |
|
|
|
MW
|
|
Megawatts |
|
|
|
MWh
|
|
Saleable megawatt hours net of internal/parasitic load megawatt-hours |
|
|
|
MWt
|
|
Megawatts Thermal |
|
|
|
NAAQS
|
|
National Ambient Air Quality Standards |
|
|
|
Net Exposure
|
|
Counterparty credit exposure to NRG, net of collateral |
|
|
|
NINA
|
|
Nuclear Innovation North America LLC |
|
|
|
NOx
|
|
Nitrogen oxide |
|
|
|
NOL
|
|
Net Operating Loss |
|
|
|
NOV
|
|
Notice of Violation |
|
|
|
NPNS
|
|
Normal Purchase Normal Sale |
|
|
|
NRC
|
|
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
|
|
|
NSR
|
|
New Source Review |
|
|
|
NYISO
|
|
New York Independent System Operator |
|
|
|
OCI
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
Phase II 316(b) Rule
|
|
A section of the Clean Water Act regulating cooling water intake structures |
|
|
|
PJM
|
|
PJM Interconnection, LLC |
|
|
|
PJM market
|
|
The wholesale and retail electric market operated by PJM primarily in all or parts of
Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Virginia and West Virginia |
5
|
|
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (continued) |
|
|
|
PML
|
|
NRG Power Marketing, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NRG which procures transportation
and fuel for the Companys generation facilities, sells the power from these facilities,
and manages all commodity trading and hedging for NRG |
|
|
|
PPA
|
|
Power Purchase Agreement |
|
|
|
PUCT
|
|
Public Utility Commission of Texas |
|
|
|
Reliant Energy
|
|
NRGs retail business in Texas purchased on May 1, 2009, from Reliant Energy, Inc. which
is now known as RRI Energy, Inc., or RRI |
|
|
|
Repowering
|
|
Technologies utilized to replace, rebuild, or redevelop major portions of an existing
electrical generating facility, not only to achieve a substantial emissions reduction, but
also to increase facility capacity, and improve system efficiency |
|
|
|
RepoweringNRG
|
|
NRGs program designed to develop, finance, construct and operate new, highly efficient,
environmentally responsible capacity over the next decade |
|
|
|
REPS
|
|
Reliant Energy Power Supply, LLC |
|
|
|
RERH
|
|
RERH Holding, LLC and its subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
NRGs $1 billion senior secured revolving credit
facility which matures on February 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
RGGI
|
|
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative |
|
|
|
ROIC
|
|
Return on Invested Capital |
|
|
|
RPM
|
|
Reliability Pricing Model term for capacity market in PJM market |
|
|
|
RTO
|
|
Regional Transmission Organization, also referred to as an Independent System Operator, or
ISO |
|
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (as amended) |
|
|
|
SEC
|
|
United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
The Securities Act of 1933, as amended |
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility
|
|
NRGs senior secured facility, which is comprised of a Term Loan Facility and a $1.3
billion Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility which mature on February 1, 2013, and a $1
billion Revolving Credit Facility, which matures on February 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
SIFMA
|
|
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association |
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
The Companys $5.4 billion outstanding unsecured senior notes consisting of $1.2 billion
of 7.25% senior notes due 2014, $2.4 billion of 7.375% senior notes due 2016, $1.1 billion
of 7.375% senior notes due 2017 and $700 million of 8.5% senior notes due 2019 |
|
|
|
SFAS
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards issued by the FASB |
|
|
|
STP
|
|
South Texas Project nuclear generating facility located near Bay City, Texas in which
NRG owns a 44% Interest |
|
|
|
STPNOC
|
|
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company |
|
|
|
Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility
|
|
NRGs $1.3 billion senior secured synthetic letter of credit facility which matures on
February 1, 2013 |
|
|
|
TANE
|
|
Toshiba American Nuclear Energy Corporation |
|
|
|
TANE Facility
|
|
NINAs $500 million credit facility with TANE
which matures on February 24, 2012 |
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility
|
|
A senior first priority secured term loan which matures on February 1, 2013, and is
included as part of NRGs Senior Credit Facility |
|
|
|
Texas Genco
|
|
Texas Genco LLC, now referred to as the Companys Texas Region |
|
|
|
Tonnes
|
|
Metric tonnes, which are units of mass or weight in the metric system each equal to 2,205
lbs and are the global measurement for GHG |
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
United States of America |
|
|
|
U.S. EPA
|
|
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States |
|
|
|
VaR
|
|
Value at Risk |
|
|
|
WCP
|
|
WCP (Generation) Holdings, Inc. |
6
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The following ASC topics are referenced in this report. In addition, certain U.S. GAAP
standards and interpretations were adopted by the Company in 2009 prior to the July 1, 2009,
effective date of the ASC, and were subsequently incorporated into one or more ASC topics.
Further, certain U.S. GAAP standards were ratified by the FASB in 2009 prior to July 1, 2009, but
are not yet effective and have therefore not yet been incorporated into the ASC. This glossary
includes the definition of these legacy standards and interpretations under the ASC topic or
topics which have been, or are expected to be, fully or partially incorporated.
|
|
|
ASC
105
|
|
ASC-105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; incorporates: |
|
|
|
SFAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles |
|
|
|
ASC 270
|
|
ASC-270, Interim Reporting; incorporates: |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
ASC 275
|
|
ASC-275, Risks and Uncertainties, incorporates: |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
ASC 320
|
|
ASC-320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities; incorporates: |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
|
|
|
|
ASC 323
|
|
ASC-323, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures; incorporates: |
|
|
|
EITF 08-6, Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations |
|
|
|
ASC 350
|
|
ASC-350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Others; incorporates: |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
ASC 450
|
|
ASC-450, Contingencies |
|
|
|
ASC 470
|
|
ASC-470, Debt; incorporates: |
|
|
|
FSP APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(Including Partial Cash Settlement) |
|
|
|
ASC 715
|
|
ASC-715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits, incorporates: |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 132 (R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
ASC 718
|
|
ASC-718, Compensation-Stock Compensation; incorporates: |
|
|
|
EITF 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed
to an Entitys Own Stock |
|
|
|
ASC 740
|
|
ASC-740, Income Taxes |
|
|
|
ASC 805
|
|
ASC-805, Business Combinations; incorporates: |
|
|
|
SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 141R-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That
Arise from Contingencies |
|
|
|
ASC 810
|
|
ASC-810, Consolidation; incorporates: |
|
|
|
SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51,
Consolidate Financial Statements |
|
|
Expected to incorporate SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretations No. 46 (R), effective January 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
ASC 815
|
|
ASC-815, Derivatives and Hedging; incorporates: |
|
|
|
SFAS 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
|
|
|
|
EITF 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to
an Entitys Own Stock |
|
|
|
ASC 820
|
|
ASC-820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures; incorporates: |
|
|
|
|
FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 |
|
|
|
|
FSP FAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability
Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly |
7
|
|
|
|
EITF 08-5, Issuers Accounting for Liabilities Measured at Fair Value with a Third-Party Credit
Enhancement |
|
|
|
ASC 825
|
|
ASC-825, Financial Instruments; incorporates: |
|
|
|
FSP APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(Including Partial Cash Settlement) |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
ASC 855
|
|
ASC-855, Subsequent Events; incorporates: |
|
|
|
SFAS 165, Subsequent Events |
|
|
|
ASU 2009-5
|
|
ASU 2009-5, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures: Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value |
|
|
|
ASU 2009-15
|
|
ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or
Other Financing; incorporates: |
|
|
|
EITF 09-1, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt
Issuance or Other Financing |
8
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
(In millions, except for per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
|
$ |
5,230 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Acquisition-related transaction and integration costs |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Development costs |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
Operating Income |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(loss), net |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
Dividends for preferred shares |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Income Available for NRG Energy, Inc. Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
basic |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Income from continuing operations per weighted
average common share basic |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.58 |
|
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
Income from discontinued operations per weighted
average common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Basic |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.58 |
|
|
$ |
3.87 |
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Income from continuing operations per weighted
average common share diluted |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
Income from discontinued operations per weighted
average common share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Diluted |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
|
$ |
3.41 |
|
|
Amounts attributable to NRG Energy, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
782 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
9
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
(In millions, except shares) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $40 and $3, respectively |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collateral paid in support of energy risk management activities |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
8,211 |
|
|
|
8,492 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,876 and $2,343,
respectively |
|
|
11,610 |
|
|
|
11,545 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in affiliates |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Capital leases and note receivable, less current portion |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $483 and $335, respectively |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
25,954 |
|
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
537 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
Cash collateral received in support of energy risk management activities |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
5,208 |
|
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
8,229 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning reserve |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
Out-of-market contracts |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
17,875 |
|
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
3.625% convertible perpetual preferred stock |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,568 |
|
|
|
4,350 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost 26,080,051 and 29,242,483 shares, respectively |
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
7,123 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
25,954 |
|
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
10
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
908 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of nuclear fuel |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Amortization of financing costs and debt discount/premiums |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Amortization of intangibles and out-of-market contracts |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
Changes in deferred income taxes and liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Changes in nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Changes in derivatives |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
Changes in collateral deposits supporting energy risk management activities |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
Gain on sale of emission allowances |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Gain recognized on settlement of pre-existing relationship |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned equity compensation |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Changes in option premiums collected |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
Cash used by changes in other working capital |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Reliant Energy, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash, net |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
(Increase)/decrease in notes receivable |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Purchases of emission allowances |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of emission allowances |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net of cash divested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Proceeds from sale of equity method investment |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Net payments to settle acquired derivatives that include financing elements |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Payment to settle CSF I CAGR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Payment for treasury stock |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Installment proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Payment of deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Payments for short and long-term debt |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by/(Used by) Financing Activities |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
Change in cash from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,483 |
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
11
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
NRG Energy, Inc., or NRG or the Company, is primarily a wholesale power generation company
with a significant presence in major competitive power markets in the United States, as well as a
major retail electricity franchise in the ERCOT (Texas) market. NRG is engaged in the ownership,
development, construction and operation of power generation facilities, the transacting in and
trading of fuel and transportation services, the trading of energy, capacity and related products
in the United States and select international markets, and supply of electricity and energy
services to retail electricity customers in the Texas market.
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions, or SECs, regulations
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. The following notes should be read in conjunction with the
accounting policies and other disclosures as set forth in the notes to the Companys financial
statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Interim results
are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements contain all material adjustments consisting of normal and recurring accruals
necessary to present fairly the Companys consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2009,
the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, and
cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008. These financial statements and
notes reflect the Companys evaluation of events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date
through November 2, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.
Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes. In addition, as
disclosed in Note 27, Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data, to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, the results of operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, have been revised to reflect the correction of a $78 million overstatement of
revenues from an error in the accounting for energy options. The effect of the revision on the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 from the Companys
previously filed Form 10-Q, as adjusted for
the effect of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 (as discussed in Note 2,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
Adjustment |
|
Increase/(decrease): |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
Operating income |
|
|
(78 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
28 |
|
Income/(losses) from continuing operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Net income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
Income/(losses) from continuing operations per weighted average common share basic |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
Net income per weighted average common share basic |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
Income/(losses) from continuing operations per weighted average common share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Net income per weighted average common share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
12
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. They also impact
the reported amount of net earnings during the reporting period. Actual results could be different
from these estimates.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2009, were predominantly held in money market funds
invested in treasury securities, treasury repurchase agreements or government agency debt.
Other Cash Flow Information
NRGs investing activities do not include non-cash capital expenditures of $43 million which
were accrued at September 30, 2009.
Recent Accounting Developments
SFAS 168 In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No.
168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, or SFAS 168. Effective July 1, 2009, this guidance establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification, or ASC, as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to
be applied by nongovernmental entities. In addition, SFAS 168 also specifies that rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the ASC carries an equal
level of authority. The Company adopted SFAS 168 for the quarterly reporting period ending
September 30, 2009. SFAS 168 has been incorporated into the ASC as ASC-105, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, or ASC 105.
Certain U.S. GAAP standards and interpretations were adopted by the Company in 2009 prior to
the July 1, 2009, effective date of the ASC, and were subsequently incorporated into one or more
ASC topics. Further, certain U.S. GAAP standards were ratified by the FASB in 2009 prior to July
1, 2009, but are not yet effective and have therefore not yet been incorporated into the ASC. This
report retains the original title of these standards and interpretations, and references the ASC
topic or topics which have been, or are expected to be, incorporated.
SFAS 141R The Company adopted SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, or SFAS
141R, on January 1, 2009. The provisions of SFAS 141R are applied prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date occurs after January 1, 2009. The statement requires
an acquirer to recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired,
the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at fair value at the
acquisition date. It also recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired or a gain from a bargain
purchase in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of
an entitys financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. In addition, transaction costs are required to be expensed as incurred. As discussed
in Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, on May 1, 2009, NRG acquired all of the Texas
electric retail business operations, or Reliant Energy, of Reliant Energy, Inc., now known as RRI
Energy, Inc., or RRI. The Company has applied the provisions of SFAS 141R to the Reliant Energy
acquisition. As discussed further in Note 13, Income Taxes, any reductions after January 1, 2009,
to existing net deferred tax assets or valuation allowances or changes to uncertain tax benefits,
as they relate to Fresh Start or previously completed acquisitions, will be recorded to income tax
expense rather than additional paid-in capital or goodwill. SFAS 141R has been incorporated into
ASC-805, Business Combinations, or ASC 805.
FSP FAS 141R-1 In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies, or FSP
FAS 141R-1, which the Company adopted effective January 1, 2009. This FSP amends and clarifies
SFAS 141R, to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in
a business combination. The provisions of FSP FAS 141R-1 are applied prospectively to assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date
occurs after January 1, 2009. Accordingly, the Company has applied the provisions of FSP FAS
141R-1 to the Reliant Energy acquisition. The provisions of FSP FAS 141R-1 have been incorporated
into ASC 805.
13
SFAS 160 The Company adopted SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, or SFAS 160, on
January 1, 2009. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the minority interest
in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It also amends certain of ARB No.
51s consolidation procedures for consistency with the requirements of SFAS 141R. This statement
is applied prospectively from the date of adoption, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which shall be applied retrospectively. Accordingly, the Company has
conformed its financial statement presentation and disclosures to the requirements of SFAS 160.
SFAS 160 has been incorporated into ASC-810, Consolidation, or ASC 810.
FSP APB 14-1 The Company adopted FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), or FSP
APB 14-1, on January 1, 2009, applying it retrospectively to all periods presented. FSP APB 14-1
clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including
partial cash settlement) should separately account for the liability component and the equity
component represented by the embedded conversion option in a manner that will reflect the entitys
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. Upon
settlement, the entity shall allocate consideration transferred and transaction costs incurred to
the extinguishment of the liability component and the reacquisition of the equity component. The
provisions of FSP APB 14-1 have been incorporated into ASC-470, Debt, or ASC 470, and ASC-825,
Financial Instruments, or ASC 825.
During the third quarter 2006, NRGs unrestricted wholly-owned subsidiaries CSF I and CSF II
issued notes and preferred interests, or CSF Debt, which included embedded derivatives, or CSF
CAGRs, requiring NRG to pay to Credit Suisse Group, or CS, at maturity, either in cash or stock at
NRGs option, the excess of NRGs then current stock price over a threshold price. The CSF Debt
and CSF CAGRs are accounted for under the guidance in ASC 470. Upon adoption of FSP APB 14-1, the
fair value of the CSF CAGRs at the date of issuance was determined to be $32 million and has been
recorded as a debt discount to the CSF Debt, with a corresponding credit to Additional Paid-in
Capital. This debt discount will be amortized over the terms of the underlying CSF Debt. The
cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle for periods prior to December 31, 2008, was
recorded as a $7 million decrease to Long-Term Debt, a $13 million decrease to Additional Paid-In
Capital, and a $20 million increase to Retained Earnings on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 2008. In addition, in August 2008 the Company paid $45 million to CS for
the benefit of CSF I to early settle the CSF CAGR in the Companys CSF I notes and preferred
interests, which was reclassified from interest expense to Additional Paid-In Capital upon the
adoption of FSP APB 14-1.
The following table summarizes the effect of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 on income and
per-share amounts for all periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase/(decrease): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
Net Income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
FSP FAS 157-4 In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When
the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, or FSP FAS 157-4. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional
guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with ASC-820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosure, or ASC 820, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased, includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction
is not orderly, and requires disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair
value. This FSP applies to all assets and liabilities within the scope of accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and is applied prospectively. The
Companys adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 beginning with the interim reporting period ended June 30,
2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position, or
cash flows. The provisions of FSP FAS 157-4 have been incorporated into ASC 820.
14
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, or FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1. This FSP
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim and annual reporting
periods of publicly traded companies ending after the FSPs effective date of June 15, 2009. The
Companys adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 beginning with the interim period ended June 30,
2009, did not have an impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position, or cash
flows. The provisions of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 have been incorporated in ASC-270, Interim
Reporting, or ASC 270, and ASC-825, Financial Instruments, or ASC 825.
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, or FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2.
This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to
make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of
other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This
FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary
impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and its disclosure requirements apply only to periods
ending after the FSPs effective date. The Companys adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
beginning with the interim period ended June 30, 2009, did not have an impact on the Companys
results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. The provisions of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 have been incorporated in ASC-320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities, or ASC 320.
SFAS 165 In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, or SFAS 165. SFAS 165
incorporates the accounting and disclosure requirements related to subsequent events found in
auditing standards into U.S. GAAP, effectively making management directly responsible for
subsequent events accounting and disclosures. SFAS 165 also requires disclosure of the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Companys
adoption of SFAS 165 beginning with the interim period ended June 30, 2009, did not have an impact
on the Companys results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. SFAS 165 has been
incorporated in ASC-855, Subsequent Events, or ASC 855.
SFAS 167 In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46(R), or SFAS 167. This guidance amends FIN 46(R) by altering how a company determines when an
entity that is insufficiently capitalized or not controlled through voting should be consolidated.
SFAS 167 is effective at the start of the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. The
Company is presently evaluating the impact of SFAS 167 on its results of operations, financial
position, and cash flows. SFAS 167 is expected be incorporated into ASC 810 upon its effective
date.
ASU 2009-15/EITF 09-1 In July 2009, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 09-1, Accounting for
Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing, or
EITF 09-1. This Issue applies to equity-classified share lending arrangements on an entitys own
shares, when executed in contemplation of a convertible debt offering or other financing. EITF 09-1
addresses how to account for the share-lending arrangement and the effect, if any, that the loaned
shares have on earnings-per-share calculations. The share lending arrangement is required to be
measured at fair value and recognized as an issuance cost associated with the convertible debt
offering or other financing. Earnings-per-share calculations would not be affected by the loaned
shares unless the share borrower defaults on the arrangement and does not return the shares. If
counterparty default is probable, the share lender is required to recognize an expense equal to the
then fair value of the unreturned shares, net of the fair value of probable recoveries. The
Company will apply EITF 09-1 for share lending agreements entered into after June 15, 2009, and
will apply EITF 09-1 on a retrospective basis for arrangements outstanding as of January 1, 2010.
NRG is currently evaluating the impact of this statement upon its adoption on the Companys results
of operations, financial position and cash flows. In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update, or ASU No. 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in
Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing, or ASU 2009-15, which formally
incorporated the provisions of EITF 09-1 into ASC 470.
ASU
2009-5 In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosures: Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, or ASU 2009-5. This ASU, which amends ASC 820
and ASC 825, provides clarification on measuring liabilities at fair value when a quoted price in
an active market is not available. The Companys adoption of ASU 2009-5 beginning with the interim
period ended September 30, 2009, did not have an impact on the Companys results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
15
Other The following accounting standards were adopted on January 1, 2009, with no impact on
the Companys results of operations, financial position, or cash flows:
|
|
|
FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which has been
incorporated in ASC-275, Risks and Uncertainties, or ASC 275,
and ASC-350, Intangibles
Goodwill and Other, or ASC 350. |
|
|
|
|
FSP No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which has been incorporated
in ASC 820. |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which has
been incorporated in ASC-815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815. |
|
|
|
|
FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets,
which has been incorporated in ASC-715, CompensationRetirement Benefits, or ASC 715. |
|
|
|
|
EITF No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an
Entitys Own Stock, which has been incorporated in ASC 718, Compensation-Equity
Compensation, or ASC 718, and ASC 815. |
|
|
|
|
EITF No. 08-5, Issuers Accounting for Liabilities Measured at Fair Value with a
Third-Party Credit Enhancement, which has been incorporated in ASC 820. |
|
|
|
|
EITF No. 08-6, Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations, which has been
incorporated in ASC-323, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures, or ASC 323. |
Note 3 Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The following table summarizes the components of the Companys comprehensive income/(loss),
net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
908 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
Changes in derivative activity |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for translation loss/(gain)
realized upon sale of foreign investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
310 |
|
Changes in derivative activity |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
38 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for translation gain realized upon sale of foreign investment |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
16
Note 4 Business Acquisition
General
On May 1, 2009, NRG, through its wholly-owned subsidiary NRG Retail LLC, acquired Reliant
Energy, which consisted of the entire Texas electric retail business operations of RRI, including
the exclusive use of the trade name Reliant. Reliant Energy arranges for the transmission and
delivery of electricity to customers, bills customers, collects payments for electricity sold and
maintains call centers to provide customer service. Reliant Energy is the second largest
electricity provider to residential and small business, or Mass, customers in Texas, with
approximately 1.6 million Mass customers as of September 30, 2009. Reliant Energy also sells
electricity and energy services to commercial, industrial and governmental/institutional customers,
or C&I, customers in Texas with approximately 0.1 million C&I customers, based on metered locations
as of September 30, 2009. These customers include refineries, chemical plants, manufacturing
facilities, hospitals, universities, government agencies, restaurants, and other facilities.
With its complementary generation portfolio, the Texas region is a supplier of power to
Reliant Energy, thereby creating the potential for a more stable, reliable and competitive business
that benefits Texas consumers. By backing Reliant Energys load-serving requirements with NRGs
generation and risk management practices, the need to sell and buy power from other financial
institutions and intermediaries that trade in the ERCOT market may be reduced, resulting in reduced
transaction costs and credit exposures. This combination of generation and retail allows for a
reduction in actual and contingent collateral, initially through offsetting transactions and over
time by reducing the need to hedge the retail power supply through third parties, thus reducing
collateral postings. In addition, with Reliant Energys base of retail customers, NRG now has a
customer interface with the scale that is important to the successful deployment of new distributed
generation and retail alternative energy technologies.
Credit Support
On May 1, 2009, NRG arranged with Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. and certain of its
affiliates, or Merrill Lynch, the former credit provider of RRI Energy, Inc., or RRI, to provide
continuing credit support to Reliant Energy after closing the acquisition. In connection with
entering into a transitional credit sleeve facility, or CSRA, NRG contributed $200 million of cash
to Reliant Energy. In conjunction with the CSRA, NRG Power Marketing LLC, or PML, and Reliant
Energy Power Supply LLC, or REPS, wholly-owned subsidiaries of NRG, modified or novated certain
transactions with counterparties to transfer PMLs in-the-money transactions to REPS and moved $522
million of cash collateral held by NRG to Merrill Lynch, thereby reducing Merrill Lynchs actual
and contingent collateral supporting Reliant Energy out-of-money positions. At September 30, 2009,
these trades with counterparties were still open, thus there was no impact on NRGs consolidated
financial statements, and NRG continued to record unrealized and realized gains/losses for these
novated trades in its Texas and Northeast segments. The monthly fee for the CSRA was 5.875% on an
annualized basis of the predetermined exposure.
Additionally, on May 1, 2009, NRG entered into a $50 million working capital facility with
Merrill Lynch in connection with the acquisition of Reliant Energy. The facility required that the
Company comply with all terms of the CSRA. NRG initially drew $25 million under the facility.
These funds accrued interest at the prime rate.
Reliant Energy conducts its business through RERH Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries, or RERH,
Reliant Energy Texas Retail, LLC, and Reliant Energy Services Texas, LLC. Through October 5, 2009,
the obligations of Reliant Energy under the CSRA were secured by first liens on substantially all
of the assets of RERH, and the obligations of RERH under the CSRA were non-recourse to NRG and its
other non-pledgor subsidiaries. The CSRA agreement (a) restricted the ability of RERH to, among
other actions, (i) encumber its assets; (ii) sell certain assets; (iii) incur additional debt; (iv)
pay dividends or pay subordinated debt; (v) make investments or acquisitions; or (vi) enter into
certain transactions with affiliates and (b) required NRG to manage risks related to commodity
prices. RERH was designed to maintain the separate nature of its assets in order to ensure that
such assets are available first and foremost to satisfy the entities creditor claims. At
September 30, 2009, the cash balance at RERH was $322 million.
Effective October 5, 2009, as discussed in Note 20, Subsequent Event, to this Form 10-Q, the Company
executed the CSRA Amendment resulting in the removal of the associated first liens and the termination
of the $50 million working capital facility with Merrill Lynch.
17
Acquisition method of accounting
The acquisition of Reliant Energy is accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting
in accordance with ASC-805. Accordingly, NRG has conducted an assessment of net assets acquired and
has recognized provisional amounts for identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at
their estimated acquisition date fair values, while transaction and integration costs associated
with the acquisition are expensed as incurred. The initial accounting for the business combination
is not complete because the appraisals necessary to assess the fair values of the net assets
acquired and the amount of goodwill (if any) to be recognized are still in process, and the Company
is also in the process of valuing the tax basis of the net assets acquired, which will affect the
deferred tax balances. The provisional amounts recognized are subject to revision until the
appraisals are completed and to the extent that additional information is obtained about the facts
and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. Any changes to the fair value
assessments and the tax basis values will affect the final balance of goodwill.
NRG paid RRI $287.5 million in cash at closing, funded from NRGs cash on hand. NRG also made
payments to RRI of $63 million on June 15, 2009, and $11 million on July 24, 2009, as initial
remittances of acquired net working capital. In addition, the Company expects to remit approximately $9 million of acquired net working capital to RRI in the
fourth quarter of 2009, bringing the
total cash consideration to approximately $370 million. NRG also recognized a $31 million non-cash
gain on the settlement of a pre-existing relationship, representing the in-the-money value to NRG
of an agreement that permits Reliant Energy to call on certain NRG gas plants when necessary for
Reliant Energy to meet its load obligations. NRG has recorded this gain within Operating
Revenues in its condensed consolidated statement of operations. This non-cash gain is considered
a component of consideration in accordance with ASC 805, and together with cash consideration,
brings total consideration to approximately $401 million.
The following table summarizes the provisional values assigned to the net assets acquired,
including cash acquired of $6 million, as of the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Current and non-current assets |
|
$ |
635 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
72 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
In-market customer contracts |
|
|
790 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
399 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
178 |
|
In-market energy supply contracts |
|
|
54 |
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
1,942 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
14 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current and non-current liabilities |
|
|
550 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
2,996 |
|
Out-of-market energy supply and customer contracts |
|
|
143 |
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
3,689 |
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
No goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Current assets include accounts receivable with a preliminary fair value of $569 million and
gross contractual amounts of $589 million at the time of acquisition. The Company expects to
collect the fair value of the contractual cash flows; any difference between fair value and the
amount collected will be an adjustment to the acquired working capital payment due to RRI.
The Company, through its acquisition of Reliant Energy, is subject to material contingencies
relating to Excess Mitigation Credits (see Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, to this Form
10-Q) and Retail Replacement Reserve (see Note 16, Regulatory Matters, to this Form 10-Q). Due to
the number of variables and assumptions involved in assessing the possible outcome of these
matters, sufficient information does not exist to reasonably estimate the fair value of these
contingent liabilities. These material contingencies have been evaluated in accordance with
ASC-450, Contingencies, or ASC 450, and related guidance, and no provisional amounts for these
matters have been recorded at the acquisition date. In addition, NRG provided certain indemnities
in connection with the acquisition. See Note 18, Guarantees, to this Form 10-Q for further
discussion.
18
Measurement period adjustments
The following measurement period adjustments to the provisional amounts, attributable to
refinement of the underlying appraisal assumptions, were recognized during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
In-market customer contracts |
|
$ |
57 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
(82 |
) |
In-market energy supply contracts |
|
|
17 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Out-of-market energy supply and customer contracts |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Fair value measurements
The provisional fair values of the intangible assets/liabilities and property, plant and
equipment at the acquisition date were measured primarily based on significant inputs that are not
observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820.
Significant inputs were as follows:
|
|
|
Customer contracts The fair values of the customer contracts, representing those with
Reliant Energys C&I customers, were estimated based on the present value of the
above/below market cash flows attributable to the contracts based on contract type,
discounted utilizing a current market interest rate consistent with the overall credit
quality of the portfolio. The fair values also accounted for Reliant Energys historical
costs to acquire customers. The above/below market cash flows were estimated by comparing
the expected cash flows to be generated based on existing contracted prices and expected
volumes with the cash flows from estimated current market contract prices for the same
expected volumes. The estimated current market contract prices were derived considering
current market costs, such as price of energy, transmission and distribution costs, and
miscellaneous fees, plus a normal profit margin. The customer contracts are amortized to
revenues, over a weighted average amortization period of five years, based on expected
volumes to be delivered for the portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships The customer relationships, reflective of Reliant Energys Mass
customer base, were valued using a variation of the income approach. Under this approach,
the Company estimated the present value of expected future cash flows resulting from the
existing customer relationships, considering attrition and charges for contributory assets
(such as net working capital, fixed assets, software, workforce and trade names) utilized
in the business, discounted at an independent power producer peer groups weighted average
cost of capital. The customer relationships are amortized to depreciation and
amortization, over a weighted average amortization period of eight years, based on the
expected discounted future net cash flows by year. |
|
|
|
|
Trade names The trade names were valued using a relief from royalty method, an
approach under which fair value is estimated to be the present value of royalties saved
because NRG owns the intangible asset and therefore does not have to pay a royalty for its
use. The trade names were valued in two parts based on Reliant Energys two primary
customer segments Mass customers and C&I customers. The avoided royalty revenues were
discounted at an independent power producer peer groups weighted average cost of capital.
The remaining useful life of the trade names was determined by considering various factors,
such as turnover and name changes in the independent power producer and utility industries,
the current age of the Reliant brand, managements intent to continue using the name at the
current time, and feedback from external consultants regarding their experience with
similar trade names. The trade names are amortized to depreciation and amortization, on a
straight-line basis, over 15 years. |
|
|
|
|
Energy supply contracts The fair values of the in-market and out-of-market energy
supply contracts were determined in accordance with ASC 820. These contracts are amortized
over periods ranging through 2016, based on the expected delivery under the respective
contracts. |
19
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment The fair value of property, plant and equipment was
valued using a cost approach, which estimates value by determining the current cost of
replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility. The cost to replace a
given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the property, less
an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation. |
The fair values of derivative assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date were
determined in accordance with ASC 820. The breakdown of Level 1, 2 and 3 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
1,375 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
1,942 |
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
2,996 |
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets and out-of-market contracts
The following table presents the estimated remaining amortization related to the acquired
intangible assets, for periods subsequent to September 30, 2009 and through 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
Customer |
|
Customer |
|
Trade |
|
Energy Supply |
(In millions) |
|
Contracts |
|
Relationships |
|
Names |
|
Contracts |
|
2009 (three months) |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
2011 |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
2012 |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2013 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
The following table presents the estimated amortization related to the acquired out-of-market
contracts for 2009 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Supply |
Year Ended December 31, |
|
and Customer |
(In millions) |
|
Contracts |
|
2009 (three months) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
2010 |
|
|
48 |
|
2011 |
|
|
18 |
|
2012 |
|
|
7 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
These amortization tables reflect the measurement period adjustments recognized during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009.
Supplemental Pro Forma Information
Since the acquisition date, Reliant Energy contributed $2,965 million of operating revenues
and $807 million in net income attributable to NRG.
The following supplemental pro forma information represents the results of operations as if
NRG and Reliant Energy had combined at the beginning of the respective reporting periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,911 |
|
|
$ |
5,122 |
|
|
$ |
8,625 |
|
|
$ |
11,633 |
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Earnings per share attributable to NRG common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
(1.43 |
) |
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
(1.43 |
) |
|
$ |
3.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
20
The supplemental pro forma information has been adjusted to include the pro forma impact of
amortization of intangible assets and out-of-market contracts, and depreciation of property, plant
and equipment, based on the preliminary purchase price allocations. The pro forma data has also
been adjusted to eliminate the non-recurring transaction costs incurred by NRG. Transactions
between NRG and Reliant Energy have not been eliminated. The pro forma results are presented for
illustrative purposes only and do not reflect the realization of potential cost savings, or any
related integration costs.
Certain cost savings may result from the acquisition,
however, there can be no assurance that these cost savings will be
achieved.
Significant Accounting Policies
The following pertains to Reliant Energy, in addition to NRGs significant accounting policies
referred to in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to this Form 10-Q:
|
|
|
Revenues Gross revenues for energy sales and services to Mass customers and to C&I
customers are recognized upon delivery under the accrual method. Energy sales and services
that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated. Gross revenues also
includes energy revenues from resales of purchased power, which were $151 million for the
period ended September 30, 2009. These revenues represent a sale of excess supply to third
parties in the market. |
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, Reliant Energy recorded unbilled revenues of $321 million for
energy sales and services. Accrued unbilled revenues are based on Reliant Energys estimates
of customer usage since the date of the last meter reading provided by the independent system
operators or electric distribution companies. Volume estimates are based on daily forecasted
volumes and estimated customer usage by class. Unbilled revenues are calculated by
multiplying these volume estimates by the applicable rate by customer class. Estimated
amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of Energy Reliant Energy records cost of energy for electricity sales and
services to retail customers based on estimated supply volumes for the applicable reporting
period. A portion of its cost of energy ($68 million as of September 30, 2009) consisted
of estimated transmission and distribution charges not yet billed by the transmission and
distribution utilities. In estimating supply volumes, Reliant Energy considers the effects
of historical customer volumes, weather factors and usage by customer class. Reliant
Energy estimates its transmission and distribution delivery fees using the same method that
it uses for electricity sales and services to retail customers. In addition, Reliant
Energy estimates ERCOT ISO fees based on historical trends, estimates supply volumes and
initial ERCOT ISO settlements. Volume estimates are then multiplied by the supply rate and
recorded as cost of operations in the applicable reporting period. |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Reliant Energy accrues an allowance for doubtful
accounts based on estimates of uncollectible revenues by analyzing counterparty credit
ratings (for commercial and industrial customers), historical collections, accounts
receivable aging and other factors. Reliant Energy writes-off accounts receivable balances
against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it determines a receivable is
uncollectible. |
|
|
|
|
Gross Receipts Taxes Reliant Energy records gross receipts taxes on a gross basis in
revenues and cost of operations in its condensed consolidated statements of operations.
During the period ended September 30, 2009, Reliant Energys revenues and cost of
operations included gross receipts taxes of $39 million. |
|
|
|
|
Sales Taxes Reliant Energy records sales taxes collected from its taxable customers
and remitted to the various governmental entities on a net basis, thus, there is no impact
on the Companys condensed consolidated statement of operations. |
21
Note 5 Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method
MIBRAG On June 10, 2009, NRG completed the sale of its 50% ownership interest in Mibrag B.V. to a
consortium of Severoćeské doly Chomutov, a member of the CEZ Group, and J&T Group. Mibrag B.V.s
principal holding is MIBRAG, which is jointly owned by NRG and URS Corporation. As part of the
transaction, URS Corporation also entered into an agreement to sell its 50% stake in MIBRAG.
For its share, NRG received EUR 203 million ($284 million at an exchange rate of 1.40
U.S.$/EUR), net of transaction costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NRG
recognized an after-tax gain of $128 million. Prior to completion of the sale, NRG continued to
record its share of MIBRAGs operations to Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.
In connection with the transaction, NRG entered into a foreign currency forward contract to
hedge the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the sale proceeds. The foreign currency forward
contract had a fixed exchange rate of 1.277 and required NRG to deliver EUR 200 million in exchange
for $255 million on June 15, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NRG recorded an
exchange loss of $24 million on the contract within Other income/(loss), net.
NRG provided certain indemnities in connection with its share of the transaction. See Note 18,
Guarantees, to this Form 10-Q for further discussion.
Note 6 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated carrying values and fair values of NRGs recorded financial instruments are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Cash collateral paid in support of energy risk management activities |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
Investment in available-for-sale securities (classified within
other non-current assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Trust fund investments |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
8,019 |
|
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
7,475 |
|
Cash collateral received in support of energy risk management
activities |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
4,489 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
4,489 |
|
|
22
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on the
Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis and their level within the fair
value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Cash collateral paid in support of energy risk management activities |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
Investment in available-for-sale securities (classified within other non-current assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Trust fund investments |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,215 |
|
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
7,650 |
|
|
Cash collateral received in support of energy risk management activities |
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
2,747 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
4,169 |
|
|
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances for financial instruments
that are recognized at fair value in the consolidated financial statements using significant
unobservable inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
(Level 3) |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Fund |
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Debt Securities |
|
Investments |
|
Derivatives |
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
Total gains/(losses) (realized and unrealized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Included in nuclear decommissioning obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Purchases/(sales), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Ending balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
The amount of the total gains for the period
included in earnings attributable to the change in
unrealized gains relating to assets still held as of
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses included in earnings that are related to the energy
derivatives are recorded in operating revenues and cost of operations.
In determining the fair value of NRGs Level 2 and 3 derivative contracts, NRG applies a
credit reserve to reflect credit risk which is calculated based on credit default swaps. As of
September 30, 2009, the credit reserve resulted in a $18 million increase in fair value which is
composed of a $4 million gain in other comprehensive income, or OCI, and a $14 million gain in
operating revenue and cost of operations.
This footnote should be read in conjunction with the complete description under Note 4, Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, to the Companys financial statements in its 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
See Note 7, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to this Form 10-Q
for discussion regarding concentration of credit risk.
23
Note 7 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
ASC 815 requires NRG to recognize all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either
assets or liabilities and to measure them at fair value each reporting period unless they qualify
for a Normal Purchase Normal Sale, or NPNS, exception. If certain conditions are met, NRG may be
able to designate certain derivatives as cash flow hedges and defer the effective portion of the
change in fair value of the derivatives to OCI until the hedged transactions occur and are
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a cash flow hedge is immediately recognized in
earnings.
For derivatives designated as hedges of the fair value of assets or liabilities, the changes
in fair value of both the derivative and the hedged transaction are recorded in current earnings.
The ineffective portion of a hedging derivative instruments change in fair value is immediately
recognized into earnings.
For derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges or do not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment, the changes in the fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Under the guidelines established per ASC 815, certain derivative instruments may qualify for the
NPNS exception and are therefore exempt from fair value accounting treatment. ASC 815 applies to
NRGs energy related commodity contracts, interest rate swaps, and foreign exchange contracts.
As the Company engages principally in the trading and marketing of its generation assets and
retail business, some of NRGs commercial activities qualify for hedge accounting under the
requirements of ASC 815. In order for the generation assets to qualify, the physical generation
and sale of electricity should be highly probable at inception of the trade and throughout the
period it is held, as is the case with the Companys baseload plants. For this reason, many trades
in support of NRGs baseload units normally qualify for NPNS or cash flow hedge accounting
treatment, and trades in support of NRGs peaking units will generally not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment, with any changes in fair value likely to be reflected on a mark-to-market
basis in the statement of operations. Most of the retail load contracts either qualify for the
NPNS exception or fail to meet the criteria for a derivative and the majority of the supply
contracts are recorded under mark-to-market accounting. All of NRGs hedging and trading
activities are in accordance with the Companys Risk Management Policy.
Energy-Related Commodities
To manage the commodity price risk associated with the Companys competitive supply activities
and the price risk associated with wholesale and retail power sales from the Companys electric
generation facilities, NRG may enter into a variety of derivative and non-derivative hedging
instruments, utilizing the following:
|
|
|
Forward contracts, which commit NRG to sell or purchase energy commodities or purchase
fuels in the future. |
|
|
|
|
Futures contracts, which are exchange-traded standardized commitments to purchase or
sell a commodity or financial instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Swap agreements, which require payments to or from counter-parties based upon the
differential between two prices for a predetermined contractual, or notional, quantity. |
|
|
|
|
Option contracts, which convey the right or obligation to purchase or sell a commodity. |
|
|
|
|
Weather and hurricane derivative products used to mitigate a portion of Reliant Energys
lost revenue due to weather. |
The objectives for entering into derivative contracts designated as hedges include:
|
|
|
Fixing the price for a portion of anticipated future electricity sales through the use
of various derivative instruments including gas collars and swaps at a level that provides
an acceptable return on the Companys electric generation operations. |
|
|
|
|
Fixing the price of a portion of anticipated fuel purchases for the operation of NRGs
power plants. |
|
|
|
|
Fixing the price of a portion of anticipated energy purchases to supply Reliant Energys
customers. |
24
NRGs trading activities include contracts entered into to profit from market price changes as
opposed to hedging an exposure, and are subject to limits in accordance with the Companys Risk
Management Policy. These contracts are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value and changes
in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments are recognized in earnings. These
trading activities are a complement to NRGs competitive wholesale supply and retail operations.
Interest Rate Swaps
NRG is exposed to changes in interest rates through the Companys issuance of variable and
fixed rate debt. In order to manage the Companys interest rate risk, NRG enters into interest-rate
swap agreements. As of September 30, 2009, NRG had interest rate derivative instruments extending
through June 2019, all of which had been designated as either cash flow or fair value hedges.
Volumetric Underlying Derivative Transactions
The following table summarizes the net notional volume buy/(sell) of NRGs derivative
transactions broken out by commodity, excluding those derivatives that qualified for the NPNS
exception as of September 30, 2009. Option contracts are reflected using delta volume. Delta
volume equals the notional volume of an option adjusted for the probability that the option will be
in-the-money at its expiration date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Volume as |
|
|
|
|
of September 30, 2009 |
Commodity |
|
Units |
|
(In millions) |
|
Emissions |
|
Short Ton |
|
|
1 |
|
Coal |
|
Short Ton |
|
|
60 |
|
Natural Gas |
|
MMBtu |
|
|
(582 |
) |
Power(a) |
|
MWH |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Interest |
|
Dollars |
|
$ |
3,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Power volumes include capacity sales. |
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table summarizes the fair value within the derivative instrument valuation on
the balance sheet as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
(In millions) |
|
Derivatives Asset |
|
Derivatives Liability |
|
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow or Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts current |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Interest rate contracts long term |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Commodity contracts current |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Commodity contracts long term |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Total Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow or Fair Value Hedges |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Cash Flow or Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts current |
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Commodity contracts long term |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Cash Flow or Fair Value Hedges |
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
Total Derivatives |
|
$ |
4,238 |
|
|
$ |
3,876 |
|
|
Impact
of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations
The following table summarizes the amount of gain/(loss) resulting from fair value hedges
reflected in interest income/(expense) for interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain/(loss) recognized |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
(In millions) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Derivative |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
Senior Notes (hedged item) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
25
The following table summarizes the location and amount of gain/(loss) resulting from cash flow
hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
|
gain/(loss) |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
recognized in |
|
recognized in |
|
|
recognized in OCI |
|
reclassified from |
|
reclassified from |
|
income |
|
income |
(In millions) |
|
(effective portion) |
|
Accumulated |
|
Accumulated |
|
(ineffective |
|
(ineffective |
Three months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
after tax |
|
OCI into Income |
|
OCI into Income |
|
portion) |
|
portion) |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
4 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
75 |
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
|
gain/(loss) |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
gain/(loss) |
|
recognized in |
|
recognized in |
|
|
recognized in OCI |
|
reclassified from |
|
reclassified from |
|
income |
|
Income |
(In millions) |
|
(effective portion) |
|
Accumulated |
|
Accumulated |
|
(ineffective |
|
(ineffective |
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
after tax |
|
OCI into Income |
|
OCI into Income |
|
portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
4 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
398 |
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
The following table summarizes the amount of gain/(loss) recognized in income for derivatives
not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges on commodity contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain/(loss) recognized in income or cost of operations for derivatives |
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
(In millions) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Location of gain/(loss) recognized in income for derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
(233 |
) |
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
Cost of operations |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
Credit Risk Related Contingent Features
Certain of the Companys hedging agreements contain provisions that require the Company to
post additional collateral if the counterparty determines that there has been deterioration in
credit quality, generally termed adequate assurance under the agreements. Other agreements
contain provisions that require the Company to post additional collateral if there was a one notch
downgrade in the Companys credit rating. The collateral required for out-of-the-money positions
and net accounts payable for contracts that have adequate assurance clauses that are in a net
liability position as of September 30, 2009, was $163 million. The collateral required for
out-of-the-money positions and net accounts payable for contracts with credit rating contingent
features that are in a net liability position as of September 30, 2009, was $31 million. The
Company is also a party to certain marginable agreements where NRG has a net liability position but
the counterparty has not called for the collateral due, which is approximately $24 million as of
September 30, 2009.
Under the CSRA, Merrill Lynch provided guarantees and the posting of collateral to the
Companys counterparties in supply transactions for the Companys retail energy business. As of
September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch was providing $163 million in credit support to various
counterparties (includes cash collateral posted by counterparties and Reliant Energy as an
offset to exposure).
As described in Note 20, Subsequent Event, to this Form 10-Q,
pursuant to the CSRA
Amendment, effective October 5, 2009, the Company was required to post collateral for any net liability
derivatives and other static margin associated with supply for
Reliant Energy. In connection with the CSRA
Amendment, the Company posted $366 million of cash collateral to Merrill Lynch and
other counterparties, returned $53 million of counterparty collateral,
issued letters of credit of $206 million, and received $45
million of counterparty collateral.
26
Concentration of Credit Risk
Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from non-performance or non-payment by
counterparties pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. The Company monitors and
manages credit risk through credit policies that include: (i) an established credit approval
process; (ii) a daily monitoring of counterparties credit limits; (iii) the use of credit
mitigation measures such as margin, collateral, credit derivatives or prepayment arrangements; (iv)
the use of payment netting agreements; and (v) the use of master netting agreements that allow for
the netting of positive and negative exposures of various contracts associated with a single
counterparty. Risks surrounding counterparty performance and credit could ultimately impact the
amount and timing of expected cash flows. The Company seeks to mitigate counterparty risk with a
diversified portfolio of counterparties, including ten participants under its first and second lien
structure. The Company also has credit protection within various agreements to call on additional
collateral support if and when necessary. Cash margin is collected and held at NRG to cover the
credit risk of the counterparty until positions settle.
Since the credit crisis began in late 2008, NRG has taken several additional steps to mitigate
credit risk including the use of netting arrangements, entering contracts with collateral
thresholds, setting volumetric limits with certain counterparties and restricting trading
relationships with counterparties where exposure was high or where credit quality of the
counterparty had deteriorated. NRG avoids concentration of counterparties whenever possible and
applies credit policies that include an evaluation of counterparties financial condition,
collateral requirements and the use of standard agreements that allow for netting and other
security.
As of September 30, 2009, total credit exposure to substantially all counterparties was $1.8
billion and NRG held collateral (cash and letters of credit) against
those positions of $280
million resulting in a net exposure of $1.5 billion. Total credit exposure is discounted at the
risk free rate.
The following table highlights the credit quality and the net counterparty credit exposure by
industry sector. Net counterparty credit exposure is defined as the aggregate net asset position
for NRG with counterparties where netting is permitted under the enabling agreement and includes
all cash flow, mark-to-market and NPNS, and non-derivative transactions. The exposure is shown net
of collateral held, includes amounts net of receivables or payables and excludes non-affiliate
third party exposure under the CSRA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Exposure (a)(b) |
|
|
as of September 30, 2009 |
Category |
|
(% of Total) |
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
81 |
% |
Utilities, energy, merchants, marketers and other |
|
|
13 |
|
Coal suppliers |
|
|
3 |
|
ISOs |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net Exposure (a)(b) |
|
|
as of September 30, 2009 |
Category |
|
(% of Total) |
|
Investment grade |
|
|
93 |
% |
Non-Investment grade |
|
|
2 |
|
Non-rated |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Credit exposure excludes California tolling, uranium, coal
transportation, New England Reliability Must-Run, cooperative load
contracts, and Texas Westmoreland coal contracts. The aforementioned
exposures were excluded for various reasons including regulatory
support or liens held against the contracts which serve to reduce the
risk of loss, or credit risks for certain contracts are not readily
measurable due to a lack of market reference prices. |
|
(b) |
|
The exposure amounts presented in the above table do not include
non-affiliate third party exposure under the CSRA which was amended on
October 5, 2009. The gross credit exposure to third parties under the
CSRA was $385 million, and the cash collateral held by Merrill Lynch
against this exposure was $304 million. |
NRG has credit risk exposure to certain counterparties representing more than 10% of total net
exposure and the aggregate of such counterparties was $704 million. Approximately 72% of NRGs
positions relating to credit risk roll-off by the end of 2011. Changes in hedge positions and
market prices will affect credit exposure and counterparty concentration. Given the credit
quality, diversification and term of the exposure in the portfolio, NRG does not anticipate a
material impact on the Companys financial results from nonperformance by a counterparty.
27
NRG is exposed to retail credit risk through our competitive electricity supply business,
which serves C&I customers and the Mass market in Texas. Retail credit risk results when a
customer fails to pay for services rendered. The losses could be incurred from nonpayment of
customer accounts receivable and any in-the-money forward value. NRG manages retail credit risk
through the use of established credit policies that include monitoring of the portfolio, and the
use of credit mitigation measures such as deposits or prepayment arrangement. Retail credit risk
is dependent on the overall economy, but is minimized due to the fact that NRGs portfolio of
retail customers is largely diversified, with no significant single name concentration.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table summarizes the effects of ASC 815 on NRGs accumulated OCI balance
attributable to hedged derivatives, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Interest |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Commodities |
|
Rate |
|
Total |
|
Accumulated OCI balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
379 |
|
Realized from OCI during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to realization of previously deferred amounts |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Mark-to-market of cash flow hedge accounting contracts |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Accumulated OCI balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
Gains/(losses) expected to be realized from OCI during the next 12 months, net of $172 tax |
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Interest |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Commodities |
|
Rate |
|
Total |
|
Accumulated OCI balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(1,235 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,265 |
) |
Realized from OCI during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to realization of previously deferred amounts |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Mark-to-market of cash flow hedge accounting contracts |
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
Accumulated OCI balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Interest |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Commodities |
|
Rate |
|
Total |
|
Accumulated OCI balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
$ |
315 |
|
Realized from OCI during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to realization of previously deferred amounts |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
Due to discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
Mark-to-market of cash flow hedge accounting contracts |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
Accumulated OCI balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Interest |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Commodities |
|
Rate |
|
Total |
|
Accumulated OCI balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
(234 |
) |
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
(265 |
) |
Realized from OCI during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to realization of previously deferred amounts |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Mark-to-market of cash flow hedge accounting contracts |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
Accumulated OCI balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
(153 |
) |
|
As of September 30, 2009, the net balance in OCI relating to ASC 815 was an unrecognized gain
of approximately $306 million, which is net of $189 million in income taxes. As of September 30,
2008, the net balance in OCI relating to ASC 815 was an unrecognized loss of approximately $153
million, which was net of $102 million in income taxes.
Accounting guidelines require a high degree of correlation between the derivative and the
hedged item throughout the period in order to qualify as a cash flow hedge. As of July 31, 2008,
the Companys regression analysis for natural gas prices to ERCOT power prices, while positively
correlated, did not meet the required threshold for cash flow hedge accounting for calendar years
2012 and 2013. As a result, the Company de-designated its 2012 and 2013 ERCOT cash flow hedges as
of July 31, 2008 and prospectively marked these derivatives to market. On April 1, 2009, the
required correlation threshold for cash flow hedge accounting was achieved for these transactions,
and accordingly, these hedges were re-designated as cash flow hedges.
28
As discussed in Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, in conjunction with the CSRA,
PML and REPS modified or novated certain transactions with counterparties. The novated
transactions are financial sales of natural gas to the counterparties covering the period from 2009
through 2012 to hedge NRGs Texas baseload generation. A portion of these transactions were
accounted for as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of the fair value of these transactions
recorded in OCI was approximately $245 million. On the date of novation, NRG elected to
de-designate these cash flow hedges and to recognize future changes
in value in earnings
prospectively. As the underlying baseload power generation is still probable, the gains through
the date of novation related to the cash flow hedges remain frozen in OCI and will be amortized
into income when the underlying power is generated. Approximately $248 million of the fair values
of these transactions at the novation date were accounted for as mark-to-market transactions
through the income statement both before and after the novations.
As
discussed in Note 20, Subsequent Event, to this
Form 10-Q, NRG amended the CSRA effective October
5, 2009, and net settled or offset certain REPS transactions with counterparties.
Statement of Operations
In accordance with ASC 815, unrealized gains and losses associated with changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments not accounted for as cash flow hedge derivatives and
ineffectiveness of hedge derivatives are reflected in current period earnings.
The following table summarizes the pre-tax effects of economic hedges that did not qualify for
cash flow hedge accounting, ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges, and trading activity on NRGs
statement of operations. These amounts are included within operating revenues and cost of
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Unrealized mark-to-market results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously
recognized unrealized
losses/(gains) on settled
positions related to economic
hedges |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
Reversal of loss positions
acquired as part of the
Reliant Energy acquisition as of May
1, 2009 |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously
recognized unrealized gains
on settled positions related
to trading activity |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Net unrealized (losses)/gains
on open positions related to
economic hedges |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Gains/(losses) on
ineffectiveness associated
with open positions treated
as cash flow hedges |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Net unrealized (losses)/gains
on open positions related to
trading activity |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
Total unrealized (losses)/gains |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
835 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Revenue from operations energy commodities |
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
|
$ |
835 |
|
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
$ |
192 |
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact to statement of operations |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
835 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
29
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the unrealized gain associated with changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedge derivatives of $376 million
was comprised of gains of $70 million from fair value increases in forward sales and purchases of
natural gas, electricity and fuel, $17 million gain from ineffectiveness, $158 million loss from
the reversal of mark-to-market gains, $448 million roll-off of Reliant Energy loss positions
acquired as of May 1, 2009, and $1 million of losses associated with the Companys trading
activity. The $70 million gain from economic hedge positions includes $217 million recognized in
earnings from previously deferred amounts in OCI as the Company discontinued cash flow hedge
accounting for certain 2009 transactions in Texas and New York due to lower expected generation,
and a $147 million increase in value of forward purchases and sales of natural gas, electricity and
fuel due to decrease in forward power and gas prices. The $17 million gain is primarily from hedge
accounting ineffectiveness related to gas trades in Texas which was driven by decreasing forward
gas prices while forward power prices decreased at a slower pace. The Company recognized a
derivative loss of $29 million resulting from discontinued NPNS designated coal purchases due to
expected lower coal consumption and accordingly could not assert taking physical delivery. This
amount is included in the Companys cost of operations.
The Reliant Energys loss positions were acquired as of May 1, 2009 and valued using forward
prices on that date. The $448 million roll-off amounts were offset by realized losses at the
settled prices and are reflected in the cost of operations during the same period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the unrealized gain associated with changes in
the fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedge derivatives of $192 million was
comprised of $180 million of fair value increases in forward sales of electricity and fuel, a $27
million loss due to the ineffectiveness associated with financial forward contracted electric and
gas sales, $52 million from the reversal of mark-to-market gains which ultimately settled as
financial revenues of which $32 million was related to economic hedges and $20 million was related
to trading activity. These decreases were partially offset by $91 million of gains associated with
open positions related to trading activity.
Discontinued Hedge Accounting During the first half of 2009, a relatively sharp decline in
commodity prices resulted in falling power prices and lower power generation for the remainder of
2009. As such, NRG discontinued cash flow hedge accounting for certain 2009 contracts previously
accounted for as cash flow hedges. These contracts were originally entered into as hedges of
forecasted sales by baseload plants in Texas and Northeast. As a result, $217 million of gain
previously deferred in OCI was recognized in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Discontinued Normal Purchase and Sale for Coal Purchases Due to lower coal-fired generation
during the first quarter 2009, the Companys coal consumption was lower than forecasted. The
Company net settled some of its coal purchases under NPNS designation and thus was no longer able
to assert physical delivery under these coal contracts. The forward positions previously treated
as accrual accounting have been reclassified into mark-to-market accounting during the first
quarter and prospectively. The impact of discontinuance of coal NPNS designated transactions
resulted in a derivative loss of $29 million that is reflected in the cost of operations for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
30
Note 8 Long-Term Debt
2019 Senior Notes
On June 5, 2009, NRG issued $700 million aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due
2019, or 2019 Senior Notes, at a discount resulting in a yield of 8.75%. The 2019 Senior Notes
were issued under an Indenture, dated February 2, 2006, between NRG and Law Debenture Trust Company
of New York, as trustee, as amended through Supplemental Indentures, which is discussed in Note 11,
Debt and Capital Leases, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The Indentures and the form of the notes provide, among other
things, that the 2019 Senior Notes will be senior unsecured obligations of NRG.
A portion of the net proceeds of $678 million were used to facilitate the early termination
of NRGs obligations pursuant to the CSRA
Amendment, which became effective
on October 5, 2009,
as discussed in Note 20, Subsequent Event, to this Form 10-Q. Interest is payable semi-annually on
the 2019 Senior Notes beginning on December 15, 2009, until their maturity date of June 15, 2019.
As of September 30, 2009, $700 million in principal was outstanding under the 2019 Senior Notes.
Prior to June 15, 2012, NRG may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2019
Senior Notes with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a redemption price of 108.5% of
the principal amount. Prior to June 15, 2014, NRG may redeem all or a portion of the 2019 Senior
Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a premium and accrued and unpaid
interest. The premium is the greater of (i) 1% of the principal amount of the note; or (ii) the
excess of the principal amount of the note over the following: the present value of 104.25% of the
note, plus interest payments due on the note from the date of redemption through June 15, 2014,
discounted at a Treasury rate plus 0.50%. In addition, on or after June 15, 2014, NRG may redeem
some or all of the notes at redemption prices expressed as percentages of principal amount as set
forth in the following table, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the notes redeemed to the first
applicable redemption date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption |
Redemption Period |
|
Percentage |
|
June 15, 2014 to June 14, 2015 |
|
|
104.25 |
% |
June 15, 2015 to June 14, 2016 |
|
|
102.83 |
% |
June 15, 2016 to June 14, 2017 |
|
|
101.42 |
% |
June 15, 2017 and thereafter |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
Interest Rate Swaps
In May 2009, NRG entered into a series of forward-starting interest rate swaps. These
interest rate swaps become effective on April 1, 2011, and are intended to hedge the risks
associated with floating interest rates. For each of the interest rate swaps, the Company will pay
its counterparty the equivalent of a fixed interest payment on a predetermined notional value, and
NRG receives the monthly equivalent of a floating interest payment based on a 1-month LIBOR
calculated on the same notional value. All interest rate swap payments by NRG and its
counterparties are made monthly and the LIBOR is determined in advance of each interest period.
The total notional amount of these swaps is $900 million. The swaps mature on February 1, 2013.
Reliant Energy Acquisition
See discussion in Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, regarding the CSRA entered
into as a result of the acquisition of Reliant Energy on May 1, 2009. Further, see discussion in
Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, regarding the $50 million working capital facility
entered into on May 1, 2009. Under the working capital facility, the Company borrowed $25 million
on May 1, 2009. On October 5, 2009, $25 million was repaid on the working capital facility, which
was terminated in conjunction with the amendment of the CSRA as discussed in Note 20, Subsequent
Event, to this Form 10-Q.
Senior Credit Facility
In March 2009, NRG made a repayment of approximately $197 million to its first lien lenders
under the Term Loan Facility. This payment resulted from the mandatory annual offer of a portion
of NRGs excess cash flow (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility) for the prior year.
31
TANE Facility
On February 24, 2009, Nuclear Innovation North America LLC, or NINA, executed an Engineering,
Procurement and Construction, or EPC, agreement with Toshiba American Nuclear Energy Corporation,
or TANE, which specifies the terms under which STP Units 3 and 4 will be constructed. Concurrent
with the execution of the EPC agreement, NINA and TANE entered into a credit facility, or the TANE
Facility, wherein TANE has committed up to $500 million to finance purchases of long-lead materials
and equipment for the construction of STP Units 3 and 4. The TANE Facility matures on February 24,
2012, subject to two renewal periods, and provides for customary events of default, which include,
among others: nonpayment of principal or interest; default under other indebtedness; the rendering
of judgments; and certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency. Outstanding borrowings will accrue
interest at LIBOR plus 3%, subject to a ratings grid, and are secured by substantially all of the
assets of and membership interests in NINA and its subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2009, no
amounts have been borrowed under the TANE Facility.
Debt Related to Capital Allocation Program
Share Lending Agreements On February 20, 2009, CSF I and CSF II, wholly-owned unrestricted
subsidiaries of the Company, entered into Share Lending Agreements with affiliates of CS relating
to the shares of NRG common stock currently held by CSF I and II in connection with the CSF Debt
originally entered into during the third quarter 2006, by and between CSF I and II and affiliates
of CS. The Company entered into Share Lending Agreements due to a lack of liquidity in the stock
borrow market for NRG shares and in order to maintain the intended economic benefits of the CSF
Debt agreements. As of September 30, 2009, CSF I and II have lent affiliates of CS 12,000,000
shares of the 21,970,903 shares of NRG common stock held by CSF I and II. The Share Lending
Agreements permit affiliates of CS to borrow up to the total number of shares of NRG common stock
held by CSF I and II.
Shares borrowed by affiliates of CS under the Share Lending Agreements will be used to replace
shares borrowed by affiliates of CS from third parties in connection with CS hedging activities
related to the financing agreements.
The shares are expected to be returned upon the termination of the financing agreements.
Until the shares are returned, the shares will be treated as outstanding for corporate law
purposes, and accordingly, the holders of the borrowed shares will have all of the rights of a
holder of the Companys outstanding shares, including the right to vote the shares on all matters
submitted to a vote of the Companys stockholders. However, because the CS affiliates must return
all borrowed shares (or identical shares), the borrowed shares are not considered outstanding for
the purpose of computing and reporting the Companys basic or diluted earnings per share.
Adoption of FSP APB 14-1 As discussed in Note 1, Basis of Presentation, to this Form 10-Q,
the Company adopted FSP APB 14-1 on January 1, 2009, which has been incorporated in ASC 470 and ASC
825. The following table summarizes certain information related to the CSF Debt in accordance with
ASC 470.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Equity Component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
Liability Component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
The unamortized discount will be amortized through the maturity of the CSF Debt. The CSF I
Debt has a maturity date of June 2010 and the CSF II Debt has a maturity date of October 2009.
Interest expense for the CSF Debt, including the debt discount amortization for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, was $10 million and $28 million, respectively. Interest expense
for the CSF Debt, including the debt discount amortization for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, was $9 million and $28 million, respectively. The effective interest rate as
of September 30, 2009, was 11.4% for the CSF I Debt and 12.1% for the CSF II Debt.
Subsequent Event On October 9, 2009, NRG commenced the process of unwinding the CSF II Debt,
making a $181.4 million capital contribution to a CSF II cash account, effectively restricting the
cash for the benefit of CS. On October 13, 2009, CS began the process of unwinding their hedges in
connection with the CSF II structure, which they are required to complete by November 24, 2009.
Once complete, CS is scheduled to return 5,400,000 shares of NRG common stock borrowed under the
Share Lending Agreements, and release 9,528,930 common shares held as collateral for the CSF II
Debt, and the Company will remit payment to CS of the $181.4 million outstanding principal and
interest.
32
The CSF II Debt contains an embedded derivative feature, or CFS II CAGR, which requires NRG to
pay CS at maturity, either in cash or stock at NRGs option, the excess of NRGs then current stock
price over a Threshold Price of $40.80 per share. On November 24, 2009, the CSF II CAGR will also
be evaluated to determine whether any payment is due to CS, at which point the CSF II CAGR will
expire.
Dunkirk Power LLC Tax-Exempt Bonds On April 15, 2009, NRG executed a $59 million tax-exempt
bond financing through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dunkirk Power LLC. The bonds were issued by
the County of Chautauqua Industrial Development Agency and will be used for construction of
emission control equipment on the Dunkirk Generating Station in Dunkirk, NY. The bonds initially
bear weekly interest based on the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, or SIFMA,
rate, have a maturity date of April 1, 2042, and are enhanced by a letter of credit under the
Companys Revolving Credit Facility covering amounts drawn on the facility. The proceeds received
through September 30, 2009, were $38 million with the remaining balance being released over time as
construction costs are paid.
GenConn
Energy LLC related financings On April 27, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NRG
closed on an equity bridge loan facility, or EBL, in the amount of $121.5 million from a syndicate
of banks. The purpose of the EBL is to fund the Companys proportionate share of the project
construction costs required to be contributed into GenConn Energy LLC, or GenConn, a 50% equity
method investment of the Company. The EBL, which is fully collateralized with a letter of credit
issued under the Companys Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility covering amounts drawn on the
facility, will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2% on drawn amounts. The EBL will mature on
the earlier of the commercial operations date of the Middletown project or July 26, 2011. The EBL
also requires mandatory prepayment of the portion of the loan utilized to pay costs of the Devon
project, of approximately $56 million, on the earlier of Devons commercial operations date or
January 27, 2011. The proceeds of the EBL received through September 30, 2009, were $88 million
and the remaining amounts will be drawn as necessary to fund construction costs.
In April 2009, GenConn secured financing for 50% of the Devon and Middletown project
construction costs through a 7-year term loan facility, and also entered into a 5-year revolving
working capital loan and letter of credit facility, which collectively with the term loan is
referred to as the GenConn Facility. The aggregate credit amount secured under the GenConn
Facility, which is non-recourse to NRG, is $291 million, including $48 million for the revolving
facility. In August 2009, GenConn began to draw under the GenConn Facility to cover costs related
to the Devon project and as of September 30, 2009, has drawn $19 million.
33
Note 9 Changes in Capital Structure
The following table reflects the changes in NRGs common stock issued and outstanding during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized |
|
Issued |
|
Treasury |
|
Outstanding |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
500,000,000 |
|
|
|
263,599,200 |
|
|
|
(29,242,483 |
) |
|
|
234,356,717 |
|
Shares issued from LTIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,220 |
|
Shares issued under NRG Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,532 |
|
|
|
81,532 |
|
Shares borrowed by affiliates of CS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
|
|
12,000,000 |
|
2009 Share Repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,919,100 |
) |
|
|
(8,919,100 |
) |
4.00% Preferred Stock conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,650 |
|
5.75% Preferred Stock conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,601,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,601,201 |
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
500,000,000 |
|
|
|
282,489,271 |
|
|
|
(26,080,051 |
) |
|
|
256,409,220 |
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
As of September 30, 2009, there were 418,468 shares of treasury stock reserved for issuance
under the ESPP.
5.75% Preferred Stock
Certain holders of the Companys 5.75% convertible perpetual preferred stock, or 5.75%
Preferred Stock, elected to convert their preferred shares into NRG common shares prior to the
mandatory conversion date of March 16, 2009, at the minimum conversion rate of 8.2712. As of March
16, 2009, each remaining outstanding share of the 5.75% Preferred Stock automatically converted
into shares of common stock at a rate of 10.2564, based upon the applicable market value of NRGs
common stock. These conversions resulted in a decrease in preferred stock of $447 million, and a
corresponding increase in Additional Paid-in Capital. The following table summarizes the
conversion of the 5.75% Preferred Stock into NRG Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
Conversion Rate |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Shares |
|
(per share) |
|
Shares |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,841,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares converted by the holders prior to March 16, 2009 |
|
|
144,975 |
|
|
|
8.2712 |
|
|
|
1,199,116 |
|
Preferred shares automatically converted as of March 16, 2009 |
|
|
1,696,705 |
|
|
|
10.2564 |
|
|
|
17,402,085 |
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,601,201 |
|
|
4% Preferred Stock
As of September 30, 2009, 413 shares of the 4% Preferred Stock were converted into 20,650
shares of common stock in 2009.
2009 Capital Allocation Program
In July 2009, as part of the Companys 2009 Capital Allocation Program, NRGs Board of
Directors approved an increase to the Companys previously authorized common share repurchases
under its capital allocation plan from the existing $330 million to $500 million. The Companys
repurchases during the period ended September 30, 2009, were $250 million. NRG intends to complete
its $500 million of share repurchases by the end of 2009, subject to market prices, financial
restrictions under the Companys debt facilities, and as permitted by securities laws.
34
Note 10 Equity Compensation
Non-Qualified Stock Options, or NQSOs
The following table summarizes the Companys NQSO activity as of September 30, 2009, and
changes during the nine months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
(In millions) |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
4,008,188 |
|
|
$ |
25.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,402,000 |
|
|
|
23.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
21.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(212,935 |
) |
|
|
27.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
5,172,253 |
|
|
|
25.19 |
|
|
$ |
29.71 |
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
2,815,800 |
|
|
$ |
21.80 |
|
|
$ |
22.98 |
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of NQSOs granted for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, was $8.63.
Restricted Stock Units, or RSUs
The following table summarizes the Companys non-vested RSU awards as of September 30, 2009,
and changes during the nine months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Units |
|
Fair Value Per Unit |
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,061,996 |
|
|
$ |
32.97 |
|
Granted |
|
|
927,000 |
|
|
|
26.12 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(334,752 |
) |
|
|
23.24 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(45,850 |
) |
|
|
33.59 |
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,608,394 |
|
|
$ |
31.03 |
|
|
Performance Units, or PUs
The following table summarizes the Companys non-vested PU awards as of September 30, 2009,
and changes during the nine months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant- Date |
|
|
Units |
|
Fair Value Per Unit |
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
659,564 |
|
|
$ |
22.81 |
|
Granted |
|
|
338,100 |
|
|
|
22.91 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(272,864 |
) |
|
|
19.44 |
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
724,800 |
|
|
$ |
24.29 |
|
|
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were no performance unit payouts in
accordance with the terms of the performance units.
Deferral Stock Units, or DSUs
The following table summarizes the Companys outstanding DSU awards as of September 30, 2009,
and changes during the nine months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant- Date |
|
|
Units |
|
Fair Value Per Unit |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
260,768 |
|
|
$ |
18.50 |
|
Granted |
|
|
65,437 |
|
|
|
22.77 |
|
Conversions |
|
|
(22,156 |
) |
|
|
23.69 |
|
|
Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
304,049 |
|
|
$ |
19.34 |
|
|
35
Note 11 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share attributable to NRG common stockholders is computed by dividing net
income attributable to NRG adjusted for accumulated preferred stock dividends by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Shares issued and treasury shares repurchased during
the year are weighted for the portion of the year that they were outstanding. The 12,000,000
shares outstanding under the Share Lending Agreements with CS affiliates are not treated as
outstanding for earnings per share purposes because the CS affiliates must return all borrowed
shares (or identical shares) upon termination of the Agreements. See Note 8, Long-Term Debt, to
this Form 10-Q, for more information on the Share Lending Agreements. Diluted earnings per share
attributable to NRG common stockholders is computed in a manner consistent with that of basic
earnings per share while giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were
outstanding during the period.
The reconciliation of basic earnings per common share to diluted earnings per share
attributable to NRG is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to NRG common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
782 |
|
Dividends for preferred shares |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
Net income available to common stockholders from continuing operations |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Net income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
249.3 |
|
|
|
234.8 |
|
|
|
246.6 |
|
|
|
235.7 |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.58 |
|
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
Net income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.58 |
|
|
$ |
3.87 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to NRG common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders from continuing operations |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
741 |
|
Add preferred stock dividends for dilutive preferred stock |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Adjusted income from continuing operations |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Net income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
901 |
|
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
249.3 |
|
|
|
234.8 |
|
|
|
246.6 |
|
|
|
235.7 |
|
Incremental shares attributable to the issuance of equity
compensation (treasury stock method) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Incremental shares attributable to embedded derivatives of 3.625%
redeemable perpetual preferred stock (if-converted method) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Incremental shares attributable to assumed conversion features of
outstanding preferred stock (if-converted method) |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
Total dilutive shares |
|
|
271.8 |
|
|
|
276.5 |
|
|
|
274.1 |
|
|
|
278.0 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
Net income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
|
$ |
3.41 |
|
|
36
Effects on Earnings per Share
The following table summarizes NRGs outstanding equity instruments that were anti-dilutive
and not included in the computation of the Companys diluted earnings per share for the three and
nine months ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions of shares) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Equity compensation (NQSOs and PUs) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Embedded derivative of 3.625% redeemable
perpetual preferred stock |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Embedded derivative of CSF II Debt |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
Note 12 Segment Reporting
NRGs segment structure has changed to reflect the Companys acquisition of Reliant Energy
along with the previously reported core areas of operation which are primarily the geographic
regions of the Companys wholesale power generation, thermal and chilled water business, and
corporate activities. Within NRGs wholesale power generation operations, there are distinct
components with separate operating results and management structures for the following regions:
Texas, Northeast, South Central, West and International.
In the second quarter 2009, management changed its method for allocating corporate general and
administrative expenses to the segments. Corporate general and administrative expenses had been
allocated based on budgeted segment revenues. Beginning in the second quarter 2009, corporate
general and administrative expenses have been allocated based on forecasted earnings/(losses)
before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale Power Generation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Energy |
|
Texas (a) |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Elimination |
|
Total |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(155 |
) |
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
Equity in earnings
of unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Income/(loss) from
continuing
operations before
income taxes |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
Net income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(351 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
|
$ |
13,634 |
|
|
$ |
1,823 |
|
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
791 |
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
22,602 |
|
|
$ |
(18,334 |
) |
|
$ |
25,954 |
|
|
|
(a) Includes inter-segment sales of $162 million to Reliant Energy.
If the Company continued using the 2008 allocation method for corporate general and
administrative expenses, the effect to net income/(loss) of each segment for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, would have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. as
reported |
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(351 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
Increase/(decrease)
in net
income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net
income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(351 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale Power Generation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Elimination |
|
Total |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,280 |
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to
NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
576 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(154 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale Power Generation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Energy (a) |
|
Texas
(b) |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Elimination |
|
Total |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,965 |
|
|
$ |
2,304 |
|
|
$ |
971 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
Equity in
earnings/(losses)
of unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Income/(loss) from
continuing
operations before
income taxes |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
908 |
|
Net loss
attributable to
non-controlling
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(851 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
(a) Reliant Energy balances are for the five months ended September 30, 2009.
(b) Includes inter-segment sales of $228 million to Reliant Energy.
If the Company continued using the 2008 allocation method for corporate general and
administrative expenses, the effect to net income/(loss) of each segment for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, would have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. as
reported |
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(851 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
Increase/(decrease)
in net
income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net
income/(loss)
attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
777 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(851 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale Power Generation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Elimination |
|
Total |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,037 |
|
|
$ |
1,247 |
|
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
5,230 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478 |
|
Equity in (losses)/earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1,285 |
|
Income from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to
NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
39
Note 13 Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate
Income taxes included in continuing operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, NRGs overall effective tax rate on continuing
operations was different than the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the U.S. taxation of
foreign earnings offset by a reduction in the valuation allowance. For the three months ended
September 30, 2008, NRGs effective tax rate was increased primarily due to the impact of state and
local income taxes.
Income taxes included in continuing operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
39.1 |
% |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NRGs overall effective tax rate on continuing
operations was different than the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to an increase in the
valuation allowance as a result of capital losses generated during the nine months for which there
are no projected capital gains or available tax planning strategies. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, NRGs overall effective tax rate was increased primarily due to the impact of
state and local income taxes.
Deferred tax assets, liabilities and valuation allowance
On a provisional basis, NRG established deferred tax assets of $1,203 million and deferred tax
liabilities of $1,189 million as a result of NRGs acquisition of Reliant Energy.
In addition, the Company anticipates reversal of the deferred tax assets and corresponding
valuation allowance pertaining to capital losses which will expire on December 31, 2009.
Valuation Allowance
As of September 30, 2009, the Companys valuation allowance was increased by approximately $63
million primarily due to losses generated in the period from derivative trading activity which
require capital treatment for tax purposes. The Company increased its foreign valuation allowance
by approximately $13 million.
Uncertain tax benefits
As of September 30, 2009, NRG has recorded a $688 million non-current tax liability for
unrecognized tax benefits, resulting from taxable earnings for the period for which there are no
NOLs available to offset for financial statement purposes. NRG has accrued interest and penalties
related to these unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $11 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, and has accrued approximately $19 million since adoption. The Company
recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
NRG is subject to examination by taxing authorities for income tax returns filed in the U.S.
federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions including major operations located
in Germany and Australia. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations
for years prior to 2002. With few exceptions, state and local income tax examinations are no longer
open for years before 2002. The Companys significant foreign operations are also no longer
subject to examination by local jurisdictions for years prior to 2000. The Company continues to be
under examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
40
Tax Receivable and Payable
As of September 30, 2009, the Company has recorded a tax receivable of approximately $51
million that represents a domestic federal tax receivable of $9 million and state tax receivable of
$42 million, net of $6 million reserve. In addition, the Company has recorded a current payable of
approximately $56 million which includes domestic tax payable of approximately $45 million as well
as foreign taxes payable of approximately $11 million.
Note 14 Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
NRG Defined Benefit Plans
NRG sponsors and operates three defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The
NRG Plan for Bargained Employees and the NRG Plan for Non-Bargained Employees are maintained solely
for eligible legacy NRG participants. A third plan, the Texas Genco Retirement Plan, is maintained
for participation solely by eligible employees. The total amount of employer contributions paid
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, was $22 million. NRG expects to make $5 million in
further contributions for the remainder of 2009. The total 2009 planned contribution of $27
million was a decrease of $33 million from the expected contributions as disclosed in Note 12,
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease in the 2009 expected contributions is due
to the adoption by the Company in March 2009 of the new funding method options now available. The
new methods were made allowable under new IRS guidance on the application of recent Congressional
legislation on funding requirements.
The net periodic pension cost related to all of the Companys defined benefit pension plans
include the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plans |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost benefits earned |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
The net periodic cost related to all of the Companys other postretirement benefits plans
includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits Plans |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost benefits earned |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
STP Defined Benefit Plans
NRG has a 44% undivided ownership interest in STP. South Texas Project Nuclear Operating
Company, or STPNOC, which operates and maintains STP, provides its employees a defined benefit
pension plan as well as postretirement health and welfare benefits. Although NRG does not sponsor
the STP plan, it reimburses STPNOC for 44% of the contributions made towards its retirement plan
obligations. The total amount of employer contributions reimbursed to STPNOC for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, was $3 million. The Company recognized net periodic costs related to its
44% interest in STP defined benefits plans of $3 million and $2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The Company recognized net periodic costs related to
its 44% interest in STP defined benefits plans of $8 million and $6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
41
Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Lease Commitments
As a result of the acquisition of Reliant Energy, the Companys operating lease commitments
have increased primarily due to additional lease agreements for office space through 2021. As of
September 30, 2009, eight additional office space locations were under lease for future commitments
of approximately $85 million.
Fuel Commitments
NRG enters into long-term contractual arrangements to procure fuel and transportation services
for the Companys generation assets. NRGs total net coal commitments, which span from 2009
through 2012, decreased by approximately $409 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, as the 2009 monthly commitments were settled. In addition, NRGs natural gas purchase
commitments decreased by approximately $199 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, as the 2009 monthly commitments were settled and average natural gas prices decreased.
Purchased Power Commitments
As a result of the acquisition of Reliant Energy, NRG is party to purchased power contracts of
various quantities and durations that are not classified as derivative assets and liabilities.
These contracts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.
Minimum purchase commitment obligations under these agreements are as follows as of September 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Fixed Pricing (a) |
|
Variable Pricing (b) |
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
2010 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
2011 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
2012 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2013 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of September 30. 2009, the maximum remaining term under any individual purchased power contract is four years. |
(b) |
|
For contracts with variable pricing components, estimated prices are based on forward commodity curves as of September 30, 2009. |
Other
As a result of the acquisition of Reliant Energy, the Company acquired the naming rights,
including advertising and other benefits, for a football stadium and other convention and
entertainment facilities included in the stadium complex in Houston, Texas. Pursuant to this
agreement, the Company is required to pay $10 million per year through 2031.
See discussion in Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, regarding the CSRA as a
result of the acquisition of Reliant Energy on May 1, 2009.
First and Second Lien Structure
NRG has granted first and second liens to certain counterparties on substantially all of the
Companys assets to reduce the amount of cash collateral and letters of credit that it would
otherwise be required to post from time to time to support its obligations under out-of-the-money
hedge agreements for forward sales of power or MWh equivalents. The Companys lien counterparties
may have a claim on NRGs assets to the extent market prices exceed the hedged price. As of
September 30, 2009, and October 22, 2009, all hedges under the first and second liens were
in-the-money on a counterparty aggregate basis.
RepoweringNRG Initiatives
NRG has capitalized $32 million through September 30, 2009, for the repowering of its El
Segundo generating facility in California. As a result of permitting delays related to on-going
Natural Resource Defense Counsel claims, the El Segundo project will not reach its original
completion date of June 1, 2011. The Company is working with the counterparty to consider certain
PPA modifications including the commercial operations date.
42
Contingencies
Set forth below is a description of the Companys material legal proceedings. The Company
believes that it has valid defenses to these legal proceedings and intends to defend them
vigorously. Pursuant to the requirements of ASC 450 and related guidance, NRG records reserves for
estimated losses from contingencies when information available indicates that a loss is probable
and the amount of the loss, or range of loss, can be reasonably estimated. In addition, legal
costs are expensed as incurred. Management has assessed each of the following matters based on
current information and made a judgment concerning its potential outcome, considering the nature of
the claim, the amount and nature of damages sought, and the probability of success. Unless
specified below, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these legal proceedings or
reasonably estimate the scope or amount of any associated costs and potential liabilities. As
additional information becomes available, management adjusts its assessment and estimates of such
contingencies accordingly. Because litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable
rulings or developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of the Companys liabilities
and contingencies could vary from its currently recorded reserves and such differences could be
material.
In addition to the legal proceedings noted below, NRG and its subsidiaries are party to other
litigation or legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In managements
opinion, the disposition of these ordinary course matters will not materially adversely affect
NRGs consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Exelon Related Litigation
Delaware Chancery Court
On November 11, 2008, Exelon and its wholly-owned subsidiary Exelon Xchange filed a complaint
against NRG and NRGs Board of Directors. The complaint alleges, among other things, that NRGs
Board of Directors failed to give due consideration and to take appropriate action in response to
the acquisition proposal announced by Exelon on October 19, 2008, in which Exelon offered to
acquire all of the outstanding shares of NRG common stock at an exchange ratio of 0.485 Exelon
shares for each NRG common share. On November 14, 2008, NRG and NRGs Board of Directors filed a
motion to dismiss Exelons complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted. On March 16, 2009, prior to responding to the motion to dismiss, Exelon and
Exelon Xchange filed an amended complaint. On April 17, 2009, NRG and NRGs Board of Directors
filed a partial motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On July 28, 2009, Exelon, NRG, and NRGs
Board of Directors collectively filed a Stipulation of Dismissal of Exelons lawsuit, thereby
ending the case.
On December 11, 2008, the Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief Fund and City of St. Claire
Shores Police & Fire Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
served a previously filed complaint on NRG and its Board of Directors alleging substantially
similar allegations as the Exelon complaint. On December 23, 2008, NRG and NRGs Board of
Directors filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted. On March 16, 2009, prior to responding to the motion to dismiss,
these plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against only NRGs Board of Directors. On April 17,
2009, the NRG Board of Directors filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint asserting that it
fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On August 4, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a
notice and proposed order of dismissal and on August 5, 2009, the court dismissed the lawsuit,
thereby ending the case.
Mercer County, New Jersey Superior Court
On January 6, 2009, three lawsuits previously filed against NRG and NRGs Board of Directors
on behalf of individual shareholders and all others similarly situated were consolidated into one
case in the Law Division of the Superior Court of Mercer County, New Jersey. On January 21, 2009,
the plaintiffs filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint in which they allege a single count of
breach of fiduciary duty against NRGs Board of Directors and seek injunctive relief. On February
20, 2009, NRGs Board of Directors filed a motion to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint for
failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, to stay the action in favor of the Delaware
Chancery Court proceedings. On March 19, 2009, the plaintiffs filed their response and on April 6,
2009, NRGs Board of Directors filed its reply. On April 17, 2009, and again on May 7, 2009, oral
argument was held and on June 18, 2009, the court found in favor of NRGs Board of Directors and
stayed the consolidated lawsuits pending resolution of the purported class-action lawsuit filed in
Delaware Chancery court by the Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief Fund and City of St. Claire
Shores Police & Fire Retirement System. On August 10, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of
Voluntary Dismissal, thereby ending the case.
43
California Department of Water Resources
This matter concerns, among other contracts and other defendants, the California Department of
Water Resources, or CDWR, and its wholesale power contract with subsidiaries of WCP (Generation)
Holdings, Inc., or WCP. The case originated with a February 2002 complaint filed by the State of
California alleging that many parties, including WCP subsidiaries, overcharged the State of
California. For WCP, the alleged overcharges totaled approximately $940 million for 2001 and 2002.
The complaint demanded that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, abrogate the CDWR
contract and sought refunds associated with revenues collected under the contract. In 2003, the
FERC rejected this complaint, denied rehearing, and the case was appealed to the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit where oral argument was held on December 8, 2004. On December 19,
2006, the Ninth Circuit decided that in the FERCs review of the contracts at issue, the FERC could
not rely on the Mobile-Sierra standard presumption of just and reasonable rates, where such
contracts were not reviewed by the FERC with full knowledge of the then existing market conditions.
WCP and others sought review by the U.S. Supreme Court. WCPs appeal was not selected, but
instead held by the Supreme Court. In the appeal that was selected by the Supreme Court, on June
26, 2008 the Supreme Court ruled: (i) that the Mobile-Sierra public interest standard of review
applied to contracts made under a sellers market-based rate authority; (ii) that the public
interest bar required to set aside a contract remains a very high one to overcome; and (iii) that
the Mobile-Sierra presumption of contract reasonableness applies when a contract is formed during a
period of market dysfunction unless (a) such market conditions were caused by the illegal actions
of one of the parties or (b) the contract negotiations were tainted by fraud or duress. In this
related case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuits decision agreeing that the case
should be remanded to the FERC to clarify the FERCs 2003 reasoning regarding its rejection of the
original complaint relating to the financial burdens under the contracts at issue and to alleged
market manipulation at the time these contracts were formed. As a result, the U.S. Supreme Court
then reversed and remanded the WCP CDWR case to the Ninth Circuit for treatment consistent with its
June 26, 2008 decision in the related case. On October 20, 2008, the Ninth Circuit asked the
parties in the remanded CDWR case, including WCP and the FERC, whether that Court should answer a
question the U.S. Supreme Court did not address in its June 26, 2008, decision; whether the
Mobile-Sierra doctrine applies to a third-party that was not a signatory to any of the wholesale
power contracts, including the CDWR contract, at issue in that case. Without answering that
reserved question, on December 4, 2008, the Ninth Circuit vacated its prior opinion and remanded
the WCP CDWR case back to the FERC for proceedings consistent with the U.S. Supreme Courts June
26, 2008 decision. On December 15, 2008, WCP and the other seller-defendants filed with the FERC a
Motion for Order Governing Proceedings on Remand. On January 14, 2009, the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California filed an Answer and Cross Motion for an Order Governing
Procedures on Remand, and on January 28, 2009, WCP and the other seller-defendants filed their
reply.
At this time, while NRG cannot predict with certainty whether WCP will be required to make
refunds for rates collected under the CDWR contract or estimate the range of any such possible
refunds, a reconsideration of the CDWR contract by the FERC with a resulting order mandating
significant refunds could have a material adverse impact on NRGs financial position, statement of
operations, and statement of cash flows. As part of the 2006 acquisition of Dynegys 50% ownership
interest in WCP, WCP and NRG assumed responsibility for any risk of loss arising from this case,
unless any such loss was deemed to have resulted from certain acts of gross negligence or willful
misconduct on the part of Dynegy, in which case any such loss would be shared equally between WCP
and Dynegy.
On April 27, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in an unrelated proceeding
involving the Mobile-Sierra doctrine that may affect the standard of review applied to the CDWR
contract on remand before the FERC. Specifically, on March 18, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the DC Circuit rejected the appeals filed by the Attorneys General of the State of Connecticut and
Commonwealth of Massachusetts regarding the settlement that established the current New England
capacity market. The settlement, filed with the FERC on March 7, 2006, provides for interim
capacity transition payments for all generators in New England for the period starting December 1,
2006 through May 31, 2010 and for the Forward Capacity Market thereafter. The DC Circuit Court of
Appeals rejected all substantive challenges to the settlement, but sustained one procedural
argument relating to the applicability of the Mobile-Sierra doctrine to non-settling parties. NRG
sought certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court, which was granted on April 27, 2009. Oral
argument is scheduled for November 3, 2009.
44
Louisiana Generating, LLC
On February 11, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice acting at the request of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, or U.S. EPA, commenced a lawsuit against Louisiana Generating, LLC
in federal district court in the Middle District of Louisiana alleging violations of the Clean Air
Act, or CAA, at the Big Cajun II power plant. This is the same matter for which Notices of
Violation, or NOVs, were issued to Louisiana Generating, LLC on February 15, 2005, and on December
8, 2006. Specifically, it is alleged that in the late 1990s, several years prior to NRGs
acquisition of the Big Cajun II power plant from the Cajun Electric bankruptcy and several years
prior to the NRG bankruptcy, modifications were made to Big Cajun II Units 1 and 2 by the prior
owners without appropriate or adequate permits and without installing and employing the best
available control technology, or BACT, to control emissions of nitrogen oxides and/or sulfur
dioxides. The relief sought in the complaint includes a request for an injunction to: (i) preclude
the operation of Units 1 and 2 except in accordance with the CAA; (ii) order the installation of
BACT on Units 1 and 2 for each pollutant subject to regulation under the CAA; (iii) obtain all
necessary permits for Units 1 and 2; (iv) order the surrender of emission allowances or credits;
(v) conduct audits to determine if any additional modifications have been made which would require
compliance with the CAAs Prevention of Significant Deterioration program; (vi) award to the
Department of Justice its costs in prosecuting this litigation; and (vii) assess civil penalties of
up to $27,500 per day for each CAA violation found to have occurred between January 31, 1997, and
March 15, 2004, up to $32,500 for each CAA violation found to have occurred between March 15, 2004,
and January 12, 2009, and up to $37,500 for each CAA violation found to have occurred after January
12, 2009.
On April 27, 2009, Louisiana Generating, LLC made several filings. It filed an objection in
the Cajun Electric Cooperative Power, Inc.s bankruptcy proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Louisiana to seek to prevent the bankruptcy from closing. It also filed a
complaint in the same bankruptcy proceeding in the same court seeking a judgment that: (i) it did
not assume liability from Cajun Electric for any claims or other liabilities under environmental
laws with respect to Big Cajun II that arose, or are based on activities that were undertaken,
prior to the closing date of the acquisition; (ii) it is not otherwise the successor to Cajun
Electric; and (iii) Cajun Electric and/or the Bankruptcy Trustee are exclusively liable for the
violations alleged in the February 11, 2009 lawsuit to the extent that such claims are determined
to have merit. On June 8, 2009, the parties filed a joint status report setting forth their views
of the case and proposing a trial schedule. On June 18, 2009, Louisiana Generating, LLC filed a
motion to bifurcate the Department of Justice lawsuit into separate liability and remedy phases,
and on June 30, 2009, the Department of Justice filed its opposition. On August 24, 2009,
Louisiana Generating, LLC filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit, and on September 25, 2009, the
Department of Justice filed its opposition to the motion to dismiss. A new federal bankruptcy
judge was appointed on October 9, 2009.
Citizens for Clean Power
On November 6, 2008, Citizens for Clean Power, or CCP, filed a notice of its intent to file a
lawsuit under the CAA against Indian River Power, LLC, or IRP, seeking to enforce opacity
limitations applicable to units 1, 2, 3, and 4. On January 5, 2009, the Delaware Department of
Natural Resources and Environmental Control, or DNREC, filed a lawsuit relating to opacity issues
against IRP in the Superior Court in Kent County, Delaware. On January 6, 2009, DNREC and IRP
agreed to a consent order resolving the DNREC action in which IRP agreed to pay a $5,000 civil
penalty and agreed to purchase for DNRECs use an Ultrafine Particle Monitor for approximately
$60,000. The consent order was filed with the court on February 6, 2009, and entered by the court
on February 13, 2009, thereby precluding CCPs ability under the CAA to commence its noticed
lawsuit. On February 26, 2009, notwithstanding the entry of the consent order, CCP filed a
complaint against IRP in federal district court in Delaware. On March 25, 2009, IRP filed a motion
to dismiss the complaint, on April 7, 2009, CCP filed its opposition, and on April 20, 2009, IRP
filed its reply. On July 23, 2009, the court dismissed the matter, thereby ending the case.
45
Excess Mitigation Credits
From January 2002 to April 2005, CenterPoint Energy applied excess mitigation credits, or
EMCs, to its monthly charges to retail electric providers as ordered by the Public Utility
Commission of Texas, or PUCT. The PUCT imposed these credits to facilitate the transition to
competition in Texas, which had the effect of lowering the retail electric providers monthly
charges payable to CenterPoint Energy. As indicated in its Petition for Review filed with the
Supreme Court of Texas on June 2, 2008, CenterPoint Energy has claimed that the portion of those
EMCs credited to Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC, or RERS, a retail electric provider and NRG
subsidiary acquired from RRI, totaled $385 million for RERSs Price to Beat Customers. It is
unclear what the actual number may be. Price to Beat was the rate RERS was required by state law
to charge residential and small commercial customers that were transitioned to RERS from the
incumbent integrated utility company commencing in 2002. In its original stranded cost case
brought before the PUCT on March 31, 2004, CenterPoint Energy sought recovery of all EMCs that were
credited to all retail electric providers, including RERS, and the PUCT ordered that relief in its
Order on Rehearing in Docket No. 29526, on December 17, 2004. After an appeal to state district
court, the court entered a final judgment on August 26, 2005, affirming the PUCTs order with
regard to EMCs credited to RERS. Various parties filed appeals of that judgment with the Court of
Appeals for the Third District of Texas with the first such appeal filed on the same date as the
state district court judgment and the last such appeal filed on October 10, 2005. On April 17,
2008, the Court of Appeals for the Third District reversed the lower courts decision ruling that
CenterPoint Energys stranded cost recovery should exclude only EMCs credited to RERS for its
Price to Beat customers. On June 2, 2008, CenterPoint Energy filed a Petition for Review with
the Supreme Court of Texas and on June 19, 2009, the Court agreed to consider the CenterPoint
Energy appeal as well as two related petitions for review filed by other entities. Oral argument
occurred on October 6, 2009.
In November 2008, CenterPoint Energy and RRI, on behalf of itself and affiliates including
RERS, agreed to suspend unexpired deadlines, if any, related to limitations periods that might
exist for possible claims against REI and its affiliates if CenterPoint Energy is ultimately not
allowed to include in its stranded cost calculation those EMCs previously credited to RERS.
Regardless of the outcome of the Texas Supreme Court proceeding, NRG believes that any possible
future CenterPoint Energy claim against RERS for EMCs credited to RERS would lack legal merit. No
such claim has been filed.
Disputed Claims Reserve
As part of NRGs plan of reorganization, NRG funded a disputed claims reserve for the
satisfaction of certain general unsecured claims that were disputed claims as of the effective date
of the plan. Under the terms of the plan, as such claims are resolved, the claimants are paid from
the reserve on the same basis as if they had been paid out in the bankruptcy. Any excess funds in
the disputed claims reserve will be reallocated to the creditor pool for the pro rata benefit of
all allowed claims. The contributed common stock and cash in the reserves is held by an escrow
agent to complete the distribution and settlement process. Since NRG has surrendered control over
the common stock and cash provided to the disputed claims reserve, NRG recognized the issuance of
the common stock as of December 6, 2003, and removed the cash amounts from the balance sheet.
Similarly, NRG removed the obligations relevant to the claims from the balance sheet when the
common stock was issued and cash contributed.
As of December 21, 2008, the reserve held approximately $9.8 million in cash and 1,282,783
shares of common stock. On December 21, 2008, the Company issued an instruction letter to The Bank
of New York Mellon to distribute all remaining cash and stock in the Disputed Claims Reserve to
NRGs creditors. On January 12, 2009, The Bank of New York Mellon commenced the distribution of
all remaining cash and stock in the Disputed Claim Reserve to the Companys creditors pursuant to
NRGs Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan and on July 13, 2009, that distribution was complete.
46
Note 16 Regulatory Matters
NRG operates in a highly regulated industry and is subject to regulation by various federal
and state agencies. As such, NRG is affected by regulatory developments at both the federal and
state levels and in the regions in which NRG operates. In addition, NRG is subject to the market
rules, procedures and protocols of the various ISO markets in which NRG participates. These power
markets are subject to ongoing legislative and regulatory changes that may impact NRGs wholesale
and retail businesses.
In addition to the regulatory proceedings noted below, NRG and its subsidiaries are a party to
other regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business or have other regulatory
exposure. In managements opinion, the disposition of these ordinary course matters will not
materially adversely affect NRGs consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
PJM By Order dated March 17, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit denied the
remaining appeals of the FERC orders establishing the Reliability Pricing Model, or RPM capacity
market. In February of 2009, the entities representing load interests, including the New Jersey
Board of Public Utilities, the District of Columbia Office of the Peoples Counsel, and the
Maryland Office of Peoples Counsel, agreed to withdraw their appeals regarding the establishment
of the RPM market design.
On June 18, 2009, FERC denied rehearing of its order dated September 19, 2008, dismissing a
complaint filed by the Maryland Public Service Commission, or MDPSC, together with other load
interests, against PJM challenging the results of the RPM transition Base Residual Auctions for
installed capacity, held between April 2007 and January 2008. The complaint had sought to replace
the auction-determined results for installed capacity for the 2008/2009, 2009/2010, and 2010/2011
delivery years with administratively-determined prices. On August 14, 2009, the MDPSC and the New
Jersey Board of Public Utilities filed an appeal of FERCs orders to the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit, and a successful appeal could disrupt the auction-determined results and create
a refund obligation for market participants.
Retail (Replacement Reserve) On November 14, 2006, Constellation Energy Commodities Group,
or Constellation, filed a complaint with the PUCT alleging that ERCOT misapplied the Replacement
Reserve Settlement, or RPRS, Formula contained in the ERCOT protocols from April 10, 2006, through
September 27, 2006. Specifically, Constellation disputed approximately $4 million in
under-scheduling charges for capacity insufficiency asserting that ERCOT applied the wrong
protocol. Reliant Energy Power Supply, or REPS, other market participants, ERCOT, and PUCT staff
opposed Constellations complaint. On January 25, 2008, the PUCT entered an order finding that
ERCOT correctly settled the capacity insufficiency charges for the disputed dates in accordance
with ERCOT protocols and denied Constellations complaint. On April 9, 2008, Constellation appealed
the PUCT order to the Civil District Court of Travis County, Texas and on June 19, 2009, the court
issued a judgment reversing the PUCT order, finding that the ERCOT protocols were in irreconcilable
conflict with each other. On July 20, 2009, REPS filed an appeal to the Third Court of Appeals in
Travis County, Texas, thereby staying the effect of the trial courts decision. If all appeals are
unsuccessful, on remand to the PUCT, it would determine the appropriate methodology for giving
effect to the trial courts decision. It is not known at this time whether only Constellations
under-scheduling charges, the under-scheduling charges of all other QSEs that disputed REPS charges
for the same time frame, the entire market, or some other approach would be used for any
resettlement.
Under the PUCT ordered formula, Qualified Scheduling Entities, or QSEs, who under-scheduled
capacity within any of ERCOTs four congestion zones were assessed under-scheduling charges which
defrayed the costs incurred by ERCOT for RPRS that would otherwise be spread among all load-serving
QSEs. Under the Courts decision, all RPRS costs would be assigned to all load-serving QSEs based
upon their load ratio share without assessing any separate charge to those QSEs who under-scheduled
capacity. If under-scheduling charges for capacity insufficient QSEs were not used to defray RPRS
costs, REPSs share of the total RPRS costs allocated to QSEs would increase.
47
Note 17 Environmental Matters
The construction and operation of power projects are subject to stringent environmental and
safety protection and land use laws and regulation in the United States. If such laws and
regulations become more stringent, or new laws, interpretations or compliance policies apply and
NRGs facilities are not exempt from coverage, the Company could be required to make modifications
to further reduce potential environmental impacts. New legislation and regulations to mitigate the
effects of greenhouse gases, or GHGs, including CO2 from power plants, are under
consideration at the federal and state levels. In general, the effect of such future laws or
regulations is expected to require the addition of pollution control equipment or the imposition of
restrictions or additional costs on the Companys operations.
Environmental Capital Expenditures
Based on current rules, technology and plans, NRG has estimated that environmental capital
expenditures from 2010 through 2013 to meet NRGs environmental commitments will be approximately
$900 million and are primarily associated with controls on the Companys Big Cajun and Indian River
facilities. These capital expenditures, in general, are related to installation of particulate,
SO2, NOx, and mercury controls to comply with federal and state air quality
rules and consent orders, as well as installation of Best Technology Available under the Phase II
316(b) Rule. NRG continues to explore cost effective alternatives that can achieve desired
results. This estimate reflects anticipated schedules and controls related to the Clean Air
Interstate Rule, or CAIR, Maximum Achievable Control Technology, or MACT, for mercury, and the
Phase II 316(b) Rule which are under remand to the U.S. EPA, and, as such, the full impact on the
scope and timing of environmental retrofits from any new or revised regulations cannot be
determined at this time.
Northeast Region
NRG operates electric generating units located in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland,
Massachusetts and New York which are subject to RGGI. These units must surrender one allowance for
every U.S. ton of CO2 emitted with true up for 2009-2011 occurring in 2012. Allowances
are partially allocated only in the state of Delaware. In 2008, NRG emitted approximately 12
million tonnes of CO2 in RGGI states, although 2009 is tracking lower than 2008 year to
date. NRG believes that to the extent CO2 will not be fully reflected in wholesale
electricity prices, the direct financial impact on the Company is likely to be negative as costs
will be incurred in the course of securing the necessary RGGI allowances and offsets at auction and
in the market.
In January 2006, NRGs Indian River Operations, Inc. received a letter of informal
notification from the DNREC stating that the Company may be a potentially responsible party with
respect to a historic captive landfill. On October 1, 2007, NRG signed an agreement with the DNREC
to investigate the site through the Voluntary Clean-up Program. On February 4, 2008, the DNREC
issued findings that no further action is required in relation to surface water and that a
previously planned shoreline stabilization project would adequately address shoreline erosion. The
landfill itself will require a further Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study to determine
the type and scope of any additional work required. Until the Remedial Investigation and
Feasibility Study is completed, the Company is unable to predict the impact of any required
remediation.
On May 29, 2008, the DNREC requested that NRGs Indian River Operations, Inc. participate in
the development and performance of a Natural Resource Damage Assessment, or NRDA, at the Burton
Island Old Ash Landfill. NRG is currently working with the DNREC and other trustees to close out
the assessment phase.
South Central Region
On February 11, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice acting at the request of the U.S. EPA
commenced a lawsuit against Louisiana Generating, LLC in federal district court in the Middle
District of Louisiana alleging violations of the CAA at the Big Cajun II power plant. This is the
same matter for which NOVs were issued to Louisiana Generating, LLC on February 15, 2005, and on
December 8, 2006. Further discussion on this matter can be found in Note 15, Commitments and
Contingencies, to this Form 10-Q, Louisiana Generating, LLC.
48
Note 18 Guarantees
NRG and its subsidiaries enter into various contracts that include indemnification and
guarantee provisions as a routine part of the Companys business activities. Examples of these
contracts include asset purchases and sale agreements, commodity sale and purchase agreements,
retail contracts, joint venture agreements, EPC agreements, operation and maintenance agreements,
service agreements, settlement agreements, and other types of contractual agreements with vendors
and other third parties, as well as affiliates. These contracts generally indemnify the
counterparty for tax, environmental liability, litigation and other matters, as well as breaches of
representations, warranties and covenants set forth in these agreements. In some cases, NRGs
maximum potential liability cannot be estimated, since the underlying agreements contain no limits
on potential liability. The Company is also obligated with respect to customer deposits associated
with Reliant Energy.
This Note 18 should be read in conjunction with the complete description under Note 25,
Guarantees, to the Companys financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
In connection with the agreement to sell its 50% ownership interest in Mibrag B.V., NRG
executed an agreement guaranteeing the performance of its subsidiary Lambique Beheer under the
purchase and sale agreement. This agreement indemnifies the buyer for tax, environmental liability
and other matters, as well as breaches of representations and warranties and is limited to EUR 206
million.
NRG signed a guarantee agreement on behalf of its subsidiary NRG Retail, LLC guaranteeing the
payment and performance of its obligations under the LLC Membership Interest Purchase Agreement and
related agreements with RRI in connection with the purchase of its retail business, including
purchase price and acquired net working capital. In accordance with the LLC Membership Interest
Purchase Agreement, on May 1, 2009, NRG signed an agreement guaranteeing payments up to $85 million
related to the Restated Power Purchase Agreement with FPL Energy Upton Wind II, LLC. NRG has no
reason to believe that the Company currently has any material liability relating to such routine
indemnification obligations.
In connection with the October 5, 2009 amendment of the CSRA, NRG signed guarantee agreements
on behalf of its subsidiary NRG Retail, LLC guaranteeing performance under power purchase and sales
contracts. See Note 20, Subsequent Event, to this Form 10-Q
for further discussion of the CSRA Amendment.
49
Note 19 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding $1.2 billion of 7.25% Senior Notes due
2014, $2.4 billion of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2016, $1.1 billion of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2017,
and $700 million of 8.50% Senior Notes due 2019. The Senior Notes are guaranteed by certain of
NRGs current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, or guarantor subsidiaries. On October
5, 2009, RERH became a guarantor subsidiary as a result of the CSRA Amendment. See Note 20,
Subsequent Event, to this Form 10-Q , for a discussion of the CSRA Amendment.
Unless otherwise noted below, each of the following guarantor subsidiaries fully and
unconditionally guaranteed the Senior Notes as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
Arthur Kill Power LLC
|
|
NRG Devon Operations Inc. |
Astoria Gas Turbine Power LLC
|
|
NRG Dunkirk Operations, Inc. |
Berrians I Gas Turbine Power LLC
|
|
NRG El Segundo Operations Inc. |
Big Cajun II Unit 4 LLC
|
|
NRG Generation Holdings, Inc. |
Cabrillo Power I LLC
|
|
NRG Huntley Operations Inc. |
Cabrillo Power II LLC
|
|
NRG International LLC |
Chickahominy River Energy Corp.
|
|
NRG Kaufman LLC |
Commonwealth Atlantic Power LLC
|
|
NRG Mesquite LLC |
Conemaugh Power LLC
|
|
NRG MidAtlantic Affiliate Services Inc. |
Connecticut Jet Power LLC
|
|
NRG Middletown Operations Inc. |
Devon Power LLC
|
|
NRG Montville Operations Inc. |
Dunkirk Power LLC
|
|
NRG New Jersey Energy Sales LLC |
Eastern Sierra Energy Company
|
|
NRG New Roads Holdings LLC |
El Segundo Power, LLC
|
|
NRG North Central Operations, Inc. |
El Segundo Power II LLC
|
|
NRG Northeast Affiliate Services Inc. |
GCP Funding Company LLC
|
|
NRG Norwalk Harbor Operations Inc. |
Hanover Energy Company
|
|
NRG Operating Services Inc. |
Hoffman Summit Wind Project LLC
|
|
NRG Oswego Harbor Power Operations Inc. |
Huntley IGCC LLC
|
|
NRG Power Marketing LLC |
Huntley Power LLC
|
|
NRG Rocky Road LLC |
Indian River IGCC LLC
|
|
NRG Saguaro Operations Inc. |
Indian River Operations Inc.
|
|
NRG South Central Affiliate Services Inc. |
Indian River Power LLC
|
|
NRG South Central Generating LLC |
James River Power LLC
|
|
NRG South Central Operations Inc. |
Kaufman Cogen LP
|
|
NRG South Texas LP |
Keystone Power LLC
|
|
NRG Texas LLC |
Lake Erie Properties Inc.
|
|
NRG Texas C & I Supply LLC |
Langford Wind Power, LLC
|
|
NRG Texas Holding Inc. |
Louisiana Generating LLC
|
|
NRG Texas Power LLC |
Middletown Power LLC
|
|
NRG West Coast LLC |
Montville IGCC LLC
|
|
NRG Western Affiliate Services Inc. |
Montville Power LLC
|
|
Oswego Harbor Power LLC |
NEO Chester-Gen LLC
|
|
Padoma Wind Power, LLC |
NEO Corporation
|
|
Reliant Energy Services Texas LLC |
NEO Freehold-Gen LLC
|
|
Reliant Energy Texas Retail LLC |
NEO Power Services Inc.
|
|
Saguaro Power LLC |
New Genco GP LLC
|
|
San Juan Mesa Wind Project II, LLC |
Norwalk Power LLC
|
|
Somerset Operations Inc. |
NRG Affiliate Services Inc.
|
|
Somerset Power LLC |
NRG Arthur Kill Operations Inc.
|
|
Texas Genco Financing Corp. |
NRG Asia-Pacific Ltd.
|
|
Texas Genco GP, LLC |
NRG Astoria Gas Turbine Operations Inc.
|
|
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. |
NRG Bayou Cove LLC
|
|
Texas Genco LP, LLC |
NRG Cabrillo Power Operations Inc.
|
|
Texas Genco Operating Services, LLC |
NRG Cadillac Operations Inc.
|
|
Texas Genco Services, LP |
NRG California Peaker Operations LLC
|
|
Vienna Operations, Inc. |
NRG Cedar Bayou Development Company LLC
|
|
Vienna Power LLC |
NRG Connecticut Affiliate Services Inc.
|
|
WCP (Generation) Holdings LLC |
NRG Construction LLC
|
|
West Coast Power LLC |
50
The non-guarantor subsidiaries include all of NRGs foreign subsidiaries and certain domestic
subsidiaries. NRG conducts much of its business through and derives much of its income from its
subsidiaries. Therefore, the Companys ability to make required payments with respect to its
indebtedness and other obligations depends on the financial results and condition of its
subsidiaries and NRGs ability to receive funds from its subsidiaries. Except for NRG Bayou Cove,
LLC, which is subject to certain restrictions under the Companys Peaker financing agreements,
there are no restrictions on the ability of any of the guarantor subsidiaries to transfer funds to
NRG. In addition, there may be restrictions for certain non-guarantor subsidiaries.
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial information
of NRG, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries in accordance with Rule 3-10
under the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation S-X. The financial information may not
necessarily be indicative of results of operations or financial position had the guarantor
subsidiaries or non-guarantor subsidiaries operated as independent entities.
In this presentation, NRG Energy, Inc. consists of parent company operations. Guarantor
subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries of NRG are reported on an equity basis. For companies
acquired, the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired have been presented on a push-down
accounting basis.
51
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Note Issuer) |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
|
$ |
1,854 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(153 |
) |
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
1,893 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
Acquisition-related transaction and integration
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
Operating Income/(Loss) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other income/(loss), net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
Total other (expense)/income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
Income/(Losses) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
444 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
Net Income/(Loss) |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
278 |
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income/(Loss) attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
(592 |
) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
52
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Note Issuer) |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,203 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(230 |
) |
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
3,901 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
Selling general and administrative |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396 |
|
Acquisition-related transaction and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
Operating Income/(Loss) |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
Other income/(loss), net |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
Total other income/(expense) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
Income/(Losses) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
1,522 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
Net Income/(Loss) |
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
908 |
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Net Income/(Loss) attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
(1,595 |
) |
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
53
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Note Issuer) |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
3,199 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
Cash collateral paid in support of
energy risk management activities |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
8,211 |
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
10,597 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,610 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
16,955 |
|
|
|
(17,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in affiliates |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
Capital leases and notes
receivable, less current portion |
|
|
4,621 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
3,018 |
|
|
|
(7,639 |
) |
|
|
507 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
1,942 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
1,039 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
8,885 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
20,150 |
|
|
|
(25,601 |
) |
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
23,076 |
|
|
$ |
6,473 |
|
|
$ |
22,599 |
|
|
$ |
(26,194 |
) |
|
$ |
25,954 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
537 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
3,017 |
|
Cash collateral received in support of energy risk management
activities |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
636 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
5,208 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
12,398 |
|
|
|
(7,639 |
) |
|
|
8,229 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning reserve |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
859 |
|
Out-of-market contracts |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
13,966 |
|
|
|
(7,895 |
) |
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,740 |
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
14,532 |
|
|
|
(8,488 |
) |
|
|
17,875 |
|
|
3.625% Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
16,336 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
|
(17,706 |
) |
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
23,076 |
|
|
$ |
6,473 |
|
|
$ |
22,599 |
|
|
$ |
(26,194 |
) |
|
$ |
25,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
54
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
NRG Energy, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Note Issuer) |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
(1,595 |
) |
|
$ |
908 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions and equity in (earnings)/losses of unconsolidated
affiliates and consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Amortization of nuclear fuel |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Amortization of financing costs and debt discount/premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Amortization of intangibles and out-of-market contracts |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
Changes in deferred income taxes and liability for unrecognized
tax benefits |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561 |
|
Changes in nuclear decommissioning liability |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Changes in derivatives |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
Changes in collateral deposits supporting energy risk management
activities |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
Gain on sale of emission allowances |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Gain recognized on settlement of pre-existing relationship |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Amortization of unearned equity compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Changes in option premiums collected |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
Cash provided by/(used by) changes in other working capital |
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided/(Used) by Operating Activities |
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany (loans to)/receipts from subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Reliant Energy, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
Investment in Reliant Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(560 |
) |
(Increase)/decrease in restricted cash, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Purchases of emission allowances |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of emission allowances |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning
trust fund
securities |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other investment |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
Net Cash (Used)/Provided by Investing Activities |
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from intercompany loans |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
(1,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment from intercompany dividends |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Net payments to settle acquired derivatives that include
financing elements |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
Payment for treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Installment
proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843 |
|
Payment of deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Payment of short and long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used)/Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
55
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Note Issuer) |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,519 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
997 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
Operating Income/(Loss) |
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings/(losses) of consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
Other income/(loss), net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
Total other income/(expense) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
Income/(Loss) From Continuing Operations Before
Income Taxes |
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
1,280 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
Income/(Loss) From Continuing Operations |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
778 |
|
Net Income/(Loss) attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
(970 |
) |
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
56
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Note Issuer) |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
4,942 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
5,230 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
2,812 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
Operating Income/(Loss) |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings/(losses) of
consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in (losses)/earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Other income/(loss), net |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
Total other income/(expense) |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
Income/(Loss) From Continuing
Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
1,285 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
Income/(Loss) From Continuing Operations |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
782 |
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Net Income/(Loss) attributable to NRG
Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
$ |
(1,575 |
) |
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
57
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
NRG Energy, |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Inc. |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
Cash collateral paid in support of energy
risk management activities |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
8,492 |
|
|
Net Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
10,725 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,545 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
(12,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in affiliates |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
Capital leases and note receivable, less
current portion |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
(3,775 |
) |
|
|
435 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
15,255 |
|
|
|
(16,375 |
) |
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
21,791 |
|
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
17,653 |
|
|
$ |
(16,605 |
) |
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital
leases |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
464 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
3,976 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
Cash collateral received in support of energy
risk management activities |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
724 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
7,729 |
|
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
7,697 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning reserve |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508 |
|
Out-of-market contracts |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
10,290 |
|
|
|
(4,007 |
) |
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
3.625% Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
12,299 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
(12,598 |
) |
|
|
7,123 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
21,791 |
|
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
17,653 |
|
|
$ |
(16,605 |
) |
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
58
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
NRG Energy, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(In millions) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Note Issuer) |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
$ |
(1,575 |
) |
|
$ |
954 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions and equity (earnings)/losses of unconsolidated
affiliates and consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478 |
|
Amortization of nuclear fuel |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Amortization of financing costs and debt discount/
premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Amortization of intangibles and out-of-market contracts |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
Changes in deferred income taxes and liability for unrecognized
tax benefits |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
Changes in nuclear decommissioning liability |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Changes in derivatives |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
Changes in collateral deposits supporting energy risk
management activities |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
Gain on sale of emission allowances |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
Amortization of unearned equity compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Changes in option premiums collected |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
Cash provided by/(used by) changes in other working capital |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by/(Used) by Operating Activities |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany (loans to)/receipts from subsidiaries |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Purchases of emission allowances |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of emission allowances |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund
securities |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations and assets, net of
cash divested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Equity investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used)/Provided by Investing Activities |
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Payments)/proceeds for intercompany loans |
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Net payments to settle acquired derivatives that include financing
elements |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Payment for CSF I CAGR settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Payments for treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Installment proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest on subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Payments for deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Payments for short and long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used)/Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
Change in cash from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,483 |
|
|
(a) |
|
All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
59
Note 20 Subsequent Event
Unwind of the Merrill Lynch Credit Sleeve
The Company executed an amendment of the existing CSRA
with Merrill Lynch, or CSRA Amendment, which became effective October 5, 2009. The CSRA Amendment removed the first
liens associated with the CSRA, and RERH subsequently became a guarantor of the Companys
obligations under its Senior Notes. See Note 19, Condensed Consolidating Financial Information, to
this Form 10-Q for further discussion of NRGs guarantees under its Senior Notes.
In connection with the CSRA Amendment, NRG net settled or offset certain REPS transactions
with counterparties and received $165 million in net
cash consideration. Merrill Lynch returned $250 million of
previously posted cash collateral and released liens on
$322 million of unrestricted cash held at
Reliant Energy.
Pursuant to the CSRA Amendment, the Company was required to post collateral for any net
liability derivatives and other static margin associated with supply for Reliant Energy. In
connection with this transaction, NRG posted $366 million of cash collateral to Merrill Lynch and
other counterparties, returned $53 million of counterparty collateral, issued letters of credit of $206 million, and received $45 million in counterparty collateral.
The funds posted by the Company were sourced from a
portion of the proceeds from the June 5, 2009 issuance of the 2019 Senior Notes. See Note 8,
Long-Term Debt, to this Form 10-Q, for further discussion of the 2019 Senior Notes. In addition,
$25 million outstanding under NRGs $50 million working capital facility with Merrill Lynch was
repaid, and the facility was terminated. See Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, for
further discussion of the working capital facility entered into on May 1, 2009.
NRG has also paid Merrill Lynch $5 million in connection with the CSRA Amendment, and will
make a second payment of $5 million on January 4, 2010. Merrill Lynch has terminated NRGs
contingent equity obligations under the previous credit sleeve. The parties have agreed to settle
any outstanding wholesale obligations under the CSRA Amendment by January 29, 2010, and any C&I
related Merrill Lynch obligations by April 30, 2010.
60
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In this discussion and analysis, NRG discusses and explains its financial condition and
results of operations, including:
|
|
|
Factors which affect the Companys business; |
|
|
|
|
NRGs earnings and costs in the periods presented; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in earnings and costs between periods; |
|
|
|
|
Impact of these factors on NRGs overall financial condition; |
|
|
|
|
A discussion of new and ongoing initiatives that may affect NRGs future results of
operations and financial condition; |
|
|
|
|
Expected future expenditures for capital projects; and |
|
|
|
|
Expected sources of cash for future operations and capital expenditures. |
As you read this discussion and analysis, refer to the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations, which present the results of operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, and 2008. NRG analyzes and explains the differences between periods in
the specific line items of NRGs Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Also refer to
NRGs 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes detailed discussions of various items
impacting the Companys business, results of operations and financial condition, including:
|
|
|
Introduction and Overview section which provides a description of NRGs business
segments; |
|
|
|
|
Strategy section; |
|
|
|
|
Business Environment section, including how regulation, weather, and other factors
affect NRGs business; and |
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section. |
The discussion and analysis below has been organized as follows:
|
|
|
Executive Summary, including introduction and overview, business strategy, and changes
to the business environment during the period including regulatory and environmental
matters; |
|
|
|
|
Results of operations beginning with an overview of the Companys consolidated results,
followed by a more detailed discussion of those results by operating segment; |
|
|
|
|
Financial condition addressing liquidity position, sources and uses of cash, capital
resources and requirements, commitments, and off-balance sheet arrangements; and |
|
|
|
|
Known trends that may affect NRGs results of operations and financial condition in the
future, including the Reliant Energy acquisition and the disposition of the MIBRAG
investment. |
Executive Summary
Introduction and Overview
NRG Energy, Inc., or NRG or the Company, is primarily a wholesale power generation company
with a significant presence in major competitive power markets in the United States, as well as a
major retail electricity franchise in the ERCOT (Texas) market. NRG is engaged in the ownership,
development, construction and operation of power generation facilities, the transacting in and
trading of fuel and transportation services, the trading of energy, capacity and related products
in the United States and select international markets, and supply of electricity and energy
services to retail electricity customers in the Texas market.
As of September 30, 2009, NRG had a total global generation portfolio of 187 active operating
fossil fuel and nuclear generation units, at 46 power generation plants, with an aggregate
generation capacity of approximately 24,100 MW, and approximately 550 MW under construction which
includes partners interests of 200 MW. In addition to its fossil fuel plant ownership, NRG has
ownership interests in two operating wind farms representing an aggregate generation capacity of
270 MW, which includes partner interests of 75 MW. Within the U.S., NRG has one of the largest and
most diversified power generation portfolios in terms of geography, fuel-type and dispatch levels,
with approximately 23,095 MW of fossil fuel and nuclear generation capacity in 179 active
generating units at 42 plants. The Companys power generation facilities are most heavily
concentrated in Texas (approximately 11,190 MW, including 195 MW from the two wind farms), the
Northeast (approximately 7,015 MW), South Central (approximately 2,840 MW), and West (approximately
2,130 MW) regions of the U.S., and approximately 115 MW of additional generation capacity from the
Companys thermal assets.
61
NRGs principal domestic power plants consist of a mix of natural gas-, coal-, oil-fired,
nuclear and wind facilities, representing approximately 46%, 32%, 16%, 5% and 1% of the Companys
total domestic generation capacity, respectively. In addition, 11% of NRGs domestic generating
facilities have dual or multiple fuel capacity, which allows plants to dispatch with the lowest
cost fuel option.
NRGs domestic generation facilities consist of intermittent, baseload, intermediate and
peaking power generation facilities, the ranking of which is referred to as Merit Order, and
include thermal energy production plants. The sale of capacity and power from baseload generation
facilities accounts for the majority of the Companys revenues and provides a stable source of cash
flow. In addition, NRGs generation portfolio provides the Company with opportunities to capture
additional revenues by selling power during periods of peak demand, offering capacity or similar
products to retail electric providers and others, and providing ancillary services to support
system reliability.
On May 1, 2009, NRG acquired Reliant Energy, which is the second largest mass market
electricity provider to residential and commercial customers in Texas. Based on metered locations,
as of September 30, 2009, Reliant Energy had approximately 1.6 million Mass customers and
approximately 0.1 million C&I customers. Reliant Energy arranges for the transmission and delivery
of electricity to customers, bills customers, collects payments for electricity sold and maintains
call centers to provide customer service.
NRGs Business Strategy
NRGs business strategy is intended to maximize shareholder value over time through the
production and the sale of safe, reliable and affordable power to its customers and in the markets
served by the Company, while aggressively pursuing sustainable energy solutions for the future.
The key to successful implementation of this strategy is the Companys sizable fleet of wholesale
power generation assets in the U.S., its leading retail franchise in Texas and, increasingly, its
position as an industry leader in the development of various types of low and no carbon generation
technologies and integrated solutions aimed at satisfying the Companys customers increasing
demand for sustainable energy lifestyles. In addition, NRG utilizes its asset base as a platform
for growth and development and as a source of cash flow generation which can be used for the return
of capital to debt and equity holders. More specifically, the Companys strategy is focused on:
(i) top decile operating performance of its existing operating assets and enhanced operating
performance of the Companys commercial operations and hedging program; (ii) repowering of power
generation assets at existing sites and development of new power generation projects; (iii)
empowering retail customers with distinctive products and services that transform how they use,
manage, and value energy; (iv) investment in energy-related new businesses and new technologies
being developed and deployed in response to the twin societal dynamics to foster sustainability and
combat climate change; and (v) engaging in a proactive capital allocation plan focused on achieving
the regular return of capital to stockholders within the dictates of prudent balance sheet
management. This strategy is supported by the Companys five major initiatives (FORNRG,
RepoweringNRG, econrg, Future NRG and NRG Global Giving) which are designed to enhance the
Companys competitive advantages in these strategic areas and enable the Company to convert the
challenges faced by the power industry in the coming years into opportunities for financial growth.
This strategy is being implemented by focusing on the following principles, which are more fully
described in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Operational Performance The Company is focused on increasing value from its existing assets,
primarily through the Companys FORNRG 2.0 initiative, commercial operations strategy, achieving
synergies between the Companys retail and wholesale business in Texas, and maintaining of
appropriate levels of liquidity, debt and equity in order to ensure continued access to capital
through all economic and financial cycles.
Development NRG is favorably positioned to pursue growth opportunities through expansion of
its existing generating capacity and development of new generating capacity at its existing
facilities, primarily through the Companys RepoweringNRG initiative. NRG expects that these
efforts will provide some or all of the following benefits: improved heat rates; lower delivered
costs; expanded electricity production capability; improved ability to dispatch economically across
the regional general portfolio; increased technological and fuel diversity; and reduced
environmental impacts, including facilities that either have near zero GHG emissions or can be
equipped to capture and sequester GHG emissions. In addition, several of the Companys original
RepoweringNRG projects or projects commenced under that initiative since its inception may qualify
for financial support under the infrastructure financing component of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act and NRG has several applications pending or contemplated.
62
New Businesses and New Technology NRG is focused on the development and investment in
energy-related new businesses and new technologies where the benefits of such investments represent
significant commercial opportunities and create a comparative advantage for the Company, including
low or no GHG emitting energy generating sources, such as nuclear, wind, solar thermal,
photovoltaic, clean coal and gasification, and the retrofit of post-combustion carbon capture
technologies. A primary focus of this strategy is supported by the econrg initiative whereby NRG
is pursuing investments in new generating facilities and technologies that are expected to be
highly efficient and will employ no and low carbon technologies to limit CO2 emissions
and other air emissions. While the Companys effort in this regard to date has focused on
businesses and technologies applicable to the centralized power station, the acquisition of Reliant
Energy has put the Company in a position to consider and pursue sustainable energy lifestyles, such
as smart meters, electric vehicle ecosystems, and distributed clean solutions.
Company-Wide Initiatives In addition, the Companys overall strategy is also supported by
Future NRG and NRG Global Giving initiatives, which address workforce planning and community
involvement and support, respectively.
Finally, NRG will continue to pursue selective acquisitions, joint ventures and divestitures
to enhance its asset mix and competitive position in the Companys core markets. NRG intends to
concentrate on opportunities that present attractive risk-adjusted returns. NRG will also
opportunistically pursue other strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions or
divestitures.
Business Environment
Financial Credit Market Availability
Power generation companies are capital intensive and, as such, rely on the credit markets for
liquidity and for the financing of power generation investments. During the first nine months of
2009, the nations credit markets have recovered to some extent although credit continued to be
tight relative to years prior to 2008. As evidence of the markets improvement, in April 2009,
GenConn Energy, a joint venture of NRG and the United Illuminating Company, closed on a $534
million project financing and NRG was able to issue $700 million of bonds in June 2009, with a 10
year maturity at a yield to maturity of 8.75%. NRG has a diversified liquidity program, with $3.9
billion in total liquidity as of September 30, 2009, excluding funds deposited by counterparties,
and a first and second lien structure that enables significant strategic hedging while reducing
requirements for the posting of cash or letters of credit as collateral. NRG transacts with a
diversified pool of counterparties and actively manages the Companys exposure to any single
counterparty. See Part I, Item 2 Liquidity and Capital Resources, and Part I, Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for further discussion.
The addition of Reliant Energy to NRGs existing generation business may provide opportunities
to match generation to load directly which should reduce hedging and credit costs that both
businesses would incur if hedged separately. Reliant Energy, which expects to lock in its
wholesale supply in order to secure its margin as load is contracted, should also benefit from
having better access to nonstandard products necessary to meet load. NRG expects to continue
hedging its wholesale production consistent with its prior practice, but now will benefit from
having an additional outlet for its range of generation products.
Proposed Over-the-Counter Derivative Legislation
Congress is currently considering legislative proposals that would significantly increase the
regulation of over-the-counter derivatives including those related to energy commodities, through
the amendment of the Commodity Exchange Act. While NRG cannot predict at this time the outcome of
any of the legislative efforts, many of the proposals generally contemplate mandatory clearing of
such derivatives through clearing organizations and the increased standardization of contracts,
products, and collateral requirements. Such changes could negatively impact NRGs ability to hedge
its portfolio in an efficient, cost-effective manner, and, among other things, may limit NRGs
ability to utilize liens as collateral. Such changes may also result in a decrease in liquidity in
the commodity markets.
63
Unsolicited Exelon Proposal
On October 19, 2008, the Company received an unsolicited proposal from Exelon Corporation to
acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company and on November 12, 2008, Exelon announced a
tender offer for all of the Companys outstanding common stock. NRGs Board of Directors, after
carefully reviewing the proposal, unanimously concluded that the proposal was not in the best
interests of the stockholders and recommended that NRG stockholders not tender their shares. In
addition, on June 17, 2009, Exelon filed a Definitive Proxy Statement with the SEC with respect to
their proposals for the Companys 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which consisted of: (i)
consideration of Exelons four nominees as Class III directors; (ii) consideration of the expansion
of NRGs Board of Directors to 19 directors; (iii) if the Exelon board expansion is approved,
consideration of five additional Exelon nominees; and (iv) consideration of repealing any
amendments to the NRG Bylaws after February 26, 2008. NRGs Board of Directors recommended a vote
against each of the proposals. On July 2, 2009, Exelon revised their unsolicited proposal and
NRGs Board of Directors, after carefully reviewing the proposal, unanimously concluded that the
proposal was not in the best interests of the stockholders and recommended that NRG stockholders
not tender their shares. On July 21, 2009, based on the preliminary vote count at NRGs 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders voted to re-elect all of the Companys director
nominees to the NRG Board of Directors. In addition, NRGs stockholders rejected Exelons proposal
to expand NRGs Board with its own slate of five Director nominees. On July 21, 2009, Exelon
Corporation announced that in light of the vote results, effective immediately, it terminated its
offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of NRG. On July 29, 2009, IVS Associates, Inc., the
independent inspector of elections, certified the final results. The total defense costs
associated with Exelons unsolicited proposal was approximately $39 million for the period October
1, 2008, through September 30, 2009, of which $31 million was for the nine months ended September
30, 2009.
Environmental Matters
Climate Change
Senators Kerry and Boxer introduced climate legislation based on The American Clean Energy and
Security Act of 2009 which passed the House of Representatives in June 2009. The Senate bill
proposes a multi-sector, market based greenhouse gas cap-and-trade system starting in 2012. It
provides for a declining cap in U.S. GHG emissions and provides for the allocation of allowances to
merchant coal generators, the use of both international and domestic offsets to local distribution
companies , and a transition from already existing state programs, all of which are important to
the electric generation industry. It proposes requirements for new coal-fueled power plants to
implement, based on commercial availability, carbon capture and sequestration to reduce
CO2 emissions. NRG will continue to provide input as a leading energy company and member
of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, or USCAP, in support of federal legislation.
In 2008, NRG emitted 60 million metric tonnes of CO2 from its domestic operations.
If climate change legislation or some other federal comprehensive climate change bill were to pass
both Houses of Congress and be enacted into law, the actual impact on the Companys financial
performance would depend on a number of factors, including the overall level of GHG reductions
required under any final legislation, the degree to which offsets may be used for compliance and
their price and availability, and the extent to which NRG would be entitled to receive
CO2 emissions allowances without having to purchase them in an auction or on the open
market. Thereafter, the impact would depend on the level of success of the Companys multifold
strategy, which includes (i) shaping public policy with the objective being constructive and
effective federal GHG regulatory policy; and (ii) pursuing its RepoweringNRG and econrg programs.
The Companys multifold strategy is discussed in greater detail in Part I, Item 1 Business,
Carbon Update in NRGs 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On April 24, 2009, the U.S. EPA published a proposed endangerment finding that stated that the
mix of six key GHGs, including CO2, threaten the public health and welfare. On
September 28, 2009, U.S.EPA and Department of Transportation, or DOT published Proposed GHG
Emissions Standards for Motor Vehicles. These actions are in response to the Supreme Courts
decision in Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA, which requires the U.S. EPA to decide under the CAAs mobile
source title whether GHGs contribute to climate change, and if so, promulgate appropriate
regulations. Under the CAA, these regulations when final, would render GHGs regulated pollutants
and subject them to other existing requirements that affect stationary sources, including power
plants. The primary impact on NRG would be a statutory requirement to install BACT determined on a
case-by-case basis, for major modifications or improvements at power plants if they cause GHG
emissions to increase by the statutory Prevention of Significant Deterioration, or PSD limits of
100 tons per year. The U.S. EPA also released, on September 30, 2009, a draft PSD tailoring rule
for GHGs that would increase the major stationary source threshold of 25,000 tons per year of
carbon dioxide equivalents. This threshold level would be used to determine (i) if an existing
source would be required to obtain a Title V operating permit and (ii) if a new facility or a major
modification at an existing facility would trigger PSD permitting requirements. Existing major
sources making modifications that result in an increase of emissions above the significance level
would be required to obtain a PSD permit and install BACT. The timing of the final motor vehicle
rule, acceptance of the PSD tailoring rule and EPAs approach to BACT for GHGs could affect the
level of impact to NRGs plants and future repowering projects.
64
Federal Environmental Initiatives
A number of regulations are under review by U.S. EPA including CAIR, MACT, National Ambient
Air Quality Standards, or NAAQS, for ozone, nitrogen dioxide, SO2, small particle
matter, or PM2.5, and the Phase II 316(b) Rule. These rules address air emissions and best
practices for units with once-through-cooling. In addition, the U.S. EPA has announced that it is
considering new rules regarding the handling and disposition of coal combustion byproducts. While
the Company cannot predict the requirements in the final versions nor the ultimate effect that the
changing regulations will have on NRGs business, NRGs planned environmental capital expenditures
include installation of particulate, SO2, NOx, and mercury controls to comply
with federal and state air quality rules and consent orders, as well as installation of Best
Technology Available under Phase II 316(b) Rule. NRG continues to explore cost-effective
alternatives that can achieve desired results. This planned investment reflects anticipated
schedules and controls related to CAIR, MACT for mercury, and the Phase II 316(B) Rule which are
under remand to the U.S. EPA and, as such, the full impact on the scope and timing of environmental
retrofits from any new or revised regulations cannot be determined at this time.
On April 24, 2009, the U.S. EPA granted petitions to reconsider three NSR rules; Fugitive
Emissions, PM2.5 Implementation, and Reasonable Possibility. A Notice for reconsideration of the
PM2.5 Implementation Rule was published in the Federal Register on May 1, 2009. While none of
these actions directly impact NRG at this point, it is unknown if any such final rules will impact
future projects.
The U.S. Supreme Court released its decision in the Phase II 316(b) Rule case on April 1,
2009, in which it concluded that the U.S. EPA does have the authority to allow a cost-benefit
analysis in the evaluation of Best Technology Available, or BTA. This ruling is favorable for the
industry and NRG as it improves the U.S. EPAs ability to include alternatives to closed-loop
cooling in its redraft of the Phase II 316(b) Rules. In the absence of federal regulations, some
states in which NRG operates, such as California, Connecticut, Delaware and New York, are moving
ahead with guidance for more stringent requirements for once through cooled units which may have an
impact on future operations.
Regional Environmental Initiatives
Northeast Region NRG operates electric generating units located in Connecticut, Delaware,
Maryland, Massachusetts and New York which are subject to RGGI. The RGGI CO2
cap-and-trade program went into effect on January 1, 2009. An allowance must be surrendered
for every U.S. ton of CO2 emitted with true up for 2009-2011 occurring in 2012. NRGs
emissions under RGGI were approximately 12 million tonnes in 2008.
Regulatory Matters
As an operator of power plants and a participant in the wholesale markets, NRG is subject to
regulation by various federal and state government agencies. In addition, NRG is subject to the
market rules, procedures, and protocols of the various ISO markets in which NRG participates. NRG
is also subject to regulatory requirements as a competitive retail electric service provider in
Texas. The power markets are subject to ongoing legislative and regulatory changes. In some of
NRGs regions, interested parties have advocated for material market design changes, including the
elimination of a single clearing price mechanism, as well as proposals to re-regulate the markets
or require divestiture by generating companies in order to reduce their market share. The Company
cannot predict the future design of the wholesale power markets or the ultimate effect that the
changing regulatory environment will have on NRGs business.
West Region
California The CAISO Market Redesign and Technology Update, or MRTU, commenced April 1,
2009. Significant components of the MRTU include: (i) locational marginal pricing of energy; (ii)
a more effective congestion management system; (iii) a day-ahead market; and (iv) an increase to
the existing bid caps. NRG considers these market reforms to generally be a positive development
for its assets in the region, but additional time is needed to assess the impact of MRTU.
65
Texas Region
On October 6, 2008, as part of its determination of Competitive Renewable Energy Zones, or
CREZ, the PUCT issued its final order approving a significant transmission expansion plan to
provide for the delivery of approximately 18,500 MW of energy from the western region of Texas,
primarily wind generation. The transmission expansion plan is composed of approximately 2,300
miles of new 345 kV lines and 42 miles of new 138 kV lines. In January 2009, Texas Industrial
Energy Consumers, a trade organization composed of large industrial customers, appealed the PUCTs
CREZ plan in state district court, seeking reversal of the final order. On March 30, 2009, the
PUCT issued a final order designating the transmission utilities that plan to construct the various
CREZ transmission component projects. A large number of separate transmission licensing proceedings
will be required prior to construction of the CREZ facilities. In July of 2009, the PUCT approved
schedules for utilities to file applications to license several of the CREZ transmission projects
(to obtain certificates of convenience and necessity, or CCNs). If the CREZ projects are completed
as currently anticipated, the transmission upgrades and associated wind generation could impact
wholesale energy and ancillary service prices in ERCOT. As part of the normal ERCOT five-year
planning process, transmission utilities are also planning other system improvements, 2,800 circuit
miles of transmission and more than 17,000 MVA of autotransformer capacity, intended to support
increasing power demand and to address transmission congestion in the ERCOT Region.
Changes in Accounting Standards
See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the condensed consolidated
financial statements of this Form 10-Q as found in Item 1 for a discussion of recent accounting
developments.
66
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table provides selected financial information for the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change % |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change % |
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue |
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
|
(44 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
3,671 |
|
|
|
(35 |
)% |
Capacity revenue |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Retail revenue |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Risk management activities |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Contract amortization |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
Thermal revenue |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
|
|
5,230 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Risk management activities |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other cost of operations |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total cost of operations |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Acquisition-related transaction and
integration costs |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Development costs |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Gain on sale of equity method
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other income/(loss), net |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
Income from Continuing Operations
before income tax expense |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Less: Net loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Net income attributable to NRG Energy,
Inc. |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Business Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
natural gas price - Henry Hub
($/MMBtu) |
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
9.67 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
67
Managements discussion of the results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
and 2008:
For the benefit of the following discussions, the table below represents the results of NRG
excluding the impact of Reliant Energy during the three months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluding |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Consolidated |
|
Reliant Energy |
|
Reliant Energy |
|
Consolidated |
|
Change % |
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue |
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
|
(44 |
)% |
Capacity revenue |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Retail revenue |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
Contract amortization |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Thermal revenue |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
Risk management activities |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other operating costs |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Total cost of operations |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Acquisition-related transaction and integration costs |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Development costs |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
611 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
1,371 |
|
|
|
(85 |
)% |
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues, excluding risk management activities, increased by $1.0 billion during the
three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008.
|
|
|
Retail revenue the acquisition of Reliant Energy contributed $1.9 billion of retail
revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2009. Retail revenue includes mass
revenues of $1.2 billion, C&I revenues of $620 million, and supply management revenues of
$99 million. |
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue decreased $602 million during the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008: |
|
o |
|
Texas energy revenue decreased by $201 million, with $177 million of the
decrease driven by lower energy prices and $24 million of the decrease driven by a
reduction in generation. The average realized energy price decreased by 21%, driven by
a 53% decrease in merchant prices offset by a 21% increase in contract prices.
Generation decreased by 3% driven by an 11% decrease in coal plant generation and an 8%
decrease in nuclear plant generation, offset by a 47% increase in gas plant generation,
as well as generation from the recently constructed Cedar Bayou 4 gas
plant and Elbow Creek wind farm, which was not
in operation in 2008. Coal plant generation was adversely affected by lower energy
prices driven by a 64% decrease in average natural gas prices. |
|
|
o |
|
Northeast energy revenue decreased by $201 million, with $120 million driven by
lower energy prices and $99 million attributable to a reduction in generation offset by
an $18 million increase from higher net contract revenue. Average merchant energy
prices were lower by 52%. The lower energy prices reduced the Companys net cost
incurred to meet obligations under load serving contracts in the PJM market. Generation
decreased by 30% with a 34% decrease in coal generation and a 9% decrease in oil and gas
generation. Weakened demand for power combined with lower gas prices resulting in
reduced merchant energy prices. Lower merchant energy prices combined with higher costs
of production from the introduction of RGGI resulting in increased hours where the coal
plants were uneconomical to dispatch. |
68
|
o |
|
South Central energy revenue decreased by $55 million due to a $24 million decline
in contract revenue coupled with a decrease of $31 million in merchant energy revenues.
The decline in contract energy price was driven by a $7 million decrease in fuel cost
pass through from the cooperatives and a $17 million decrease due to the expiration of a
contract with a regional utility. Total MWh sales to the regions contract customers
were down 7% while the average realized price on contract energy sales was $22.83 per
MWh in 2009 compared to $29.19 per MWh in 2008. The expiration of the contract allowed
more energy to be sold into the merchant market, but at lower average prices resulting
in a $31 million decline in revenue. Megawatt hours sold to the merchant market
increased by 18% as increased use of the regions tolled facility provided additional
energy to the merchant market while prices fell by 61%. |
|
o |
|
Intercompany energy revenue intercompany sales of $144 million by the Companys
Texas region to Reliant Energy were eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
Capacity revenue decreased $78 million during the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008: |
|
o |
|
Texas capacity revenue decreased by $79 million due to a lower proportion of
baseload contracts which contained a capacity component. |
|
|
o |
|
South Central capacity revenue increased by a $12 million primarily resulting
from a new capacity agreement. |
|
|
o |
|
Intercompany capacity revenue intercompany sales of $18 million by the
Companys Texas region to Reliant Energy were eliminated in
consolidation. |
|
|
|
Contract amortization revenue decreased by $136 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease includes $85
million in amortization expense of net in-market C&I contracts related to the Reliant
Energy acquisition in 2009 and a reduction of $52 million in revenue from the Texas Genco
acquisition due to the lower volume of contracted energy. |
|
|
|
|
Other revenues decreased by $14 million driven by $15 million in lower ancillary
revenue and $13 million in lower emissions revenues. These decreases were offset by a $12
million increase in fuels trading. |
Cost of Operations
Cost of operations, excluding risk management activities, increased $912 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008.
|
|
|
Cost of sales increased $848 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008 due to: |
|
o |
|
Retail Reliant Energy incurred $1.2 billion of cost of energy during the three
months ended September 30, 2009. Supply costs were $837 million which included $162
million of intercompany supply costs. Transmission and distribution charges totaled
$392 million for the period. These costs were offset by $11 million of contract
amortization for net out-of-market supply contracts. |
|
|
o |
|
Texas cost of energy decreased $81 million due to lower natural gas and coal
costs. Natural gas costs decreased $84 million, reflecting a 64% decline in average
natural gas per MMBtu prices offset by a 47% increase in gas-fired generation. Coal
costs decreased $7 million due to 11% lower generation. In addition, a $19 million
decrease in ancillary service costs was offset by a $13 million increase in purchased
energy and other fuel costs. |
|
|
o |
|
Northeast cost of energy decreased $86 million due to a $53 million reduction
in natural gas and oil costs and a $39 million reduction in coal costs. Natural gas and
oil costs decreased due to 67% lower average natural gas prices and 9% lower generation.
Coal costs decreased by $33 million due to 34% lower coal generation and by $6 million
due to lower prices. These decreases were offset by a $6 million increase in costs
related to RGGI which became effective in 2009. |
|
|
o |
|
South Central cost of energy decreased $52 million primarily due to a $35
million decrease in purchased energy reflecting lower fuel costs associated with energy
from the regions tolled facility and a $14 million decrease in natural gas costs
reflecting 88% lower generation and 61% lower average gas prices. |
|
|
o |
|
Intercompany cost of sales intercompany purchases of $162 million by Reliant
Energy from the Companys Texas region is eliminated in
consolidation. |
69
|
|
|
Other cost of operations increased $64 million during the three months ended September
30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. Reliant Energy incurred $37 million related
to customer service operations and $24 million in gross receipt
tax on revenue. |
Risk Management Activities
Risk management activities include economic hedges that did not qualify for cash flow hedge
accounting, ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges, and trading activities. Total derivative gains
decreased by $722 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same
period in 2008. The breakdown of changes by region follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
West |
|
Thermal |
|
Elimination |
|
Total |
|
Net gains/(losses) on settled positions, or
financial income in revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
Mark-to-market results in revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized
(gains)/losses on settled positions related to
economic hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Reversal of gain positions acquired as part of
the Reliant Energy acquisition as of May 1, 2009 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized
gains on settled positions related to trading
activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on open positions
related to economic hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on open positions
related to trading activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
Subtotal mark-to-market results |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
Total derivative gain/(loss) included in revenues |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
Elimination |
|
Total |
|
Net gains/(losses) on settled positions, or financial
expense in cost of operations |
|
$ |
(202 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(187 |
) |
|
Mark-to-market results in cost of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized losses on
settled positions related to economic hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Reversal of
loss positions acquired as part of the Reliant Energy
acquisition as of May 1, 2009 |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on open positions related to
economic hedges |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
Subtotal mark-to-market results |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
Total derivative gain/(loss) included in cost of operations |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
Total |
|
Net losses on settled positions, or financial income |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
Mark-to-market results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains on settled
positions related to economic hedges |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains on settled
positions related to trading activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net unrealized gains on open positions related to economic hedges |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791 |
|
Net unrealized gains on open positions related to trading activity |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Subtotal mark-to-market results |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
Total derivative gain included in revenue |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
Total derivative gain included in cost of operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
70
NRGs third quarter 2009 net gain of $22 million was comprised of $14 million of
mark-to-market losses and $36 million in settled gains. Of the $14 million of mark-to-market
losses, there was a loss of $217 million in revenue and a gain of $203 million in expense. The
$217 million loss in revenue included a $51 million loss from the reversal of mark-to-market gains
recognized during 2008 and loss of $165 million due to the decrease in value of forward purchases
and sales of electricity and fuel due to higher forward power and gas prices. The $203 million of
mark-to-market gains in expense included a gain of $31 million from the reversal of mark-to-market
losses recognized during 2008, a $67 million loss due to the decrease in value of forward purchases
and sales of electricity and fuel due to higher forward power and gas prices, and a $239 million
from the roll-off of Reliant Energy loss positions. The Reliant
Energy loss positions were acquired
as of May 1, 2009 and valued using forward prices on that date. The $239 million roll-off amounts
were offset by realized losses at settled prices and are reflected in the cost of operations during
the same period.
NRGs third quarter 2008 net gain of $744 million was comprised of mark-to-market gains of
$835 million and $91 million in settled losses, or
financial income. The realized losses were primarily driven by
increases in settled power and gas prices. The mark-to-market gains
were primarily driven by decreases in forward power and gas prices,
and gains from a reduction in hedge accounting ineffectiveness.
Since these hedging activities are intended to mitigate the risk of commodity price movements
on revenues and cost of operations, the changes in such results should not be viewed in isolation,
but rather should be taken together with the effects of pricing and cost changes on energy revenue
and costs. During and prior to 2009, NRG hedged a portion of the Companys 2008 and 2009
generation. During the third quarter 2009, the settled prices of electricity and
natural gas decreased resulting in the recognition of realized gains while
the forward prices of electricity and natural gas increased resulting
in the recognition of unrealized mark-to-market
losses. During the third quarter 2008, the settled prices for power
and gas increased resulting in the recognition of realized losses
while decreasing forward prices of electricity and natural gas resulted
in recognition of unrealized mark-to-market gains.
The following table represents the results of the Companys financial and physical trading of
energy commodities for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008. The realized financial trading
results and unrealized financial and physical trading results are included in the risk management
activities above, while the realized physical trading results are included in energy revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Trading gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
Total trading gains/(losses) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
NRGs depreciation and amortization expense increased by $56 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. Reliant Energys depreciation and
amortization expense for the three month period was $42 million principally for amortization of
customer relationships. The balance of the increase was due to depreciation on the baghouse
projects in western New York and the Elbow Creek project which came
online in late 2008, and the Cedar Bayou 4 project which came online
in the second quarter 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $107 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The increase was due to:
|
|
|
Retail selling, general and administrative expense totaled $76 million, including $28
million of bad debt expense incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Consultant costs increased $18 million consisting of non-recurring costs related to
Exelons exchange offer and proxy contest efforts of $21 million offset by a decrease in
other consulting costs of $3 million. |
|
|
|
|
Wage and benefits expense increased $13 million. |
Acquisition-Related Transaction and Integration Costs
NRG incurred Reliant Energy acquisition-related transaction costs of $2 million and
integration costs of $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
71
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates
NRGs equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliates decreased by $52 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. During the three months
ended September 30, 2009, there was no equity earnings from the Sherbino I Wind Farm LLC, or
Sherbino, investment. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, Sherbino recognized a $40
million mark-to-market gain on a natural gas swap executed to hedge its future power generation.
Additionally, in 2009, the Companys share in its former MIBRAG investments and Gladstone Power
Station decreased $10 million and $4 million, respectively, while the Companys share in NRG
Saguaro LLC earnings increased by $2 million.
Other Income/(Loss), Net
NRGs other income/(loss), net increased $12 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The 2009 interest income was lower compared to 2008 due
to reduced interest rates. The effect of lower interest income in
2009 was offset by the effect of $19 million
impairment charge in 2008 to restructure distressed investments in commercial paper.
Interest Expense
NRGs interest expense increased by $36 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily due to a $15 million increase in
fees incurred on the CSRA facility which began in May 2009, a $15 million increase in interest
expense as a result of the 2019 Senior Notes issued in June 2009, a $4 million increase related to
ineffective portion of the interest rate cash flow hedge on the Companys Term Loan Facility and a
$5 million increase in the amortization of deferred financing costs. These increases were offset
by a $7 million decrease in interest expense on the Companys Term Loan Facility due to a decrease
in the outstanding notional amount and lower interest rates related to the unhedged portion of the
Term Loan and fair value portion of the Senior Notes.
Income Tax Expense
NRGs income tax expense decreased by $336 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to
a decrease in income. The effective tax rate was 37.4% and 39.2% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, NRGs overall effective tax rate on continuing
operations was different than the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the U.S. taxation of
foreign earnings offset by a reduction in the valuation allowance. For the three months ended
September 30, 2008, NRGs effective tax rate was increased primarily due to the impact of state and
local income taxes.
72
Managements discussion of the results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008:
For the benefit of the following discussions, the table below represents the results of NRG
excluding the impact of Reliant Energy during the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluding |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Consolidated |
|
Reliant Energy |
|
Reliant Energy |
|
Consolidated |
|
Change % |
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue |
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
3,671 |
|
|
|
(35 |
)% |
Capacity revenue |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Retail revenue |
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Contract amortization |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Thermal revenue |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
6,811 |
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
5,230 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Risk management activities |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other operating costs |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Total cost of operations |
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Acquisition-related transaction and integration costs |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Development costs |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
|
(40 |
)% |
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues, excluding risk management activities, increased $1.2 billion during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008.
|
|
|
Retail revenue the acquisition of Reliant Energy contributed $3.1 billion of retail
revenue during the five months ended September 30, 2009. Retail revenue includes mass
revenues of $1.9 billion, C&I revenues of $1.1 billion, and supply management revenues of
$151 million. |
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue decreased $1.3 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008: |
|
o |
|
Texas energy revenue decreased by $478 million, with $373 million driven by
lower average realized energy prices and a $105 million decrease driven by a reduction
in generation. The average realized energy price decreased by 17%, driven by a 52%
decrease in merchant prices, offset by a 23% increase in contract prices. Lower
merchant prices were driven by the combination of lower gas prices in 2009 and unusually
high pricing events that occurred in 2008 that did not repeat in 2009. Generation
decreased by 5% driven by a 9% decrease in coal plant generation offset by a 6% increase
in gas plant generation, and generation from the recently constructed
Cedar Bayou 4 gas plant and Elbow Creek wind
farm, which was not in operation in 2008. Coal plant generation was adversely affected
by lower energy prices driven by a 66% decrease in average natural gas prices in
combination with increased wind generation which shifted the coal units position in the
bid stack, negatively affecting coal plant generation. |
|
|
o |
|
Northeast energy revenue decreased by $490 million, with $231 million driven by
lower energy prices and $312 million attributable to a reduction in generation offset by
a $53 million increase from higher net contract revenue. Merchant energy prices were
lower by an average of 40%. The lower energy prices reduced the Companys net cost
incurred to meet obligations under load serving contracts in the PJM market. Generation
decreased by 35%, with a 36% decrease in coal generation and a 28% decrease in oil and
gas generation. Weakened demand for power combined with lower gas prices resulted in
reduced merchant energy prices. Lower merchant energy prices combined with higher costs
of production from the introduction of RGGI resulted in increased hours where the coal
plants were uneconomical to dispatch. The decline in oil and gas generation is
attributable to fewer reliability run hours at the Connecticut plants. |
73
|
o |
|
South Central decreased by $108 million due to a $66 million decline in contract
revenue coupled with a $42 million decrease in merchant energy revenues. Contract
customer sales volumes were down 10%. The decline in contract energy price was driven by
a $12 million decrease in fuel cost pass through to the cooperatives. Also contributing
to the decline in contract revenue was $48 million due to the expiration of a contract
with a regional utility. Average realized price on contract energy sales was $23.04 per
MWh in 2009 compared to $28.89 per MWh in 2008. The expiration of the contract allowed
more energy to be sold into the merchant market, but at lower average prices resulting in
a $42 million decline in revenue. Megawatt hours sold to the merchant market increased
by 41%, while prices fell by 50%. Increased use of the regions tolled facility provided
additional energy to the merchant market. |
|
|
o |
|
Intercompany energy revenue intercompany sales of $199 million by the Companys
Texas region to Reliant Energy were eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
Capacity revenue decreased $246 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008: |
|
o |
|
Texas capacity revenue decreased by $222 million due to a lower proportion of
baseload contracts which contained a capacity component. |
|
|
o |
|
Northeast capacity revenue decreased by $12 million due to lower capacity prices in the NYISO. |
|
|
o |
|
South Central capacity revenue increased by $30 million resulting primarily from a new capacity agreement. |
|
|
o |
|
Intercompany capacity revenue intercompany sales of $29 million by the
Companys Texas region to Reliant Energy were eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
Contract amortization revenue decreased by $325 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease includes a
reduction of $166 million in revenue from the Texas Genco acquisition due to the lower
volume of contracted energy and $160 million in amortization expense of net in-market C&I
contracts related to the Reliant Energy acquisition in 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Other revenues decreased by $82 million driven by $45 million in lower ancillary
revenue, $46 million in lower emissions revenue, and a $26 million decrease in fuels
trading. These decreases were offset by the recognition of a $31 million non-cash gain
related to settlement of a pre-existing in-the-money contract with Reliant Energy. |
Cost of Operations
Cost of operations, excluding risk management activities, increased $1.2 billion during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008.
|
|
|
Cost of sales increased $1.1 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008 due to: |
|
o |
|
Retail Reliant Energy incurred $1.8 billion of cost of energy during the five
months ended September 30, 2009, which included $228 million of intercompany supply
costs. |
|
|
o |
|
Texas cost of energy decreased $331 million due to lower natural gas, coal,
purchased energy and ancillary services costs. Natural gas costs decreased $281
million, reflecting a 66% decline in average natural gas per MMBtu prices offset by a 6%
increase in gas-fired generation. Coal costs decreased $17 million as the 2008 expense
included a $15 million loss reserve related to a coal contract dispute and $6 million
resulting from reduced generation. Ancillary service costs decreased by $41 million due
to a decrease in purchased ancillary services costs incurred to meet contract
obligations. |
|
|
o |
|
Northeast cost of energy decreased $254 million due to a $160 million reduction
in natural gas and oil costs and a $108 million reduction in coal costs. Natural gas
and oil costs decreased due to 28% lower generation and 60% lower average natural gas
prices. Coal costs decreased due to 36% lower coal generation. These decreases were
offset by a $15 million increase in costs related to RGGI which became effective in
2009. |
74
|
o |
|
South Central cost of energy decreased $71 million due to a $52 million decrease in
purchased energy reflecting lower fuel costs associated with the regions tolled facility
and lower market energy prices, a $13 million decrease in natural gas cost, a $4 million
decrease in coal costs and a $5 million decrease in transmission expense due to
transmission line outages. The decrease in natural gas cost is attributable to a 32%
decrease in gas generation and a 58% decrease in natural gas prices. The coal cost
decreased due to a 7% decrease in generation offset by a 5% increase in price. |
|
|
o |
|
West cost of energy decreased $8 million due to a 43% decline in average
natural gas per MMBtu prices offset by a 7% increase in natural gas consumption and a $2
million increase in fuel oil expense resulting from a write-down to market of fuel oil
inventory no longer used in the production of energy. |
|
|
o |
|
Intercompany cost of energy intercompany purchases of $228 million by Reliant
Energy from the Companys Texas region were eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
Other cost of operations increased $118 million during the nine months ended September
30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. Reliant Energy incurred $101 million which
includes $62 million for customers service operations and $39 million for gross receipt
tax on revenue. Further, operating and maintenance expenses increased by $6 million and
property taxes increased by $11 million. |
Risk Management Activities
Risk management activities include economic hedges that did not qualify for cash flow hedge
accounting, ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges, and trading activities. Total derivative gains
increased by $556 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same
period in 2008. The breakdown of changes by region follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
|
Texas |
|
|
Northeast |
|
|
Central |
|
|
West |
|
|
Thermal |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net gains/(losses) on settled positions, or
financial income in revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
Mark-to-market results in revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized
(gains)/losses on settled positions related to
economic hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132 |
) |
Reversal of gain positions acquired as part of
the Reliant Energy acquisition as of May 1, 2009 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized
gains on settled positions related to trading
activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on open positions
related to economic hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on open positions
related to trading activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Subtotal mark-to-market results |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
Total derivative gain/(loss) included in revenues |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Energy |
|
|
Texas |
|
|
Northeast |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net gains/(losses) on settled positions, or financial
expense in cost of operations |
|
$ |
(316 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(324 |
) |
|
Mark-to-market results in cost of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized losses on
settled positions related to economic hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
Reversal of loss positions acquired as part of the Reliant
Energy acquisition as of May 1, 2009 |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449 |
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on open positions related to
economic hedges |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
Subtotal mark-to-market results |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
476 |
|
|
Total derivative gain/(loss) included in cost of operations |
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Texas |
|
|
Northeast |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net losses on settled positions, or financial income |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(165 |
) |
|
Mark-to-market results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains on settled
positions related to economic hedges |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized (gains)/losses on
settled positions related to trading activity |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Net unrealized gains on open positions related to economic hedges |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
Net unrealized gains on open positions related to trading activity |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
Subtotal mark-to-market results |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
Total derivative gain/(loss) |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
Total derivative gain/(loss) included in revenues |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Total derivative gain included in cost of operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
NRGs 2009 gain of $583 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, was comprised
of $376 million of mark-to-market gains and $207 million in settled gains. Of the $376 million of
mark-to-market gains there was a $476 million gain in expense and a $100 million loss in revenue.
The $100 million loss in revenue consisted of a loss of $257 million from the reversal of
mark-to-market gains recognized during 2008 offset by $158 million due to the increase in value of
the forward purchases and sales of electricity and fuel. The $158 million gain consists of a $217
million gain recognized in earnings from previously deferred amounts in OCI as the Company
discontinued cash flow hedge accounting in the first quarter for certain 2009 transactions in Texas
and New York due to lower expected generation, offset by a $59 million decrease in value in forward
sales of electricity and fuel due to lower forward power and gas prices. The Company recognized a
derivative loss of $29 million resulting from discontinued NPNS designated coal purchases due to
expected lower coal consumption and accordingly the Company could not assert taking physical
delivery of coal purchase transactions under NPNS designation. This amount was included in the
Companys cost of operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The gain of $476
million in expense consists of $449 million of the Reliant
Energy roll-off of loss positions, $99 million
from the reversal of mark-to-market losses recognized during 2008 and a $72 million loss from the
decrease in value of forward purchases of electricity and fuel.
Reliant Energys loss positions were acquired as of May 1, 2009, and valued using forward
prices on that date. The $448 million roll-off amounts were offset by realized losses at the
settled prices and are reflected in the cost of operations during the same period.
Since these hedging activities are intended to mitigate the risk of commodity price movements
on revenues and cost of energy, the changes in such results should not be viewed in isolation, but
rather should be taken together with the effects of pricing and cost changes on energy revenue and
costs. During and prior to 2009, NRG hedged a portion of the Companys 2008 and 2009 generation.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the settled
prices of electricity and
natural gas decreased resulting in the recognition of realized gains
while forward power and gas prices decreased resulting in the recognition
of unrealized mark-to-market
gains. During the nine months of 2008, decreasing forward prices of electricity and natural gas resulted in
recognition of unrealized mark-to-market gains while the settled
prices for power and gas increased resulting in the recognition of realized losses.
The following table represents the results of the Companys financial and physical trading of
energy commodities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008. The realized financial trading
results and unrealized financial and physical trading results are included in the risk management
activities above, while the realized physical trading results are included in energy revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Trading gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
Total trading gains/(losses) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
76
Depreciation and Amortization
NRGs depreciation and amortization expense increased by $116 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. Reliant Energys depreciation and
amortization expense for the five month period was $85 million principally for amortization of
customer relationships. The balance of the increase was due to depreciation on the baghouse
projects in western New York and the Elbow Creek project which came online in late 2008,
and the Cedar Bayou 4 plant which came online in the second quarter 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $163 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The increase was due to:
|
|
|
Reliant Energys selling, general and administrative expense totaled $125 million, including $37
million of bad debt expense incurred during the five months ended September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Wage and benefits expense increased $18 million. |
|
|
|
|
Consultant costs increased $23 million consisting of non-recurring costs related to
Exelons exchange offer and proxy contest efforts of $31 million offset by a decrease in
other consulting costs of $8 million. |
These increases were offset by:
|
|
|
Other expenses decreased by $2 million. This decrease is attributable to a bad debt
write-off in 2008. |
Acquisition-Related Transaction and Integration Costs
NRG incurred Reliant Energy acquisition-related transaction costs of $29 million and
integration costs of $12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates
NRGs equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliates decreased by $2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. During 2009, the Companys
share in Gladstone Power Station and MIBRAG decreased by $7 million and $11 million, respectively.
These decreases were offset by the Companys share of NRG Saguaro, LLC earnings increasing $9
million in 2009. In addition, there was a $7 million decrease in Sherbino I Wind Farm, LLCs
mark-to-market unrealized loss as compared to 2008 as a result of a natural gas swap executed to
hedge to future power generation.
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investments and Other Income/(Loss), Net
NRGs gain on sale of equity method investments increased by $128 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008 and other (loss)/income, net
decreased by $23 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period
in 2008. The 2009 amounts include a $128 million gain on the sale of NRGs 50% ownership interest
in MIBRAG and a $24 million mark-to-market unrealized loss on a forward contract for foreign
currency executed to hedge the sale proceeds from the MIBRAG sale. In addition, the 2009 interest
income was lower compared to 2008 due to lower interest rates. Further in 2008, a $19 million
impairment charge was incurred to restructure distressed investments in commercial paper.
Interest Expense
NRGs interest expense increased by $33 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily due to a $28 million increase in
fees incurred during the months of May through September of 2009 on the CSRA facility, a $19
million increase in interest expense as a result of the 2019 Senior Notes issued in June 2009, a $4
million increase related to ineffective portion of the interest rate cash flow hedges on the
Companys Term Loan Facility and a $8 million increase in the amortization of deferred financing
costs. These increases were offset by a $25 million decrease in interest expense on the Companys
Term Loan Facility due to a decrease in the outstanding notional amount and lower interest rates
related to the unhedged portion of Term Loan and fair value portion of Senior Notes.
77
Income Tax Expense
NRGs income tax expense increased by $111 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in income tax expense was primarily due to
an increase in income coupled with the U.S. taxation of foreign earnings. The effective tax rate
was 40.3% and 39.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NRGs overall effective tax rate on continuing
operations was different than the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to an increase in the
valuation allowance as a result of capital losses generated during the nine months for which there
are no projected capital gains or available tax planning strategies. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, NRGs overall effective tax rate was increased primarily due to the impact of
state and local income taxes.
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax Expense
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, NRG recorded income from discontinued
operations, net of income tax expense, of $172 million. NRG closed the sale of ITISA during the
second quarter 2008.
78
Results of Operations for Reliant Energy
Reliant Energy
The following is a detailed discussion of the results of operations of NRGs retail business
segment since the date of acquisition.
Operating Strategy
Reliant Energys business is to earn a margin by selling electricity to end use customers,
providing innovative and value-enhancing services to such customers, and acquiring supply for the
estimated demand. As a retail energy provider, Reliant Energy arranges for the transmission and
delivery of electricity to customers, bills customers, collects payment for electricity sold,
develops innovative energy solutions, engages in energy efficiency initiatives and maintains call
centers to provide customer service. Although NRG has begun the process of becoming the primary
provider of Reliant Energys supply requirements, Reliant Energy presently purchases a substantial
portion of its supply requirements from third parties such as generation companies and power
marketers. Transmission and distribution services are purchased from entities regulated by the
PUCT and subject to ERCOT protocols.
The energy usage of Reliant Energys retail customers varies by season, with generally higher
usage during the summer period. As a result, Reliant Energys net working capital requirements
generally increase during summer months along with the higher revenues, and then decline during
off-peak months.
As of September 30, 2009, Reliant Energy had 1,161 employees, none of whom are
covered by a bargaining agreement.
Customer Segments
The following is a description of Reliant Energys significant customer segments in Texas.
|
|
|
Mass Reliant Energys Mass customer base is made up of approximately 1.6 million
residential and small business customers in the ERCOT market with more than half located in
the Houston area. Reliant Energy also serves customers in other competitive markets in
ERCOT including the Dallas, Fort Worth, and Corpus Christi areas. |
|
|
|
|
C&I Reliant Energy markets electricity and energy services to approximately 0.1
million C&I customers in Texas. These customers include refineries, chemical plants,
manufacturing facilities, hospitals, universities, commercial real estate, government
agencies, restaurants, and other commercial facilities. |
Market Framework
Reliant Energy operates within the same ERCOT market as the Companys Texas region. For
further discussion of the Texas market framework, see pages 25-26 of NRG Energy Inc.s 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
For further discussion of the Companys Reliant Energy operations, see Item I, Note 4,
Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q.
79
Selected Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Period Ended |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 (a) |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mass revenues |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
|
$ |
1,918 |
|
Commercial and industrial revenues |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
Supply management revenues |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Risk management activities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Contract amortization |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy (including risk management activities) |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
Electricity sales volume GWh (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mass |
|
|
7,776 |
|
|
|
12,627 |
|
Commercial and Industrial (b) |
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
13,780 |
|
Business Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average retail customers count (in thousands, metered locations) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mass |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
Commercial and Industrial (b) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Retail customers count (in thousands, metered locations) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mass |
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
1,552 |
|
Commercial and Industrial (b) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Cooling Degree Days, or CDDs (c) |
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
CDDs 30 year average |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
Heating Degree Days, or HDDs (c) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
HDDs 30 year average |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the period May 1, 2009, to September 30, 2009. |
(b) |
|
Includes customers of the Texas General Land Office for whom the Company provides services. |
(c) |
|
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration-Climate Prediction Center - A CDD
represents the number of degrees that the mean temperature for a particular day is above
65 degrees Fahrenheit in each region. An HDD represents the number of degrees that the
mean temperature for a particular day is below 65 degrees Fahrenheit in each region. The
CDDs/HDDs for a period of time are calculated by adding the CDDs/HDDs for each day during
the period. The CDDs/HDDs amounts are representative of the Coast and North Central Zones
within the ERCOT market in which Reliant Energy serves its customer base. |
80
Quarterly results
Operating Income
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2009, was $409 million, which
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Reliant Energy Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
Mass revenues |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
Commercial and industrial revenues |
|
|
620 |
|
Supply management revenues |
|
|
99 |
|
|
Total retail operating revenues (a) |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
Retail cost of sales (a) |
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
Total retail gross margin |
|
|
443 |
|
Unrealized gains on energy supply derivatives |
|
|
217 |
|
Contract amortization, net |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(136 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts exclude unrealized gains/(losses) on energy supply derivatives and contract amortization. |
|
|
|
Gross margin Reliant Energys gross margin totaled $443 million for the quarter, which
was driven by strong margins in the mass customer segment and expanding margins in the
commercial and industrial segment. Volumes were higher due to greater customer usage as a
result of warmer weather as compared to the 30 year CDD average, which was partially offset
by a decrease in the number of customers during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Reliant Energy announced and enacted price reductions effective June 1 and July 1, 2009,
that cumulatively, lowered prices up to 20% for certain Mass customers. These lower
prices, relative to lower short term supply costs, delivered strong margins. Competition,
price reductions, and supply costs based on forward market prices, will likely drive lower
margins in the future. |
|
|
|
|
Relative to first half of 2009, competitive retail prices have decreased due to lower supply
costs driven by a decline in natural gas prices. If supply costs continue to remain low, the
Company expects competitive retail prices to continue to decline and place pressure on unit
margins. Additionally, the Companys customer counts have declined approximately 2% during
the quarter. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities Unrealized gains of $217 million on economic hedges relates
to supply contracts that were recognized for the three months ended September 2009
including $239 million of gains representing a roll-off of loss positions acquired at May
1, 2009, valued at forward prices and $21 million of losses that represents mark-to-market
changes in forward value of purchased electricity and gas. The $239 million gain from
roll-off of loss positions is offset by realized losses at the settled prices and reflected
in the cost of operations. |
Operating Revenues
Total operating revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009, were $1.8 billion and
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Mass revenues totaled $1,157 million for the quarter from retail electric sales to
approximately 1.6 million end use customers in the Texas market. The current quarter
revenue rates reflect the price reductions of up to 20% for certain Mass customer classes
that were announced and enacted effective June 1 and July 1, 2009. Also, warmer weather,
as compared to the 30 year CDD average, caused an increase in customer usage. The higher
prices, along with higher usage, were accompanied by a 2% decrease in the number of
customers during the quarter. |
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial revenue As of May 1, 2009, Reliant Energy re-launched its
C&I segment. C&I revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009, totaled $620
million for the quarter on volume sales of approximately 8,199 GWh. Variable rate
contracts tied to the market price of natural gas accounted for approximately 69% of the
contracted volumes as of September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Contract amortization reduced operating revenues by $85 million resulting from net
in-market C&I contracts, which will continue to amortize over the term of the contracts
acquired in the Reliant Energy acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Supply management revenues totaled $99 million for the quarter from the sale of excess
supply into various markets in Texas. |
81
Cost of Energy
Cost of energy for the three months ended September 30, 2009, was $1,203 million and consisted
of the following:
|
|
|
Supply costs totaled $837 million for the quarter. The market cost of energy was
relatively low during the quarter. This was driven by the lowest natural gas prices in the
last three years for the same time period. Also, warmer weather for the period, as
compared to the 30 year CDD average, caused an increase in purchased supply volumes at a
relatively low cost. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities Unrealized gains of $218 million on economic hedges relate
to supply contracts that were recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
including $239 million of gains which represent a roll-off of loss positions acquired at
May 1, 2009, valued at forward prices and $21 million of losses that represent
mark-to-market changes in forward value of purchased electricity and gas. The $239 million
gain from roll-off positions is offset by realized losses at the settled prices and
reflected in cost of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Transmission and distribution charges totaled $392 million for the quarter for the
cost to transport the power from the generation sources to the end use customers. |
|
|
|
|
Financial settlements totaled $202 million of losses for the quarter resulting from
financial settlement of energy related derivatives. |
|
|
|
|
Contract amortization reduced the cost of energy by $11 million, resulting from the
net out-of-market supply contracts established at the acquisition date. These contracts
will be amortized over the life of the contracts. |
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009, were $136 million, or
8% of the regions total operating revenues. Other operating expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance expenses totaled $37 million for the quarter, primarily
consisted of the labor and external costs associated with customer activities, including
the call center, billing, remittance processing, and credit and collections, as well as the
information technology costs associated with those activities. |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $48 million for the quarter,
primarily consisted of the costs of labor and external costs associated with advertising
and other marketing activities, as well as human resources, community activities, legal,
procurement, regulatory, accounting, internal audit, and management, as well as facilities
leases and other office expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Gross receipts tax totaled $24 million for the quarter or 1.3% of Mass and C&I
revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Bad debt expense totaled $28 million for the quarter or 1.6% of Mass and C&I revenues
which was driven by higher summer bills due to warmer weather and economic factors
including unemployment in Dallas and Houston, which approximated national averages. |
82
Year to date results
Operating Income
Operating income for the period ended September 30, 2009, was $837 million, which consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Reliant Energy Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
Mass revenues |
|
$ |
1,918 |
|
Commercial and industrial revenues |
|
|
1,057 |
|
Supply management revenues |
|
|
151 |
|
|
Total retail operating revenues (a) |
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
Retail cost of sales (a) |
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
Total retail gross margin |
|
|
763 |
|
Unrealized gains on energy supply derivatives |
|
|
520 |
|
Contract amortization, net |
|
|
(135 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(226 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts exclude unrealized gains/(losses) on energy supply derivatives and contract amortization. |
|
|
|
Gross margin Reliant Energys gross margin totaled $763 million, which was driven by
strong margins in the mass customer segment and expanding margins in the commercial and
industrial segment. Volumes were higher due to greater customer usage as a result of
warmer weather as compared to the 30 year CDD average, although partially offset by a
decrease in number of customers during the five months ended September 30, 2009. The
Company acquired Reliant Energy customers on prices more consistent with 2008 costs of
natural gas. Reliant Energy announced and enacted price reductions effective June 1 and
July 1, 2009, that cumulatively lowered prices up to 20% for certain Mass customers.
These lower prices, relative to lower short term supply costs, delivered strong margins.
Competition, price reductions, and supply costs based on forward market prices, will likely
drive lower margins in the future. |
|
|
|
|
With the decline in natural gas prices, and the corresponding decline in the cost of energy
supply, competitive retail prices have decreased relative to 2008. If supply costs continue
to remain low, the Company expects competitive retail prices to continue to decline and place
pressure on unit margins. Additionally, the Companys customer counts have declined
approximately 4% since May 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities Unrealized gains of $520 million on economic hedges relates
to supply contracts that were recognized for the period ended September 2009 including $448
million of gains representing a roll-off of loss positions acquired at May 1, 2009, valued
at forward prices and $72 million of gains that represents mark-to-market changes in
forward value of purchased electricity and gas. The $448 million gain from roll-off of
loss positions is offset by realized losses at the settled prices and reflected in the cost
of operations. In August 2009, Reliant Energy entered into two contracts to mitigate a
portion of Reliant Energys exposure to lost revenue as a result of a hurricane during the
2009 season. The contracts premiums of $5.7 million provided coverage for a $50 million
loss. |
Operating Revenues
Total operating revenues for the period ended September 30, 2009, were $3.0 billion and
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Mass revenues totaled $1,918 million from retail electric sales to approximately 1.6
million end use customers in the Texas market. Revenue rates for acquired Reliant Energy
customers were not consistent with current costs of natural gas. These acquired revenue
rates were reduced by Reliant Energys announced and enacted price reductions effective
June 1 and July 1, 2009 of up to 20% for certain Mass customers classes. Also, warmer
weather, as compared to the 30 year CDD average, caused an increase in customer usage. The
higher prices, along with higher usage, were accompanied by a 4% decrease in the number of
customers since May 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial revenue As of May 1, 2009, Reliant Energy re-launched its
C&I segment. C&I revenues for the period ended September 30, 2009, totaled $1,057 million
on volume sales of roughly 13,780 GWh. Variable rate contracts tied to the market price of
natural gas accounted for approximately 71% of the contracted volumes as of September 30,
2009. |
83
|
|
|
Contract amortization reduced operating revenues by $160 million resulting from net
in-market C&I contracts, which will continue to amortize over the term of the contracts
acquired in the Reliant Energy acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
Supply management revenues totaled $151 million from the sale of excess supply into
various markets in Texas. |
Cost of Energy
Cost of energy for the period ended September 30, 2009, was $1,817 million and consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
Supply costs totaled $1,387 million. The market cost of energy is significantly down
for the period. Natural gas prices have declined 69% since the same period last year.
Also, warmer weather for the period, as compared to the 30 year CDD average, caused an
increase in purchased supply volumes at a relatively low cost. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities Unrealized gains of $521 million on economic hedges relate
to supply contracts that were recognized for the period ended September 30, 2009, including
$449 million of gains which represent a roll-off of loss positions acquired at May 1, 2009,
valued at forward prices and $72 million of gains that represent mark-to-market changes in
forward value of purchased electricity and gas. The $449 million gain from roll-off of
loss positions is offset by realized losses at the settled prices and reflected in cost of
operations. |
|
|
|
|
Transmission and distribution charges totaled $659 million for the cost to transport
the power from the generation sources to the end use customers. |
|
|
|
|
Financial settlements totaled $316 million resulting from financial settlement of
energy related derivatives. |
|
|
|
|
Contract amortization reduced the cost of energy by $24 million, resulting from the
net out-of-market supply contracts established at the acquisition date. These contracts
will be amortized over the life of the contracts. |
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses for the period ended September 30, 2009, were $226 million, or 8% of
the regions total operating revenues. Other operating expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance expenses totaled $62 million, primarily consisted of the
labor and external costs associated with customer activities, including the call center,
billing, remittance processing, and credit and collections, as well as the information
technology costs associated with those activities. |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $88 million, primarily consisted
of the costs of labor and external costs associated with advertising and other marketing
activities, as well as human resources, community activities, legal, procurement,
regulatory, accounting, internal audit, and management, as well as facilities leases and
other office expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Gross receipts tax totaled $39 million or 1.3% of Mass and C&I revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Bad debt expense totaled $37 million or 1.2% of Mass and C&I revenues which was driven
by higher summer bills due to warmer weather and economic factors including unemployment in
Dallas and Houston which approximated national averages. |
84
Results of Operations for Wholesale Power Generation Regions
The following is a detailed discussion of the results of operations of NRGs major wholesale
power generation business segments.
Texas
For a discussion of the business profile of the Companys Texas operations, see pages 23-26 of
NRG Energy, Inc.s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Selected Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change % |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change % |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue |
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
|
$ |
2,344 |
|
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Capacity revenue |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
Risk management activities |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Contract amortization |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy (including risk
management activities) |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
1,009 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
$ |
695 |
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
MWh sold (in thousands) |
|
|
13,979 |
|
|
|
13,111 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
36,485 |
|
|
|
36,817 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
MWh generated (in thousands) |
|
|
12,534 |
|
|
|
12,891 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
34,527 |
|
|
|
36,147 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Business Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average on-peak market power
prices ($/MWh) |
|
|
33.68 |
|
|
|
102.82 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
37.51 |
|
|
|
112.80 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Cooling Degree Days, or CDDs
(a) |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
CDDs 30 year average |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
Heating Degree Days, or HDDs
(a) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
HDDs 30 year average |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Climate Prediction
Center - A CDD represents the number of degrees that the mean
temperature for a particular day is above 65 degrees Fahrenheit in
each region. An HDD represents the number of degrees that the mean
temperature for a particular day is below 65 degrees Fahrenheit in
each region. The CDDs/HDDs for a period of time are calculated by
adding the CDDs/HDDs for each day during the period. |
Quarterly Results
Operating Income
Operating income decreased by $828 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Operating revenues decreased by $877 million due to a reduced impact from
risk management activities, in addition to lower energy revenues due to lower average
energy prices and lower sales volume. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $70 million resulting from lower natural gas
costs. |
85
Operating Revenues
Total operating revenues decreased by $877 million during the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Risk management activities decreased by $538 million due to the difference between
gains of $14 million for the three months ending September 30, 2009, compared to gains of
$552 million during the same period in 2008. The $14 million gain included $102 million of
unrealized mark-to-market losses and $116 million in gains on settled transactions, or
financial income, compared to $596 million in unrealized mark-to-market gains and $44
million in financial losses during the same period in 2008. Please refer to the
consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a more complete description of
movements in risk management activities. |
|
|
|
|
Energy revenues decreased $201 million due to: |
|
o |
|
Energy prices decreased by $177 million as the prices continue to remain lower
in the third quarter 2009 compared to the same period 2008. The average realized energy
price decreased by 21%, driven by a 53% decrease in merchant prices offset by a 21%
increase in contract prices. |
|
|
o |
|
Generation decreased by 3% resulting in a $24 million decrease in sales volume.
This decrease was driven by an 11% decrease in coal plant generation and an 8% decrease
in nuclear plant generation. Coal plant generation was adversely affected by lower
energy prices driven by a 64% decrease in average natural gas prices. This was offset
by a 47% increase in gas plant generation due to very warm temperatures in the third
quarter 2009 compared to the same period 2008, as well as generation from the recently
constructed Cedar Bayou 4 gas plant and Elbow Creek wind farm which
began commercial operations in June 2009 and December of 2008, respectively. |
|
|
|
Capacity revenue decreased by $79 million due to a lower proportion of baseload
contracts which contain a capacity component. |
|
|
|
|
Contract amortization revenue resulting from the Texas Genco acquisition decreased by
$52 million due to the reduced volume of contracted energy in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Other revenue decreased by $7 million primarily due to lower ancillary services
revenue of $16 million. This decrease was offset by $6 million higher physical sales of
natural gas and coal and $1 million higher emissions credit revenue. |
Cost of Energy
Cost of energy decreased by $70 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Natural gas costs decreased by $84 million due to a 64% decline in average natural gas
prices offset by a 47% increase in gas-fired generation. |
|
|
|
|
Ancillary services costs decreased by $19 million due to a decrease in purchased
ancillary services costs incurred to meet obligations. |
|
|
|
|
Coal and nuclear fuel costs decreased by $7 million due to lower generation, offset by
an $8 million increase in nuclear fuel due to the reversal of amortization of nuclear fuel
inventory established under Texas Genco accounting. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Purchased energy increased $13 million due to baseload units either unavailable or
uneconomic to provide power for contract commitments. |
|
|
|
|
Cost contract amortization increased $10 million driven primarily by the reduction in
amortization credit for out-of-the money coal contracts assumed in the acquisition of Texas
Genco as coal is delivered under that contract. |
86
|
|
|
Fuel risk management activities losses of $11 million were recorded for the three months
ending September 30, 2009. In the first quarter 2009, all NPNS coal contracts were
discontinued and reclassified into mark-to-market accounting. The $11 million loss included
$7 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses, largely associated with forward coal
positions and $4 million in losses on settled transactions, or financial cost of energy.
Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a more complete
description of movements in risk management activities. |
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses increased by $10 million during the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008, driven by an increase of $9 million in general and
administrative expenses due to higher corporate allocations as a result of the change in method in
allocating corporate costs as described in Note 12, Segment Reporting, in combination with a $3
million increase in operations and maintenance expense as a result of maintenance outages at the
regions baseload plants.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $11 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. This increase is the result of Cedar
Bayou 4 and Elbow Creek reaching commercial operations in June 2009 and December 2008,
respectively.
Year to date results
Operating Income
Operating income decreased by $503 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
Operating revenues decreased by $733 million due to unfavorable energy and capacity
revenues offset by favorable impact of risk management activities. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $267 million reflecting lower natural gas costs and a
decrease in coal generation. |
Operating Revenues
Total operating revenues decreased by $733 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Energy revenues decreased $478 million due to: |
|
o |
|
Energy prices decreased by $373 million as the average realized merchant price
was lower in 2009 due to the combination of lower gas prices and unusually high pricing
events that occurred in 2008 but did not repeat in 2009. Higher MWh sold under merchant
market was offset by lower merchant prices. The average realized energy price decreased
by 17%, driven by a 52% decrease in merchant prices offset by a 23% increase in contract
prices. |
|
|
o |
|
Generation decreased by 5% resulting in a $105 million decrease in sales
volume. This decrease was driven by a 9% decrease in coal plant generation. This was
offset by a 6% increase in gas plant generation, and generation from the recently
constructed Cedar Bayou 4 gas plant and Elbow Creek wind farm which
began commercial operation in June 2009 and December 2008, respectively.
Coal plant generation was adversely affected by lower energy prices driven by a 66%
decrease in average natural gas prices in combination with increased wind generation in
the region. |
|
|
|
Capacity revenue decreased by $222 million due to a lower proportion of baseload
contracts which contain a capacity component. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities increased by $194 million due to the difference between
gains of $223 million recorded for the nine months ending September 30, 2009, compared to
gains of $29 million during the same period in 2008. The $223 million gain included $36
million of unrealized mark-to-market losses and $259 million in gains on settled
transactions, or financial income, compared to $123 million in unrealized mark-to-market
gains and $94 million in financial losses during the same period in 2008. Please refer to
the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a more complete description of
movements in risk management activities. |
87
|
|
|
Contract amortization revenue resulting from the Texas Genco acquisition decreased by
$166 million due to the reduced volume of contracted energy in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Other revenue decreased by $61 million primarily due to lower ancillary services
revenue of $41 million provided to the market, lower emissions credit revenue of $13
million and reduced physical sales of natural gas and coal of $7 million. |
Cost of Energy
Cost of energy decreased by $267 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Natural gas costs decreased by $281 million due to a 66% decline in average natural
gas prices offset by a 6% increase in gas-fired generation. |
|
|
|
|
Ancillary service costs decreased by $41 million due to a decrease in purchased
ancillary services costs incurred to meet contract obligations. |
|
|
|
|
Coal costs decreased by $17 million as the first three months of 2008 included a $15
million loss reserve related to a coal contract dispute in addition to a decrease of $6
million due to lower generation. These decreases were offset by higher transportation
costs of $9 million. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Fuel risk management activities losses of $65 million were recorded for the nine
months ending September 30, 2009. In the first quarter 2009, all NPNS coal contracts were
discontinued and reclassified into mark-to-market accounting. The $65 million loss
included $48 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses, largely associated with forward
coal positions and $17 million in losses on settled transactions, or financial cost of
energy. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a more
complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses increased by $18 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008, driven by an increase of $14 million in general and
administrative expense due to higher corporate allocations as a result of the change in method in
allocating corporate costs as described in Note 12, Segment
Reporting, to this Form 10-Q. In
addition there was an increase of $4 million for development expense as prior year results included a one
time credit due to the reimbursement by the Companys nuclear development partner of previously expensed
development costs on STP units 3 and 4 of $8 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $19 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was the result of Cedar
Bayou 4 and Elbow Creek reaching commercial operations in June 2009 and December 2008,
respectively.
88
Northeast Region
For a discussion of the business profile of the Northeast region, see pages 27-29 of NRG
Energy, Inc.s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Selected Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change % |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change % |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
|
(62 |
)% |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
|
(56 |
)% |
Capacity revenue |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Risk management activities |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy (including risk management
activities) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
MWh sold (in thousands) |
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
6,779 |
|
|
|
10,424 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
MWh generated (in thousands) |
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
6,779 |
|
|
|
10,424 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Business Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average on-peak market power prices
($/MWh) (b) |
|
|
40.42 |
|
|
|
108.44 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
46.13 |
|
|
|
100.66 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Cooling Degree Days, or CDDs (a) |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
CDDs 30 year average |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
Heating Degree Days, or HDDs (a) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
HDDs 30 year average |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
4,093 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration-Climate Prediction Center - A CDD
represents the number of degrees that the mean temperature for a particular day is
above 65 degrees Fahrenheit in each region. An HDD represents the number of degrees
that the mean temperature for a particular day is below 65 degrees Fahrenheit in each
region. The CDDs/HDDs for a period of time are calculated by adding the CDDs/HDDs for
each day during the period. |
(b) |
|
MWh sold are shown net of MWh purchased to satisfy certain load contracts in the region. |
Quarterly Results
Operating Income
Operating income decreased by $246 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008 due to:
|
|
|
Operating revenues decreased by $352 million due to unfavorable energy revenues and an
unfavorable impact from risk management activities. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $108 million due to lower generation and fuel costs. |
89
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased by $352 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Energy revenues decreased by $201 million due to: |
|
o |
|
Energy prices decreased by $120 million reflecting an average 52% decline in
merchant energy prices. This decrease was partially offset by higher net contract
revenues of $18 million driven by lower net costs incurred in meeting obligations under
load serving contracts in the PJM market. |
|
|
o |
|
Generation decreased by $99 million due to a 30% decrease in generation in 2009
compared to 2008, with a 34% decrease in coal generation and a 9% decrease in oil and
gas generation. Coal generation in western New York declined 33%, or 568,247 MWhs, due
to weak power prices that made the plants uneconomic to dispatch. Coal generation at
the Indian River plant declined 35%, or 305,203 MWhs, due to a combination of weakened
demand for power, low gas prices and higher cost of production from compliance with RGGI
resulting in increased hours where the units were uneconomic to dispatch. The Somerset
plant experienced similar weakened demand and low gas prices, with generation down 82%,
or 111,819 MWh. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Risk management activities gains of $19 million were recorded for the three months
ending September 30, 2009, compared to gains of $168 million during the same period in
2008. The $19 million gain included $99 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses and
$118 million in gains on settled transactions, or financial income, compared to $211
million in unrealized mark-to-market gains and $43 million in financial losses during the
same period in 2008. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis
for a more complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
Cost of Energy
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $108 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to: |
|
o |
|
Natural gas and oil costs decreased by $53 million, or 57%, due to 9% lower
generation and 67% lower average natural gas prices. |
|
|
o |
|
Coal costs decreased by $39 million, or 38%, due to lower coal generation of
34% accounting for $33 million and lower prices accounting for $6 million. |
|
|
o |
|
Fuel risk management activities gains of $22 million were recorded for the
three months ending September 30, 2009. In the first quarter 2009, all NPNS coal
contracts were discontinued and reclassified into mark-to-market accounting. The $22
million gain included $23 million of mark-to-market gains, largely associated with
forward coal positions and $1 million in losses on settled transactions, or financial
cost of energy. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis
for a more complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Carbon emission expense increased by $6 million due to the January 1, 2009,
implementation of RGGI and the recognition of carbon compliance cost under this program. |
90
Year-to-Date Results
Operating Income
Operating income increased by $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008 due to:
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $292 million due to lower generation and fuel costs. |
This decrease was offset by:
|
|
|
Operating revenues decreased by $276 million due to unfavorable energy revenues, other
revenues and capacity revenues partially offset by a favorable impact from risk management
activities. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization increased by $11 million primarily due to depreciation
from the 2009 baghouse projects at our Western New York coal plants and additional
depreciation recognized in 2009 compared to 2008 from the June 2008 Cos Cob repowering
project. |
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased by $276 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Energy revenues decreased by $490 million due to: |
|
o |
|
Energy prices decreased by $231 million reflecting an average 40% decline in
merchant energy prices. This decrease was partially offset by higher net contract
revenues of $53 million driven by lower net costs incurred in meeting obligations under
load serving contracts in the PJM market. |
|
|
o |
|
Generation decreased by $312 million due to a 35% decrease in generation in
2009 compared to 2008, driven by a 36% decrease in coal generation and a 28% decrease in
oil and gas generation. Coal generation in western New York declined 31% or 1,480,454
MWhs due to weak power prices that made the plants uneconomic to dispatch. Coal
generation at the Indian River plant declined 44% or 1,257,936 MWhs due to a combination
of weakened demand for power, low gas prices and higher cost of production from the
introduction of RGGI resulting in increased hours where the units were uneconomic to
dispatch. The Somerset plant experienced similar weakened demand and low gas prices,
with generation down 79% or 408,435 MWh. The decline in oil and gas generation is
attributable to fewer reliability run hours at the Norwalk plant and a higher
maintenance work at the Arthur Kill plant in 2009. |
|
|
|
Other revenues decreased by $42 million due to $22 million from decreased activity in
the trading of emission allowances and $17 million lower allocations of net physical gas
sales. |
|
|
|
|
Capacity revenues decreased by $12 million due to lower capacity cash flow revenue in
New York in 2009. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Risk management activities gains of $252 million were recorded for the nine months
ending September 30, 2009, compared to losses of $16 million during the same period in
2008. The $252 million gain included $22 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses and
$274 million in gains on settled transactions, or financial income, compared to $51 million
in unrealized mark-to-market gains and $67 million in financial losses during the same
period in 2008. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for
a more complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
91
Cost of Energy
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $292 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to: |
|
o |
|
Natural gas and oil costs decreased by $160 million, or 61%, due to 28% lower
generation and 60% lower average natural gas prices. |
|
|
o |
|
Coal costs decreased by $108 million, or 38%, due to lower coal generation of
36% accounting for $106 million and lower prices accounting for $2 million. |
|
|
o |
|
Fuel risk management activities gains of $37 million were recorded for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. In the first quarter 2009, all NPNS coal contracts
were discontinued and reclassified to mark-to-market accounting. The $37 million gain
included $43 million of unrealized mark-to-market gains, largely associated with forward
coal positions and $6 million in losses on settled transactions, or financial cost of
energy. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a
more complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
o |
|
Carbon emission expense increased by $15 million due to the January 1, 2009,
implementation of RGGI and the recognition of carbon compliance cost under this program. |
92
South Central Region
For a discussion of the business profile of the South Central region, see pages 29-31 of NRG
Energy, Inc.s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Selected Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change% |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change% |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
(38 |
)% |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Capacity revenue |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Risk management activities |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Contract amortization |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy (including risk
management activities) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (Loss)/Income |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
MWh sold (in thousands) |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
9,204 |
|
|
|
9,448 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
MWh generated (in thousands) |
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
7,819 |
|
|
|
8,469 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Business Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average on-peak market power
prices ($/MWh) |
|
|
29.50 |
|
|
|
84.88 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
33.00 |
|
|
|
79.14 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Cooling Degree Days, or CDDs
(a) |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
CDDs 30 year average |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
Heating Degree Days, or HDDs
(a) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
HDD 30 year average |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Climate Prediction
Center - A CDD represents the number of degrees that the mean
temperature for a particular day is above 65 degrees Fahrenheit in
each region. An HDD represents the number of degrees that the mean
temperature for a particular day is below 65 degrees Fahrenheit in
each region. The CDDs/HDDs for a period of time are calculated by
adding the CDDs/HDDs for each day during the period. |
Quarterly Results
Operating income decreased by $59 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
Operating revenues decreased by $91 million due to decreases in energy revenue and
risk management activities offset by increased capacity revenue. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $34 million due to lower purchased energy, fuel and
transmission costs, offset by higher fuel risk management activities. |
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses increased by $2 million due to higher maintenance expense
offset by lower general and administrative costs. |
93
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased by $91 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Energy revenues decreased by $55 million due to a $24 million decline in contract
revenue coupled with a decrease of $31 million in merchant energy revenues. Total MWh
sales to the regions contract customers were down 7% while the average realized price on
contract energy sales was $22.83 per MWh in 2009 compared to $29.19 per MWh in 2008. The
decline in contract energy price was driven by a $7 million decrease in fuel cost pass
through from the cooperatives. Also contributing to the decline in contract revenue was $17
million due to the expiration of a contract with a regional utility. The expiration of the
contract allowed more energy to be sold into the merchant market, but at lower average
prices resulting in a $31 million decline in revenue. Megawatt hours sold to the merchant
market increased by 18% as increased use of the regions tolled facility provided
additional energy to the merchant market while prices fell by 61% to $54.52/MWh. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities losses of $27 million were recorded for the three months
ending September 30, 2009, compared to gains of $24 million during the same period in 2008.
The $27 million loss included $25 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses and $2
million in losses on settled transactions, or financial income, compared to $28 million in
unrealized mark-to-market gains and $4 million in financial losses during the same period
in 2008. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a more
complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
|
|
|
|
Capacity revenues capacity revenue increased by $12 million due to an $11 million
increase from a new capacity agreement and a $1 million increase in capacity revenue from
the regions Rockford plants which dispatch into the PJM market. |
Cost of Energy
Cost of energy decreased by $34 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Purchased energy Total purchased energy and capacity decreased by $35 million.
Purchased energy costs decreased by $35 million reflecting a 2% decrease in MWhs purchased
and a 65% decrease in price reflecting lower fuel costs associated with energy from the
regions tolled facility and lower costs of market purchases. |
|
|
|
|
Natural gas expense decreased by $14 million reflecting an 88% decrease in gas
generation and a 61% decrease in gas prices. The regions gas facilities ran extensively
to support transmission system stability following hurricane Gustav in September 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Coal expense decreased $2 million as cost per ton was $31.94 compared to $32.46 for
the same period last year reflecting lower fuel transportation surcharges partially offset
by increased transportation contract rates. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Fuel risk management activities losses of $17 million were recorded for the three
months ending September 30, 2009. In the first quarter 2009, all NPNS coal contracts were
discontinued and reclassified into mark-to-market accounting. The $17 million loss
included $16 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses, largely associated with forward
coal positions and $1 million in losses on settled transactions, or financial cost of
energy. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a more
complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
94
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expense increased by $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance expense increased by $4 million because of work done on
river docking facility used for barge unloading and expenditures in preparation for fall
outages. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense declined by $2 million due to lower corporate
allocations as such costs are spread over a wider base following the Reliant Energy
acquisition. |
Year-to-Date Results
Operating income decreased by $101 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
|
Operating revenues decreased by $141 million due to decreases in energy revenue, risk
management activities, and other revenue. These decreases were offset by an increase in
capacity revenue. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $36 million due to lower purchased energy, fuel and
transmission costs, offset by higher fuel risk management activities. |
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses decreased by $4 million because of lower general and
administrative costs. |
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased by $141 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Energy revenues decreased by $108 million due to a $66 million decline in contract
revenue coupled with a $42 million decrease in merchant energy revenues. Contract customer
sales volumes were down 10% while the average realized price on contract energy sales was
$23.04 per MWh in 2009 compared to $28.89 per MWh in 2008. The decline in contract energy
price was driven by a $12 million decrease in fuel cost pass through to the cooperatives.
Also contributing to the decline in contract revenue was $48 million due to the expiration
of a contract with a regional utility. The expiration of the contract allowed more energy
to be sold into the merchant market, but at lower average prices resulting in a $42 million
decline in revenue. Megawatt hours sold to the merchant market increased by 41%, while
prices fell by 50% to $52.10/MWh. Increased use of the regions tolled facility provided
additional energy to the merchant market. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities losses of $46 million were recorded for the nine months
ending September 30, 2009, compared to gains of $14 million during the same period in 2008.
The $46 million loss included $55 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses offset by $9
million in gains on settled transactions, or financial income, compared to $18 million in
unrealized mark-to-market gains offset by $4 million in financial losses during the same
period in 2008. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for
a more complete description of movements in risk management activities |
|
|
|
|
Other revenue declined by $4 million due to $1 million in lower physical coal and
natural gas sales and $3 million reduction in emission sales. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Capacity revenues increased by $30 million due to a $30 million increase from new
capacity agreements with regional utilities and a $5 million increase in capacity revenue
from the regions Rockford plants which dispatch into the PJM market, offset by lower
contract capacity revenue of $5 million. |
95
Cost of Energy
Cost of energy decreased by $36 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Purchased energy decreased by $52 million while purchased capacity increased by $3
million. The lower purchased energy reflects lower fuel costs associated with the regions
tolled facility and lower market energy prices. The energy declines were offset by higher
capacity payments of $3 million on tolled facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Natural gas expense decreased by $13 million reflecting a 32% decrease in gas
generation and a 58% decrease in gas prices. The regions gas facilities ran extensively
to support transmission system stability following hurricane Gustav in September 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Transmission expense decreased by $5 million due to certain transmission line outages
between electrical power regions which limited merchant energy volumes that would attract
transmission costs as well as lower network interchange transmission costs associated with
reduced contract customer energy volumes. |
|
|
|
|
Coal expense decreased $4 million as coal generation was down 7%, offset by a 5%
increase in cost per ton. |
These decreases were offset by:
|
|
|
Fuel risk management activities losses of $33 million were recorded for the nine
months ending September 30, 2009. In the first quarter 2009, all NPNS coal contracts were
discontinued and reclassified into mark-to-market accounting. The $33 million loss
included $26 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses largely associated with forward
coal positions and $7 million in losses on settled transactions, or financial cost of
energy. Please refer to the consolidated Managements Discussion and Analysis for a more
complete description of movements in risk management activities. |
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expense decreased by $4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
General and administrative expense declined by $4 million due to lower corporate
allocations as such costs are spread over a wider base following the Reliant Energy
acquisition. |
96
West Region
For a discussion of the business profile of the West region, see pages 31-33 of NRG Energy,
Inc.s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Selected Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In millions except otherwise noted) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change% |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change% |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy revenue |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Capacity revenue |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Risk management activities |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of energy (including risk
management activities) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
MWh sold (in thousands) |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
MWh generated (in thousands) |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Business Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average on-peak market power
prices ($/MWh) |
|
|
38.78 |
|
|
|
96.72 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
37.46 |
|
|
|
91.52 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Cooling Degree Days, or CDDs
(a) |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
CDDs 30 year average |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
Heating Degree Days, or HDDs
(a) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(30 |
)% |
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
HDDs 30 year average |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Climate Prediction
Center - A CDD represents the number of degrees that the mean
temperature for a particular day is above 65 degrees Fahrenheit in
each region. An HDD represents the number of degrees that the mean
temperature for a particular day is below 65 degrees Fahrenheit in
each region. The CDDs/HDDs for a period of time are calculated by
adding the CDDs/HDDs for each day during the period. |
Quarterly Results
Operating Income
Operating income was unchanged at $13 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008.
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues of $40 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, were
unchanged compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Energy revenues increased by $3 million primarily due to a 23% increase in generation
in 2009 compared to 2008 offset by a 7% decrease in merchant energy prices. |
|
|
|
|
Capacity revenues increased by $5 million primarily due to additional resource
adequacy contract sales at El Segundo in 2009 compared to 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Other revenues increased by $1 million due to an increase in ancillary services
revenue. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities losses of $9 million were recorded during the quarter
including $6 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses and $3 million in realized losses
on settled transactions. There was no risk management activity in 2008. For further
discussion of the Companys risk management activities, see Consolidated Results of
Operations. |
97
Year-to-Date Results
Operating income decreased by $18 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to
the same period in 2008, due to decreases in capacity revenue, energy revenue, risk management
activity revenue and other revenues.
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues decreased by $17 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Capacity revenues decreased by $4 million primarily due to expiration of a two year
tolling agreement at the El Segundo facility in April 2008, which was replaced by resource
adequacy and capacity contracts at lower prices. |
|
|
|
|
Energy revenues decreased by $3 million primarily due to a 19% decrease in merchant
prices in 2009 compared to 2008; offset by a 6% increase in merchant generation in 2009
compared to 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Other revenue decreased by $4 million primarily due to lower emission allowance sales
partially offset by an increase in ancillary services revenue. |
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities realized losses of $6 million on settled transactions were
recognized during the period. There was no risk management activity in 2008. For further
discussion of the Companys risk management activities, see Consolidated Results of
Operations. |
Cost of Energy and Other Operating Expenses
Cost of energy and other operating expenses increased by $1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Cost of energy decreased by $8 million due to a 43% decline in average natural gas
prices per MMBtu. This decrease was partially offset by a 7% increase in natural gas
consumption and a $2 million increase in fuel oil expense. |
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses increased by $9 million due to higher maintenance expense
associated with a major overhaul at El Segundo and higher maintenance at Long Beach. |
98
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity Position
As of September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, NRGs liquidity, excluding collateral
received, was approximately $3.9 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, and comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Total cash |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility availability |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
Revolver Credit Facility availability |
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Total liquidity |
|
|
4,229 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
Less: Funds deposited as collateral by hedge counterparties |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
Total liquidity, excluding collateral received |
|
$ |
3,936 |
|
|
$ |
3,364 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, total liquidity, excluding collateral received,
increased by $572 million due to a higher cash balance of
$756 million, partially offset by decreased availability of
the Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility of $104 million and $96
million, respectively. Changes in cash balances are further discussed below under the heading Cash
Flow Discussion. Cash and cash equivalents and funds deposited by counterparties at September 30,
2009, were predominantly held in money market funds invested in treasury securities, treasury
repurchase agreements or government agency debt.
The line item Funds deposited by counterparties represents the amounts that are held by NRG
as a result of collateral posting obligations from our counterparties due to positions in our
hedging program. These amounts are segregated into separate accounts that are not contractually
restricted but, based on the Companys intention, are not available for
the payment of NRGs general corporate obligations. Depending on market fluctuation and the
settlement of the underlying contracts, the Company will refund this collateral to the
counterparties pursuant to the terms and conditions of the underlying trades. Since collateral
requirements fluctuate daily and the Company cannot predict if any collateral will be held for more
than twelve months, the funds deposited by counterparties are classified as a current asset on the
Companys balance sheet, with an offsetting liability for this cash collateral received within
current liabilities. The decrease in these amounts from December 31, 2008 was due to cash
collateral moved from NRG to Merrill Lynch in connection with novations under the CSRA (see Note 4,
Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q), offset by an increase of in-the-money positions as a
result of decreasing forward prices.
Management believes that the Companys liquidity position and cash flows from operations will
be adequate to finance operating and maintenance capital expenditures, to fund dividends to NRGs
preferred shareholders and other liquidity commitments. Management continues to regularly monitor
the Companys ability to finance the needs of its operating, financing and investing activity in a
manner consistent with its intention to maintain a net debt to capital ratio in the range of
45-60%.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
The principal sources of liquidity for NRGs future operating and capital expenditures are
expected to be derived from new and existing financing arrangements, asset sales, existing cash on
hand and cash flows from operations.
Financing Arrangements
Senior Credit Facility
As of September 30, 2009, NRG had a Senior Credit Facility which is comprised of a senior
first priority secured term loan, or the Term Loan Facility, a $1.0 billion senior first priority
secured revolving credit facility, or the Revolving Credit Facility, and a $1.3 billion senior
first priority secured synthetic letter of credit facility, or the Synthetic Letter of Credit
Facility. The Senior Credit Facility was last amended on June 8, 2007. On July 23, 2009, Moodys
upgraded the Senior Credit Facility to Baa3 due to the underlying value that the capital structure
provides to secured creditors. As of September 30, 2009, NRG had issued $544 million of letters of
credit under the Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility, leaving $756 million available for future
issuances. Under the Revolving Credit Facility, as of September 30, 2009, NRG had issued a letter
of credit of $96 million of which $59 million supports the tax exempt bonds issued by Dunkirk Power
LLC as described in Note 8, Long-Term Debt, to this Form 10-Q.
99
2019 Senior Notes
On June 5, 2009, NRG completed the issuance of $700 million aggregate principal amount of 8.5%
Senior Notes due 2019, or 2019 Senior Notes as described in Note 8, Long-Term Debt, to this Form
10-Q. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds of $678 million to
facilitate the early termination of NRGs obligations pursuant
to the CSRA Amendment, which became effective October 5, 2009. Net proceeds in
excess of this amount are available for general corporate purposes.
See further discussion of the CSRA Amendment in Note 20, Subsequent
Event, to this Form 10-Q.
Merrill Lynch Credit Sleeve Facility
As of September 30, 2009, Merrill Lynch, through the CSRA with NRG, provided the Company with
$163 million in credit support (includes cash collateral posted by counterparties and Reliant Energy as an offset to exposure)
that significantly reduced the liquidity requirements and
substantially eliminated collateral postings for Reliant Energy. See discussion in Note 4,
Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, regarding the CSRA as a result of the acquisition of
Reliant Energy on May 1, 2009. Effective October 5, 2009,
the Company executed the CSRA Amendment. In connection with this transaction, the Company
posted $366 million of cash collateral to Merrill Lynch and other
counterparties,
returned $53 million of counterparty collateral, issued $206 million
of letters of credit, and received
$45 million of counterparty collateral. In addition, Merrill Lynch returned
$250 million of previously posted cash collateral, and released liens on $322 million
of unrestricted cash held by Reliant Energy. See further discussion of the
CSRA Amendment in Note 20, Subsequent
Event, to this Form 10-Q.
TANE Facility
On February 24, 2009, NINA executed an EPC agreement with TANE, which specifies the terms
under which STP Units 3 and 4 will be constructed. Concurrent with the execution of the EPC
agreement, NINA and TANE entered into the TANE Facility wherein TANE has committed up to $500
million to finance purchases of long-lead materials and equipment for the construction of STP Units
3 and 4. The TANE Facility matures on February 24, 2012, subject to two renewal periods, and
provides for customary events of default, which include, among others: nonpayment of principal or
interest; default under other indebtedness; the rendering of judgments; and certain events of
bankruptcy or insolvency. Outstanding borrowings will accrue interest at LIBOR plus 3%, subject to
a ratings grid, and are secured by substantially all of the assets of and membership interests in
NINA and its subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2009, no amounts had been borrowed under the TANE
Facility.
Dunkirk Power LLC Tax-Exempt Bonds
On April 15, 2009, NRG executed a $59 million tax-exempt bond financing through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Dunkirk Power LLC. The bonds were issued by the County of Chautauqua Industrial
Development Agency and will be used for construction of emission control equipment on the Dunkirk
Generating Station in Dunkirk, NY. The bonds initially bear weekly interest based on the
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, or SIFMA, rate, have a maturity date of
April 1, 2042, and are enhanced by a letter of credit under the Companys Revolving Credit Facility
covering amounts drawn on the facility. The proceeds received through September 30, 2009, were $38
million with the remaining balance being released over time as construction costs are paid.
GenConn Energy LLC related financings
In April 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NRG executed an equity bridge loan facility, or
EBL, in the amount of $121.5 million from a syndicate of banks. The purpose of the EBL is to fund
the Companys proportionate share of the project construction costs required to be contributed into
GenConn Energy LLC, or GenConn, a 50% equity method investment of the Company. The EBL, which is
fully collateralized with a letter of credit issued under the Companys Synthetic Letter of Credit
Facility covering amounts drawn on the facility, will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2% on
drawn amounts. The EBL will mature on the earlier of the commercial operations date of the
Middletown project or July 26, 2011. The EBL also requires mandatory prepayment of the portion of
the loan utilized to pay costs of the Devon project, of approximately $56 million, on the earlier
of Devons commercial operations date or January 27, 2011. The proceeds of the EBL received
through September 30, 2009, were $88 million and the remaining amounts will be drawn as necessary
to fund construction costs.
In April 2009, GenConn secured financing for 50% of the Devon and Middletown project
construction costs through a 7-year term loan facility, and also entered into a 5-year revolving
working capital loan and letter of credit facility, which collectively with the term loan is
referred to as the GenConn Facility. The aggregate credit amount secured under the GenConn
Facility, which is non-recourse to NRG, is $291 million, including $48 million for the revolving
facility. In August 2009, GenConn began to draw under the GenConn Facility to cover costs related
to the Devon project and as of September 30, 2009, has drawn $19 million.
100
First and Second Lien Structure
NRG has granted first and second liens to certain counterparties on substantially all of the
Companys assets. NRG uses the first and second lien structure to reduce the amount of cash
collateral and letters of credit that it would otherwise be required to post from time to time to
support its obligations under out-of-money hedge agreements for forward sales of power or MWh
equivalents. To the extent that the underlying hedge positions for a counterparty are in-the-money
to NRG, the counterparty would have no claim under the lien program. The lien program limits the
volume that can be hedged, not the value of underlying out-of-money positions. The first lien
program does not require NRG to post collateral above any threshold amount of exposure. Within the
first and second lien structure, the Company can hedge up to 80% of its baseload capacity and 10%
of its non-baseload assets with these counterparties for the first 60 months and then declining
thereafter. Net exposure to a counterparty on all trades must be positively correlated to the
price of the relevant commodity for the first lien to be available to that counterparty. The first
and second lien structure is not subject to unwind or termination upon a ratings downgrade of a
counterparty or NRG and has no stated maturity date.
The Companys lien counterparties may have a claim on its assets to the extent market prices
exceed the hedged price. As of September 30, 2009, and October 22, 2009, all hedges under the
first and second liens were in-the-money on a counterparty aggregate basis.
The following table summarizes the amount of MWs hedged against the Companys baseload assets
and as a percentage relative to the Companys forecasted baseload capacity under the first and
second lien structure as of October 22, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent Net Sales Secured by First and Second Lien Structure (a) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
In MW (b) |
|
|
3,617 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
As a percentage of total forecasted baseload capacity (c) |
|
|
52% |
|
|
|
58% |
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
24% |
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Equivalent Net Sales include natural gas swaps converted using a weighted average heat rate by region. |
(b) |
|
2009 MW value consists of November through December positions only. |
(c) |
|
Forecasted baseload capacity under the first and second lien structure represents 80% of the Companys total baseload assets. |
Asset Sales Disposition of MIBRAG Investment
MIBRAG On June 10, 2009, NRG completed the sale of its 50% ownership interest in Mibrag B.V.
to a consortium of Severoćeské doly Chomutov, a member of the CEZ Group, and J&T Group. Mibrag
B.V.s principal holding is MIBRAG, which is jointly owned by NRG and URS Corporation. As part of
the transaction, URS Corporation also entered into an agreement to sell its 50% stake in MIBRAG.
For its share, NRG received EUR 203 million ($284 million at an exchange rate of 1.40
U.S.$/EUR), net of transaction costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NRG
recognized a pre-tax gain of $128 million. Prior to completion of the sale, NRG continued to
record its share of MIBRAGs operations to Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.
In connection with the transaction, NRG entered into a foreign currency forward contract to
hedge the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the sale proceeds. The foreign currency forward
contract had a fixed exchange rate of 1.277 and required NRG to deliver EUR 200 million in exchange
for $255 million on June 15, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NRG recorded an
exchange loss of $24 million on the contract within Other (loss)/income, net.
USES OF FUNDS
The Companys requirements for liquidity and capital resources, other than for operating its
facilities, can generally be categorized by the following: (i) commercial operations activities;
(ii) debt service obligations; (iii) capital expenditures including RepoweringNRG and
environmental; and (iv) corporate financial transactions including return of capital to
shareholders.
Commercial Operations
NRGs commercial operations activities require a significant amount of liquidity and capital
resources. These liquidity requirements are primarily driven by: (i) margin and collateral posted
with counterparties; (ii) initial collateral required to establish trading relationships; (iii)
timing of disbursements and receipts (i.e., buying fuel before receiving energy revenues); and (iv)
initial collateral for large structured transactions. As of September 30, 2009, commercial
operations had total cash collateral outstanding of $222 million, and $345 million outstanding in
letters of credit to third parties primarily to support its economic hedging activities. As of
September 30, 2009, total collateral held from counterparties was $293 million and $19 million of
letters of credit. These collateral amounts do not include collateral postings by Merrill Lynch
under the CSRA.
101
Upon execution of
the CSRA Amendment, effective October 5, 2009,
the Company is required to
post collateral for any net liability derivatives, and other static margin associated
with supply for Reliant Energy.
Debt Service Obligations
NRG must annually offer a portion of its excess cash flow (as defined in the Senior Credit
Facility) to its first lien lenders under the Term Loan Facility. The percentage of excess cash
flow offered to these lenders is dependent upon the Companys consolidated leverage ratio (as
defined in the Senior Credit Facility) at the end of the preceding year. Of the amount offered,
the first lien lenders must accept 50% while the remaining 50% may either be accepted or rejected
at the lenders option. In March 2009, NRG made and the lenders accepted a repayment of
approximately $197 million for the mandatory annual offer relating to 2008.
As of September 30, 2009, NRG had issued approximately $5.4 billion in aggregate principal
amount of unsecured high yield notes, or Senior Notes, had approximately $2.4 billion in principal
amount outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, and had issued $544 million of letters of credit
under the Companys $1.3 billion Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility and $96 million of letters of
credit under the Companys Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility matures on
February 2, 2011, and the Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility matures on February 1, 2013.
As of September 30, 2009, the Companys CSF I and CSF II subsidiaries had outstanding notes
and preferred interests classified as debt that matured in two tranches: $143 million for CSF II in
October 2009, plus accrued interest and the balance of $190 million for CSF I in June 2010, plus
accrued interest. On October 9, 2009, NRG commenced the process of unwinding the CSF II Debt,
making a $181.4 million capital contribution to a CSF II cash account, effectively restricting the
cash for the benefit of CS. On October 13, 2009, CS began the process of unwinding their hedges in
connection with the CSF II structure, which they are required to complete by November 24, 2009.
Once complete, CS is scheduled to return 5,400,000 shares of NRG common stock borrowed under the
Share Lending Agreements, and release 9,528,930 common shares held as collateral for the CSF II
Debt, and the Company will remit payment to CS of the $181.4 million outstanding principal and
interest. The CSF II Debt contains an embedded derivative feature, or CFS II CAGR, which requires
NRG to pay CS at maturity, either in cash or stock at NRGs option, the excess of NRGs then
current stock price over a Threshold Price of $40.80 per share. On November 24, 2009, the CSF II
CAGR will also be evaluated to determine whether any payment is due to CS, at which point the CSF
II CAGR will expire.
Capital Expenditures
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Companys capital expenditures, including
accruals, were approximately $556 million, of which $272 million was related to RepoweringNRG
projects. The following table summarizes the Companys capital expenditures for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, and the estimated capital expenditure and repowering investments forecast
for the remainder of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Maintenance |
|
Environmental |
|
Repowering |
|
Total |
|
Northeast |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
Texas |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
South Central |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
West |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Reliant Energy |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Nuclear development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
Estimated capital expenditures for the remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
RepoweringNRG capital expenditures and investments RepoweringNRG project capital
expenditures consisted of approximately $104 million related to the Companys Langford wind farm
project which is currently under construction. In addition, the Companys RepoweringNRG capital
expenditures included $29 million for the construction of Cedar Bayou Unit 4 in Texas and $130
million for the development of STP Units 3 and 4 in Texas.
The Companys estimated repowering capital expenditures for the remainder of 2009 are expected
to be approximately $73 million. Of this amount, $58 million is estimated for STP Units 3 and 4
without giving effect to any partner contributions or potential equity sell down and approximately
$10 million to complete the construction of the Langford wind farm.
102
Major maintenance and environmental capital expenditures The Companys baghouse projects at
western New York facilities resulted in environmental capital expenditures of $104 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. In addition, the Companys maintenance capital expenditures
were $165 million, of which $112 million was primarily related to the Texas regions assets which
included approximately $38 million in nuclear fuel expenditures related STP units 1 and 2.
NRG anticipates funding its maintenance capital projects primarily with funds generated from
operating activities. In addition, on April 15, 2009, the Company executed a $59 million
tax-exempt bond financing through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dunkirk Power LLC, with the bonds
issued by the County of Chautauqua Industrial Development Agency. These funds are expected to fund
environmental capital expenditures at the Dunkirk Generating facility.
Loans to affiliates The Company had funded approximately $48 million in interest bearing
loans to GenConn Energy LLC, a 50/50 joint venture vehicle of NRG and the United Illuminating
Company as part of the Devon and Middletown plant repowering projects prior to the closing of the
EBL and GenConn Facility. As of September 30, 2009, these loans were repaid with proceeds from the EBL
financing. Subsequent to the financing, the equity portion of construction costs for GenConn are
funded through the EBLs of NRG Connecticut Peaking and United Illuminating. These funds are made
available to GenConn through convertible interest bearing promissory notes that convert to equity
upon repayment of the EBL loans by NRG Connecticut Peaking and United Illuminating. As of
September 30, 2009, there was $88 million was outstanding
under the loan from NRG Connecticut Peaking.
Environmental Capital Expenditures
Based on current rules, technology and plans, NRG has estimated that environmental capital
expenditures from 2010 through 2013 to meet NRGs environmental commitments will be approximately
$900 million and are primarily associated with controls on the Companys Big Cajun and Indian River
facilities. These capital expenditures, in general, are related to installation of particulate,
SO2, NOx, and mercury controls to comply with federal and state air quality
rules and consent orders, as well as installation of Best Technology Available under the Phase II
316(b) Rule. NRG continues to explore cost effective alternatives that can achieve desired
results. This estimate reflects anticipated schedules and controls related to CAIR, MACT for
mercury, and the Phase II 316(b) rule which are under remand to the U.S. EPA and, as such, the full
impact on the scope and timing of environmental retrofits from any new or revised regulations
cannot be determined at this time.
Capital Allocation
In addition to the aforementioned planned investments in maintenance and environmental capital
expenditures and RepoweringNRG in 2009, and the 2009 repayment of Term Loan Facility debt to the
first lien lenders, the Companys Capital Allocation Plan includes the completion of the 2008
Capital Allocation Plan with the planned purchase of $30 million of common stock as well as the
purchase of an additional $300 million in common stock under the previously announced 2009 Capital
Allocation Plan. In July 2009, as part of the Companys 2009 Capital Allocation Program, the Board
of Directors approved an increase to the Companys previously authorized common share repurchases
under its capital allocation plan from the existing $330 million to $500 million. The Companys
repurchases during the period ended September 30, 2009, were approximately $250 million. NRG
intends to complete its $500 million of share repurchases by the end of 2009, subject to market
prices, financial restrictions under the Companys debt facilities, and as permitted by securities
laws.
Preferred Stock Dividend Payments
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NRG paid approximately $6 million, $13 million,
and $8 million in dividend payments to holders of the Companys 5.75%, 4%, and 3.625% Preferred
Stock, respectively. On March 16, 2009, the outstanding shares of the 5.75% Preferred Stock
converted into common stock and, as a result, there will be no further dividends paid with respect
to this series of preferred stock.
Benefit Plans Obligations
As of September 30, 2009, NRG contributed $22 million towards its three defined benefit
pension plans to meet the Companys 2009 benefit obligation. The Companys expected contribution
to the plans is $5 million during the remainder of 2009. The total 2009 planned contribution of
$27 million is a decrease of $33 million from the expected contributions as disclosed in Part II,
Item 7 - Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Liquidity and Capital Resources, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This decrease in the 2009 expected contributions is due to the adoption by the
Company in March 2009 of the new funding method options now available. The new methods were made
allowable under new IRS guidance on the application of recent Congressional legislation on funding
requirements.
103
Reliant Energy Customer Deposits
Changes in the Texas law will require customer deposits and advance payments to be held in a
segregated cash account on or before May 21, 2010. The amount of deposits subject to segregation
at September 30, 2009, was approximately $56 million.
Cash Flow Discussion
The following table reflects the changes in cash flows for the comparative years; all cash
flow categories include the cash flows from both continuing operations and discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
$ |
1,086 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
(395 |
) |
Net cash provided by/(used by) financing activities |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities
increased by $194 million compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Cash generated by Reliant Energy Reliant Energy
contributed approximately $370 million to the Companys
consolidated cash flow from operations in 2009, primarily reflecting
$807 million in pre-tax income since the May 1, 2009, acquisition
date. This contribution from pre-tax income was offset by $250
million in collateral postings to satisfy obligations under the CSRA.
In addition, a seasonal increase in accounts receivable of $174
million and a $68 million decrease in accrued expenses and other
current liabilities also negatively impacted Reliant Energys
cash flow from operations. |
|
|
|
|
Lower cash flows from
Wholesale Power Generation The Companys cash flow
from operation excluding Reliant Energy was lower by approximately
$176 million in 2009 compared to 2008, as drops in generation and
power prices impacted results from operation. In addition, $15
million more cash was used for working capital in 2009 compared to
2008, as higher coal inventory balances were partially offset by $35
million lower pension contributions. The reductions to cash flows
were partially offset by the return of collateral deposits from the
settlement of gas options during the first quarter of 2009 which
resulted in a $97 million net inflow of cash. |
Net Cash Used By Investing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash used in investing activities increased
by $395 million compared to the same period in 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Acquisition of Reliant Energy During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
Company paid $356 million, net of cash acquired of $6 million, towards its acquisition of
Reliant Energy. This amount was comprised of approximately $288 million paid at closing, as well as
$63 million paid on June 11, 2009, and $11 million paid on July 24, 2009, as initial
remittances of the acquired working capital to RRI. |
|
|
|
|
Trading of emission allowances Net purchases and sales of emission allowances resulted
in a decrease in cash of $117 million for 2009 as compared to 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of equity method investment and discontinued operations Net
proceeds from investing activities increased by $43 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 due
to the sale of MIBRAG in June 2009 for net proceeds of $284 and the sale of ITISA for
proceeds, net of divested cash, of $241 million in the first half of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures and loans to affiliates NRGs capital expenditures decreased by
$89 million due to decreased spending on RepoweringNRG projects. Loans to affiliates
increased by $37 million in 2009 as compared to 2008. |
104
Net Cash Provided By/Used By Financing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net
cash provided by financing
activities increased by $646 million compared to 2008, due to:
|
|
|
Issuance of debt During 2009, the Company received $25 million from the draw under the
Reliant Energy working capital facility with Merrill Lynch, $38 million from the Dunkirk
bonds, $88 million in GenConn financings and $688 million in gross proceeds from the 2019
Senior Notes. During 2008, the Company received $20 million in proceeds from borrowings. |
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs During 2009, the Company paid deferred financing costs of $15
million related to the Reliant Energy CSRA, $10 million related to the 2019 Senior Notes,
and $2 million related to the Dunkirk bonds and the Reliant Energy working capital
facility. |
|
|
|
|
Term Loan Facility debt payment In 2009, the Company paid down $221 million of its
Term Loan Facility, including the payment of excess cash flow, as discussed above under
Debt Service Obligations. The Company paid down $166 million of its Term Loan Facility
during 2008 which resulted in a net cash decrease of $55 million. |
|
|
|
|
Share repurchase During 2009, the Company repurchased common stock of $250 million as
compared to $185 million in 2008, which resulted in a net cash decrease of $65 million. |
|
|
|
|
Net payments to settle acquired derivatives that include financing elements In 2009,
the Company paid a net of $140 million for the settlement of gas swaps related to Reliant
Energy and Texas Genco compared to a payment of $49 million for 2008 related to Texas Genco
for a net decrease in cash of $91 million. |
|
|
|
|
Payment for CSF I CAGR settlement In August 2008, the Company paid $45 million to CS
for the benefit of CSF I to early settle the embedded derivative in the Companys CSF I
notes and preferred interests. |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options During 2009, the Company received proceeds of $1 million
from the exercise of stock options as compared to $8 million for 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, dividends
payments on preferred stock decreased by $14 million as compared to the same period in 2008
due to the conversion of the 5.75% preferred stock in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and for the period ended September 30, 2009. |
NOLs, Deferred Tax Assets and Uncertain Tax Position Implications, under ASC-740, Income Taxes, or
ASC 740
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had generated total domestic pre-tax book income of
$1,371 million and foreign continuing pre-tax book income of $151 million. The Company has net
operating losses for tax return purposes that have been classified as capital loss carryforwards
for financial statement purposes and for which a full valuation allowance has been established. In
addition, NRG has cumulative foreign NOL carryforwards of $290 million, of which $83 million will
expire starting in 2011 through 2018 and of which $207 million do not have an expiration date. As
a result of the Companys tax position, and based on current forecasts, the Company anticipates
income tax payments of up to $75 million during 2009.
However, as the position remains uncertain, the Company has recorded a non-current tax
liability of $688 million. The $688 million non-current tax liability for unrecognized tax
benefits is due to taxable earnings for which there are no NOLs available to offset for financial
statement purposes.
The Company continues to be under examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
105
New and On-going Company Initiatives
FORNRG Update
Beginning in January 2009, the Company transitioned to FORNRG 2.0 to target an incremental 100
basis point improvement to the Companys ROIC by 2012. The initial targets for FORNRG 2.0 were
based upon improvements in the Companys ROIC as measured by increased cash flow. The economic
goals of FORNRG 2.0 will focus on: (i) revenue enhancement; (ii) cost savings; and (iii) asset
optimization, including reducing excess working capital and other assets. The FORNRG 2.0 program
will measure its progress towards the FORNRG 2.0 goals by using the Companys 2008 financial
results as a baseline, while plant performance calculations will be based upon the appropriate
historic baselines.
The 2009 FORNRG goal is a 20 basis point improvement in ROIC which corresponds to
approximately $30 million in cash flow. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has exceeded its
2009 goal with a 29.5 basis point improvement in ROIC, which is equivalent to approximately $44
million in cash flows. The performance of the plants coupled with strategic projects undertaken by
corporate functions is evidenced in the overall corporate performance.
Nuclear Innovation North America
NINA is an NRG subsidiary focused on marketing, siting, developing, financing and investing in
new advanced design nuclear projects in select markets across North America, including the planned
STP Units 3 and 4 that NRG is developing on a 50/50 basis with City of San Antonios agent City
Public Service Board of San Antonio, or CPS Energy, at the STP nuclear power station site. TANE, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Toshiba Corporation, owns a non-controlling interest in NINA. On May 1,
2009, TANE made the second of its scheduled $50 million contributions to NINA.
The Department of Energy, or DOE, has confirmed that STP Units 3 and 4 is one of four projects
selected for further due diligence and negotiation leading to a conditional commitment under the
DOE loan guarantee program. NINA will now begin discussions with the DOE on the specific terms and
amount to be loaned for the project. NRG believes DOE loan guarantee support is critical to new
nuclear development projects. In addition to U.S. loan guarantees, NINA is seeking to diversify
financing by actively pursuing additional loan guarantees through the Japanese government. Due
diligence by Japanese financing agencies is in progress and represents an important step in
Japanese loan support.
On February 24, 2009, NINA executed an EPC agreement with TANE to build the STP expansion.
The EPC agreement is structured so as to assure that the new plant is constructed on time, on
budget and to exacting standards. In accordance with the EPC agreement, TANE will provide
engineering and development services prior to Full Notice to Proceed, or FNTP, on a time and
materials basis. Upon the NSR approval of the STP Units 3 and 4 combined license and the owners
decision to issue the FNTP, the EPC converts to a lump-sum turnkey contract with customary
warranties, performance and schedule guarantees, and liquidated damage provisions. TANEs
obligations are backed by a guaranty from its ultimate parent, the Toshiba Corporation. Concurrent
with the execution of the EPC agreement, NINA entered into a $500 million credit facility with TANE
to finance the cost of material and equipment commitments prior to FNTP for STP Units 3 and 4.
In light of the progress made by the project in terms of regulatory schedule, DOE loan
guarantee process, and the conclusion of the EPC agreement, NINA has initiated a partial sell down
process in the STP expansion. NINA has Memorandums of Understanding with a mix of investment grade
rated load serving entities and industrial customers for all offtake from NINAs anticipated 40%
ownership interest in STP Units 3 and 4s generation. Currently, NINA and CPS Energy each own 50%
of the 2,700 megawatt planned expansion of the South Texas Project nuclear facility. After the
sell down, it is expected that each would own 40% and a new owner(s) would have a 20% equity
interest although other ownership outcomes may arise. The ownership interests of STP Units 1 and 2
(NRG 44%, CPS Energy 40% and Austin Energy 16%) are not affected by this proposed sale.
A request to intervene in the Combined License, or COL, proceeding was submitted by several
individuals and public interest groups on April 21, 2009. An Atomic Licensing and Safety Board, or
Licensing Board, heard oral arguments on the Petitioners request for a hearing on June 23, 2009,
and June 24, 2009, in Bay City, Texas. On August 27, 2009, and September 29, 2009, the Licensing
Board of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or NRC, issued its decision on the
petition to intervene in the COL proceeding for STP Units 3 and 4. Of the 28 contentions submitted
by the Petitioners, the Licensing Board rejected 23 and admitted a portion of five contentions.
The Licensing Boards decision to admit a contention represents a procedural ruling only. The
ruling does not reflect any decision on the merits of any admitted contention by the Licensing
Board. NINA will continue to defend its position against the admitted contentions in future
hearings.
106
On October 22, 2009, NINA amended its revolving credit agreement with the Royal Bank of
Scotland PLC, or RBS. The amended agreement allows for NINA to have borrowings outstanding on both
its RBS facility and its TANE facility. Under the new agreement NINA will be required to repay all
outstanding balances on the RBS facility by March 31, 2010.
Agreement with eSolar
On June 1, 2009, NRG completed an agreement with eSolar, a leading provider of modular,
scalable solar thermal power technology, to acquire the development rights for
solar thermal power plants at sites in California and the Southwest.
The agreement currently contemplates up to 465 MW of solar thermal
development. The first plant is anticipated
to begin producing electricity as early as 2011, subject to certain technology demonstration
milestones being pursued by eSolar and successful financial closing in 2010. At the closing with
eSolar, NRG invested approximately $5 million for an equity interest in eSolar and $5 million for
deposits and land purchase options associated with development rights for three projects on sites
in south central California and the Southwest U.S. as well as a portfolio of PPAs to develop,
build, own and operate up to 10 eSolar modular solar generating units at these sites. These
development assets will use eSolars concentrating solar power, or CSP, technology to sell
renewable electricity under contracted PPAs with local utilities.
NRG has three projects in various stages of development: NRG New Mexico SunTower, Alpine
SunTower and Desert View SunTower. While each of these projects has an anticipated commercial
operation date, the development of these projects are subject to certain conditions and milestones
which may effect the Companys decision to pursue further development of these projects.
RepoweringNRG Update
Currently, NRG has several projects in varying stages of development that include the
following: a solar project with the City of Houston, a biomass project at the Montville Generating
Station, a new generating unit at the Limestone power station and the repowering of Big Cajun I,
Encina and El Segundo sites. The following is a summary of repowering projects that are under
construction. In addition, NRG continues to participate in active bids in response to requests for
proposals in markets in which it operates.
Plants Completed and Operating
Cedar Bayou Generating Station On June 24, 2009, NRG and Optim Energy, LLC, or Optim Energy,
completed construction and began commercial operation of a new natural gas-fueled combined cycle
generating plant at NRGs Cedar Bayou Generating Station in Chambers County, Texas. NRG and Optim
Energy have a 50/50 undivided interest basis in the 550 MW generating plant. NRG is the operator
of the plant and Optim Energy is acting as energy manager for Cedar Bayou unit 4. Cedar Bayou unit
4 is providing the Company a net capacity of 275 MW given NRGs 50% ownership.
Plants under Construction
GenConn Energy LLC In a procurement process conducted by the Department of Public Utility
Control, or DPUC, and finalized in 2008, GenConn Energy, a 50/50 joint venture of NRG and The
United Illuminating Company, secured contracts in 2008 with Connecticut Light & Power, or CL&P, for
the construction and operation of two 200 MW peaking facilities, at NRGs Devon and Middletown
sites in Connecticut. The contracts, which are structured as contracts for differences for the
operation of the new power plants, have a 30-year term and call for commercial operation of the
Devon project by June 1, 2010, and the Middletown project by June 1, 2011. GenConn has secured all
state permits required for the projects and has entered into contracts for engineering,
construction and procurement of the eight GE LM6000 combustion turbines required for the projects.
Construction has begun at the Devon facility while site demolition has begun at the Middletown
location.
On April 27, 2009, GenConn Energy closed on $534 million of project financing related to these
projects. The project financing includes a seven-year project backed term loan and a five year
working capital facility which together total $291 million. In addition, NRG and United
Illuminating have each closed an equity bridge loan of $121.5 million, which together total $243
million. NRG is funding its share of costs related to these projects via year to date draw downs
on the equity bridge loan of $88 million as of September 30, 2009. In August 2009, GenConn began
to draw on the project financing facility to cover costs related to the Devon project.
107
Langford Wind Project On March 16, 2009,
NRG, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Padoma
Wind Power LLC, began construction on a 150 MW wind farm located in Tom Green, Irion, and
Schleicher Counties, Texas. The Langford Wind Project will utilize 100 General Electric 1.5 MW
wind turbines. The project is scheduled to reach commercial operation by the end of 2009 and is
expected to be eligible to qualify for a cash grant from the Department of Treasury.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Obligations under Certain Guarantee Contracts
NRG and certain of its subsidiaries enter into guarantee arrangements in the normal course of
business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties. These arrangements include
financial and performance guarantees, stand-by letters of credit, debt guarantees, surety bonds and
indemnifications. See Note 18, Guarantees, to this Form 10-Q for additional discussion.
See discussion in Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q, regarding the CSRA as a
result of the acquisition of Reliant Energy on May 1, 2009.
Retained or Contingent Interests
NRG does not have any material retained or contingent interests in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity.
Derivative Instrument Obligations
The Companys 3.625% Preferred Stock includes a feature which is considered an embedded
derivative per ASC 815. Although it is considered an embedded derivative, it is exempt from
derivative accounting as it is excluded from the scope pursuant to ASC 815. As of September 30,
2009, based on the Companys stock price, the embedded derivative was out-of-the-money and had no
redemption value.
The Companys unrestricted wholly-owned subsidiary, CSF II, has outstanding notes and
preferred interests that contain a feature considered an embedded derivative as defined in ASC 815.
Although it is considered a derivative, it is exempt from derivative accounting as it is excluded
from the scope of ASC 815. As of September 30, 2009, based on the Companys stock price, the CSF
II embedded derivative was out-of-the-money and had no redemption value.
Obligations Arising Out of a Variable Interest in an Unconsolidated Entity
Variable Interest in Equity Investments As of September 30, 2009, NRG has several
investments with an ownership interest percentage of 50% or less in energy and energy-related
entities that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. One of these investments,
GenConn, is a variable interest entity for which NRG is not the primary beneficiary.
NRGs pro-rata share of non-recourse debt held by unconsolidated affiliates was approximately
$77 million as of September 30, 2009. This indebtedness may restrict the ability of these
subsidiaries to issue dividends or distributions to NRG.
Letter of Credit Facilities The Companys $1.3 billion Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility
is unfunded by NRG and is secured by a $1.3 billion cash deposit at Deutsche Bank AG, New York
Branch that was funded using proceeds from the Term Loan Facility investors who participated in the
facility syndication. Under the Synthetic Letter of Credit Facility, NRG is allowed to issue
letters of credit for general corporate purposes including posting collateral to support the
Companys commercial operations activities.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
NRG has a variety of contractual obligations and other commercial commitments that represent
prospective cash requirements in addition to the Companys capital expenditure programs, as
disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K. Also see Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, to the
condensed consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of new commitments
and contingencies that also include contractual obligations and commercial commitments that
occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
108
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
NRGs discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based
upon the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
and related disclosures in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP,
requires the application of appropriate technical accounting rules and guidance as well as the use
of estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The application of these
policies necessarily involves judgments regarding future events, including the likelihood of
success of particular projects and legal and regulatory challenges. These judgments, in and of
themselves, could materially affect the financial statements and disclosures based on varying
assumptions, which may be appropriate to use. In addition, the financial and operating environment
may also have a significant effect, not only on the operation of the business, but on the results
reported through the application of accounting measures used in preparing the financial statements
and related disclosures, even if the nature of the accounting policies have not changed.
On an ongoing basis, NRG evaluates these estimates, utilizing historic experience,
consultation with experts and other methods the Company considers reasonable. In any event, actual
results may differ substantially from the Companys estimates. Effects on the Companys business,
financial position or results of operations resulting from revisions to these estimates are
recorded in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
Critical accounting policies and estimates are the accounting policies that are most important
to the portrayal of NRGs financial condition and results of operations and require managements
most difficult, subjective or complex judgment. NRGs critical accounting policies include revenue
recognition and derivative accounting, income taxes and valuation allowance for deferred taxes,
evaluation of assets for impairment and other than temporary decline in value, goodwill and other
intangible assets, and contingencies.
In connection with the Reliant Energy acquisition, the Company will record additional
intangible assets. See Note 4, Business Acquisition, to this Form 10-Q. In addition, accrued
unbilled revenues related to the Reliant Energy segment are critical accounting estimates as
volumes are not precisely known at the end of each reporting period and the revenue amounts are
material. Accrued unbilled revenues were $321 million as of September 30, 2009, which represents
5% of the Companys consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 11% of
Reliant Energys revenues for the period ended September 30, 2009. Accrued unbilled revenues are
based on Reliant Energys estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter reading
provided by the independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Volume estimates
are based on daily forecasted volumes and estimated customer usage by class. Unbilled revenues are
calculated by multiplying these volume estimates by the applicable rate by customer class.
Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.
109
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
NRG is exposed to several market risks in the Companys normal business activities. Market
risk is the potential loss that may result from market changes associated with the Companys
merchant power generation or with an existing or forecasted financial or commodity transaction.
The types of market risks the Company is exposed to are commodity price risk, interest rate risk,
liquidity risk, credit risk, and currency exchange risk. In order to manage these risks, the
Company uses various fixed-price forward purchase and sales contracts, futures and option contracts
traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange, and swaps and options traded in the over-the-counter
financial markets to:
|
|
|
Manage and hedge fixed-price purchase and sales commitments; |
|
|
|
|
Manage and hedge exposure to variable rate debt obligations; |
|
|
|
|
Reduce exposure to the volatility of cash market prices; and |
|
|
|
|
Hedge fuel requirements for the Companys generating facilities. |
Commodity Price Risk
Commodity price risks result from exposures to changes in spot prices, forward prices,
volatilities, and correlations between various commodities, such as natural gas, electricity, coal,
oil, and emissions credits. A number of factors influence the level and volatility of prices for
energy commodities and related derivative products. These factors include:
|
|
|
Seasonal, daily and hourly changes in demand; |
|
|
|
|
Extreme peak demands due to weather conditions; |
|
|
|
|
Available supply resources; |
|
|
|
|
Transportation availability and reliability within and between regions; and |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the nature and extent of federal and state regulations. |
As a result of the acquisition of Reliant Energy, NRGs portfolio consists of generation
assets and full requirement load serving obligations. NRG manages the commodity price risk of the
Companys merchant generation operations and load serving obligations by entering into various
derivative or non-derivative instruments to hedge the variability in future cash flows from
forecasted sales and purchases of electricity and fuel. These instruments include forwards,
futures, swaps, and option contracts traded on various exchanges, such as New York Mercantile
Exchange, or NYMEX, Intercontinental Exchange, or ICE, and Chicago Climate Exchange, or CCX, as
well as over-the-counter financial markets. The portion of forecasted transactions hedged may vary
based upon managements assessment of market, weather, operations and other factors.
While some of the contracts the Company uses to manage risk represent commodities or
instruments for which prices are available from external sources, other commodities and certain
contracts are not actively traded and are valued using other pricing sources and modeling
techniques to determine expected future market prices, contract quantities, or both. NRG uses the
Companys best estimates to determine the fair value of commodity and derivative contracts held and
sold. These estimates consider various factors, including closing exchange and over-the-counter
price quotations, time value, volatility factors and credit exposure. However, it is likely that
future market prices could vary from those used in recording mark-to-market derivative instrument
valuation, and such variations could be material.
NRG measures the risk of the Companys portfolio using several analytical methods, including
sensitivity tests, scenario tests, stress tests, position reports, and Value at Risk, or VaR. VaR
is a statistical concept that defines risk of loss, at a certain confidence level, over a
designated horizon due to changes in market prices over that horizon. Currently, the company
estimates VaR using a Monte Carlo simulation of prices. NRGs total portfolio includes
mark-to-market and non-mark-to-market energy assets and liabilities.
NRG uses a diversified VaR model to calculate an estimate of the potential loss in the fair
value of the Companys energy assets and liabilities, which includes generation assets, load
obligations, and bilateral physical and financial transactions. The key assumptions for the
Companys diversified model include: (i) a lognormal distribution of prices; (ii) a one-day holding
period; (iii) a 95% confidence interval; (iv) a rolling 36-month forward looking period; and (v)
market implied volatilities and historical price correlations.
As of September 30, 2009, the VaR for NRGs commodity portfolio, including generation assets,
load obligations and bilateral physical and financial transactions calculated using the diversified
VaR model was $53 million. The inclusion of the Reliant Energy retail portfolio, comprised of
contracted load and related supply, did not materially affect the VaR measure as the portfolio is
currently hedged.
110
The following table summarizes average, maximum and minimum VaR for NRG for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAR |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30: |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
Average |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Maximum |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30: |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
Average |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Maximum |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Due to the inherent limitations of statistical measures such as VaR, the evolving nature of
the competitive markets for electricity and related derivatives, and the seasonality of changes in
market prices, the VaR calculation may not capture the full extent of commodity price exposure. As
a result, actual changes in the fair value of mark-to-market energy assets and liabilities could
differ from the calculated VaR, and such changes could have a material impact on the Companys
financial results.
In order to provide additional information for comparative purposes to NRGs peers, the
Company also uses VaR to estimate the potential loss of derivative financial instruments that are
subject to mark-to-market accounting. These derivative instruments include transactions that were
entered into for both asset management and trading purposes. The VaR for the derivative financial
instruments calculated using the diversified VaR model as of September 30, 2009, for the entire
term of these instruments entered into for both asset management and trading, was approximately $26
million primarily driven by asset-backed transactions.
Interest Rate Risk
NRG is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates through the Companys issuance of fixed rate
and variable rate debt. Exposures to interest rate fluctuations may be mitigated by entering into
derivative instruments known as interest rate swaps, caps, collars and put or call options. These
contracts reduce exposure to interest rate volatility and result in primarily fixed rate debt
obligations when taking into account the combination of the variable rate debt and the interest
rate derivative instrument. NRGs risk management policies allow the Company to reduce interest
rate exposure from variable rate debt obligations.
In May 2009, NRG entered into a series of forward-starting interest rate swaps. These
interest rate swaps become effective on April 1, 2011, and are intended to hedge the risks
associated with floating interest rates. For each of the interest rate swaps, the Company will pay
its counterparty the equivalent of a fixed interest payment on a predetermined notional value, and
NRG receives the monthly equivalent of a floating interest payment based on a 1-month LIBOR
calculated on the same notional value. All interest rate swap payments by NRG and its
counterparties are made monthly and the LIBOR is determined in advance of each interest period.
The total notional amount of these swaps is $900 million. The swaps mature on February 1, 2013.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had various interest rate swap agreements with notional
amounts totaling approximately $3.3 billion. If the swaps had been discontinued on September 30,
2009, the Company would have owed the counterparties approximately $124 million. Based on the
investment grade rating of the counterparties, NRG believes its exposure to credit risk due to
nonperformance by counterparties to its hedge contracts to be insignificant.
NRG has both long and short-term debt instruments that subject the Company to the risk of loss
associated with movements in market interest rates. As of September 30, 2009, a 1% change in
interest rates would result in a $11 million change in interest expense on a rolling twelve month
basis.
As of September 30, 2009, the Companys long-term debt fair value was $8.4 billion and the
carrying amount was $8.6 billion. NRG estimates that a 1% decrease in market interest rates would
have increased the fair value of the Companys long-term debt by $435 million.
111
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk arises from the general funding needs of NRGs activities and in the management
of the Companys assets and liabilities. NRGs liquidity management framework is intended to
maximize liquidity access and minimize funding costs. Through active liquidity management, the
Company seeks to preserve stable, reliable and cost-effective sources of funding. This enables the
Company to replace maturing obligations when due and fund assets at appropriate maturities and
rates. To accomplish this task, management uses a variety of liquidity risk measures that take
into consideration market conditions, prevailing interest rates, liquidity needs, and the desired
maturity profile of liabilities.
Based on a sensitivity analysis for power and gas positions under marginable contracts
excluding all non-affiliate third party positions under the CSRA, a
$1 per MMBtu change in natural gas prices across the term of the marginable contracts would cause a change in
margin collateral posted of approximately $73 million as of September 30, 2009, and a 0.25
MMBtu/MWh change in heat rates for heat rate positions would result in a change in margin
collateral posted of approximately $53 million as of
September 30, 2009. This analysis uses simplified
assumptions and is calculated based on portfolio composition and margin-related contract provisions
as of September 30, 2009.
With the CSRA Amendment, effective October 5, 2009, based on a sensitivity analysis for power
and gas positions under marginable contracts, a $1 per MMBtu change in natural gas
prices across the term of the marginable contracts would cause a change in margin collateral
posted of approximately $164 million, and a $0.25 MMBtu/MWh change in heat rate positions would
result in a change in margin collateral posted of approximately $69 million. This analysis uses
simplified assumptions and is calculated based on portfolio composition and margin-related contract
provisions as of October 5, 2009.
Under the second lien, NRG is required to post certain letters of credit as credit support for
changes in commodity prices. As of September 30, 2009, no letters of credit are outstanding to
second lien counterparties. With changes in commodity prices, the letters of credit could grow to
$87 million, the cap under the agreements.
Credit Risk
Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from non-performance or non-payment by
counterparties pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. The Company monitors and
manages credit risk through credit policies that include: (i) an established credit approval
process; (ii) a daily monitoring of counterparties credit limits; (iii) the use of credit
mitigation measures such as margin, collateral, credit derivatives or prepayment arrangements; (iv)
the use of payment netting agreements; and (v) the use of master netting agreements that allow for
the netting of positive and negative exposures of various contracts associated with a single
counterparty. Risks surrounding counterparty performance and credit could ultimately impact the
amount and timing of expected cash flows. The Company seeks to mitigate counterparty risk with a
diversified portfolio of counterparties, including ten participants under its first and second lien
structure. The Company also has credit protection within various agreements to call on additional
collateral support if and when necessary. Cash margin is collected and held at NRG to cover the
credit risk of the counterparty until positions settle.
Since the credit crisis began in late 2008, the Company has taken several additional steps to
mitigate credit risk including the use of netting arrangements, entering contracts with collateral
thresholds, setting volumetric limits with certain counterparties and restricting trading
relationships with counterparties where exposure was high or where credit quality of the
counterparty had deteriorated. NRG avoids concentration of counterparties whenever possible and
applies credit policies that include an evaluation of counterparties financial condition,
collateral requirements and the use of standard agreements that allow for netting and other
security.
As of September 30, 2009, total credit exposure to substantially all counterparties was $1.8
billion and NRG held collateral (cash and letters of credit) against
those positions of $280
million resulting in a net exposure of $1.5 billion. Total credit exposure is discounted at the
risk free rate.
112
The following table highlights the credit quality and the net counterparty credit exposure by
industry sector. Net counterparty credit exposure is defined as the aggregate net asset position
for NRG with counterparties where netting is permitted under the enabling agreement and includes
all cash flow, mark-to-market and NPNS, and non-derivative transactions. The exposure is shown net
of collateral held, includes amounts net of receivables or payables and excludes non-affiliate
third party exposure under the CSRA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Exposure (a) (b) |
|
|
as of September 30, 2009 |
Category |
|
(% of Total) |
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
81 |
% |
Utilities, energy, merchants, marketers and other |
|
|
13 |
|
Coal suppliers |
|
|
3 |
|
ISOs |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net Exposure (a) (b) |
|
|
as of September 30, 2009 |
Category |
|
(% of Total) |
|
Investment grade |
|
|
93 |
% |
Non-Investment grade |
|
|
2 |
|
Non-rated |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Credit exposure excludes California tolling, uranium, coal
transportation, New England Reliability Must-Run, cooperative load
contracts, and Texas Westmoreland coal contracts. The aforementioned
exposures were excluded for various reasons including regulatory
support or liens held against the contracts which serve to reduce the
risk of loss, or credit risks for certain contracts are not readily
measurable due to a lack of market reference prices. |
|
(b) |
|
The exposure amounts presented in the above table do not include
non-affiliate third party exposure under the CSRA. The gross credit
exposure to third parties under the CSRA is $385 million, and the cash
collateral held by Merrill Lynch against this exposure is $304
million. |
NRG has credit risk exposure to certain counterparties representing more than 10% of total net
exposure and the aggregate of such counterparties was $704 million. Approximately 72% of NRGs
positions relating to credit risk roll-off by the end of 2011. Changes in hedge positions and
market prices will affect credit exposure and counterparty concentration. Given the credit
quality, diversification and term of the exposure in the portfolio, NRG does not anticipate a
material impact on the Companys financial results from nonperformance by a counterparty.
NRG is exposed to retail credit risk through its competitive electricity supply business,
which serves commercial and industrial customers and the mass market in Texas. Retail credit risk
results when a customer fails to pay for services rendered. The losses could be incurred from
nonpayment of customer accounts receivable and any in-the-money forward value. NRG manages retail
credit risk through the use of established credit policies that include monitoring of the
portfolio, and the use of credit mitigation measures such as deposits or prepayment arrangement.
Retail credit risk is dependent on the overall economy, but is minimized due to the fact that NRGs
portfolio of retail customers is largely diversified, with no significant single name
concentration.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
NRG may enter into long-term power purchase and sales contracts, fuel purchase contracts and
other energy-related financial instruments to mitigate variability in earnings due to fluctuations
in spot market prices, to hedge fuel requirements at generation facilities, hedge supplies for
retail operations and protect fuel inventories. In addition, in order to mitigate interest rate
risk associated with the issuance of the Companys variable rate and fixed rate debt, NRG enters
into interest rate swap agreements.
NRGs trading activities include contracts to profit from market price changes as opposed to
hedging an exposure, and are subject to limits in accordance with the Companys risk management
policy. These contracts are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value and changes in the fair
value of these derivative financial instruments are recognized in earnings. These trading
activities are a complement to NRGs energy marketing portfolio.
113
The tables below disclose the activities that include both exchange and non-exchange traded
contracts accounted for at fair value in accordance with ASC 820. Specifically, these tables disaggregate realized and
unrealized changes in fair value; identify changes in fair value attributable to changes in
valuation techniques; disaggregate estimated fair values at September 30, 2009, based on
their level within the fair value hiearchy defined in ASC 820;
and indicate the
maturities of contracts at September 30, 2009. Also, in connection with the Companys acquisition
of Reliant Energy, NRG acquired retail load and supply contracts. The table below also includes
the fair value of supply contracts under mark-to-market accounting treatment as of May 1, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Activity Gains/(Losses) |
|
(In millions |
) |
|
Fair value of contracts as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
996 |
|
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period |
|
|
(375 |
) |
Contracts acquired in conjunction with Reliant Energy |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
Changes in fair value |
|
|
795 |
|
|
Fair value of contracts as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Contracts as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Less Than |
|
Maturity |
|
Maturity |
|
in Excess |
|
Total Fair |
|
Fair value hiearchy gains/(losses) |
|
1 Year |
|
1-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
424 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
A small portion of NRGs contracts are exchange-traded contracts with readily available quoted
market prices. The majority of NRGs contracts are non-exchange-traded contracts valued using
prices provided by external sources, primarily price quotations available through brokers or
over-the-counter and on-line exchanges. For the majority of NRG markets, the Company receives
quotes from multiple sources. To the extent that NRG receives multiple quotes, the Companys
prices reflect the average of the bid-ask mid-point prices obtained from all sources that NRG
believes provide the most liquid market for the commodity. If the Company receives one quote, then
the mid-point of the bid-ask spread for that quote is used. The terms for which such price
information is available vary by commodity, region and product. A
significant portion of the fair value of the Companys
derivative portfolio is based on price quotes from brokers in active
markets who regularly facilitate our transactions and we believe such
price quotes are executable. We do not use third party sources that
derive price based on proprietary models or market surveys. The remainder of the assets
and liabilities represents contracts for which external sources or observable market quotes are not
available. These contracts are valued based on various valuation techniques including but not
limited to internal models based on a fundamental analysis of the market and extrapolation of
observable market data with similar characteristics. Contracts valued with prices provided by
models and other valuation techniques make up 19% of the total fair value of all derivative
contracts. The fair value of each contract is discounted using a risk free interest rate. In
addition, the Company applies a credit reserve to reflect credit risk which is calculated based on
published default probabilities. To the extent that NRGs net exposure under a specific master
agreement is an asset, the Company uses the counterpartys default swap rate. If the exposure under
a specific master agreement is a liability, the Company uses NRGs default swap rate. The credit
reserve is added to the discounted fair value to reflect the exit price that a market participant
would be willing to receive to assume NRGs liabilities or that a market participant would be
willing to pay for NRGs assets. As of September 30, 2009, the credit reserve resulted in a $18
million increase in fair value which is composed of a $4 million gain in OCI and a $14 million gain
in derivative revenue and cost of operations.
The fair values in each category reflect the level of forward prices and volatility factors as
of September 30, 2009, and may change as a result of changes in these factors. Management uses its
best estimates to determine the fair value of commodity and derivative contracts NRG holds and
sells. These estimates consider various factors including closing exchange and over-the-counter
price quotations, time value, volatility factors and credit exposure. It is possible, however,
that future market prices could vary from those used in recording assets and liabilities from
energy marketing and trading activities and such variations could be material.
The Company has elected to disclose derivative activity on a trade-by-trade basis and does not
offset amounts at the counterparty master agreement level. Consequently, the magnitude of the
changes in individual current and non-current derivative assets or liabilities is higher than the
underlying credit and market risk of the Companys portfolio. As discussed in Item 7A Commodity
Price Risk in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,
NRG measures the sensitivity of the Companys portfolio to potential changes in market prices using
VaR, a statistical model which attempts to predict risk of loss based on market price and
volatility. NRGs risk management policy places a limit on
one-day holding period VaR, which
limits the Companys net open position. As the Companys trade-by-trade derivative accounting
results in a gross-up of the Companys derivative assets and liabilities, the net derivative assets
and liability position is a better indicator of NRGs hedging activity. As of September 30, 2009,
NRGs net derivative asset was $362 million, a decrease to total fair value of $634 million as
compared to December 31, 2008. This decrease was primarily driven by the acquisition of Reliant
Energys retail portfolio offset by increase in fair value due to the decreases in gas and power
prices and the roll-off of trades that settled during the period.
Based on a sensitivity analysis, the impact of a $1 per MMBtu increase or decrease in natural
gas prices across the term of the derivative contracts would cause a
change of approximately $574
million in the value of derivatives as of September 30, 2009.
114
Currency Exchange Risk
NRG may be subject to foreign currency exchange risk as a result of the Company entering into
purchase commitments with foreign vendors for the purchase of major equipment associated with
RepoweringNRG initiatives. To reduce the risks to such foreign currency exposure, the Company may
enter into transactions to hedge its foreign currency exposure using currency options and forward
contracts. As of September 30, 2009, there were no foreign currency options or forward contracts
outstanding for purchase commitments.
In connection with the MIBRAG sale transaction, NRG entered into a foreign currency forward
contract to hedge the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the sale proceeds. The foreign
currency forward contract had a fixed exchange rate of 1.277 and required NRG to deliver EUR 200
million in exchange for $255 million on June 15, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, NRG recorded an exchange loss of $24 million on the contract within Other income/(expense).
As a result of the Companys limited foreign currency exposure to date, the effect of foreign
currency fluctuations has not been material to the Companys results of operations, financial
position and cash flows as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of NRGs management, including its principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, NRG conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, the Companys principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer concluded that the
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-Q.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred in the third quarter 2009
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations over Internal Controls
NRGs internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
However, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving
financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of
human error and circumvention by collusion or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an
effective internal control system may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely
basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
115
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a discussion of material legal proceedings in which NRG was involved through September 30,
2009, see Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, to the condensed consolidated financial
statements of this Form 10-Q.
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS
Information regarding risk factors appears in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in NRGs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors
in NRGs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
ITEM 2 UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares |
|
shares that may be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
purchased under the |
|
|
Total number of |
|
Average price |
|
publicly announced |
|
2009 Capital Allocation |
For the period ended September 30, 2009 |
|
shares purchased |
|
paid per share |
|
plans or programs |
|
Plan |
|
First quarter 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
330,000,000 |
|
Second quarter 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1 July 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000,000 |
|
August 1 August 31 |
|
|
8,477,000 |
|
|
|
28.09 |
|
|
|
8,477,000 |
|
|
|
261,753,846 |
|
September 1 September 30 |
|
|
442,100 |
|
|
|
26.57 |
|
|
|
442,100 |
|
|
|
250,002,565 |
|
|
Third quarter 2009 Total |
|
|
8,919,100 |
|
|
|
28.01 |
|
|
|
8,919,100 |
|
|
|
250,002,565 |
|
|
Year-to-date |
|
|
8,919,100 |
|
|
$ |
28.01 |
|
|
|
8,919,100 |
|
|
$ |
250,002,565 |
|
|
In July 2009, as part of the Companys 2009 Capital Allocation Program, NRGs Board of
Directors approved an increase to the Companys previously authorized common share repurchases
under its capital allocation plan from the existing $330 million to $500 million. The Companys
repurchases during the period ended September 30, 2009, were approximately $250 million. NRG
intends to complete its $500 million of share repurchases by the end of 2009, subject to market
prices, financial restrictions under the Companys debt facilities, and as permitted by securities
laws.
ITEM 3 DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4 SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The stockholders of NRG Energy, Inc. voted on nine items at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
held on July 21, 2009:
|
1. |
|
The election of Class III Directors to a three-year term; |
|
|
2. |
|
The proposal to adopt the NRG Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive
Plan; |
|
|
3. |
|
The proposal to adopt the NRG Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Plan
for Designated Corporate Officers; |
|
|
4. |
|
The proposal to approve the amendment to Article Six of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation; |
|
|
5. |
|
The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as NRGs independent registered
public accounting firm; |
|
|
6. |
|
The stockholder proposal to prepare a report on the Carbon
Principles; |
|
|
7. |
|
Exelon Corporations proposal to approve an amendment to the NRG Bylaws to increase the
size of the NRG Board to 19 members; |
|
|
8. |
|
If proposal 7 was approved, Exelons proposal to elect five Exelon nominees to serve as
a director of NRG Board; and |
|
|
9. |
|
Exelons proposal to repeal any Bylaw amendments adopted by the NRG Board without
stockholder approval after February 26, 2008 and prior to the effectiveness of the
resolution effecting such repeal. |
There were 265,646,655 shares of common and preferred stock entitled to vote at the meeting
and a total of 234,133,623 shares (approximately 88%) were represented at the meeting.
116
The four NRG nominees named below were elected to serve a three-year term as Class III
Directors expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2012, while the four Exelon nominees
named below were defeated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Nominee |
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
|
John F. Chlebowski |
|
|
175,973,764 |
|
|
|
691,844 |
|
Howard E. Cosgrove |
|
|
176,009,097 |
|
|
|
656,511 |
|
William E. Hantke |
|
|
176,018,113 |
|
|
|
647,495 |
|
Anne C. Schaumburg |
|
|
176,019,858 |
|
|
|
645,750 |
|
|
|
Exelon Nominee |
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
|
Betsy S. Atkins |
|
|
57,258,080 |
|
|
|
209,935 |
|
Ralph E. Faison |
|
|
57,256,776 |
|
|
|
211,239 |
|
Coleman Peterson |
|
|
57,256,676 |
|
|
|
211,339 |
|
Thomas C. Wajnert |
|
|
57,256,726 |
|
|
|
211,289 |
|
|
The names of the directors whose terms as directors continued after the meeting are as
follows:
|
|
|
Class I: Kirbyjon H. Caldwell, David Crane, Stephen L. Cropper, Kathleen A. McGinty,
Thomas W. Weidemeyer |
|
|
|
|
Class II: Lawrence S. Coben, Paul W. Hobby, Gerald Luterman, Herbert H. Tate, Walter R.
Young |
The proposal to adopt the NRG Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan was
approved with 225,514,895 shares voting for, 4,790,467 shares voting against, and 3,828,260 shares
abstaining.
The proposal to adopt the NRG Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Plan for
Designated Corporate Officers was approved with 228,716,330 shares voting for, 1,578,602 shares
voting against, and 3,838,682 shares abstaining.
The proposal to approve the amendment to Article Six of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation was approved with 227,053,518 shares voting for, 3,098,376 shares voting against,
and 3,981,728 shares abstaining.
The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting
firm was ratified with 229,676,224 shares voting for, 653,217 shares voting against, 3,804,181
shares abstaining.
The stockholder proposal to prepare a report on the Carbon Principles was defeated with
189,432,665 shares voting against, 2,553,249 voting for, and 42,147,708 abstaining.
Exelon Corporations proposal to approve an amendment to the NRG Bylaws to increase the size
of the NRG Board to 19 members was defeated with 179,032,706 shares voting against, 54,982,954
shares voting for, and 117,963 abstaining. As a result of the defeat of this proposal, Exelons
proposal to elect five additional Exelon nominees to serve as a director of the NRG Board was
rendered moot.
Exelons proposal to repeal any Bylaw amendments adopted by the NRG Board without stockholder
approval after February 26, 2008 and prior to the effectiveness of the resolution effecting such
repeal was defeated with 195,842,708 shares voting against, 38,084,601 shares voting for, and
206,313 abstaining. Regardless of the vote outcome, NRG did not initiate any amendments to the
Bylaws during the reference period.
ITEM 5 OTHER INFORMATION
None.
117
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated July 14, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the guarantors named therein and
Law Debenture Trust Company of New York.
(1) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Twenty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law
Debenture Trust Company of New York. (2) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Twenty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law
Debenture Trust Company of New York. (2) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law Debenture
Trust Company of New
York. (2) |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law Debenture Trust
Company of New
York. (2) |
|
|
|
10.1A
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement, dated September 30, 2009 (effective October 5,
2009), among Reliant Energy Power Supply, LLC, RERH Holdings, LLC, Reliant Retail Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy
Retail Services, LLC, RE Retail Renewables, LLC, Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
|
|
|
|
10.1B
|
|
Schedules and
Exhibits to the Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement, dated September 30, 2009 (effective October 5,
2009)
(Portions of this Exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to NRG Energy, Inc.s current report on Form 8-K filed on July
15, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to NRG Energy, Inc.s current report on Form 8-K filed on
October 6, 2009. |
118
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG ENERGY, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID W. CRANE
|
|
|
|
David W. Crane |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT C. FLEXON
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Flexon |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES J. INGOLDSBY
|
|
|
|
James J. Ingoldsby |
|
Date: November 2, 2009 |
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
119
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated July 14, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the guarantors named therein and
Law Debenture Trust Company of New York.
(1) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Twenty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law
Debenture Trust Company of New York. (2) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Twenty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law
Debenture Trust Company of New York. (2) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law
Debenture Trust Company of New York. (2) |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2009, among NRG Energy, Inc., the existing guarantors named
therein, the guaranteeing subsidiaries named therein and Law
Debenture Trust Company of New York. (2) |
|
|
|
10.1A
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement, dated September 30, 2009, among Reliant Energy
Power Supply, LLC, RERH Holdings, LLC, Reliant Retail Holdings, LLC, Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC, RE Retail
Renewables, LLC, Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. |
|
|
|
10.1B
|
|
Schedules and
Exhibits to the Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement, dated September 30, 2009 (effective October 5,
2009)
(Portions of this Exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to NRG Energy, Inc.s current report on Form 8-K filed on July
15, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to NRG Energy, Inc.s current report on Form 8-K filed on
October 6, 2009. |
120
exv10w1wa
Exhibit 10.1A
Execution
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT SLEEVE
AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
Originally dated as of
September 24, 2006
among
NRG ENERGY, INC.,
(from and after the Unwind Start Date)
The Other Sleeve Obligors referred to herein,
as Reimbursement Guarantors,
MERRILL LYNCH COMMODITIES, INC.,
as Sleeve Provider,
and
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.,
as ML Guarantee Provider,
dated as of September 30, 2009 and
effective as of October 5, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Table of Contents is not part of the Agreement to which it is attached but is inserted for
convenience of reference only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Page |
|
|
Section 1. Definitions and Accounting Matters |
|
|
1 |
|
1.01. Certain Defined Terms |
|
|
1 |
|
1.02. Terms Generally |
|
|
22 |
|
1.03. Accounting Terms and Determinations |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 2. Credit Sleeve for Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations |
|
|
23 |
|
2.01. Credit Sleeve |
|
|
23 |
|
2.02. Power and Hedging Contracts; Obligations of Compliance Parties |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 3. Payments, Fees and Records |
|
|
26 |
|
3.01. Notice of Payment on ML Guarantee or Collateral Foreclosure |
|
|
26 |
|
3.02. Repayment of Draw Reimbursement Obligations |
|
|
26 |
|
3.03. Interest |
|
|
27 |
|
3.04. Monthly Sleeve Fee |
|
|
28 |
|
3.05. Make-Whole Payment |
|
|
28 |
|
3.06. Payments Generally |
|
|
28 |
|
3.07. Records; Prima Facie Evidence |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 4. Conditions |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 5. Representations and Warranties |
|
|
29 |
|
5.01. Existence, Qualification and Power; Compliance with Laws |
|
|
29 |
|
5.02. Authorization; No Contravention |
|
|
30 |
|
5.03. Governmental Authorization; Other Consents |
|
|
30 |
|
5.04. Binding Effect |
|
|
30 |
|
5.05. Financial Statements; No Material Adverse Effect |
|
|
30 |
|
5.06. Litigation |
|
|
31 |
|
5.07. No Default |
|
|
31 |
|
5.08. [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
31 |
|
5.09. [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
31 |
|
5.10. [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
31 |
|
5.11. ERISA Compliance |
|
|
31 |
|
5.12. [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
32 |
|
5.13. Margin Regulations; Investment Company Act; Public Utility
Holding Company Act |
|
|
32 |
|
5.14. Disclosure |
|
|
32 |
|
5.15. Compliance with Laws |
|
|
33 |
|
5.16. Security Interest in Posted Collateral |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
5.17. Solvency |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 6. Affirmative Covenants |
|
|
33 |
|
6.01. Financial Statements |
|
|
33 |
|
6.02. Certificates; Other Information |
|
|
34 |
|
6.03. Notices |
|
|
35 |
|
6.04. Payment of Obligations |
|
|
35 |
|
6.05. Preservation of Existence, Etc |
|
|
35 |
|
6.06. [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
35 |
|
6.07. [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
35 |
|
6.08. Compliance with Laws |
|
|
35 |
|
6.09. Books and Records |
|
|
36 |
|
6.10. Inspection Rights |
|
|
36 |
|
6.11. Further Assurances |
|
|
36 |
|
6.12. Obligation to Post Collateral |
|
|
36 |
|
6.13. Obligation to Cause Partial Credit Sleeve Termination Date and
Credit Sleeve Termination Date |
|
|
36 |
|
6.14. Return of TDSP Postings |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 7. Negative Covenants |
|
|
37 |
|
7.01. Fundamental Changes |
|
|
37 |
|
7.02. Other Covenants |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 8. Events of Default |
|
|
38 |
|
8.01. Reliant Events of Default |
|
|
38 |
|
8.02. Sleeve Provider Events of Default |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 9. Remedies and Termination |
|
|
41 |
|
9.01. Remedies of Sleeve Provider |
|
|
41 |
|
9.02. Remedies of NRG |
|
|
42 |
|
9.03. [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
43 |
|
9.04. Certain Limitations on Remedies |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 10. Posted Collateral |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 11. Reimbursement Guaranty by Other Reliant Retail Parties |
|
|
49 |
|
11.01 Reimbursement Guaranty of the Obligations |
|
|
49 |
|
11.02 Payment by Guarantors |
|
|
49 |
|
11.03 Liability of Reimbursement Guarantors Absolute |
|
|
49 |
|
11.04 Waivers by Reimbursement Guarantors |
|
|
51 |
|
11.05 [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
51 |
|
11.06 [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
52 |
|
11.07 Continuing Reimbursement Guaranty |
|
|
52 |
|
11.08 Authority of Reimbursement Guarantors or NRG |
|
|
52 |
|
11.09 Financial Condition of NRG |
|
|
52 |
|
-ii-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
11.10
Bankruptcy, etc. |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 12. Miscellaneous |
|
|
53 |
|
12.01 Notices |
|
|
53 |
|
12.02 Confidentiality; Limitation on Use of Information |
|
|
54 |
|
12.03 Reliant Employees |
|
|
54 |
|
12.04 [Intentionally Deleted] |
|
|
54 |
|
12.05 Waiver
|
|
|
55 |
|
12.06
Amendments, Etc. |
|
|
55 |
|
12.07
Expenses, Etc. |
|
|
55 |
|
12.08 Successors and Assigns |
|
|
56 |
|
12.09 Assignments |
|
|
56 |
|
12.10 Survival |
|
|
56 |
|
12.11 Counterparts |
|
|
56 |
|
12.12
Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Etc. |
|
|
56 |
|
12.13 Certain Dispute Resolution Procedures |
|
|
57 |
|
12.14 Captions |
|
|
58 |
|
12.15 Limitation on Interest |
|
|
58 |
|
12.16 Integration |
|
|
58 |
|
12.17 Conditions to Amendment and Restatement |
|
|
58 |
|
12.18 Additional Unwind Start Date Actions |
|
|
60 |
|
12.19 Existing CSRA Provisions |
|
|
61 |
|
12.20 Public Disclosures |
|
|
61 |
|
-iii-
Schedules
Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE 1.01(a)
|
|
-
|
|
Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations |
SCHEDULE 1.01(c)
|
|
-
|
|
Data and Reporting Requirement |
SCHEDULE 3.06(a)
|
|
-
|
|
Merrill Account |
SCHEDULE 5.06
|
|
-
|
|
Litigation |
SCHEDULE 5.15
|
|
-
|
|
Compliance With Laws |
SCHEDULE 12.13
|
|
-
|
|
Calculation Agents |
SCHEDULE 12.17(a)
|
|
-
|
|
Releases of Merrill Collateral |
SCHEDULE 12.18(b)
|
|
-
|
|
Terminated Agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT A
|
|
-
|
|
Form of Acceptable Letter of Credit |
EXHIBIT B
|
|
-
|
|
Form of BAC Guarantee |
-iv
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT SLEEVE AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement)
originally dated as of September 24, 2006, as amended and restated as of September 30, 2009 (the
Signing Date) and effective October 5, 2009 (the Unwind Start Date), among NRG
ENERGY, INC. (NRG) (but only as of and after the Unwind Start Date), RELIANT ENERGY POWER
SUPPLY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (REPS), RERH Holdings, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (RERH Holdings), Reliant Energy Retail Holdings, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (RERH), Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (RERS) and RE Retail Receivables, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (RERR, and together with NRG (but only on and after the Unwind
Start Date), REPS, RERH Holdings, RERH, RERS and RERR, the Sleeve Obligors), MERRILL
LYNCH COMMODITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, as sleeve provider (the Sleeve
Provider), and MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., a Delaware corporation, as guarantee provider (the
ML Guarantee Provider, together with the Sleeve Provider, the Merrill Parties,
and together with the Sleeve Obligors, the Parties, and each a Party).
The Sleeve Obligors (other than NRG), the Sleeve Provider and the ML Guarantee Provider are
parties to the existing Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of September 24, 2006,
as previously amended and restated as of December 1, 2006, and as further amended and restated as
of August 1, 2007 and May 1, 2009 (as so previously amended and restated the Existing
CSRA), pursuant to which such Sleeve Obligors have requested that the Sleeve Provider, and the
Sleeve Provider has agreed to, arrange for the provision of certain guarantees of the ML Guarantee
Provider and the posting of required collateral in connection therewith, in each case, in
connection with the trading and related activities of the Sleeve Obligors.
The Sleeve Obligors have arranged for the return of all Merrill Collateral on the Unwind Start
Date, including all ML Guarantees, and the release on the Unwind Start Date of the Merrill Parties
from all other obligations under the Existing CSRA, in each case, except for the Merrill Parties
obligations in respect of the Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations (as defined below).
In connection with the Unwind Start Date, the Parties desire to amend and restate the Existing
CSRA.
Accordingly, subject to Section 12.17, the Parties agree that the Existing CSRA shall
be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
Section 1. Definitions and Accounting Matters.
1.01. Certain Defined Terms. As used herein, the following terms shall have the following
respective meanings:
Acceptable Collateral Agent means (a) any of BNYMellon N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
Deutsche Bank, N.A. or JPMorgan Chase, N.A., in each case, so long as such person has a short-term
credit rating of at least A-1 by S&P and P-2 by Moodys, a long-term debt rating
of at least A by S&P and A-1 by Moodys, and assets of at least $10,000,000,000, or (b) other
major U.S. commercial bank or a foreign bank with a U.S. branch office as may be agreed by the
Parties.
Acceptable Letter of Credit means an irrevocable, non-transferable, standby letter
of credit, expiring in not less than 20 Business Days (or, if earlier, the date on which the
obligations secured by such Acceptable Letter of Credit are satisfied), issued by Deutsche Bank,
BNP Paribas, Bank of America, N.A. or Royal Bank of Scotland, in each case, so long as such issuer
possesses a Credit Rating of at least A by S&P and A2 by Moodys, in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A or such other form that is reasonably acceptable to the Merrill Parties and is
maintained in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of this Agreement. All costs relating
to any such Acceptable Letter of Credit shall be for the account of the Sleeve Obligors.
Affiliate of any specified Person means any other Person directly or indirectly
Controlling or Controlled by or under direct or indirect common Control with such specified Person;
provided that a Person will be deemed to be an Affiliate of NRG if NRG has knowledge that such
Person beneficially owns 10% or more of the Voting Stock of NRG; provided, further, that NRG shall
only be deemed to have knowledge of any Person beneficially owning 10% or more of NRGs Voting
Stock if such Person has filed a statement of beneficial ownership pursuant to Sections 13(d) or
13(g) of the Exchange Act or has provided written notice thereof to NRG.
Aggregate Merrill Threshold means, at any time, the sum of the Thresholds
applicable at such time to REPS (and MLCI as its credit support provider) to the extent actually
utilized at such time to cover Current Exposure under Power and Hedging Contracts for which any
Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction remains outstanding.
Agreement has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
Asset Sale shall have the meaning set forth in the NRG Credit Agreement as in effect
on the date hereof.
Attributable Debt means, on any date, (a) in respect of a sale and leaseback
transaction, the present value of the obligation of the lessee for net rental payments during the
remaining term of the lease included in such sale and leaseback transaction including any period
for which such lease has been extended or may, at the option of the lessor, be extended (such
present value to be calculated using a discount rate equal to the rate of interest implicit in such
transaction, determined in accordance with GAAP; provided, that if such sale and leaseback
transaction results in a Capital Lease Obligation, the amount of Indebtedness represented thereby
will be determined in accordance with the definition of Capital Lease Obligation) and (b) in
respect of any Synthetic Lease Obligation or financing lease, the amount of the remaining lease
payments under the relevant lease that would as of such date be required to be capitalized on a
balance sheet in accordance with GAAP if such lease were accounted for as a Capital Lease
Obligation.
Audited Financial Statements means the audited consolidated balance sheet of NRG and
its consolidated Subsidiaries for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2008, and the
-2-
related consolidated statements of income or operations, stockholders equity, comprehensive
income (loss) and cash flows for such Fiscal Year, setting forth in each case in comparative form
the figures as of the end of, and for, the previous Fiscal Year, all in reasonable detail.
BAC Guarantee means the guarantee of the ML Parent Guarantor in the form of
Exhibit B hereto.
Bankruptcy Code means the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as heretofore and hereafter
amended, as codified at 11 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq.
Base Rate means for any day a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the higher of (a)
the Federal Funds Rate in effect for such day plus 1/2 of 1% and (b) the Prime Rate in effect for
such day. Any change in the Base Rate due to a change in the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate
shall be effective from and including the effective date of such change in the Prime Rate or the
Federal Funds Rate, respectively.
BCFe means, (a) with respect to any Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction, the
contracted volume of the Sleeve Obligors power and gas positions for such transaction expressed as
a billion cubic feet equivalent, (b) in the case of options, by using the delta volumes instead of
the contracted volume, and (c) in the case of power, by converting fixed price power to Henry Hub
gas using a market heat rate, as calculated by the Sleeve Provider in a manner consistent with
Section VII of the Sleeve Obligors retail risk management policy in effect on the Unwind Start
Date.
Business Day means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which
commercial banks are authorized to close under the Laws of, or are in fact closed in, Houston,
Texas or New York City.
Calculation Agent has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 12.13.
Capital Lease Obligation means, as applied to any Person, at the time any
determination is to be made, the amount of the liability in respect of a capital lease that would
at that time be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet of such Person in accordance with
GAAP in the reasonable judgment of such Person, and the stated maturity thereof shall be the date
of the last payment of rent or any other amount due under such lease prior to the first date upon
which such lease may be prepaid by the lessee without payment of a penalty.
Capital Outlay Date has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.01.
Capital Stock means:
(a) in the case of a corporation, corporate stock;
(b) in the case of an association or business entity, any and all shares, interests,
participations, rights or other equivalents (however designated) of corporate stock;
-3-
(c) in the case of a partnership or limited liability company, partnership interests
(whether general or limited) or membership interests; and
(d) any other interest or participation that confers on a Person the right to receive a
share of the profits and losses of, or distributions of assets of, the issuing Person, but
excluding from all of the foregoing any debt securities convertible into Capital Stock,
whether or not such debt securities include any right of participation with Capital Stock.
Change of Control means the occurrence of any of the following:
(a) the direct or indirect sale, transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than
by way of merger or consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of all or
substantially all of the properties or assets of NRG and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole
to any person (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, but excluding
any employee benefit plan of NRG or any of its Subsidiaries, and any Person or entity acting
in its capacity as trustee, agent or other fiduciary or administrator of such plan);
(b) the adoption of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of NRG;
(c) the consummation of any transaction (including any merger or consolidation) the
result of which is that any person (as defined above) becomes the beneficial owner,
directly or indirectly, of more than 40% of the Voting Stock of NRG, measured by voting
power rather than number of shares;
(d) NRG consolidates with, or merges with or into, any Person, or any Person
consolidates with, or merges with or into, NRG, in any such event pursuant to a transaction
in which any of the outstanding Voting Stock of NRG or such other Person is converted into
or exchanged for cash, securities or other property, other than any such transaction where
the Voting Stock of NRG outstanding immediately prior to such transaction is converted into
or exchanged for Voting Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the surviving or transferee
Person constituting a majority of the outstanding shares of such Voting Stock of such
surviving or transferee Person (immediately after giving effect to such issuance); and
(e) any Other Sleeve Obligor ceases to be a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of NRG (other than
RERS or RERR).
It shall not be deemed a Change of Control pursuant to clauses (a), (c) or
(d) above, if NRG or the surviving entity, as the case may be, has the same or higher
Credit Rating from each of S&P and Moodys immediately following such transfer, sale, disposition,
merger, consolidation or other transaction as NRG did immediately prior to such transfer, sale,
disposition, merger, consolidation or other transaction.
C&I Guarantees means each of the ML Guarantees identified as C&I Guarantees on
Schedule 1.01(a).
-4-
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
Collateral Foreclosure means any setoff, application or foreclosure taken by an
applicable secured party with respect to any Merrill Collateral or any failure of any applicable
Counterparty or other beneficiary of Merrill Collateral hereunder to return Merrill Collateral to
the applicable Merrill Party within one Business Day of the date required by the terms of the
applicable Counterparty Documents or other applicable agreement.
Collateral Trustee has the meaning ascribed thereto in the Existing Security
Documents.
Compliance Information means, with respect to any Compliance Party, the information
customarily requested from similarly situated trading counterparties by the Sleeve Provider or the
ML Guarantee Provider in the ordinary course of their respective businesses (i) to comply with
applicable Laws (including the USA PATRIOT Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107-56 (signed into law
October 26, 2001))) and (ii) to comply with other internal compliance requirements, in each case to
the extent the same are of general application to, and established by the Sleeve Provider or the ML
Guarantee Provider in the ordinary course of their respective businesses for, similarly situated
trading counterparties.
Compliance Party means each Person entitled to benefit from (i) an ML Guarantee, or
(ii) the posting of cash collateral by, or any agreement to post or provide cash collateral by, the
Sleeve Provider, under any Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction.
Compliance Requirements means, with respect to any Compliance Party, the receipt by
the Sleeve Provider or the ML Guarantee Provider, as applicable, from such Compliance Party of
applicable Compliance Information that satisfies the compliance requirements generally established
by the Sleeve Provider or the ML Guarantee Provider for similarly situated trading counterparties
in the ordinary course of their respective businesses.
Contingent Adjustment Amount has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 10.
Contingent Cash Collateral means, for any day, all cash posted by or on behalf of
the Sleeve Obligors to the Merrill Parties pursuant to clauses (a)(i)(2) or
(a)(ii)(B) of Section 10, which as of such day has not theretofore been applied or
used by the Merrill Parties to satisfy any Credit Sleeve Obligation or otherwise returned to NRG.
Contingent Collateral means, for any day, the aggregate amount of all Acceptable
Letters of Credit, together with all Contingent Cash Collateral, posted by or on behalf of the
Sleeve Obligors to the Merrill Parties pursuant to clauses (a)(i)(2) or (a)(ii)(B)
of Section 10, which as of such day has not theretofore been applied or used by the Merrill
Parties to satisfy any Credit Sleeve Obligation or otherwise returned to NRG.
Contingent Exposure means, with respect to any Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction,
the aggregate Dollar amount of all potential liability of the Merrill Parties in respect of such
transaction, as reasonably determined by the Merrill Parties to a 99.0% (2.32-sigma) confidence
level. The determination of Contingent Exposure in respect of any Post-Unwind
-5-
Start Date Transaction shall be made on a contract by contract basis and shall exclude any
amounts included in the calculation of Current Exposure.
Contractual Obligation means, as to any Person, any provision of any security issued
by such Person or of any agreement, instrument or other undertaking to which such Person is a party
or by which it or any of its property is bound.
Control means, with respect to any Person, the possession, directly or indirectly,
of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such Person, whether
through the ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise; and the terms controlling,
controlled by and under common control with have correlative meanings.
Core Collateral Subsidiary shall have the meaning set forth in the NRG Credit
Agreement as in effect on the date hereof, it being understood and agreed that any and all
provisions in effect on the date hereof under the NRG Credit Agreement permitting any Person to
designate and re-designate any Core Collateral Subsidiary, any assets thereof or any equity issued
by it as a Subsidiary or asset that is not Core Collateral (as defined in the NRG Credit Agreement)
shall apply hereunder, and upon any Core Collateral Subsidiary or any assets or equity thereof
being so designated, such Subsidiary shall cease to be a Core Collateral Subsidiary hereunder.
Counterparty means each counterparty in respect of a Post-Unwind Start Date
Transaction identified on Schedule 1.01(a) hereto.
Counterparty Document means, with respect to each Counterparty, the Power and
Hedging Contract, Credit Support Agreement and ML Guarantee and any related certificates, documents
and agreements, as applicable, relating to such Counterparty.
CPT means the prevailing time in Houston, Texas.
Credit Rating means at any time:
(a) with respect to any Counterparty or any issuer of an Acceptable Letter of Credit,
if Moodys or S&P has issued a credit rating for long-term senior unsecured, and non-credit
enhanced, Dollar-denominated debt of such Person, or, if such credit rating is not
available, the issuer rating of such Person, issued by each of Moodys and S&P, as
applicable, as in effect at such time in respect of such Person (in the event of a split
rating the lower rating shall apply);
(b) with respect to any Counterparty or any issuer of an Acceptable Letter of Credit,
if (i) clause (a) above does not apply at such time, (ii) the obligations of such
Person are guaranteed by any Person, (iii) the Sleeve Provider has approved in its
reasonable discretion the form of such guarantee and (iv) Moodys or S&P has issued a credit
rating for long-term senior unsecured, and non-credit enhanced debt of such guarantor, such
credit rating issued by each of Moodys and S&P, as applicable, as in effect at such time in
respect of the guarantor (in the event of a split rating the lower rating shall apply);
-6-
(c) with respect to any Counterparty, if neither clause (a) nor
clause (b) above shall apply at such time, the credit rating, if any, for such
Person designated in writing by the Sleeve Provider and in effect at such time for purposes
of this Agreement (which the Sleeve Provider may designate or withhold in its reasonable
discretion after consultation with, and review of any relevant credit information provided
by, the Sleeve Obligors); or
(d) with respect to the ML Guarantee Provider, if Moodys or S&P has issued a credit
rating for long-term senior unsecured, and non-credit enhanced, Dollar-denominated debt of
the ML Guarantee Provider, such credit rating, or, if such credit rating in not available,
the issuer rating of the ML Guarantee Provider, issued by Moodys or S&P, as applicable, as
in effect at such time in respect of the ML Guarantee Provider.
Credit Sleeve Obligations mean the Obligations of the Sleeve Obligors under this
Agreement, including the Reimbursement Obligations and the Obligations in respect of the payment of
all Monthly Sleeve Fees, Make-whole Payment and any other amounts required to be paid by the Sleeve
Obligors hereunder.
Credit Sleeve Termination Date means the earliest date on which the Credit Sleeve
Obligations have been terminated and satisfied in full and all Merrill Collateral, including all
C&I Guarantees, posted by the Merrill Parties has been returned to the Merrill Parties or
reimbursement has been made therefore and on which all other obligations owed to the Merrill
Parties hereunder and under the other Transaction Documents have been paid and satisfied in full
(in each case, other than indemnities and any similar obligations of NRG and the Other Sleeve
Obligors not then due and payable that expressly survive termination of this Agreement and the
other Transaction Documents).
Credit Support Agreement means a credit support agreement among a Counterparty, REPS
and the Sleeve Provider, in each case, in the form in effect as of the Unwind Start Date.
Current Adjustment Amount has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 10.
Current Collateral means, for any day, all cash and Acceptable Letters of Credit
posted by or on behalf of the Sleeve Obligors to the Merrill Parties pursuant to clauses
(a)(i)(1) or (a)(ii)(A) of Section 10 of this Agreement, which as of such day
has not theretofore been applied or used by the Merrill Parties to satisfy any Credit Sleeve
Obligation or otherwise returned to NRG.
Current Draw Reimbursement Obligations means Draw Reimbursement Obligations other
than any portion thereof that becomes a Deferred Reimbursement Obligation.
Current Exposure means, as of any Business Day, (a) the sum, without duplication, of
(i) the Current Mark-to-Market of all Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions, (ii) all cash, letters
of credit, surety bonds and any cash equivalents posted by the Merrill Parties under this
Agreement, (iii) the aggregate amount of all outstanding ML Guarantees (other than any ML Guarantee
of a Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction) and (iv) Current Payables, in each case, as determined by
the Merrill Parties as of such Business Day and set forth in the related Exposure Report; provided
that for purposes of the foregoing (1) Current Mark-to-Market shall
-7-
exclude the effect of the True Forward Hedge Positions solely to the extent such positions are
in-the-money to the Sleeve Obligors and exceed Current Payables and (2) the amount of any ML
Guarantee shall be deemed equal to the stated or determinable amount of the related primary
obligation, or portion thereof, in respect of which such ML Guarantee is made or, if not stated or
determinable, the maximum reasonably anticipated liability in respect thereof as determined by ML
Guarantee Provider in good faith. Without limiting any challenge rights of the Sleeve Obligors
provided in Part I of Schedule 1.01(c), the determination of Current Exposure shall be
conclusive and binding on all of the Parties hereto absent manifest error. As used in this
definition, True Forward Hedge Positions means all Forward Hedge Positions (as defined in
Schedule 1.01(c)).
Current Mark-to-Market has the meaning ascribed thereto in Schedule 1.01(c).
Current Payables means, for any day, the aggregate accounts payable balance for such
day of the Sleeve Obligors under all Power and Hedging Contracts in respect of which any
Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction remains outstanding, as reflected in the books and records of
the Sleeve Obligors.
Custody Date means the date on which a definitive standby custody agreement with an
Acceptable Collateral Agent has been executed and delivered by each of NRG, MLCI and such
Acceptable Collateral Agent.
Default means an Event of Default or an event that with notice or lapse of time or
both would, unless cured or waived, become an Event of Default.
Deferred Cure Reimbursement Obligations has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 12.07(b).
Deferred Draw Reimbursement Obligations has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 3.02.
Deferred Reimbursement Obligations means the Deferred Draw Reimbursement Obligations
and Deferred Cure Reimbursement Obligations.
Dollars and $ means lawful money of the United States of America.
Draw Reimbursement Obligations has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section
3.02.
Environmental Laws means any and all Federal, state, local, regional and foreign
statutes, laws, rules of common law, constitutional provisions, regulations, ordinances, rules
judgments, orders, decrees, permits, concessions, grants, franchises, licenses, agreements or
governmental restrictions relating to pollution and the protection of the environment or Hazardous
Materials, including, those relating to the use analysis, generation, manufacture, storage,
discharge, emission, release, disposal, transportation treatment, investigation, removal, or
remediation of Hazardous Materials. Environmental Laws include those acts commonly referred to as:
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980; the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act; the National Environmental Policy
-8-
Act; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,
the Solid Waste Disposal Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control
Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and their state counterparts.
ERCOT means the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or any successor thereto.
ERISA means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from
time to time, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
ERISA Affiliate means any trade or business (whether or not incorporated) which is a
member of the controlled group of RERH Holdings or under common control with RERH Holdings within
the meaning of Section 414(b) or (c) of the Code (and Sections 414(m) and (o) of the Code for
purposes of provisions relating to Section 412 of the Code) or Section 4001(a)(14) of ERISA.
ERISA Event means (a) a reportable event (within the meaning of Section 4043 of
ERISA) with respect to a Pension Plan; (b) a withdrawal by RERH Holdings or any ERISA Affiliate
from a Pension Plan subject to Section 4063 of ERISA during a plan year in which it was a
substantial employer (as defined in Section 4001(a)(2) of ERISA) or a cessation of operations that
is treated as such a withdrawal under Section 4062(e) of ERISA; (c) a complete or partial
withdrawal (within the meaning of Sections 4203 or 4205 of ERISA) by RERH Holdings or any ERISA
Affiliate from a Multiemployer Plan or notification that a Multiemployer Plan is in reorganization;
(d) the filing of a notice of intent to terminate, the treatment of a Plan amendment as a
termination under Sections 4041 or 4041A of ERISA, or the commencement of proceedings by the PBGC
to terminate a Pension Plan or Multiemployer Plan; (e) an event or condition which constitutes
grounds under Section 4042 of ERISA for the termination of, or the appointment of a trustee to
administer, any Pension Plan or Multiemployer Plan; or (f) the imposition of any liability under
Title IV of ERISA, other than for PBGC premiums due but not delinquent under Section 4007 of ERISA,
upon RERH Holdings or any ERISA Affiliate.
Event of Default means a Sleeve Provider Event of Default or a Reliant Event of
Default.
Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exchange Traded Contract has the meaning ascribed thereto in the Existing CSRA.
Excluded Subsidiaries means collectively, the Excluded Subsidiaries from time to
time as defined in the NRG Credit Agreement and the Excluded Subsidiaries from time to time as
defined in the Senior Note Documents as the NRG Credit Agreement and such Senior Note Documents are
in effect on the Unwind Start Date, it being understood and agreed that any provisions in effect on
the date hereof under the NRG Credit Agreement permitting any Person to designate and re-designate
a Subsidiary as an Excluded Subsidiary shall apply hereunder and upon any such designation under
the NRG Credit Agreement, the relevant Subsidiary shall be an Excluded Subsidiary hereunder.
-9-
Exclusivity and Fee Letter means that certain letter agreement, dated February 22,
2009, from NRG and accepted and agreed to by the Merrill Parties.
Exempt Subsidiaries means the Exempt Subsidiaries from time to time as defined in
the NRG Credit Agreement as such agreement is in effect on the Unwind Start Date.
Existing CSRA has the meaning ascribed thereto in the introductory paragraphs to
this Agreement.
Existing Security Documents shall mean the Security Documents (as defined in the
Existing CSRA).
Exposure Report has the meaning ascribed thereto in Schedule 1.01(c).
Fair Market Value means the value that would be paid by a willing buyer to a willing
seller in a transaction not involving distress or necessity of either party, determined in good
faith by the chief financial officer or the treasurer of NRG or Board of Directors of NRG or the
selling entity.
Federal Funds Rate means, for any day, the rate per annum equal to the weighted
average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve
System arranged by Federal funds brokers on such day, as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York on the Business Day next succeeding such day; provided, that (a) if such day is not a
Business Day, the Federal Funds Rate for such day shall be such rate on such transactions on the
next preceding Business Day as so published on the next succeeding Business Day, and (b) if no such
rate is so published on such next succeeding Business Day, the Federal Funds Rate for such day
shall be the average rate (rounded upward, if necessary, to a whole multiple of 1/100 of 1%)
charged to Bank of America, N.A. on such day on such transactions as determined by the Sleeve
Provider.
Federal Reserve Board means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System of
the United States of America.
First Execution Date means September 24, 2006.
Fiscal Quarter means each three month period of a Fiscal Year ending on March 31,
June 30, September 30, and December 31.
Fiscal Year means any period of twelve consecutive calendar months ending on
December 31; references to a Fiscal Year with a number corresponding to any calendar year
(e.g., the 2006 Fiscal Year) refer to the Fiscal Year ending on December 31 of
such calendar year.
GAAP means generally accepted accounting principles set forth in the opinions and
pronouncements of the Accounting Principles Board and statements and pronouncements of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board or in such other statements by such other entity as
-10-
have been approved by a significant segment of the accounting profession, which are in effect
from time to time.
Governmental Authority means the government of the United States of America, any
other nation or any political subdivision thereof, whether state, county, or local, and any agency,
authority, instrumentality, regulatory body, court, central bank, independent system operator,
transmission organization or other entity to the extent exercising executive, legislative,
judicial, taxing, monetary, regulatory, supervisory or administrative powers or functions of or
pertaining to government or the regulation of the business of the Sleeve Obligors.
Governmental Contract means a contract for the purchase or sale of any retail
electric products or services between any Sleeve Obligor and a Governmental Customer.
Governmental Customer means (a) any agency, authority, instrumentality, central
bank, independent system operator, transmission organization or other entity owned or controlled by
any Governmental Authority or (b) any Person that is or could be a Governmental Authority; in
either case, to the extent acting in a commercial capacity under a Governmental Contract.
Guarantee means a guarantee other than by endorsement of negotiable instruments for
collection in the ordinary course of business, direct or indirect, in any manner including by way
of a pledge of assets or through letters of credit or reimbursement agreements in respect thereof,
of all or any part of any Indebtedness (whether arising by virtue of partnership arrangements, or
by agreements to keep-well, to purchase assets, goods, securities or services, to take or pay or to
maintain financial statement conditions or otherwise; provided, that standard contractual
indemnities that do not relate to Indebtedness shall not be considered a Guarantee). The term
Guarantee as a defined verb has a corresponding meaning.
Guaranteed Obligations has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 11.01.
Hazardous Materials means all explosive, flammable, corrosive or radioactive
substances or wastes and all hazardous, carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic substances, wastes or
other pollutants, including petroleum or petroleum distillates, asbestos or asbestos-containing
materials, polychlorinated biphenyls, radon gas, infectious or medical wastes, toxic mold and all
other substances or wastes of any nature regulated pursuant to any Environmental Law.
ICE means the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. or its successor.
Indebtedness means, with respect to any specified Person, any indebtedness of such
Person (excluding accrued expenses or trade payables), whether or not contingent (without
duplication):
(a) in respect of borrowed money;
(b) evidenced by bonds, notes, debentures or similar instruments or letters of credit
or reimbursement agreements in respect thereof;
(c) in respect of bankers acceptances;
-11-
(d) representing Capital Lease Obligations or Attributable Debt in respect of sale and
leaseback transactions, Synthetic Lease Obligations or financing leases;
(e) representing the balance deferred and unpaid of the purchase price of any property
or services due more than six months after such property is acquired or such services are
completed;
(f) representing any Interest Hedging Obligations; or
(g) consisting of Disqualified Stock;
whether or not any of the preceding items appear as a liability upon a balance sheet of the
specified Person prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the term Indebtedness includes
all Indebtedness of others secured by a Lien on any asset of the specified Person (whether or not
such Indebtedness is assumed by the specified Person) and, to the extent not otherwise included,
the Guarantee by the specified Person of any Indebtedness of any other Person. The amount of any
Indebtedness outstanding as of any date will be:
(i) the accreted value of the Indebtedness, in the case of any Indebtedness issued with
original issue discount;
(ii) the principal amount of and premium (if any) on the Indebtedness, in the case of
any other Indebtedness;
(iii) in respect of Indebtedness of other Persons secured by a Lien on the assets of
the specified Person, the lesser of:
(A) the Fair Market Value of such asset at such date of determination, and
(B) the amount of such Indebtedness of such other Persons; and
(iv) in respect of any Guarantee, an amount equal to the stated or determinable amount
of the related primary obligation, or portion thereof, in respect of which such Guarantee is
made or, if not stated or determinable, the maximum reasonably anticipated liability in
respect thereof as determined by the guaranteeing Person in good faith.
Interest Hedging Obligations means, with respect to any specified Person, the net
obligations of such Person under:
(a) interest rate swap agreements (whether from fixed to floating or from
floating to fixed), interest rate cap agreements and interest rate collar
agreements;
(b) other agreements or arrangements designed to manage interest rate risk; and
-12-
(c) other agreements or arrangements designed to protect such Person against
fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Law means, as to any Person, any law, rule, regulation, ordinance or treaty, or any
determination, ruling or other directive by or from a court, arbitrator or other Governmental
Authority, including ERCOT, in each case applicable to or binding on such Person or any of its
property or assets or to which such Person or any of its property or assets is subject.
Lien means, with respect to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security
interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of such asset, whether or not filed, recorded or
otherwise perfected under applicable law, including any conditional sale or other title retention
agreement and any lease that constitutes a security interest.
Loans means the loans made by the Working Capital Facility Provider to REPS under,
and in accordance with, the Working Capital Facility.
Make-whole Payment has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.05.
Margin Stock means margin stock within the meaning of Regulations T, U and X of
the Federal Reserve Board.
Market Information means market information such as price curves, volatilities,
interest rates and similar information for which quotes are customarily available from reference
market makers.
Material Adverse Effect means a material adverse effect upon (a) the business,
operations, property or financial condition of NRG and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole; or
(b) the validity or enforceability against any of NRG or any Other Sleeve Obligor of any
Transaction Document to which it is a party or the material rights and remedies of the Sleeve
Provider thereunder.
Merrill Collateral or ML Collateral has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 3.01.
Merrill Parties means the Sleeve Provider and the ML Guarantee Provider.
Minimum Transfer Amount means $100,000.
Mirror OTC Contract has the meaning ascribed thereto in the Existing CSRA.
ML Credit Event means the any of the following:
(a) the ML Guarantee Provider (i) shall default (after giving effect to all
applicable grace periods) in the payment of any Indebtedness or Guarantee having an
aggregate principal amount (including amounts owing to all creditors under any
combined or syndicated credit arrangement) of more than $100,000,000 and (ii) either
(A) at the time of such default (after giving effect to all applicable grace
periods), the final scheduled maturity of such Indebtedness shall have
-13-
occurred or (B) the final scheduled maturity of such Indebtedness shall have
been accelerated; or
(b) any senior unsecured, non-credit enhanced debt of the ML Guarantee Provider
shall fail to maintain a Credit Rating of at least BBB by S&P or Baa by Moodys; or
(c) the ML Guarantee Provider institutes or consents to the institution of any
proceeding under any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, receivership,
liquidation, winding-up or other debtor relief law, or makes an assignment for the
benefit of creditors; or applies for or consents to the appointment of any receiver,
trustee, custodian, conservator, liquidator, rehabilitator or similar officer for it
or for all or any material part of their respective property; or any receiver,
trustee, custodian, conservator, liquidator, rehabilitator or similar officer is
appointed without the application or consent of the ML Guarantee Provider and the
appointment continues undischarged or unstayed for 60 calendar days; or any
proceeding under any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, receivership,
liquidation, winding-up or other debtor relief law relating to the ML Guarantee
Provider or to all or any material part of their respective property is instituted
without the consent of such Person and continues undismissed or unstayed for 60
calendar days, or an order for relief is entered in any such proceeding; or
(d) the ML Guarantee Provider becomes unable or admits in writing its inability
or fails generally to pay its debts as they become due; or
(e) the entry into any definitive agreement for the sale, merger or
consolidation, or other transaction or disposition of or by either of the Merrill
Parties, if the resulting successor to or assignee of either of the Merrill Parties
would not be a direct or indirect 100% owned subsidiary of the ML Parent Guarantor,
or would otherwise result in the termination of the BAC Guarantee.
ML Guarantee means each guarantee listed on Schedule 1.01(a) and any
guarantee by the ML Guarantee Provider in respect of any Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction.
ML Guarantee Provider means ML&Co.
ML&Co. means Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation.
MLCI means Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
ML Parent Guarantor means Bank of America Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
Monthly Determination Date means, with respect to any calendar month, the last
Business Day of the immediately preceding month.
Monthly Payment Date means, in respect of any month, the date two Business Days
after the first day of such month.
-14-
Monthly Sleeve Fee means, in respect of any calendar month for which the Credit
Sleeve Termination Date has not occurred or prior to the Monthly Determination Date for such month,
(a) if the Merrill Parties remain obligated in respect of any Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions
with Current Exposure that is equal to or greater than 50 BCFe (as determined as of the Monthly
Determination Date for such month), $1,000,000, (b) if the Merrill Parties remain obligated in
respect of any Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions with Current Exposure that is equal to or
greater than 30 BCFe but less than 50 BCFe (as determined as of the Monthly Determination Date for
such month), $750,000, and (c) if the Merrill Parties remain obligated in respect of any
Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions with Current Exposure that is less than 30 BCFe (as determined
as of the Monthly Determination Date for such month) or if the Credit Sleeve Termination Date has
not occurred on or prior to such Monthly Determination Date, $500,000; provided that for any month
following January 2010 in which the Credit Sleeve Termination Date has not occurred on or prior to
the Monthly Determination Date for such month, the Monthly Sleeve Fee that would otherwise be
payable for such month shall be increased by 100%.
Moodys shall mean Moodys Investors Service, Inc. or if such company shall cease to
issue ratings, another nationally recognized rating company selected in good faith by mutual
agreement of the Sleeve Provider and NRG.
Multiemployer Plan means a multiemployer plan defined as such in Section 3(37) of
ERISA to which contributions have been made, or have been required to be made, by RERH Holdings or
any ERISA Affiliate and that is covered by Title IV of ERISA.
Notice Date has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.02.
NRG has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
NRG Credit Agreement means the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as
of June 8, 2007 between NRG, Citicorp North America Inc., as Administrative Agent, and the lenders
and other Persons party thereto, as amended, restated, refinanced and otherwise modified from time
to time.
NYMEX means the New York Mercantile Exchange or its successor.
Obligations means any amounts, principal, interest, premium, fees, indemnifications,
reimbursements, expenses, damages and other liabilities payable under the applicable documentation.
Obligee Guarantor has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 11.06.
Other Sleeve Obligors means each of REPS, RERH Holdings, RERH, RERS, RERR and any
other Subsidiaries of RERH Holdings and, in each case, their respective successors and assigns.
Partial Credit Sleeve Termination Date means the earliest date on which all of the
Merrill Parties obligations in respect of the Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions have been
terminated and satisfied in full and all Merrill Collateral (other than any C&I Guarantee in
-15-
respect of which NRG has satisfied the requirements of Section 10(a)(iii)) posted by the
Merrill Parties has been returned to the Merrill Parties or reimbursement has been made therefor.
Party has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
PBGC means the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation or any entity succeeding to any
or all of its functions under ERISA.
Pension Plan means any employee pension benefit plan (as such term is defined in
Section 3(2) of ERISA), other than a Multiemployer Plan, that is subject to Title IV of ERISA and
is sponsored or maintained by RERH Holdings or any ERISA Affiliate or to which RERH Holdings or any
ERISA Affiliate contributes or has an obligation to contribute or with respect to which RERH
Holdings or any ERISA Affiliate has any direct or contingent liability, or in the case of a
multiple employer or other plan described in Section 4064(a) of ERISA, has made contributions at
any time during the immediately preceding five plan years.
Person means any individual, corporation, firm, partnership, joint venture,
association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or
government or other entity.
Plan means any employee benefit plan (as such term is defined in Section 3(3) of
ERISA) established by RERH Holdings or its Subsidiaries or with respect to which RERH Holdings or
its Subsidiaries could have any direct or contingent liability or, with respect to any such plan
that is subject to Section 412 of the Code, or Title IV of ERISA, any such plan established by an
ERISA Affiliate.
Post-Default Rate means a per annum rate equal to the Base Rate (as in effect from
time to time) plus 11.00%.
Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations means, collectively, the Post-Unwind Start Date
Transactions, the outstanding cash postings to TDSPs described on Schedule 1.01(a) hereto
and the ML Guarantees.
Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction means a trade entered prior to the Unwind Start
Date in accordance with this Agreement under which the final delivery date, payment date, or
settlement date is scheduled to occur after the Unwind Start Date, and in each case, is identified
on Schedule 1.01(a) hereto.
Posted Collateral means, for any day, all cash and letters of credit posted by the
Sleeve Obligors to the Merrill Parties under this Agreement, including all Current Collateral and
Contingent Collateral posted in accordance with Section 10, which as of such day has not
theretofore been applied or used by the Merrill Parties to satisfy any Credit Sleeve Obligation or
otherwise returned to NRG.
Power and Hedging Contract means each over-the-counter master agreement between REPS
and a Counterparty providing for transactions regarding Accepted Products (as such term is defined
in the Existing CSRA), and including as part thereof the associated Credit Support Agreement, in
each case, existing on the Unwind Start Date.
-16-
Preferred Equity means, collectively, each of (i) the Certificate of Designations of
NRG, adopted December 14, 2004, with respect to 4.0% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock and (ii)
the Certificate of Designations of NRG, adopted August 5, 2005, with respect to 3.625% Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock.
Prime Rate means a fluctuating rate of interest equal to the rate of interest most
recently announced by the Wall Street Journal as the prime rate for Dollar-denominated loans.
Reimbursement Guarantors means each of the Other Sleeve Obligors and their
respective successors and assigns.
Reimbursement Guaranty means the guarantee of the Reimbursement Guarantors to repay
the Guaranteed Obligations in accordance with Section 11.
Reimbursement Obligations means the Draw Reimbursement Obligations and the Deferred
Reimbursement Obligations.
Reliant Default means any Default with respect to a Reliant Event of Default.
Reliant Event of Default has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 8.01.
Remaining C&I Exposure means an amount equal to 115% of the sum of all exposure and
all other liabilities and potential liabilities of the Merrill Parties under each C&I Guarantee, as
reasonably determined by the Merrill Parties (in each case, calculated by the Merrill Parties in a
manner consistent with the calculation of Current Exposure and Contingent Exposure hereunder).
REPS has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble of this Agreement.
RERH has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
RERH Holdings has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
RERR has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
RERS has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
Responsible Officer means the chief executive officer, president, chief financial
officer, treasurer or assistant treasurer of a Party and, in addition with respect to the Other
Sleeve Obligors, any officer thereof that is also a vice president or more senior officer of NRG
(excluding vice presidents in marketing). Any document delivered hereunder that is signed by a
Responsible Officer of a Party shall be conclusively presumed to have been authorized by all
necessary corporate, partnership and/or other action on the part of such Party and such Responsible
Officer shall be conclusively presumed to have acted on behalf of such Party.
Restricted Subsidiary shall have the meaning set forth in the NRG Credit Agreement
as in effect on the date hereof, it being understood and agreed that any and all
-17-
provisions in effect on the date hereof under the NRG Credit Agreement permitting any Person
to designate and re-designate any Restricted Subsidiary or any other type of Subsidiary shall apply
hereunder; provided that, for purposes of this Agreement, each Other Sleeve Obligor shall be deemed
to be a Restricted Subsidiary at all times.
S&P means Standard & Poors Ratings Group (presently a division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.), together with its successors, or, if such company shall cease to issue ratings,
another nationally recognized rating company selected in good faith by mutual agreement of the
Sleeve Provider and NRG.
Scheduled Term means the period from the First Execution Date through January 29,
2010.
SEC means the Securities and Exchange Commission or any Governmental Authority
succeeding to any of its principal functions.
Senior Note Documents means any or all of the following:
(a) The Base Indenture, dated as of February 2, 2006 (as amended, restated, refinanced,
modified or otherwise in effect from time to time) (the Base Indenture), by and
between NRG and Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, as trustee (the Trustee);
(b) First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 2, 2006, by and among NRG, the
subsidiaries of the Company set forth on Schedule I attached thereto and the Trustee,
providing for the issuance of 7.250% Senior Notes due 2014;
(c) Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 2, 2006, by and among NRG, the
subsidiaries of the Company set forth on Schedule I attached thereto and the Trustee,
providing for the issuance of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2016;
(d) Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2006, by and among NRG, the
guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(e) Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2006, by and among NRG, the
guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(f) Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2006, by and among NRG, the
guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(g) Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2006, among NRG, the guarantors
listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(h) Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated November 13, 2006 among NRG, the guarantors
listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(i) Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated November 13, 2006 among NRG, the guarantors
listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
-18-
(j) Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2006, by and among NRG, the
subsidiaries of NRG set forth on Schedule I attached thereto and the Trustee, providing for
the issuance of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2017;
(k) Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated July 19, 2007 among NRG, the guarantors listed
on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(l) Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated July 19, 2007 by and among NRG, the
guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(m) Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 19, 2007 among NRG, the
subsidiaries of the Company set forth on Schedule I attached thereto and the Trustee;
(n) Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 28, 2007 among NRG, the
guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(o) Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 28, 2007, by and among NRG,
the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and the Trustee;
(p) Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 28, 2007, by and among NRG,
the subsidiaries of the Company set forth on Schedule I attached thereto and the Trustee;
(q) Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2009, by and among NRG, the
subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(r) Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2009, by and among NRG,
the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(s) Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2009, by and among NRG,
the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(t) Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 8, 2009, by and among NRG, the
subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(u) Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 8, 2009, by and among NRG, the
subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(v) Twenty-first Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 8, 2009, by and among NRG, the
subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(w) Twenty-second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 5, 2009, by and among NRG,
the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(x) Twenty-third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 14, 2009, by and among NRG,
the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
-19-
(y) Twenty-fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2009, by and among
NRG, the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(z) Twenty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2009, by and among NRG,
the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(aa) Twenty-sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2009, by and among
NRG, the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee;
(bb) Twenty-seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2009, by and among
NRG, the subsidiaries of NRG party thereto and the Trustee; and
(cc) Any other supplemental indenture issued pursuant to the Base Indenture.
Senior Notes shall mean each note issued pursuant to the Senior Note Documents.
Significant Subsidiary shall mean any Subsidiary that would be a significant
subsidiary as defined in Article 1, Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X, promulgated pursuant to the
Securities Act, as such Regulation is in effect on the date hereof and shall in any event include
the Core Collateral Subsidiaries.
Sleeve Obligors has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
Sleeve Provider has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this Agreement.
Sleeve Provider Event of Default has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section
8.02.
Solvent and Solvency mean, with respect to any Person on any date of
determination, that on such date (i) the fair value of the property of such Person is greater than
the total amount of liabilities, including contingent liabilities, of such Person, (ii) the present
fair salable value of the assets of such Person is not less than the amount that will be required
to pay the probable liability of such Person on its debts as they become absolute and matured,
(iii) such Person does not intend to, and does not believe that it will, incur debts or liabilities
beyond such Persons ability to pay such debts and liabilities as they mature and (iv) such Person
is not engaged in business or a transaction, and is not about to engage in business or a
transaction, for which such Persons property would constitute an unreasonably small capital. The
amount of contingent liabilities at any time shall be computed as the amount that, in the light of
all the facts and circumstances existing at such time, represents the amount that can reasonably be
expected to become an actual or matured liability; provided that if the context in which Solvent
or Solvency is used refers to a Person together with its Subsidiaries, Person as used above shall
be deemed to be a reference to such Person together with its Subsidiaries.
Specified Transaction means, with respect to any Person (i) any prepaid forward sale
of energy, oil, gas or minerals by such Person that is intended primarily as a borrowing of
-20-
funds, excluding volumetric production payments, and (ii) any interest rate, currency,
commodity or other swap, collar, cap, option or other derivative that is intended primarily as a
borrowing of funds, or any combination of any of the foregoing, with the amount of the obligations
of such Person thereunder being the net obligations of such Person thereunder.
Subsidiary of a Person means a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited
liability company or other business entity of which a majority of the shares of securities or other
interests having ordinary voting power for the election of directors or other governing body (other
than securities or interests having such power only by reason of the happening of a contingency)
are at the time beneficially owned, or the management of which is otherwise controlled, directly,
or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, or both, by such Person.
Synthetic Lease Obligation means the monetary obligation of a Person under a
so-called synthetic, off-balance sheet or tax retention lease.
TDSP means a transmission or distribution service provider.
Terminated Agreements has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 12.18(b).
Third A&R Date means May 1, 2009.
Transaction Documents means this Agreement and any other contract or agreement
(including ISDA Master Agreements, but excluding any Credit Support Agreements and any Terminated
Agreements) between any Merrill Party or its Affiliates, on one hand, and any Sleeve Obligor or its
Affiliates, on the other hand, relating to the transactions contemplated hereby.
Unaudited Financial Statements means the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of NRG
and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at the end of the Fiscal Quarter ended June 30, 2009, and the
related unaudited consolidated statements of income or operations for such Fiscal Quarter and cash
flows for the Fiscal Quarter then ended, including normal year-end adjustments and without
comparisons to prior periods.
Unfunded Pension Liability means the failure of a Pension Plan to satisfy the
minimum funding standard applicable to such Pension Plan for any plan year, as determined in
accordance with Section 412 of the Code.
Unrestricted Subsidiary shall have the meaning set forth in the NRG Credit
Agreement.
Unwind Start Date has the meaning ascribed thereto in the preamble to this
Agreement.
Valuation Date means, (a) when used with respect to the determination of the Current
Adjustment Amount, each Business Day, and (b) when used with respect to the determination of the
Contingent Adjustment Amount, each Monthly Determination Date.
-21-
Voting Stock of any Person as of any date means the Capital Stock of such Person
that is at the time entitled to vote in the election of the board of directors of such Person.
Wholly Owned Subsidiary of any specified Person means a Subsidiary of such Person
all of the outstanding Capital Stock or other ownership interests of which (other than directors
qualifying shares) is owned by such Person or by one or more other Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of
such Person.
Working Capital Facility means the Working Capital Facility dated as of September 1,
2006, as amended and restated as of the Third A&R Date, among Working Capital Facility Provider, as
Lender, REPS, as Borrower, and the Other Sleeve Obligors, as Guarantors.
Working Capital Facility Provider means Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, a
Delaware corporation.
1.02. Terms Generally. The definitions of terms herein shall apply equally to the singular
and plural forms of the terms defined. Whenever the context may require, any pronoun shall include
the corresponding masculine, feminine and neuter forms. The words include, includes and
including shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase without limitation. The word will
shall be construed to have the same meaning and effect as the word shall. Unless the context
requires otherwise (a) any definition of or reference to any agreement, instrument or other
document herein shall be construed as referring to such agreement, instrument or other document as
from time to time amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, renewed or replaced
(subject to any restrictions on such amendments, restatements, supplements or modifications,
renewals or replacements set forth therein or herein), (b) references to any law, constitution,
statute, treaty, regulation, rule or ordinance, including any section or other part thereof (each,
for purposes of this Section 1.02, a law) shall refer to that law as amended from
time to time and shall include any successor law, (c) any reference herein to any Person shall be
construed to include such Persons successors and permitted assigns, (d) the words herein,
hereof and hereunder, and words of similar import, shall be construed to refer to this
Agreement in its entirety and not to any particular provision hereof and (e) all references herein
to Sections, Exhibits and Schedules shall be construed to refer to Sections of, and Exhibits and
Schedules to, this Agreement.
1.03. Accounting Terms and Determinations. Unless otherwise specified herein, all
accounting terms used herein shall be interpreted, all determinations with respect to accounting
matters hereunder shall be made, and all financial statements and certificates and reports as to
financial matters required to be furnished to the Sleeve Provider hereunder shall be prepared in
accordance with GAAP, applied on a basis consistent with that used in the financial statements
referred to in Section 5.05.
-22-
Section 2. Credit Sleeve for Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations.
2.01. Credit Sleeve.
(a) From and after the Unwind Start Date, and otherwise subject to and in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Merrill Parties shall:
(i) until the earlier of the Credit Sleeve Termination Date and January 29, 2010, cause
the ML Guarantee Provider to perform under ML Guarantees in respect of REPS obligations
under the Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions, and prevent any events of default or
termination events relating solely to the ML Guarantee Provider as a credit support provider
under such Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions, including the related Credit Support
Agreements;
(ii) until the earlier of the Credit Sleeve Termination Date and January 29, 2010,
cause the Sleeve Provider to perform under Credit Support Agreements providing credit
support for the obligations in respect of the Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions, and
prevent any events of default or termination events relating solely to the Sleeve Provider
as a credit support provider under the Credit Support Agreements related to the Post-Unwind
Start Date Transactions;
(iii) until the earlier of the Credit Sleeve Termination Date and April 30, 2010, cause
the ML Guarantee Provider to perform under the C&I Guarantees; and
(iv) execute and deliver such further certificates, documents and agreements, and take
such further actions, as NRG may reasonably request to fully implement the intent of the
foregoing;
provided, however, that from and after the Unwind Start Date, the foregoing obligations of
the Merrill Parties are subject to the following: (A) all obligations of the Merrill Parties
to perform in respect of any ML Guarantee or to post or provide any collateral or other
credit support under this Agreement shall be limited to the Post-Unwind Start Date
Obligations; (B) all commitments of the Merrill Parties with respect to entering into any
Mirror OTC Contract or Exchange Traded Contract shall be terminated; (C) all commitments of
the Merrill Parties with respect to providing ML Guarantees or the posting or provision of
collateral to Governmental Authorities that are not Governmental Customers shall be
terminated, including, without limitations, all obligations to post or provide collateral to
any TDSP or ERCOT; and (D) the Sleeve Obligors, in consultation with the Merrill Parties,
shall have the right to deliver to all applicable Persons notices that all such commitments
as provided in the foregoing clauses (A), (B) and (C) have terminated and the right to the
return of any collateral theretofore posted under such commitments.
(b) From and after the Unwind Start Date, each of the Other Sleeve Obligors shall have the
right to conduct any power, gas and other commodity purchases or sales and hedging transactions;
provided that (i) such transactions do not impose setoff rights against any Post-Unwind Start Date
Obligations and (ii) the Other Sleeve Obligors may not enter into any
-23-
transaction under any Power and Hedging Contract so long as any Post-Unwind Start Date
Transaction remains outstanding thereunder and so long as the Merrill Parties have not been fully
released and legally discharged from all obligations under such Power and Hedging Contract (other
than any indemnities and/or other contingent obligations not then due and payable, if any).
2.02. Power and Hedging Contracts; Obligations of Compliance Parties.
(a) Power and Hedging Contracts. In connection with the obligations of the Merrill
Parties under Section 2.01(a):
(i) Modifications to any Power and Hedging Contract, Credit Support Agreement or ML
Guarantee, in each case, in respect of any Post-Unwind Start Date Obligation shall require
the consent of the Merrill Parties, not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
(ii) Following receipt of notice from any Counterparty or Governmental Customer in
respect of which any Post-Unwind Start Date Obligation is outstanding, that REPS (or the
Sleeve Provider on its behalf) is required to post or return collateral in connection with
any collateral posting obligation that the Sleeve Provider has undertaken in accordance with
this Agreement, REPS shall promptly (and in no event later than, for collateral to be posted
on the same day, 11:00 a.m. CPT on such day of receipt, and for collateral to be posted on
the next day, 2:00 p.m. CPT on such day of receipt) provide such notice to the Sleeve
Provider. On each day in which REPS is permitted to value exposure or make any other
determination in respect of collateral to be posted by or to the Sleeve Provider in
connection with any posting obligation that the Sleeve Provider has agreed to undertake in
connection with this Agreement, REPS shall make such valuation or determination in good
faith and in a commercially reasonable manner. To the extent applicable, following any
valuation or determination made pursuant to the prior sentence, REPS shall make demand to
the applicable Person for the posting of collateral by or the return of collateral to the
Sleeve Provider and to the extent the Sleeve Provider receives such a demand from REPS, the
Sleeve Provider shall, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including,
without limitation, the provisions of Section 4, and the related Credit Support
Agreement, make such posting of collateral as demanded, whether or not the Sleeve Provider
disputes the valuation, determination or demand (but subject to the Sleeve Providers rights
to cause the adjustment thereof below). Each valuation, determination and demand of REPS
specified in this clause (ii) shall be made by REPS without consultation with the
Sleeve Provider unless such consultation is sought by REPS, except that:
(1) if the Sleeve Provider disputes any such valuation, determination or
demand, prior to any action taken under paragraphs (2) or (3) below,
and prior to the commencement of any further remedial action, REPS shall negotiate
with the Sleeve Provider in good faith for one Business Day to resolve any such
dispute and upon resolution of such dispute, the applicable valuation, determination
or demand shall be adjusted accordingly, with corresponding adjustments to the
subsequent requests to the Persons to whom such valuations, determinations or
demands apply;
-24-
(2) if the Sleeve Provider disputes any such valuation based on Market
Information, prior to any action taken under paragraph (3) below, the Market
Information and resulting calculation shall be determined in accordance with
Section 12.13 and upon such determination, the applicable valuation shall be
adjusted accordingly, with corresponding adjustments to the subsequent requests to
the Persons to whom such valuations apply; provided that, until such determination
in accordance with Section 12.13, the valuation determined by REPS shall
apply;
(3) to the extent applicable, if after the application of paragraphs
(1) and (2) above, the Sleeve Provider in its reasonable discretion
determines that (x) more than $15,000,000 in outstanding value of Merrill Collateral
remains at any time posted or is requested to be posted in excess of the amount that
is required to be posted as determined by REPS (determined, in each case, on
aggregate basis across all Persons to whom the Sleeve Provider has such excess
posted or has requested posting of Merrill Collateral in an outstanding value of
$2,000,000 or more in connection with this Agreement), or (y) more than $5,000,000
in outstanding value of Merrill Collateral remains at any time posted or is
requested to be posted to any single Person in excess of the amount that is required
to be posted as determined by REPS, then, in either case, if REPS disputes such
determination, such determination shall be referred by the parties to the
Calculation Agent within three Business Days for resolution, and upon resolution of
such dispute the applicable valuation shall apply and REPS shall use its reasonable
best efforts to negotiate with, and to the extent applicable, dispute valuations of,
or provide updated valuations to each such Person holding excess Merrill Collateral
that the Sleeve Provider may direct in accordance with the resolution; provided that
in lieu thereof REPS may instead authorize the Sleeve Provider to do so; and
provided further that, until resolution of this dispute by the Calculation Agent,
the valuation determined by REPS shall apply; and
(4) to the extent applicable, if after application of paragraphs (1)
and (2) above the Sleeve Provider in its reasonable discretion determines
that the outstanding value of any single Counterpartys cash collateral posted or
requested to be posted to any Sleeve Obligor as determined by REPS is more than
$5,000,000 in deficiency of the amount that is required to be posted as determined
by Sleeve Provider, then, if REPS disputes such determination, such determination
shall be referred by the parties to the Calculation Agent for within three Business
Days, and upon resolution of such dispute the applicable valuation shall apply and
REPS shall use its reasonable best efforts to negotiate with, and to the extent
applicable, dispute valuations of, or provide updated valuations to each such
Counterparty that the Sleeve Provider may direct in accordance with the resolution;
provided that in lieu thereof REPS may instead authorize the Sleeve Provider to do
so; and provided further that, until resolution of this dispute by the Calculation
Agent, the valuation determined by REPS shall apply .
(b) Compliance Requirements. Each Compliance Party shall be subject to the Compliance
Requirements.
-25-
Section 3. Payments, Fees and Records.
3.01. Notice of Payment on ML Guarantee or Collateral Foreclosure. The Sleeve Provider
shall notify NRG, promptly upon receipt from any beneficiary or recipient of an ML Guarantee or any
secured party to which the Sleeve Provider has provided collateral pursuant to Section 2
(whether an ML Guarantee, posted cash collateral, surety bond, letter of credit or other collateral
or credit support, Merrill Collateral or ML Collateral) of any demand for
payment under such ML Collateral or any Collateral Foreclosure thereon or of any notice of default.
The Sleeve Provider shall notify NRG of the Dollar amount paid by the Merrill Parties as a result
of such demand or the Dollar amount of Merrill Collateral relating to such Collateral Foreclosure,
as applicable, and the date on which payment was made by a Merrill Party in respect of such demand
or the date on which such Collateral Foreclosure occurred, as applicable (any such date, a
Capital Outlay Date).
3.02. Repayment of Draw Reimbursement Obligations. NRG hereby unconditionally and
irrevocably promises to pay to the Sleeve Provider, on behalf of the applicable Merrill Party, the
entire outstanding Dollar amount of each payment on behalf of the Sleeve Obligors by the ML
Guarantee Provider or the Sleeve Provider arising from each demand for payment under Merrill
Collateral or payment on behalf of the Sleeve Obligors by the Sleeve Provider arising from each
Collateral Foreclosure of ML Collateral and the entire outstanding Dollar amount of any ML
Collateral that is not returned by any person to the Merrill Parties for any reason (including, any
bankruptcy or insolvency of the applicable counterparty) within one Business Day of the time
required by the terms of the applicable Counterparty Document or other applicable arrangement
pursuant to which such Merrill Collateral was posted to such person (each, a Draw
Reimbursement Obligation), notwithstanding the identity of the beneficiary or recipient of any
Merrill Collateral, and without presentment, demand, protest or other formalities of any kind.
Each such Draw Reimbursement Obligation shall mature on the Business Day following the date the
Sleeve Provider delivers notice to NRG of the related Capital Outlay Date as provided in
Section 3.01 (the Notice Date); provided that, in the event that, on or prior to
the Business Day following the Notice Date, NRG delivers to the Sleeve Provider in good faith a
written notice referred to in Section 8.02(b) or (c) predicated upon (i) failure to pay
under any ML Guarantee after demand by the beneficiary complying with the terms and conditions of
the ML Guarantee or (ii) the breach of a Merrill Party of its obligations under Section
2.01 or any Credit Support Agreement, such Draw Reimbursement Obligation shall mature and be
payable on the earliest of (A) the date that the notice to the Sleeve Provider is withdrawn, (B)
the date the underlying failure related to the Draw Reimbursement Obligation is cured, (C) the date
that the remedies under Section 9.02 with respect to such failure have been resolved,
mutually concluded, or finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, or (D) January 29,
2010 (any Reimbursement Obligation subject to the foregoing proviso, a Deferred Draw
Reimbursement Obligation).
Notwithstanding any payment of a Draw Reimbursement Obligation NRG makes as required in this
Section 3.02, NRG does not by making such payment waive any rights under Sections
8.02 and 9.02 against a Merrill Party related to the applicable Draw Reimbursement
Obligation, subject to the limitations in Section 9.04.
-26-
3.03. Interest.
(a) (i) NRG hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the Sleeve Provider, when due and
payable in accordance with Section 3.03(d):
(A) interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the Base Rate (as in effect from
time to time) plus 5.875% on the unreimbursed Dollar amount of each Current Draw
Reimbursement Obligation for the period from and including the Business Day following the
related Notice Date to but excluding the date the Dollar amount of such Current Draw
Reimbursement Obligation shall be paid in full; and
(B) interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the LIBO Rate (as defined in the
Working Capital Facility and incorporated by reference in accordance with Section
3.03(a)(ii)) plus 5.875% on the unpaid Dollar amount of each Deferred Reimbursement
Obligation for the period from and including the Business Day following the related Notice
Date to but excluding the date the Dollar amount of such Deferred Reimbursement Obligation
shall be paid in full.
(ii) NRG agrees, for the benefit of the Sleeve Provider, to perform, comply with and
be bound by each of its covenants, agreements and obligations contained in Sections 2.10,
2.13, and 2.14 of the Working Capital Facility with respect to Deferred Reimbursement
Obligations, as modified and supplemented and in effect from time to time, or as last in
effect in the event the Working Capital Facility shall be terminated.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the above-mentioned provisions of the Working
Capital Facility, together with related definitions (including the definition of LIBO Rate and
Interest Payment Date) and ancillary provisions, are hereby incorporated herein by reference, as
if set forth herein in full, mutatis mutandis, notwithstanding that the Working Capital Facility is
being terminated concurrently with the Unwind Start Date.
(b) Notwithstanding Section 3.03(a), NRG hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the
Sleeve Provider, when due and payable in accordance with Section 3.03(d), interest accruing
at a rate per annum equal to the Post-Default Rate (as in effect from time to time) on (i) the
Dollar amount of each Reimbursement Obligation that is not paid in full within one Business Day
after becoming due and (ii) any other overdue amount payable by NRG or any Other Sleeve Obligor
under any Transaction Documents with any Merrill Party, in each case for the period from and
including the due date thereof to but excluding the date the same is paid in full.
(c) Interest on any amount, including interest on Reimbursement Obligations, shall be computed
on the basis of actual days elapsed (including the first day but excluding the last day) occurring
during the period such interest accrues and a year of 365 or 366 days, as applicable (if computed
by reference to the Prime Rate) or 360 days (if computed by reference to the Federal Funds Rate or
the LIBO Rate).
(d) (i) Subject to clause (iii) below, accrued interest on each Current Draw
Reimbursement Obligation shall be payable monthly on the last Business Day of each month and
-27-
on the date that such Current Draw Reimbursement Obligation shall be paid in full; (ii)
subject to clause (iii) below, accrued interest on each Deferred Reimbursement Obligation
shall be payable on each Interest Payment Date (as defined in the Working Capital Facility and
incorporated by reference in accordance with Section 3.03(a)(ii)) for such Deferred
Reimbursement Obligation and on the date that such Deferred Reimbursement Obligation shall be paid
in full; and (iii) accrued interest on any amount (including Current Draw Reimbursement Obligations
and Deferred Reimbursement Obligations) payable in accordance with Section 3.03(b) shall be
payable on demand from time to time, on the last Business Day of each month and on the date that
such amount is paid in full.
3.04. Monthly Sleeve Fee. NRG hereby unconditionally promises to pay to the Sleeve
Provider, with respect to each month, the Monthly Sleeve Fee for such month, payable in advance on
the Monthly Payment Date for such month. The Monthly Sleeve Fee or any portion thereof shall not
be refundable under any circumstances. In addition, NRG hereby unconditionally promises to pay to
the Sleeve Provider from time to time on demand interest accruing at a rate per annum equal to the
Post-Default Rate (as in effect from time to time) on the aggregate amount of any Monthly Sleeve
Fee and on any other amount payable hereunder that is not paid in full when due.
3.05. Make-Whole Payment. In lieu of any amounts that would otherwise become due and
payable under the Exclusivity and Fee Letter, NRG shall pay to the Sleeve Provider on the Unwind
Start Date a make-whole payment in an amount equal to $5,000,000, and on January 4, 2010 a further
make-whole payment in an amount equal to $5,000,000 (collectively, the Make-whole
Payment). The Make-whole Payment shall discharge the obligations of the Sleeve Obligors under
Section 3(iii) of the Exclusivity and Fee Letter. The Make-whole Payment or any portion thereof
shall not be refundable under any circumstances.
3.06. Payments Generally.
(a) Payments by Sleeve Obligors. Except to the extent otherwise provided herein, all
payments in respect of Reimbursement Obligations, interest, Monthly Sleeve Fees, the Make-whole
Payment and other amounts to be made by the Sleeve Obligors under this Agreement, and, except to
the extent otherwise provided therein, all payments to be made by the Sleeve Obligors under any
other Transaction Document, shall be made in Dollars, in immediately available funds, without
deduction, set-off or counterclaim to the Sleeve Provider at the account designated on Schedule
3.06(a) or any other account designated in writing by the Sleeve Provider to NRG not less than
five Business Days before any payment is made, not later than 3:00 p.m., New York City time, on the
date on which such payment shall become due (each such payment made after such time on such due
date to be deemed to have been made on the next succeeding Business Day).
(b) Extensions to Next Business Day. If the due date of any payment under this
Agreement would otherwise fall on a day that is not a Business Day, such date shall be extended to
the immediately succeeding Business Day and interest shall be payable for any amount so extended
for the period of such extension (except in the case of the Monthly Sleeve Fee).
-28-
3.07. Records; Prima Facie Evidence.
(a) Maintenance of Records by the Sleeve Provider. The Sleeve Provider shall maintain
records in which it shall record (i) each ML Guarantee issued hereunder or other Merrill Collateral
provided hereunder, (ii) the amount of each Reimbursement Obligation, (iii) interest due and
payable or to become due and payable from NRG to the Sleeve Provider hereunder and (iv) the amount
of any sum received by the Sleeve Provider hereunder.
(b) Effect of Entries. The entries made in the records maintained pursuant to
paragraph (a) above shall be prima facie evidence of the existence and
amounts of the obligations recorded therein; provided that the failure of the Sleeve Provider to
maintain such records or any error therein shall not in any manner affect the obligation of NRG to
repay the Reimbursement Obligations in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
Section 4. Conditions.
The obligation of the Merrill Parties to post or provide any Merrill Collateral, including to
post or provide any additional cash collateral or to otherwise make any payment or perform under
any ML Guarantee, in respect of any Post-Unwind Start Date Obligation is subject to the following
conditions precedent that, both immediately prior to and after giving effect thereto and to the
intended use thereof:
(a) (i) Each of the representations and warranties of the Sleeve Obligors made in
Section 5 and in the other Transaction Documents, if any, which is qualified by
materiality shall be true and correct and (ii) each of the other representations and
warranties of the Sleeve Obligors made in Section 5 and in the other Transaction
Documents shall be true and correct in all material respects, in each case of clause (i) and
(ii) on and as of the date of request provision of such Merrill Collateral, with the same
force and effect as if made on and as of such date (or, if any such representation or
warranty is expressly stated to have been made as of a specific date, as of such specific
date);
(b) The Sleeve Obligors shall be in compliance with all obligations to post Current
Collateral and Contingent Collateral in accordance with Section 10; and
(c) no Reliant Default or Reliant Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing.
Each request by NRG or any Other Sleeve Obligor for provision of Merrill Collateral shall
constitute a certification to the effect that the above conditions have been satisfied.
Section 5. Representations and Warranties. NRG and each of the Other Sleeve Obligors hereby
represents and warrants as follows:
5.01. Existence, Qualification and Power; Compliance with Laws. Such Person (a) is duly
organized or formed, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of
its incorporation or organization, (b) has all requisite power and authority and
-29-
all requisite governmental licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals to (i) own its assets
and carry on its business and (ii) execute, deliver and perform its obligations under the
Transaction Documents to which it is a party, (c) is duly qualified and is licensed and in good
standing under the Laws of each jurisdiction where its ownership, lease or operation of properties
or the conduct of its business requires such qualification or license, and (d) is in compliance
with all Laws; except in each case referred to in clause (b)(i), (c) or
(d), to the extent that failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect.
5.02. Authorization; No Contravention. The execution, delivery and performance by such
Person of each Transaction Document to which such Person is party, have been duly authorized by all
necessary corporate or other organizational action, and do not and will not (a) contravene the
terms of any of such Persons organizational documents; (b) conflict with or result in any breach
or contravention of, or require any payment to be made under (i) any Contractual Obligation to
which such Person is a party or affecting such Person or the properties of such Person or any of
its Subsidiaries, except in each case as could not reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect, or (ii) any order, injunction, writ or decree of any Governmental Authority or any
arbitral award to which such Person or its property is subject that could reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect; or (c) violate any Law that could reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect. The Sleeve Obligors are in compliance with all Contractual Obligations
referred to in clause (b)(i), except to the extent that failure to do so could not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
5.03. Governmental Authorization; Other Consents. Except as to (i) those which have been
duly obtained, taken, given or made and are in full force and effect and (ii) those third party
(including Governmental Customers) consents and agreements necessary to obtain the release and
discharge of any Merrill Collateral, no approval, consent, exemption, authorization, or other
action by, or notice to, or filing with, any Governmental Authority or any other Person is
necessary or required in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by any Sleeve
Obligors of this Agreement or any other Transaction Document; provided that any failure of the
Sleeve Obligors to obtain any consents and agreements described in clause (ii) shall not
relieve the Sleeve Obligors of their obligation to cause the Partial Credit Sleeve Termination Date
and Credit Sleeve Termination Date each to occur as provided herein.
5.04. Binding Effect. This Agreement has been, and each other Transaction Document, when
executed and delivered hereunder, will have been, duly executed and delivered by each Sleeve
Obligor that is party thereto. This Agreement constitutes, and each other Transaction Document
when so executed and delivered will constitute, a legal, valid and binding obligation of each
Sleeve Obligor, enforceable against each Sleeve Obligor that is party thereto in accordance with
its terms, except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization or similar laws affecting creditors rights generally and by general principles of
equity, whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity.
5.05. Financial Statements; No Material Adverse Effect.
(a) The Audited Financial Statements (i) were prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently
applied throughout the period covered thereby, except as otherwise expressly
-30-
noted therein and (ii) fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial
condition of NRG and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the date thereof and their results of
operations and cash flows for the period covered thereby in accordance with GAAP consistently
applied throughout the period covered thereby, except as otherwise expressly noted therein.
(b) The Unaudited Financial Statements (i) were prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently
applied throughout the period covered thereby, except as otherwise expressly noted therein and (ii)
fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial condition of NRG and its
consolidated Subsidiaries as of the date thereof and their results of operations and cash flows for
the period covered thereby in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the period
covered thereby, except as otherwise expressly noted therein, subject, in the case of
clauses (i) and (ii), to the absence of footnotes and to normal year-end audit
adjustments.
(c) From the date of the Audited Financial Statements through the Unwind Start Date, except as
disclosed in public filings or in writing to the Sleeve Provider on or before five Business Days
before the Unwind Start Date, there has been no event or circumstance, either individually or in
the aggregate that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
5.06. Litigation. There are no actions, suits, proceedings, claims or disputes pending or,
to the knowledge of each Sleeve Obligor, threatened or contemplated, at law, in equity, in
arbitration or before any Governmental Authority, by or against the Sleeve Obligors or against any
of their properties or revenues that (a) purport to affect or pertain to this Agreement or any
other Transaction Document, or any of the transactions contemplated hereby or (b) except as
disclosed to the Sleeve Provider on Schedule 5.06 or as disclosed in public filings, exist
on or prior to the Unwind Start Date and either individually or in the aggregate, if determined
adversely, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
5.07. No Default. Immediately prior to the Unwind Start Date, and before giving effect to
the amendment and restatement of this Agreement described in Section 12.17, no Reliant
Default had occurred and was continuing. On the Unwind Start Date, and after giving effect to the
amendment and restatement of this Agreement described in Section 12.17, no Reliant Default
has occurred and is continuing or would result from the consummation of the amendment and
restatement described in Section 12.17 or the resulting transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or any other Transaction Document.
5.08. [Intentionally Deleted].
5.09. [Intentionally Deleted].
5.10. [Intentionally Deleted].
5.11. ERISA Compliance.
(a) Except as could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, (i)
each Plan has been established, operated and administered in compliance in all
-31-
material respects with its terms and the applicable provisions of ERISA, the Code and other
Federal or state Laws, (ii) each Plan that is intended to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Code
has received a favorable determination letter from the IRS or an application for such a letter is
currently being processed by the IRS with respect thereto and, to the best knowledge of the Sleeve
Obligors, nothing has occurred which would prevent, or cause the loss of, such qualification, and
(iii) NRG and each ERISA Affiliate have made all required contributions (both quarterly and
annually) to each Plan subject to Section 412 of the Code, and no application for a funding waiver
or an extension of any amortization period pursuant to Section 412 of the Code has been made with
respect to any Plan.
(b) There are no pending or, to the best knowledge of the Sleeve Obligors, threatened claims,
actions or lawsuits or investigations, or action by any Governmental Authority, with respect to any
Plan that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. There has been no
prohibited transaction or violation of the fiduciary responsibility rules with respect to any Plan
that has resulted or could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
(c) (i) No ERISA Event has occurred or is reasonably expected to occur that could reasonably
be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; (ii) no Pension Plan has any Unfunded Pension
Liability, whether or not waived, that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect, and no application for a waiver of the minimum funding standard has been filed or is
expected to be filed with respect to any Pension Plan; (iii) none of the Sleeve Obligors and any of
their ERISA Affiliates has incurred, or reasonably expects to incur, any liability (and no event
has occurred which, with the giving of notice under Section 4219 of ERISA, would result in such
liability) under Sections 4201 or 4243 of ERISA with respect to a Multiemployer Plan that could
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; and (iv) none of the Sleeve Obligors and
any of their ERISA Affiliates has engaged in a transaction that could be subject to Sections 4069
or 4212(c) of ERISA.
5.12. [Intentionally Deleted].
5.13. Margin Regulations; Investment Company Act; Public Utility Holding Company Act.
(a) None of the Sleeve Obligors is engaged principally or as one of its material activities,
in the business of extending credit for the purpose of buying or carrying Margin Stock.
(b) None of the Sleeve Obligors or any Person Controlling the Sleeve Obligors (i) is in
violation of any regulation under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, the Federal Power
Act or any foreign, federal or local statute or any other Law of the United States of America or
any other jurisdiction, except in each case as could not reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect, or (ii) is or is required to be registered as an investment company under the
Investment Company Act of 1940.
5.14. Disclosure. The Sleeve Obligors have disclosed to the Sleeve Provider all
agreements, instruments and corporate or other restrictions to which the Sleeve
-32-
Obligors are subject, and all other matters known to it (other than general industry, political,
and economic conditions or matters disclosed in public filings), that, individually or in the
aggregate, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. No report,
financial statement, certificate or other information furnished (whether in writing or orally) by
or on behalf of any Sleeve Obligor to the Sleeve Provider in connection with the transactions
contemplated or delivered to the Sleeve Provider hereunder or under any other Transaction Document
(in each case, as modified or supplemented by other information so furnished), at the time
furnished or delivered, contains any material misstatement of fact or omits to state any material
fact necessary to make the statements therein, taken as a whole, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; provided that with respect to projected financial
information, the Sleeve Obligors represent only that such information was prepared in good faith
based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time made; it being understood that
estimates are by their nature inherently uncertain and no assurances are being given that such
results will be achieved; and provided further, that the Sleeve Obligors make no representation or
warranty, express or implied, with respect to the Compliance Information delivered to Sleeve
Provider in accordance with Section 2.02(b).
5.15. Compliance with Laws. Except as set forth on Schedule 5.15 or as disclosed
in public filings, each of the Sleeve Obligors is in compliance in all material respects with the
requirements of all Laws and all orders, writs, injunctions and decrees applicable to it or to its
properties, except in such instances in which (a) such requirement of Law or order, writ,
injunction or decree is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently
conducted or (b) the failure to comply therewith, either individually or in the aggregate, could
not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
5.16. Security Interest in Posted Collateral. Section 10 creates for the benefit
of the Merrill Parties, a valid, first priority perfected security interest in the Posted
Collateral, subject to no other Lien other than inchoate Liens on account of taxes, assessments or
governmental charges not yet delinquent or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings.
5.17. Solvency. NRG and the Other Sleeve Obligors are, on a consolidated basis, Solvent.
Section 6. Affirmative Covenants. From the Unwind Start Date until the Credit Sleeve Termination
Date, NRG shall, and shall cause each of the Other Sleeve Obligors, to:
6.01. Financial Statements. Deliver to the Sleeve Provider, in form and detail reasonably
satisfactory to the Sleeve Provider:
(a) as soon as available, but in any event within 90 days after the end of each Fiscal Year of
NRG ending after the Unwind Start Date, an audited consolidated balance sheet of NRG and its
consolidated Subsidiaries as at the end of such Fiscal Year, and the related consolidated
statements of income or operations, stockholders equity, comprehensive income (loss) and cash
flows for such Fiscal Year, setting forth in each case, the figures as of the end of,
-33-
and for, the
previous Fiscal Year, all in reasonable detail and prepared in accordance with
GAAP, such consolidated statements to be audited and accompanied by a report and opinion of an
independent registered public accounting firm of nationally recognized standing, which report and
opinion shall be prepared in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board or its successor and shall not be subject to any going concern or like
qualification or exception; and
(b) as soon as available, but in any event within 50 days after the end of each of the first
three Fiscal Quarters of each Fiscal Year of NRG ending after the Unwind Start Date, an unaudited
consolidated balance sheet of NRG and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at the end of such Fiscal
Quarter, and the related unaudited consolidated statements of income or operations for such Fiscal
Quarter and for the portion of NRGs Fiscal Year to date then ended and cash flows for the portion
of NRGs Fiscal Year to date then ended, setting forth in each case (beginning with Fiscal Quarter
ending September 2009) in comparative form the figures for the corresponding Fiscal Quarter of the
previous Fiscal Year and the corresponding portion of the previous Fiscal Year, all in reasonable
detail, certified by a Responsible Officer of NRG as fairly presenting in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of NRG and its consolidated Subsidiaries
in accordance with GAAP, subject only to normal year-end audit adjustments and the absence of
footnotes.
6.02. Certificates; Other Information. Deliver to the Sleeve Provider, in form and detail
reasonably satisfactory to the Sleeve Provider:
(a) promptly after any request by the Sleeve Provider, copies of any detailed audit reports,
management letters or written recommendations submitted to the board of directors (or the audit
committee of the board of directors) of NRG by independent accountants in connection with the
accounts or books of NRG or any of the Other Sleeve Obligors or any audit of any of them;
(b) promptly after the furnishing or receiving thereof, copies of any written notice of
default furnished to, or received from, any holder of debt securities of NRG or any of the Other
Sleeve Obligors pursuant to the terms of any indenture, guarantee or credit or similar agreement
reflecting material indebtedness for borrowed money and not otherwise required to be furnished to
the Sleeve Provider pursuant to Section 6.01 or any other clause of this Section;
(c) at the applicable times required by Schedule 1.01(c), the data, reports and other
information set forth therein; and
(d) promptly, such additional information regarding the business, financial or corporate
affairs of NRG or any of the Other Sleeve Obligors, or compliance with the terms of the Transaction
Documents, as the Sleeve Provider may from time to time reasonably request.
Documents required to be delivered pursuant to Section 6.01(a) or (b) (to the
extent any such documents are included in materials otherwise filed with the SEC) shall be
delivered electronically and when so delivered, shall be deemed to have been delivered on the date
on which NRG provides such documents electronically, including by email or electronic posting;
provided that: (i) NRG shall at the request of the Sleeve Provider deliver paper copies of
-34-
such
documents to the Sleeve Provider and (ii) if documents are electronically posted, NRG shall
notify the Sleeve Provider (by telecopier or electronic mail) of the posting. The Sleeve
Provider shall have no obligation to request the delivery or to maintain copies of the documents
referred to above, and in any event shall have no responsibility to monitor compliance by NRG with
any such request for delivery.
6.03. Notices. Promptly notify the Sleeve Provider:
(a) after any Responsible Officers obtaining knowledge of the occurrence of any
Default with respect to a Reliant Event of Default and the intended actions of the Sleeve
Obligors with respect thereto;
(b) of any matter that has resulted or could reasonably be expected to result in a
Material Adverse Effect; and
(c) after any Responsible Officers obtaining knowledge of the occurrence of any
ERISA Event or of any actual or reasonably likely contribution failure under Code Section
412, or ERISA Section 302 with respect to any Pension Plan or the filing of an application
seeking waiver of any potential contribution failure that either individually or in the
aggregate could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
Each notice pursuant to this Section shall be accompanied by a statement of a Responsible Officer
of the applicable Sleeve Obligor setting forth details of the occurrence referred to therein and
stating what action the applicable Sleeve Obligor has taken and proposes to take with respect
thereto. Each notice pursuant to Section 6.03(a) shall describe with particularity any and
all provisions of this Agreement and any other Transaction Document that have been breached.
6.04. Payment of Obligations. Pay and discharge as the same shall become due and payable
(a) all material tax liabilities, assessments and governmental charges or levies upon it or its
properties or assets, unless the same are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings
diligently conducted and adequate reserves in accordance with GAAP are being maintained by each
Sleeve Obligor; and (b) all lawful claims which, if unpaid, could reasonably be expected to result
in a Material Adverse Effect.
6.05. Preservation of Existence, Etc. (a) Preserve, renew and maintain in full force and
effect its legal existence and good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its organization
except in a transaction permitted by Section 7.01; and (b) take all reasonable action to
maintain all rights, privileges, permits, licenses and franchises necessary or desirable in the
normal conduct of its business, except to the extent that failure to do so could not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
6.06. [Intentionally Deleted].
6.07. [Intentionally Deleted].
6.08. Compliance with Laws. Comply in all material respects with the requirements of all
Laws and all orders, writs, injunctions and decrees applicable to it or to its
-35-
business or
property, except in such instances in which (a) such requirement of Law or order,
writ, injunction or decree is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently
conducted or (b) the failure to comply therewith could not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect.
6.09. Books and Records. (a) Maintain proper books of record and account, in which entries
in conformity with GAAP consistently applied shall be made of all financial transactions and
matters involving the assets and business of the Sleeve Obligors and (b) maintain such books of
record and account in material conformity with all applicable requirements of any Governmental
Authority having regulatory jurisdiction over the Sleeve Obligors.
6.10. Inspection Rights. Permit representatives and independent contractors of the Sleeve
Provider to visit and inspect any of its properties, to examine its corporate, financial and
operating records, and make copies thereof or abstracts therefrom, and to discuss its affairs,
finances and accounts with its officers, and independent public accountants at such reasonable
times during normal business hours and as often as may be reasonably desired, upon reasonable
advance notice to NRG, all at the expense of the Sleeve Obligors, and the Sleeve Obligors will pay
up to $50,000 during any contract year to the extent of the third party expenses of the Sleeve
Provider incurred in connection therewith (but the Sleeve Obligors shall pay no further expenses in
connection therewith); provided that when a Reliant Event of Default exists the Sleeve Provider (or
any of their respective representatives or independent contractors) may do any of the foregoing at
the expense of the Sleeve Obligors, to the extent reasonable under the circumstances, without being
subject to the expense limit described above, and at any time during normal business hours and
without advance notice.
6.11. Further Assurances. Promptly upon request by the Sleeve Provider, (a) correct any
material defect or error that may be discovered in any Transaction Document or in the execution,
acknowledgment, filing or recordation thereof, and (b) do, execute, acknowledge, deliver, record,
re-record, file, re-file, register and re-register any and all such further acts, deeds,
certificates, assurances and other instruments as the Sleeve Provider may reasonably require from
time to time in order to (i) carry out more effectively the purposes of the Transaction Documents,
(ii) perfect and maintain the validity and effectiveness of any of the Transaction Documents and
(iii) assure, convey, grant, assign, transfer, preserve, protect and confirm more effectively unto
the Merrill Parties the rights granted or now or hereafter intended to be granted to the Merrill
Parties under any Transaction Document or under any other instrument executed in connection with
any Transaction Document to which NRG or any of its Subsidiaries is or is to be a party.
6.12. Obligation to Post Collateral. At the times required by Section 10, NRG
shall post and maintain such cash or Acceptable Letters of Credit, as applicable, as provided in
such Section to the Merrill Parties.
6.13. Obligation to Cause Partial Credit Sleeve Termination Date and Credit Sleeve Termination
Date. NRG and the Other Sleeve Obligors shall cause the Partial Credit Sleeve Termination Date
to occur on or prior to January 29, 2010, and shall cause the
-36-
Credit Sleeve Termination Date to
occur on or prior to April 30, 2010. Notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary, the Credit Sleeve Termination Date shall not occur until the
date on which all Merrill Collateral, including all C&I Guarantees, posted by the Merrill Parties
have been returned to the Merrill Parties and the Merrill Parties have been legally discharged from
all obligations in respect of the transactions contemplated hereby and all ML Guarantees have been
terminated, and on which all other obligations owed to the Merrill Parties hereunder and under the
other Transaction Documents have been paid and satisfied in full (other than indemnities and any
similar obligations of the Sleeve Obligors not then due and payable and that expressly survive
termination of this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents).
6.14. Return of TDSP Postings. The Sleeve Obligors agree to use all commercially
reasonable efforts to effect the release and discharge of all ML Collateral held by any TDSP as
soon as practicable following the Unwind Start Date; provided that nothing herein shall limit the
Sleeve Obligors obligations to cause the Partial Credit Sleeve Termination Date and Credit Sleeve
Termination Date each to occur in accordance with Section 6.13.
Section 7. Negative Covenants. From the Unwind Start Date until the Credit Sleeve Termination
Date, NRG shall not, and shall cause its Restricted Subsidiaries not to:
7.01. Fundamental Changes. (a) Merge into or consolidate with any other Person, or permit
any other Person to merge into or consolidate with it, or liquidate or dissolve; provided that, if
at the time thereof and immediately after giving effect thereto no Reliant Default or Reliant Event
of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, (i) any Person may merge into NRG in a
transaction in which NRG is the surviving corporation, (ii) any Person may merge into any
Restricted Subsidiary in a transaction in which the surviving entity is a Restricted Subsidiary,
(iii) any Restricted Subsidiary (other than REPS) may liquidate or dissolve if NRG determines in
good faith that such liquidation or dissolution is in the best interests of NRG and is not
materially disadvantageous to the Merrill Parties, and (iv) any merger, consolidation, liquidation
or dissolution otherwise prohibited by this Section 7.01(a) may be consummated in reliance
of the General Disposition Basket (as defined below), or (b) consummate any Asset Sale (except to
the extent any transaction permitted by Section 7.01(a) constitutes an Asset Sale, which
transaction shall be permitted pursuant to the terms of Section 7.01(a)); provided that, (i) NRG
and/or any Restricted Subsidiary may sell, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of its assets to
NRG or to Restricted Subsidiary (as applicable), and (ii) if at the time thereof and immediately
after giving effect thereto no Reliant Default or Reliant Event of Default shall have occurred and
be continuing, NRG or any Subsidiary may sell, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of (A) any of
its assets (or otherwise undertake any transaction otherwise prohibited by Section 7.01(a))
provided that the aggregate fair market value (as determined by NRG in good faith) of all property
disposed of in reliance on this clause 7.01(b)(ii)(A) (sub-clauses (A) and (B), the
General Disposition Basket) from and after the date hereof shall not exceed $750,000,000,
and (B) any of the assets or capital stock of Nuclear Innovation North America LLC, NRG Texas Power
LLC, Elbow Creek Wind Project LLC and West Coast Power LLC and Subsidiaries of each of the
foregoing.
7.02. Other Covenants. The provisions of Sections 6.01, 6.02 and Sections 6.05 through
6.15 of the NRG Credit Agreement, together with all underlying
-37-
definitions (the Specified
Covenants), all as in effect from time to time, are hereby
incorporated herein by reference mutatis mutandis and shall be deemed to continue in effect (with
any amendments, modifications or waivers thereof (whether or not effected in connection with a
replacement, refinancing or restatement of the NRG Credit Agreement)) for the benefit of MLCI;
provided that if the NRG Credit Agreement is no longer in effect or at any time the aggregate
outstanding principal amount of Indebtedness outstanding and/or available to be drawn thereunder is
less than $100 million then the foregoing clause shall be deemed to apply to such Specified
Covenants as the same were in effect immediately before the NRG Credit Agreement ceased to be in
effect or immediately before the aggregate outstanding principal amount and/or amount available to
be drawn thereunder was reduced to less than $100 million, as the case may be, and without giving
effect to any amendments or waivers entered into immediately prior to or otherwise in connection
with the termination of such agreement or such reduction in principal amount; provided further,
that so long as the NRG Credit Agreement has not been terminated and the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of Indebtedness outstanding and/or available to be drawn thereunder is at least
$100 million, the Sleeve Obligors shall not be required to provide to the Merrill Parties hereunder
copies of any notices required to be given to the lenders under the terms of the Specified
Covenants.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, (x) NRG shall have at all times
the right (and the Merrill Parties shall have no right or claim in respect of any such action) to
amend, restate, supplement, replace, refinance, obtain waivers or consents, or otherwise modify any
and all terms and conditions of the NRG Credit Agreement (including the Specified Covenants) in
accordance with the terms thereof (provided that after the date when the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of Indebtedness outstanding and/or available to be drawn thereunder was reduced to
less than $100 million, no such amendment, restatement, supplement, replacement, waiver or
modification shall affect the Specified Covenants hereunder), and (y) (except following the date
when the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Indebtedness outstanding and/or available to be
drawn under the NRG Credit Agreement was reduced to less than $100 million) a waiver of any breach
of, or consent obtained under, any term or condition of the NRG Credit Agreement (including with
respect to the Specified Covenants) obtained in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof
shall operate, automatically and without further action, as a waiver or consent in respect of the
same terms and conditions under this Agreement and any other Transaction Document as relevant to
the Specified Covenants.
Section 8. Events of Default.
8.01. Reliant Events of Default. Each of the following shall constitute a Reliant
Event of Default:
(a) Non-Payment. Any Sleeve Obligor fails to pay within three Business Days
after the same becomes due, any amount payable to any Merrill Party hereunder or under any
other Transaction Document; or
(b) Specific Covenants. Any Sleeve Obligor fails to perform or observe any
term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 10; or
-38-
(c) Other Defaults. Any Sleeve Obligor fails to perform or observe any other
material covenant or agreement (not specified in clause (a) or (b) above or
not addressed
by clause (j) below) contained in any Transaction Document on its part to be
performed or observed and such failure continues for 30 days after the earlier to occur of
(i) such Sleeve Obligors receiving notice thereof from Sleeve Provider, or (ii) a
Responsible Officer or other executive officer of such Sleeve Obligor obtains knowledge of
such occurrence; or
(d) Representations and Warranties. Any representation, warranty, certification
or statement of fact made or deemed made by or on behalf of any Sleeve Obligor herein, in
any other Transaction Document, or in any document delivered in connection herewith or
therewith shall be incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made or deemed made;
or
(e) Insolvency Proceedings, Etc. Any Sleeve Obligor institutes or consents to
the institution of any proceeding under any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization,
receivership or other debtor relief law, or makes an assignment for the benefit of
creditors; or applies for or consents to the appointment of any receiver, trustee,
custodian, conservator, liquidator, rehabilitator or similar officer for it or for all or
any material part of their respective property; or any receiver, trustee, custodian,
conservator, liquidator, rehabilitator or similar officer is appointed without the
application or consent of such Person and the appointment continues undischarged or unstayed
for 60 calendar days; or any proceeding under any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization,
receivership or other debtor relief law relating to any such Person or to all or any
material part of their respective property is instituted without the consent of such Person
and continues undismissed or unstayed for 60 calendar days, or an order for relief is
entered in any such proceeding; or
(f) Inability to Pay Debts; Attachment. Any Sleeve Obligor becomes unable or
admits in writing its inability or fails generally to pay its debts as they become due; or
(g) Invalidity of Documents or Security Interest in Posted Collateral. (i)
This Agreement shall for any reason (other than pursuant to the terms hereof) cease to
create a valid and perfected first priority Lien on and security interest in the Posted
Collateral purported to be covered by Section 10 hereof; or (ii) any Sleeve Obligor
shall so assert such invalidity or lack of perfection or priority; or (iii) at any time
after its execution and delivery and for any reason other than as expressly permitted
hereunder or thereunder or satisfaction in full of all the Credit Sleeve Obligations, this
Agreement ceases to be in full force and effect; or (iv) any Sleeve Obligor or any other
Person contests in any manner the validity or enforceability of any provision of this
Agreement; or (v) any Sleeve Obligor denies that it has any further liability or obligation
under any Transaction Document (other than pursuant to the terms hereof or thereof), or
purports to revoke, terminate or rescind any provision of any Transaction Document; or
(h) Cross-Default. NRG or any of its Significant Subsidiaries or any group of
Significant Subsidiaries (other than, in each case, the Exempt Subsidiaries, Excluded
Subsidiaries and Unrestricted Subsidiaries, in all cases, other than any Other Sleeve
-39-
Obligor) (i) fails to make any payment when due (whether by scheduled maturity, required
prepayment, acceleration, demand, or otherwise) in respect of any Indebtedness
(or Guarantee) or under any Specified Transaction (in each case, except with respect to
payments described in paragraph (a) above) having an aggregate amount (including
amounts owing to all creditors under any combined or syndicated credit arrangement) of more
than $75,000,000 or contained in any instrument or agreement evidencing, securing or
relating thereto, or any other event occurs, the effect of which default or other event is
to permit such Indebtedness or amounts owing under such Specified Transaction to be demanded
as a result of such failure or to become due or to be repurchased, prepaid, defeased or
redeemed (automatically or otherwise), or an offer to repurchase, prepay, defease or redeem
such Indebtedness to be made, prior to its stated maturity, or such Guarantee to become
payable or cash collateral in respect thereof to be demanded as a result of such failure,
and such failure or occurrence is not waived by the creditors within three Business Days of
such failure or occurrence; or
(i) [Intentionally Deleted];
(j) Credit Sleeve Termination Date. The Partial Credit Sleeve Termination Date
shall not have occurred at or prior to January 29, 2010 or the Credit Sleeve Termination
Date shall not have occurred at or prior to April 30, 2010; or
(k) Change of Control. The occurrence of any Change of Control.
8.02. Sleeve Provider Events of Default. Any of the following shall constitute a
Sleeve Provider Event of Default:
(a) Non-Payment. (i) Any Merrill Party fails to pay within three Business Days
after the same becomes due, any amount payable to a Sleeve Obligor hereunder or under any
other Transaction Document, or (ii) at any time after the Custody Date, the Merrill Parties
shall fail to transfer any Posted Collateral to the applicable Acceptable Collateral Agent
when required by Section 10(d)(i), or (iii) the ML Parent Guarantor fails to pay
within three Business Days after the same becomes due, any amount payable to a Sleeve
Obligor under the BAC Guarantee; or
(b) Willful Defaults. Any Merrill Party fails to perform or observe any
covenant or agreement set forth in Section 2.01 and such failure continues for ten
Business Days after such Merrill Party receiving written notice thereof from any Sleeve
Obligor, which notice makes specific reference to this Section 8.02(b) and provides
reasonably detailed information regarding the facts constituting such failure; provided that
any such failure shall not fall within the provisions of this Section 8.02(b) in the
event that both: (i) the covenant or agreement the Merrill Party failed to perform or
observe is a covenant or agreement that necessarily involves a consent, determination or
judgment required to be made by any Merrill Party or Sleeve Obligor in a reasonable or
commercially reasonable manner, or in good faith or with reasonable discretion or
without unreasonably withholding any such consent (each, a Decision); and (ii) there is a
good faith dispute among the parties as to such Decision; provided further, however, that
the foregoing proviso shall not apply at any time that (1) any Merrill Party is in
-40-
breach of
its obligations to maintain ML Guarantees or Credit Support Agreements with two or more
Counterparties when required by this Agreement, or (2) any Merrill Party is
in breach of its obligations to post collateral to any two or more Counterparties when
required by the applicable Credit Support Agreement; or
(c) Other Defaults. Any Merrill Party fails to perform or observe any other
covenant or agreement (excluding those specified in clause (a) above) contained in
any Transaction Document on its part to be performed or observed and such failure continues
for 30 days after the earlier to occur of (i) the Sleeve Provider receiving notice thereof
from any Sleeve Obligor or (ii) a Responsible Officer or other executive officer of Sleeve
Provider obtains knowledge of such occurrence; or
(d) Representations and Warranties. Any representation, warranty,
certification or statement of fact made or deemed made by or on behalf of any Merrill Party
herein, in any other Transaction Document, or in any document delivered in connection
herewith or therewith shall be incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made or
deemed made; or
(e) Insolvency. Either Merrill Party institutes or consents to the institution
of any proceeding under any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, receivership,
liquidation, winding-up or other debtor relief law, or makes an assignment for the benefit
of creditors; or applies for or consents to the appointment of any receiver, trustee,
custodian, conservator, liquidator, rehabilitator or similar officer for it or for all or
any material part of their respective property; or any receiver, trustee, custodian,
conservator, liquidator, rehabilitator or similar officer is appointed without the
application or consent of such Person and the appointment continues undischarged or unstayed
for 60 calendar days; or any proceeding under any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization,
receivership, liquidation, winding-up or other debtor relief law relating to such Person or
to all or any material part of their respective property is instituted without the consent
of such Person and continues undismissed or unstayed for 60 calendar days, or an order for
relief is entered in any such proceeding; or
(f) Failure to Pay Debts. Either Merrill Party becomes unable or admits in
writing its inability or fails generally to pay its debts as they become due.
Section 9. Remedies and Termination.
9.01. Remedies of Sleeve Provider. If any Reliant Event of Default shall have occurred and
be continuing, the Sleeve Provider shall have each of the following rights and remedies:
(a) the right to cure or cure the effects of such Reliant Event of Default and the
right to exercise all contractual rights and remedies of REPS under any Power and Hedging
Contract in respect of which any Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction remains outstanding;
-41-
(b) (i) the right to declare, by written notice to the Sleeve Obligors, an amount equal
to 115% of the sum of all Current Exposure and all other liabilities and potential
liabilities of the Merrill Parties to any Counterparty or other beneficiary under this
Agreement, as reasonably determined by the Merrill Parties to a 99.0% (2.32-sigma)
confidence level (such amount, the Required Collateralization Amount), to be, and
the Required Collateralization Amount shall thereupon become, immediately due and payable
without presentment, demand, protest or other notice of any kind, all of which are hereby
waived by the Sleeve Obligors, which amount shall be posted to the Sleeve Provider, and may
be applied by the Sleeve Provider from time to time to satisfy any Draw Reimbursement
Obligation or any other Credit Sleeve Obligation, or at the option of the Sleeve Provider,
posted from time to time to any Counterparty or other beneficiary in such amounts as may be
agreed between the Sleeve Provider and such Counterparty or other beneficiary in exchange
for a release or return of Merrill Collateral, following which the Merrill Parties shall
have no liability to the Sleeve Obligors with respect to such portion of the Required
Collateralization Amount so applied or posted to any Counterparty or other beneficiary and
(ii) the right from time to time to require the Sleeve Obligors to post such additional
amounts to the extent that the Merrill Parties determine that the amount of cash then posted
is insufficient to exceed 115% of all Current Exposure and other potential liabilities as of
such time, all of which may be applied by the Merrill Parties as provided in clause
(i);
(c) the right to set off and apply any and all deposits (general or special, time or
demand, provisional or final) at any time held and other obligations at any time owing by
any Merrill Party or any of their Affiliates to or for the credit or the account of the
Sleeve Obligors, against any amounts owed by any Sleeve Obligor, including Credit Sleeve
Obligations, whether such obligations are direct or indirect, absolute or contingent, or
matured or unmatured;
(d) the right of specific performance and injunctive relief to give effect to the terms
and conditions of the Transaction Documents, to the extent permitted by applicable law, and
in connection therewith the Parties acknowledge that the monetary remedies provided to the
Merrill Parties under the Transaction Documents are insufficient to cover all damages that
could be incurred by the Merrill Parties in connection with such a Reliant Event of Default;
and
(e) any other rights and remedies available at law or in equity with respect to breach
of contract, subject to the provisions of Section 9.04.
9.02. Remedies of NRG. If any Sleeve Provider Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing, NRG shall have each of the following rights and remedies:
(a) the right to cure or cure the effects of such Sleeve Provider Event of Default; and
(b) any other rights and remedies available at law or in equity with respect to breach of
contract, subject to the provisions of Section 9.04.
-42-
9.03. [Intentionally Deleted].
9.04. Certain Limitations on Remedies. FOR BREACH OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR
WHICH AN EXPRESS REMEDY OR MEASURE OF DAMAGES IS PROVIDED, SUCH EXPRESS REMEDY OR MEASURE OF
DAMAGES SHALL BE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY, THE OBLIGORS LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED AS SET
FORTH IN SUCH PROVISION AND ALL OTHER REMEDIES OR DAMAGES AT LAW OR IN EQUITY ARE WAIVED. IF NO
REMEDY OR MEASURE OF DAMAGES IS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED HEREIN, THE OBLIGORS LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED
TO DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES ONLY, SUCH DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES SHALL BE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY,
AND ALL OTHER REMEDIES OR DAMAGES AT LAW OR IN EQUITY ARE WAIVED. UNLESS EXPRESSLY HEREIN
PROVIDED, NO PARTY SHALL BE LIABLE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE,
EXEMPLARY OR INDIRECT DAMAGES, INCLUDING CONSEQUENTIAL LOST PROFITS OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL BUSINESS
INTERRUPTION DAMAGES, BY STATUTE, IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE
PARTIES THAT THE LIMITATIONS HEREIN IMPOSED ON REMEDIES AND THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES BE WITHOUT
REGARD TO THE CAUSE OR CAUSES RELATED THERETO, INCLUDING THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANY PARTY, WHETHER SUCH
NEGLIGENCE BE SOLE, JOINT OR CONCURRENT OR ACTIVE OR PASSIVE. TO THE EXTENT ANY DAMAGES REQUIRED
TO BE PAID HEREUNDER ARE LIQUIDATED, THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE DAMAGES ARE DIFFICULT OR
IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE, OR OTHERWISE OBTAINING AN ADEQUATE REMEDY IS INCONVENIENT, AND THE DAMAGES
CALCULATED HEREUNDER CONSTITUTE A REASONABLE APPROXIMATION OF THE HARM OR LOSS.
Section 10. Posted Collateral.
(a) Obligation to Post and Maintain Collateral.
(i) NRG shall on the Unwind Start Date (1) post (and shall maintain to the extent
required by clause (ii) below) cash and/or Acceptable Letters of Credit in an
aggregate amount at least equal to the Current Exposure; provided that at no time shall the
aggregate value of Acceptable Letters of Credit posted in respect of Current Exposure exceed
the Aggregate Merrill Threshold applicable at such time, and (2) post (and shall maintain to
the extent required by clause (ii) below) cash or provide one or more Acceptable
Letters of Credit having an aggregate value at least equal to the Contingent Exposure; and
provided, further, that on the Unwind Start Date NRG may, at its election, post cash in
satisfaction of its obligations under this Section 10(a)(i) by applying to that effect any
or all cash collateral already held by the Sleeve Provider pursuant to the terms of the
Existing CSRA (including Section 6.11(c) thereof).
(ii) In addition, from time to time after the Unwind Start Date, upon demand by the
Sleeve Provider or NRG, as applicable, on or promptly following any Valuation Date,
-43-
(A) if the Current Adjustment Amount for such Valuation Date is positive and equals
or exceeds the Minimum Transfer Amount, then NRG shall within one Business Day of
such demand post to the Merrill Parties additional cash and/or Acceptable Letters
of Credit in an aggregate amount at least equal to the Current Adjustment Amount
(rounded to the nearest $10,000); provided that if the Current Adjustment Amount
for such Valuation Date is negative and the absolute value equals or exceeds the
Minimum Transfer Amount, then, so long as no Reliant Default or Reliant Event of
Default has occurred and is continuing, the Merrill Parties shall within one
Business Day of such demand return to NRG in cash an amount of Current Collateral
equal to the absolute value of the Current Adjustment Amount (rounded to the
nearest $10,000); provided, further, that at no time shall the aggregate value of
Acceptable Letters of Credit posted in respect of Current Exposure exceed the
Aggregate Merrill Threshold applicable at such time. For purposes hereof, the
Current Adjustment Amount for any Valuation Date will equal:
(1) the Current Exposure for such Valuation Date
minus
(2) the aggregate amount of Current Collateral then held by (or on behalf
of) the Merrill Parties as of such Valuation Date; and
(B) if the Contingent Adjustment Amount for such Valuation Date is positive and
equals or exceeds the Minimum Transfer Amount, then NRG shall within one Business
Day of such demand post to the Merrill Parties additional cash and/or additional
Acceptable Letters of Credit having an aggregate value at least equal to the
Contingent Adjustment Amount; provided that if the Contingent Adjustment Amount for
such Valuation Date is negative and the absolute value equals or exceeds the
Minimum Transfer Amount, then, so long as no Reliant Default or Event of Default
has occurred and is continuing, the Merrill Parties shall within one Business Day
of such demand return in cash to NRG Contingent Cash Collateral in an amount equal
to the absolute value of the Current Adjustment Amount (rounded to the nearest
$100,000); provided that to the extent Contingent Cash Collateral is not available,
NRG may request, and the Merrill Parties hereby consent, to the reduction of the
available face amount of one or more Acceptable Letters of Credit by the value of
the Current Adjustment Amount.
For purposes hereof, the Contingent Adjustment Amount for any Valuation
Date will equal:
(1) the Contingent Exposure for such Valuation Date
minus
-44-
(2) the aggregate value of Contingent Collateral then held by (or on behalf
of) the Merrill Parties as of such Valuation Date.
(iii) On or prior to January 29, 2010, to the extent the ML Guarantee Provider has not been
released and fully discharged from all liability under any C&I Guarantee on such date, NRG shall
post cash or provide one or more Acceptable Letters of Credit having an aggregate value at least
equal to the Remaining C&I Exposure at such time.
(b) Grant of Security Interest. Each of NRG and the Other Sleeve Obligors, as the
pledgor, hereby pledges to the Merrill Parties, as the secured party, as security for the Credit
Sleeve Obligations, and grants to the Merrill Parties a first priority continuing security interest
in, Lien on and right of set-off against all Posted Collateral transferred to or received by (or on
behalf of) the Merrill Parties hereunder.
(c) Representations Regarding Posted Collateral. NRG and each Other Sleeve Obligor,
as applicable, represents to the Merrill Parties (which representations will be deemed to be
repeated as of each date on which it provides to the Merrill Parties any Posted Collateral) that:
(i) it has the power to grant a security interest in and Lien on such Posted Collateral
and has taken all necessary actions to authorize the granting of that Lien;
(ii) it is the sole owner of or otherwise has the right to transfer to the Merrill
Parties all Posted Collateral hereunder, free and clear of any Lien, encumbrance or other
restrictions other than the security interest and Lien granted under clause (b)
above and the Lien described in Section 5.16;
(iii) upon the transfer of any Posted Collateral to (or on behalf of) the Merrill
Parties under the terms of this Section 10, the Merrill Parties will have a valid
and perfected first priority Lien therein (subject to the Lien described in Section 5.16);
and
(iv) the performance by it of its obligations under this Section 10 will not
result in the creation of any Lien on any Posted Collateral other than the security interest
and Lien granted under clause (b) above.
(d) Eligibility to Hold Posted Collateral.
(i) The Merrill Parties will be entitled to hold Posted Collateral; provided, that at
anytime upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an ML Credit Event and/or a sleeve
Provider Event of Default, then upon a demand made by NRG, the Merrill Parties shall
transfer within three Business Days of such demand all Posted Collateral (free and clear of
any and all Liens except for the Liens of the Merrill Parties) held by them to an Acceptable
Collateral Agent; provided further that in all cases, the Merrill Parties shall have the
right to withdraw deposits held by any such collateral agent to apply or offset such amounts
against any Merrill Collateral required to be posted to any Counterparty or other
beneficiary of Merrill Collateral. The Merrill Parties will cooperate in good faith with
NRG and use commercially reasonably efforts to promptly
-45-
enter into a standby custody
agreement and such other customary documentation as may
be necessary to establish a custody account with an Acceptable Collateral Agent as
contemplated by this clause (i).
(ii) Except as provided in clause (i) above, the Merrill Parties will,
notwithstanding Section 9-207 of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, have the right to (A)
sell, pledge, rehypothecate, assign, invest, use, commingle or otherwise dispose of, or
otherwise use in its business any Posted Collateral it holds, free from any claim or right
of any nature whatsoever of the Sleeve Obligors, including any equity or right of redemption
by the Sleeve Obligors and (B) register any Posted Collateral in the name of either Merrill
Party, a custodian or a nominee for either.
(e) Merrill Parties Rights and Remedies. Following any Reliant Event of Default and
during the continuance thereof, the Merrill Parties may exercise one or more of the following
rights and remedies in respect of the Posted Collateral:
(i) all rights and remedies available to a secured party under applicable law with
respect to Posted Collateral held by the Merrill Parties;
(ii) any other rights and remedies available to the Merrill Parties under the terms of
any Counterparty Document;
(iii) the right to liquidate any Posted Collateral through one or more public or
private sales or other dispositions with such notice, if any, as may be required under
applicable law, free from any claim or right of any nature whatsoever of NRG or any of its
Subsidiaries, including any equity or right of redemption by NRG and to apply the proceeds
(or the cash equivalent thereof) from the liquidation of the Posted Collateral to any
amounts payable by the Sleeve Obligors with respect to any Credit Sleeve Obligations,
whether or not contingent, in that order as the Merrill Parties may elect; or
(iv) any other applicable right or remedy in respect of a Reliant Event of Default
provided in Section 9.01 hereof.
(f) Further Assurances. Promptly following a demand made by any Party, the other
parties will execute, deliver, file and record any financing statement, specific assignment or
other document and take any other action that may be necessary or desirable and reasonably
requested by that party to create, preserve, perfect or validate any security interest or lien
granted under clause (b) above, to enable such Party to exercise or enforce its rights
under this Agreement with respect to Posted Collateral or to effect or document a release of a
security interest on Posted Collateral, as applicable.
(g) Further Protection. NRG will promptly give notice to the Merrill Parties of, and
defend against, any suit, action, proceeding or Lien that involves Posted Collateral or that would
reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the Lien granted by it under clause
(b) above.
-46-
(h) Interest on Posted Collateral. The Sleeve Provider hereby unconditionally
promises to pay to NRG, with respect to any Posted Collateral which is cash, interest accruing
at a rate per annum equal to the Federal Funds Rate, for each day, on the Dollar amount of such
collateral posted as cash held by the Sleeve Provider on such day (which has not been theretofore
applied or used by the Merrill Parties to satisfy any Draw Reimbursement Obligation or any other
Credit Sleeve Obligation or otherwise returned to NRG). Such interest shall be payable monthly in
arrears within two Business Days following the last day of each month and on the Credit Sleeve
Termination Date.
(i) Return of Posted Collateral on Credit Sleeve Termination Date. Promptly following
the occurrence of the Credit Sleeve Termination Date (or concurrently therewith to the extent that
the Sleeve Obligors have made arrangements satisfactory to the Merrill Parties to cause the
occurrence of the Credit Sleeve Termination Date in accordance with Section 6.13 below) and
the date on which all other Credit Sleeve Obligations have been paid or satisfied in full (other
than indemnities and any similar obligations of the Sleeve Obligors not then due and payable and
that expressly survive termination of this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents), the
Merrill Parties shall return all Posted Collateral, together with any accrued interest, to NRG
which has not been theretofore applied and will not be concurrently applied by the Merrill Parties
to satisfy any Draw Reimbursement Obligation or any other Credit Sleeve Obligation or otherwise
returned to NRG.
(j) Acceptable Letters of Credit. Any Acceptable Letter of Credit shall be subject to
the following provisions:
(i) Any Acceptable Letter of Credit shall be delivered by the Sleeve Obligors to such
address as the Merrill Parties shall specify and shall be maintained for the benefit of the
Merrill Parties or their designees. The Sleeve Obligors or the issuer of the Acceptable
Letter of Credit shall (1) renew or cause the renewal of each outstanding Acceptable Letter
of Credit on a timely basis as provided in the relevant Acceptable Letter of Credit, (2) if
the bank that issued an outstanding Acceptable Letter of Credit has indicated its intent not
to renew such Acceptable Letter of Credit, provide a substitute Acceptable Letter of Credit
at least twenty Business Days prior to the expiration of the outstanding Acceptable Letter
of Credit, and (3) if a bank issuing an Acceptable Letter of Credit shall fail to honor the
Merrill Parties properly documented request to draw on an outstanding Acceptable Letter of
Credit, provide for the benefit of the Merrill Parties a substitute Acceptable Letter of
Credit that is issued by a bank acceptable to the Merrill Parties within 3 Business Days
after such refusal.
(ii) Upon the occurrence of a Letter of Credit Default, the Sleeve Obligors agree to
deliver to the Merrill Parties a substitute Acceptable Letter of Credit on or before the
second Business Day after the occurrence thereof (or on or before the fifth Business Day
after the occurrence thereof if only clause (1) under the definition of Letter of Credit
Default applies). Letter of Credit Default shall mean with respect to an
outstanding Acceptable Letter of Credit, the occurrence of any of the following events: (1)
the issuer of such Acceptable Letter of Credit shall fail to maintain a Credit Rating of at
least A by S&P and A2 by Moodys; (2) the issuer of the Acceptable Letter of Credit shall
fail to
-47-
comply with or perform its obligations under such Acceptable Letter of Credit if
such
failure shall be continuing after the lapse of any applicable grace period; (3) the
issuer of such Acceptable Letter of Credit shall disaffirm, disclaim, repudiate or reject,
in whole or in part, or challenge the validity of such Acceptable Letter of Credit; (4) such
Acceptable Letter of Credit shall expire or terminate, or shall fail or cease to be in full
force and effect at any time during the term of this Agreement; or (5) the issuer of such
Acceptable Letter of Credit institutes or consents to the institution of any proceeding
under any insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, receivership, liquidation, winding-up or
other debtor relief law, or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors; or applies for
or consents to the appointment of any receiver, trustee, custodian, conservator, liquidator,
rehabilitator or similar officer for it or for all or any material part of its respective
property; or any receiver, trustee, custodian, conservator, liquidator, rehabilitator or
similar officer is appointed without the application or consent of the issuer of such
Acceptable Letter of Credit and the appointment continues undischarged or unstayed for 60
calendar days, or an order for relief is entered in any such proceeding; provided, however,
that no Letter of Credit Default shall occur in any event with respect to an Acceptable
Letter of Credit after the time such Acceptable Letter of Credit is required to be cancelled
or returned to the Sleeve Obligors in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
(iii) An Acceptable Letter of Credit shall provide that the Merrill Parties may draw
upon the Acceptable Letter of Credit in an amount that is equal to all amounts that are due
and owing from the Sleeve Obligors but have not been paid to the Merrill Parties within the
time allowed for such payments under this Agreement. An Acceptable Letter of Credit shall
provide that a drawing may be made on the Acceptable Letter of Credit upon submission to the
bank issuing the Acceptable Letter of Credit of one or more certificates of the Merrill
Parties in accordance with the specific requirements of the Acceptable Letter of Credit.
Upon or at any time after the occurrence of a Reliant Event of Default, the Merrill Parties
may draw on the entire, undrawn portion of any outstanding Acceptable Letter of Credit upon
submission to the bank issuing such Acceptable Letter of Credit of one or more certificates
in accordance with the specific requirements of the Acceptable Letter of Credit. Cash
proceeds received from drawing upon the Acceptable Letter of Credit shall be deemed Posted
Collateral and shall be applied against all amounts that are due and owing from the Sleeve
Obligors but have not been paid to the Merrill Parties within the time allowed for such
payments under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the Merrill Parties receipt of cash under
the Acceptable Letter of Credit, the Sleeve Obligors shall remain liable to the Merrill
Parties for any failure to transfer sufficient Posted Collateral to the Merrill Parties in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement. In addition, the Sleeve Obligors shall remain
liable for any amounts owing to the Merrill Parties and remaining unpaid after the
application of the amounts so drawn by the Merrill Parties.
(k) BAC Guarantee. On the Unwind Start Date, the Merrill Parties shall cause
the ML Parent Guarantor to issue the BAC Guarantee in respect of the obligations of the
Merrill Parties to return Posted Collateral in accordance with the terms of this Section
10.
-48-
Section 11. Reimbursement Guaranty by Other Reliant Retail Parties
11.01. Reimbursement Guaranty of the Obligations. Subject to the provisions of Section
11.02, the Reimbursement Guarantors jointly and severally hereby irrevocably and
unconditionally guaranty to the Merrill Parties (i) the due and punctual payment in full of all
Reimbursement Obligations and all other amounts payable by NRG to the Merrill Parties under the
Transaction Documents when the same shall become due, whether at stated maturity, by required
prepayment, declaration, acceleration, demand or otherwise (including amounts that would become due
but for the operation of the automatic stay under Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C.
Section 362(a)) and (ii) the performance of all other obligations of NRG hereunder (collectively,
the Guaranteed Obligations).
11.02. Payment by Guarantors. The Reimbursement Guarantors hereby jointly and severally
agree, in furtherance of the foregoing and not in limitation of any other right which any Merrill
Party may have at law or in equity against any Reimbursement Guarantor by virtue hereof, that upon
the failure of NRG to pay any of the Guaranteed Obligations when and as the same shall become due,
whether at stated maturity, by required prepayment, declaration, acceleration, demand or otherwise
(including amounts that would become due but for the operation of the automatic stay under Section
362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Section 362(a)), the Reimbursement Guarantors will upon
demand pay, or cause to be paid, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, to the Merrill
Parties, an amount equal to the sum of the unpaid principal amount of all Guaranteed Obligations
then due as aforesaid, accrued and unpaid interest on such Guaranteed Obligations (including
interest which, but for NRGs becoming the subject of a case under the Bankruptcy Code, would have
accrued on such Guaranteed Obligations, whether or not a claim is allowed against NRG for such
interest in the related bankruptcy case) and all other Guaranteed Obligations then owed to the
Merrill Parties as aforesaid.
11.03. Liability of Reimbursement Guarantors Absolute. Each Reimbursement Guarantor agrees
that its obligations hereunder are irrevocable, absolute, independent and unconditional and shall
not be affected by any circumstance which constitutes a legal or equitable discharge of a guarantor
or surety other than payment in full of the Guaranteed Obligations. In furtherance of the
foregoing and without limiting the generality thereof, each Reimbursement Guarantor agrees as
follows:
(a) this Reimbursement Guaranty is a guaranty of payment when due and not of
collectability. This Reimbursement Guaranty is a primary obligation of each Reimbursement
Guarantor and not merely a contract of surety;
(b) the obligations of each Reimbursement Guarantor hereunder are independent of the
obligations of NRG and the obligations of any other guarantor (including any other
Reimbursement Guarantor) of the obligations of NRG, and a separate action or actions may be
brought and prosecuted against such Reimbursement Guarantor whether or not any action is
brought against NRG or any of such other guarantors and whether or not NRG is joined in any
such action or actions;
-49-
(c) payment by any Reimbursement Guarantor of a portion, but not all, of the
Guaranteed Obligations shall in no way limit, affect, modify or abridge any Reimbursement
Guarantors liability for any portion of the Guaranteed Obligations which
has not been paid; and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if the Merrill
Parties is awarded a judgment in any suit brought to enforce any Reimbursement Guarantors
covenant to pay a portion of the Guaranteed Obligations, such judgment shall not be deemed
to release such Reimbursement Guarantor from its covenant to pay the portion of the
Guaranteed Obligations that is not the subject of such suit, and such judgment shall not,
except to the extent satisfied by such Reimbursement Guarantor, limit, affect, modify or
abridge any other Reimbursement Guarantors liability hereunder in respect of the Guaranteed
Obligations;
(d) any Merrill Party, upon such terms as it deems appropriate, without notice or
demand and without affecting the validity or enforceability hereof or giving rise to any
reduction, limitation, impairment, discharge or termination of any Reimbursement Guarantors
liability hereunder, from time to time may (i) renew, extend, accelerate, increase the rate
of interest on, or otherwise change the time, place, manner or terms of payment of the
Guaranteed Obligations; (ii) settle, compromise, release or discharge, or accept or refuse
any offer of performance with respect to, or substitutions for, the Guaranteed Obligations
or any agreement relating thereto and/or subordinate the payment of the same to the payment
of any other obligations; (iii) request and accept other guaranties of the Guaranteed
Obligations and take and hold security for the payment hereof or the Guaranteed Obligations;
(iv) release, surrender, exchange, substitute, compromise, settle, rescind, waive, alter,
subordinate or modify, with or without consideration, any security for payment of the
Guaranteed Obligations, any other guaranties of the Guaranteed Obligations, or any other
obligation of any Person (including any other Reimbursement Guarantor) with respect to the
Guaranteed Obligations; (v) enforce and apply any security now or hereafter held by or for
the benefit of such Merrill Party in respect hereof or the Guaranteed Obligations and direct
the order or manner of sale thereof, or exercise any other right or remedy that such Merrill
Party may have against any such security, in each case as such Merrill Party in its
discretion may determine consistent herewith or any applicable security agreement, including
foreclosure on any such security pursuant to one or more judicial or nonjudicial sales,
whether or not every aspect of any such sale is commercially reasonable, and even though
such action operates to impair or extinguish any right of reimbursement or subrogation or
other right or remedy of any Reimbursement Guarantor against NRG or any security for the
Guaranteed Obligations; and (vi) exercise any other rights available to it under the
Transaction Documents; and
(e) this Reimbursement Guaranty and the obligations of the Reimbursement Guarantors
hereunder shall be valid and enforceable and shall not be subject to any reduction,
limitation, impairment, discharge or termination for any reason (other than payment in full
of the Guaranteed Obligations), including the occurrence of any of the following, whether or
not any Reimbursement Guarantor shall have had notice or knowledge of any of them: (i) any
failure or omission to assert or enforce or agreement or election not to assert or enforce,
or the stay or enjoining, by order of court, by operation of law or otherwise, of the
exercise or enforcement of, any claim or demand or any right,
-50-
power or remedy (whether
arising under the Transaction Documents, at law, in equity or otherwise) with respect to the
Guaranteed Obligations or any agreement relating thereto, or with respect to any other
guaranty of or security for the payment of the Guaranteed
Obligations; (ii) any rescission, waiver, amendment or modification of, or any consent
to departure from, any of the terms or provisions (including provisions relating to events
of default) hereof, any of the other Transaction Documents or any agreement or instrument
executed pursuant thereto, or of any other guaranty or security for the Guaranteed
Obligations, in each case whether or not in accordance with the terms hereof or such
Transaction Document or any agreement relating to such other guaranty or security; (iii) the
Guaranteed Obligations, or any agreement relating thereto, at any time being found to be
illegal, invalid or unenforceable in any respect; (iv) any Merrill Partys consent to the
change, reorganization or termination of the corporate structure or existence of NRG or any
of its Subsidiaries and to any corresponding restructuring of the Guaranteed Obligations;
(v) any failure to perfect or continue perfection of a security interest in any collateral
which secures any of the Guaranteed Obligations; and (vi) any other act or thing or
omission, or delay to do any other act or thing, which may or might in any manner or to any
extent vary the risk of any Reimbursement Guarantor as an obligor in respect of the
Guaranteed Obligations.
11.04. Waivers by Reimbursement Guarantors. Each Reimbursement Guarantor hereby waives,
for the benefit of the Merrill Parties: (a) any right to require any Merrill Party, as a condition
of payment or performance by such Reimbursement Guarantor, to (i) proceed against NRG, any other
guarantor (including any other Reimbursement Guarantor) of the Guaranteed Obligations or any other
Person, (ii) proceed against or exhaust any security held from NRG, any such other guarantor or any
other Person, (iii) proceed against or have resort to any balance of any Posted Collateral or
credit on the books of any Merrill Party in favor of NRG or any other Person, or (iv) pursue any
other remedy in the power of any Merrill Party whatsoever; (b) any defense arising by reason of the
incapacity, lack of authority or any disability of NRG or any other Reimbursement Guarantor
including any defense based on or arising out of the lack of validity or the unenforceability of
the Guaranteed Obligations or any agreement or instrument relating thereto; (c) any defense based
upon any statute or rule of law which provides that the obligation of a surety must be neither
larger in amount nor in other respects more burdensome than that of the principal; (d) (i) any
principles or provisions of law, statutory or otherwise, which are or might be in conflict with the
terms hereof, to the extent the same may be waived, (ii) the benefit of any statute of limitations
affecting such Reimbursement Guarantors liability hereunder or the enforcement hereof, and
(iii) promptness, diligence and any requirement that any Merrill Party protect, secure, perfect or
insure any security interest or lien or any property subject thereto; (e) notices, demands,
presentments, protests, notices of protest, notices of dishonor and notices of any action or
inaction, including acceptance hereof, notices of default hereunder or under any agreement or
instrument related thereto, notices of any renewal, extension or modification of the Guaranteed
Obligations or any agreement related thereto, notices of any extension of credit to NRG and notices
of any of the matters referred to in Section 11.04; and (f) any other defenses or benefits
that may be derived from or afforded by law which limit the liability of or exonerate guarantors or
sureties, or which may conflict with the terms hereof.
11.05. [Intentionally Deleted].
-51-
11.06. [Intentionally Deleted].
11.07. Continuing Reimbursement Guaranty. This Reimbursement Guaranty is a continuing
guaranty and shall remain in effect until all of the Guaranteed Obligations shall have been paid in
full (subject to reinstatement as provided in Section 11.10(b) below). Each Reimbursement
Guarantor hereby irrevocably waives any right to revoke this Reimbursement Guaranty as to future
transactions giving rise to any Guaranteed Obligations.
11.08. Authority of Reimbursement Guarantors or NRG. It is not necessary for any Merrill
Party to inquire into the capacity or powers of any Reimbursement Guarantor or NRG or the officers,
directors or any agents acting or purporting to act on behalf of any of them.
11.09. Financial Condition of NRG. Any Reimbursement Guaranty may be made to NRG or
continued from time to time, without notice to or authorization from any Reimbursement Guarantor
regardless of the financial or other condition of NRG at the time of any such grant or
continuation. No Merrill Party shall have any obligation to disclose or discuss with any
Reimbursement Guarantor its assessment, or any Reimbursement Guarantors assessment, of the
financial condition of NRG. Each Reimbursement Guarantor has adequate means to obtain information
from NRG on a continuing basis concerning the financial condition of NRG and its ability to perform
its obligations under the Transaction Documents, and each Reimbursement Guarantor assumes the
responsibility for being and keeping informed of the financial condition of NRG and of all
circumstances bearing upon the risk of nonpayment of the Guaranteed Obligations. Each
Reimbursement Guarantor hereby waives and relinquishes any duty on the part of any Merrill Party to
disclose any matter, fact or thing relating to the business, operations or conditions of NRG now
known or hereafter known by any Merrill Party.
11.10. Bankruptcy, etc.
(a) Each Reimbursement Guarantor acknowledges and agrees that any interest on any portion of
the Guaranteed Obligations which accrues after the commencement of any bankruptcy, reorganization
or insolvency case or proceeding (or, if interest on any portion of the Guaranteed Obligations
ceases to accrue by operation of law by reason of the commencement of such case or proceeding, such
interest as would have accrued on such portion of the Guaranteed Obligations if such case or
proceeding had not been commenced) shall be included in the Guaranteed Obligations because it is
the intention of Reimbursement Guarantors and Merrill Parties that the Guaranteed Obligations which
are guaranteed by Reimbursement Guarantors pursuant hereto should be determined without regard to
any rule of law or order which may relieve NRG of any portion of such Guaranteed Obligations.
Reimbursement Guarantors will permit any trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, debtor in possession,
assignee for the benefit of creditors or similar person to pay the Merrill Parties, or allow the
claim of the Merrill Parties in respect of, any such interest accruing after the date on which such
case or proceeding is commenced.
(b) In the event that all or any portion of the Guaranteed Obligations are paid by NRG or a
Reimbursement Guarantor, the obligations of Reimbursement Guarantors hereunder
-52-
shall continue and
remain full force and effect or be reinstated, as the case may be, in the event that all or any
part of such payment(s) are rescinded or recovered directly or indirectly from any Merrill Party as
a preference, fraudulent transfer or otherwise, and any such payments which are
so rescinded or recovered shall constitute Guaranteed Obligations for all purposes hereunder.
Section 12. Miscellaneous.
12.01. Notices. All notices and other communications provided for herein shall be in
writing, including telecopy and electronic mail, and shall be delivered by hand or overnight
courier service, mailed by certified or registered mail or sent by telecopy or other means of
electronic transmission approved in advance by the recipient party, as follows:
(a) if to NRG or any Other Sleeve Obligor:
NRG ENERGY, INC.
211 Carnegie Center
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
Attention: Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
Telecopy No.: (609) 524-4501
(b) if to the Sleeve Provider:
MERRILL LYNCH COMMODITIES, INC.
20 East Greenway Plaza
Suite 700
Houston, Texas 77046
Attention: Legal Department
Telephone No.: (713) 544-5263
Telecopy No.: (713) 544-5551
E-Mail: reliantsleeve_notices@ml.com
(c) if to the ML Guarantee Provider:
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
4 World Financial Center, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10281
Attention: Treasurer
Fax: (212) 449-2766
E-Mail: reliantsleeve_notices@ml.com
With a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
222 Broadway, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10038
Attention: Corporate Secretary
-53-
Any Party hereto may change its address, telecopy number or e-mail address for notices and other
communications hereunder by notice to the other Party hereto. All notices and other
communications given to any Party hereto in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement shall
be deemed to have been given on the date of receipt.
12.02. Confidentiality; Limitation on Use of Information. (a) Any information made
available by the Sleeve Obligors, any Subsidiary of any of the foregoing, any Merrill Party or any
Affiliate thereof with respect to this Agreement is confidential and shall not be discussed with or
disclosed to any third party, except for such information (i) as may become generally available to
the public other than as a result of a violation of this Agreement, (ii) as may be required or
appropriate in response to any summons, subpoena, or otherwise in connection with any litigation or
to comply with any applicable law, order, regulation, or ruling or to the extent requested by any
regulatory authority, (iii) which becomes available to the Sleeve Obligors, any Subsidiary of any
of the foregoing, any Merrill Party or any Affiliate thereof on a non-confidential basis from a
source other than the other Party, (iv) as may be furnished to any person or entity (including that
Persons auditors, attorneys, advisors, or financial institutions) with which such Person has a
written agreement or which are otherwise required to keep the information that is disclosed in
confidence, or (v) relating to the U.S. Federal income tax treatment and tax structure of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including all relevant materials relating to such tax
treatment and tax structure (except where confidentiality is reasonably necessary to comply with
the securities laws). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the existence and terms of the ML Guarantees
shall not be considered confidential information.
(b) In connection with the foregoing provisions of this Section 12.02, (A) the Parties
recognize that the Parties are both engaged in wholesale trading activities in the gas and
electricity markets that may from time to time be adverse, (B) the possession by the Merrill
Parties of the confidential information of the Sleeve Obligors, or the possession by the Sleeve
Obligors of the confidential information of the Merrill Parties, in compliance with the foregoing
does not constitute a reason for one Party to limit the ability of the other Party to engage in
such adverse trading activities, and (C) the Parties may in compliance with the foregoing and for
the purposes of the Transaction Documents discuss the confidential information of the other Parties
internally.
12.03. Reliant Employees. During the Scheduled Term, the Merrill Parties shall not solicit
or otherwise induce any director, officer or key employee of the Sleeve Obligors, or any officer or
key employee of NRG or its Subsidiaries that is actively involved in the negotiation or
administration of this Agreement to leave the employ of the Sleeve Obligors, NRG or its
Subsidiaries; provided that this prohibition shall not apply to (i) directors, officers or key
employees of the Sleeve Obligors or officers or key employees of NRG or its Subsidiaries who are
not full time employees or who are not actively involved with the Merrill Parties in negotiating on
or administering this Agreement or (ii) officers, directors or key employees of the Sleeve
Obligors, NRG or its Subsidiaries who respond to general solicitations or who otherwise
independently seek employment without inducement by any Merrill Party.
12.04. [Intentionally Deleted].
-54-
12.05. Waiver. No failure on the part of any Party to exercise and no delay in exercising,
and no course of dealing with respect to, any right, power or privilege under this Agreement shall
operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any
right, power or privilege under this Agreement preclude any other or further exercise thereof or
the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. The remedies provided herein are cumulative
and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law.
12.06. Amendments, Etc. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any
provision of this Agreement or in any other Transaction Document between or among any of the
Merrill Parties, on one hand, and any of the Sleeve Obligors, on the other hand, may be modified or
supplemented only by an instrument in writing signed by the applicable Parties thereto.
12.07. Expenses, Etc.
(a) REPS (and, from and after the Unwind Start Date, NRG) agrees to pay or reimburse the
Sleeve Provider for: (A) all reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses of the
Sleeve Provider (including the reasonable fees and expenses of legal counsel and of any other
third-party advisors or consultants) in connection with the execution or delivery of this Agreement
or any other Transaction Document or any agreement or instrument contemplated hereby or thereby,
the performance by the Parties hereto and thereto of their respective obligations hereunder or
thereunder or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including, any such costs
and expenses incurred in connection with (1) any waiver, modification or amendment of this
Agreement or any other Transaction Document, whether or not consummated, (2) any Default by the
Sleeve Obligors and any enforcement or collection proceedings resulting therefrom, including all
manner of participation in or other involvement with (i) bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership,
foreclosure, winding up or liquidation proceedings, (ii) judicial or regulatory proceedings and
(iii) workout, restructuring or other negotiations or proceedings (whether or not the workout,
restructuring or transaction contemplated thereby is consummated) and (3) the enforcement of this
Section 12.07; and (B) all transfer, stamp, documentary or other similar taxes, assessments
or charges levied by any governmental or revenue authority in respect of this Agreement or any of
the other Transaction Documents or any other document referred to herein or therein and all costs,
expenses, taxes, assessments and other charges incurred in connection with any filing,
registration, recording or perfection of any security interest contemplated by this Agreement or
any other document referred to herein.
(b) REPS (and, from and after the Unwind Start Date, NRG) agrees to reimburse the Merrill
Parties for any amounts paid by the Merrill Parties to cure defaults by NRG or any Other Sleeve
Obligor under any Transaction Document or any other document, contract or agreement to which NRG or
such Other Sleeve Obligor is a party (the amounts referred to in this clause (b) being
herein collectively referred to as the Deferred Cure Reimbursement Obligations).
Deferred Cure Reimbursement Obligations may be prepaid but shall mature and be payable on January
29, 2010.
-55-
(c) REPS (and, from and after the Unwind Start Date, NRG) shall indemnify each Merrill Party
and each related Party of the Merrill Parties (each such Person being called an
Indemnitee) against, and hold each Indemnitee harmless from, any and all actual losses,
claims, damages, liabilities and related expenses, including the fees, charges and disbursements
of any counsel for any Indemnitee, incurred by or asserted against any Indemnitee arising out
of, in connection with, or as a result of (i) the execution or delivery of this Agreement or any
agreement or instrument contemplated hereby, the performance by the parties hereto of their
respective obligations hereunder or the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated
hereby, (ii) the provision of any ML Guarantee or other Merrill Collateral or use thereof, (iii)
any actual or alleged presence or release of Hazardous Materials on or from any property owned or
operated by NRG or any of its Subsidiaries, or any liability under any Environmental Law related in
any way to NRG or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iv) any actual or prospective claim, litigation,
investigation or proceeding relating to any of the foregoing, whether based on contract, tort or
any other theory and regardless of whether any Indemnitee is a party thereto; provided that such
indemnity shall not, as to any Indemnitee, be available to the extent that such losses, claims,
damages, liabilities or related expenses are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction by
final and nonappealable judgment to have resulted from (A) the gross negligence or willful
misconduct of such Indemnitee, (B) any breach by such Indemnitee of its obligations hereunder, or
(C) claims by one Indemnitee against another Indemnitee not relating to a breach of this Agreement
by any Sleeve Obligor.
12.08. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. There shall
be no third party beneficiaries of this Agreement
12.09. Assignments. Neither the Sleeve Obligors nor the Merrill Parties may assign any of
their rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Parties
hereto.
12.10. Survival. The obligations of NRG under Section 3.05, Section 11.07,
Section 12.07 and any other provision that expressly provides for survival after
termination shall survive the Credit Sleeve Termination Date.
12.11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of
which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument and any of the Parties hereto may
execute this Agreement by signing any such counterpart.
12.12. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Etc.
(a) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the law of the State of New York.
(b) Submission to Jurisdiction. The Parties hereby submit to the nonexclusive
jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and of the
Supreme Court of the State of New York sitting in New York County (including its Appellate
Division), and of any other appellate court in the State of New York (the New York Courts),
-56-
for
the purposes of all legal proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby. Notwithstanding the nonexclusive submission above:
(A) With respect to any proceeding initiated by or on behalf of any Sleeve Obligor
arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby, the Sleeve Obligors agree to bring such proceeding exclusively in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York or if such court does
not have subject matter jurisdiction in any of the other New York Courts located in New
York, New York, and in such case EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY SUCH LEGAL
PROCEEDING;
(B) With respect to any proceeding initiated by or on behalf of any Merrill Party
arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, which
the Merrill Parties elect to bring in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York or if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction in any of
the other New York Courts located in New York, New York, EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY
WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY
JURY IN ANY SUCH LEGAL PROCEEDING; and
(C) With respect to any proceeding initiated by or on behalf of any Merrill Party
arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, which
the Merrill Parties elect to bring in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas (Houston Division) or if such court does not have subject matter
jurisdiction in any of the other Texas Courts located in Houston, Texas, the Sleeve Obligors
expressly reserve their rights to trial by jury.
(c) Waiver of Venue. Each Party hereby irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, any objection that it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the
venue of any such proceeding brought in such a court and any claim that any such proceeding brought
in such a court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.
(d) Service of Process. Each Party to this Agreement irrevocably consents to service
of process in the manner provided for notices in Section 12.01. Nothing in this Agreement
will affect the right of any Party to this Agreement to serve process in any other manner permitted
by law.
12.13. Certain Dispute Resolution Procedures. If a Party (a Disputing Party)
disputes any Market Information forming a component used in a calculation under Sections
2.02, then (i) the Disputing Party will notify the other Party not later than the close of
business on the Business Day following the date that Disputing Party received the other Partys
calculation and such Disputing Party will also provide its calculation of such amount and the
applicable Market Information used to make such calculation, (ii) the Parties will in good faith
consult with each other in an attempt to resolve the dispute and (iii) if the Parties fail to
resolve the dispute by the third (3rd) Business Day following the date the notice of
dispute was delivered, then the Calculation Agent will recalculate the applicable calculation by:
(A) utilizing any
-57-
Market Information that the Parties have agreed are not in dispute; and (B)
calculating the component that is in dispute by seeking four actual quotations at mid market from
reference market makers, and taking the arithmetic average of those obtained; provided that if such
number of quotations are not available for a particular component, then fewer than such number of
quotations may be used for such component; and if no quotations are available for a particular
component, then the Calculation Agent shall use its own calculations for that component. Following
a recalculation pursuant to this Section, the Calculation Agent will notify the Parties of the
recalculation of such amount not later than 12:00 noon CPT on the fifth Business Day following the
date of the notice of dispute was delivered, and the same shall be binding for the purposes of this
Agreement. The Calculation Agent shall be a third party agreed to by both NRG and the
Sleeve Provider from the list of third parties in Schedule 12.13; provided that if the
Parties are unable to promptly agree on such third party, then the next third party listed on such
Schedule who has not yet served as Calculation Agent shall be the Calculation Agent for such
dispute.
12.14. Captions. The table of contents and captions and section headings appearing herein
are included solely for convenience of reference and are not intended to affect the interpretation
of any provision of this Agreement.
12.15. Limitation on Interest. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if at
any time the interest rate applicable to any Reimbursement Obligation, together with all fees,
charges and other amounts which are treated as interest on such Reimbursement Obligation under
applicable law (collectively the Charges), shall exceed the maximum lawful rate (the
Maximum Rate) which may be contracted for, charged, taken, received or reserved by the
Sleeve Provider in accordance with applicable law, the rate of interest payable in respect of such
Reimbursement Obligations hereunder, together with all Charges payable in respect thereof, shall be
limited to the Maximum Rate and, to the extent lawful, the interest and Charges that would have
been payable in respect of such Reimbursement Obligation but were not payable as a result of the
operation of this Section shall be cumulated and the interest and Charges payable to the Sleeve
Provider in respect of other Reimbursement Obligations or periods shall be increased (but not above
the Maximum Rate therefor) until such cumulated amount, together with interest thereon at the
Federal Funds Rate to the date of repayment, shall have been received by the Sleeve Provider.
12.16. Integration. This Agreement and the other Transaction Documents constitute the
entire contract among the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersede any and all
previous agreements and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof.
12.17. Conditions to Amendment and Restatement. The Existing CSRA shall be amended
and restated hereby as of the Unwind Start Date; provided that each of the following conditions has
been satisfied or waived by the Merrill Parties on or prior to October 5, 2009 (which may occur
concurrently with the effectiveness of such amendment and restatement):
(a) All Merrill Collateral shall have been returned to the Merrill Parties, including
all ML Guarantees, and the Merrill Parties shall have been legally discharged,
-58-
in each case,
in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the Merrill Parties, from all other obligations under
the Existing CSRA (including all obligations to post any collateral or provide credit
support to any Governmental Authority or under any Power and Hedging Contract or any other
agreement for the benefit of the Sleeve Obligors, but excluding indemnities and other
contingent obligations not then due and payable), except for the
Merrill Parties obligations in respect of the Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, each of the actions set forth in
Section 12.18(a) and on Schedule 12.17(a) shall have been duly taken on the
Unwind Start Date.
(b) The Sleeve Obligors shall have, no later than one Business Day prior to the Unwind
Start Date, formally notified each TDSP that is the beneficiary of any ML Collateral that
the Sleeve Obligors desire for such TDSP to release all ML Collateral, and to discharge all
future obligations of the Merrill Parties to provide or post any future collateral or ML
Guarantee, in exchange for alternate collateral or other arrangements to be negotiated
between the Sleeve Obligors and such TDSP.
(c) Since May 1, 2009, there shall have not have occurred any event or circumstance,
either individually or in the aggregate that has had or could reasonably be expected to have
a Material Adverse Effect.
(d) The Merrill Parties shall have received a favorable written opinion of Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, counsel for NRG and the Other Sleeve Obligors (or from such other counsel, which
may be in-house counsel, as is reasonably acceptable to the Merrill Parties), as to the
enforceability of this Agreement effective as of the Unwind Start Date, the validity and
perfection of the liens created by Section 10, the absence of any violation of
federal and New York law and absence of conflict with the organization documents and any
material Contractual Obligations of the Sleeve Obligors (provided that, other than with
respect to the NRG Credit Agreement, the Senior Note Documents and the Preferred Equity, or
any refinancing in effect at the relevant time, such opinion as to absence of conflicts with
other Contractual Obligations may be from in-house counsel to NRG), in each case, in
connection with the execution, delivery and performance by the Sleeve Obligors of this
Agreement, and covering such other matters relating to the Sleeve Obligors, this Agreement
or the transactions contemplated hereby as the Merrill Parties or their counsel shall
reasonably request.
(e) The Loans and all other Obligations under Working Capital Facility shall be repaid
and satisfied in full and the Working Capital Facility shall be terminated (other than
indemnities and any similar obligations of the Sleeve Obligors not then due and payable and
that expressly survive termination of this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents).
(f) The Merrill Parties shall have received all reasonable fees and expenses that are
due hereunder, including payment of the following: (i) the invoice of the Merrill Parties
dated as of September 30, 2009 and (ii) the invoice of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
dated September 30, 2009.
-59-
(g) The Merrill Parties shall have received a certificate, dated the Unwind Start Date,
of a Responsible Officer of NRG, to the effect that:
(1) the representations and warranties of the Sleeve Obligors made in this
Agreement are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the Unwind
Start Date, and
(2) no Reliant Default or Reliant Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing as of the Unwind Start Date.
12.18. Additional Unwind Start Date Actions.
(a) ICE Block of Exchange Traded Contracts. With respect to each Exchange Traded
Contract and each corresponding Mirror OTC Contract that is held by the Sleeve Obligors and the
Merrill Parties on the Unwind Start Date, the Sleeve Obligors will, or will cause an Affiliate to,
(i) enter into a transaction on ICE or NYMEX, as applicable, to transfer the Sleeve Providers
position in such Exchange Traded Contract to such Sleeve Obligor or such Affiliate and (ii)
close-out each related Mirror OTC Contract (which may be through novation of the Sleeve Providers
position under such Mirror OTC Contract to such Affiliate), in each case, at no cost or expense to
the Merrill Parties. Concurrently with the completion of the foregoing transfers and novations,
the Merrill Parties shall be legally discharged from all obligations under such transactions, the
Merrill Parties shall have received the return of all variation margin and all other ML Collateral
posted in connection therewith, and all related ML Guarantees shall be terminated.
(b) Terminated Agreements. Effective upon the satisfaction of each of the conditions
precedent set forth in Section 12.17(a), each of the Parties that is a party thereto hereby
terminates, and each other Party hereby consents to the termination of, each agreement listed on
Schedule 12.18(b) (the Terminated Agreements), provided that (i) each Party shall
remain liable for its obligations incurred under each Terminated Agreement relating to any period
prior to the Unwind Start Date that have not been discharged and (ii) all provisions which by their
express terms survive expiration or termination of any Terminated Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.
(c) Release of Collateral Under Existing Security Documents. The Merrill Parties
hereby agree that, effective upon each of the conditions precedent set forth in Section
12.17(a), the Merrill Parties shall and/or shall direct the Collateral Trustee to release all
of the Collateral (as defined in the Existing Security Documents), in each case, other than any
Posted Collateral to be retained by the Merrill Parties hereunder, and the Sleeve Provider shall
release all Class B limited liability company interests in RERH Holdings held by the Sleeve
Provider. In connection with the foregoing, the Merrill Parties shall timely execute and deliver,
provide, return or otherwise make available or direct the execution and delivery, provision, return
or otherwise making available of all filings, recordings, notices, and other related documents and
agreements, including releases and notices, directions and other communications to the Collateral
Trustee, reasonably required to implement the foregoing in accordance with the terms of the
foregoing.
-60-
12.19. Existing CSRA Provisions. Until the Unwind Start Date, the Parties agree that the
Existing CSRA and all rights and remedies of the Parties thereunder shall remain in full force and
effect; provided, that the Parties agree that from the Signing Date until
the Unwind Start Date, notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Existing CSRA or this
Agreement:
(a) the transactions contemplated by that certain Framework Agreement dated as of the
date hereof between REPS and MLCI (the Framework Agreement) and by any other
agreement listed on Schedule 12.17(a) may be consummated;
(b) the Merrill Parties will not be required to report Exposure and Risk Limits on
October 1, 2009;
(c) any transactions entered into after the Signing Date between REPS and NRG shall be
entered into under the Energy Management Services Agreement, dated October 1, 2009, between
REPS and NRG Power Marketing LLC;
(d) the Sleeve Obligors will not be required to transfer data to the Merrill Parties
pursuant to Schedule 1.01(c) of the Existing CSRA (but instead will transfer
information required by new Schedule 1.01(c) of this Agreement; and
(e) the Sleeve Obligors will not be required to remain in compliance with Section
2.02(b) (or Exhibit B) of the Existing CSRA relating to limitations with respect to
Accepted Counterparties (as defined in the Existing CSRA) or Section 7.17 of the
Existing CSRA.
12.20. Public Disclosures. NRG agrees that neither it nor its Affiliates will at any
time issue any press release or other public disclosure, including any prospectus, proxy statement
or other materials filed with any Governmental Authority using the name of the Sleeve Provider, the
ML Guarantee Provider or any of their Affiliates or referring to this Agreement, the transactions
or any of the agreements contained herein or contemplated hereby or any discussions relating to any
of the foregoing, without at least one full Business Day (or such shorter period as may be
practicable in the circumstances) prior notice to the Merrill Parties and the prior written consent
of the Sleeve Provider (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned).
[signatures follow]
-61-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and
delivered as of the day and year first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG ENERGY, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Christopher S. Sotos
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Christopher S. Sotos |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President and Treasurer |
|
|
Signature Page to Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERRILL PARTIES
MERRILL LYNCH COMMODITIES, INC.,
as Sleeve Provider
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Dennis Albrecht
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Dennis Albrecht |
|
|
|
Title: |
Managing Director |
|
|
|
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.,
as ML Guarantee Provider
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Marlene Debel
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Marlene Debel |
|
|
|
Title: |
Assistant Treasurer |
|
|
|
Accepted and agreed, for the purposes of Section 12.17.
MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL CORPORATION,
as Working Capital Facility Provider
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Barry Price
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Barry Price |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
Signature Page to Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER SLEEVE OBLIGORS
RELIANT ENERGY POWER SUPPLY, LLC
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Christopher S. Sotos
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Christopher S. Sotos |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President and Treasurer |
|
|
|
RERH HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Christopher S. Sotos
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Christopher S. Sotos |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
|
RELIANT ENERGY RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Christopher S. Sotos
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Christopher S. Sotos |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
|
RELIANT ENERGY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Christopher S. Sotos
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Christopher S. Sotos |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
|
RE RETAIL RECEIVABLES, LLC
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Christopher S. Sotos
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Christopher S. Sotos |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President |
|
|
Signature Page to Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
exv10w1wb
Exhibit
10.1B
Schedule 1.01(a)
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations
I. |
|
Post-Unwind Start Date Obligations by Counterparty |
|
|
|
Shell Energy North America (US) LP |
|
|
|
Fortis Energy Marketing & Trading GP |
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation |
|
|
|
NextEra Energy Power Marketing, L.L.C. |
|
|
|
ANP Funding I, LLC
Endure Energy, LLC |
|
|
|
Integrys Energy Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
Keystone Energy Partners, LP |
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Commodity Services Inc. |
|
|
|
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas |
|
|
|
Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation |
|
|
|
Tenaska Power Services Co. |
|
II. |
|
C&I Guarantees by Counterparty |
|
|
|
[*****] |
|
III. |
|
TDSP Postings |
|
|
|
Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric |
|
|
|
AEP Texas Central Company |
|
|
|
Oncor Electric Delivery Company (Previously TXU Electric Delivery Company) |
|
IV. |
|
Other ML Guarantees |
|
|
|
Electric Reliability Council of Texas
NRG Texas LP
Public Utility Commission of the State of Texas |
Schedule 1.01(c) to CSRA
Schedule 1.01(c) To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Data and Reporting Requirements
I. General Provisions Certain Defined Terms
This Schedule 1.01(c) shall constitute a part of the Credit Sleeve Reimbursement Agreement
(CSRA). Capitalized Terms used herein shall either (a) have the meaning specified in the CSRA or
(b) the meaning defined in this Schedule 1.01(c). References to Schedule 1.01(c) shall be to the
entirety of this Schedule 1.01(c) and all sub-parts unless an individual sub-part is specified.
Current Exposure and Contingent Exposure shall be calculated on the basis of data REPS provided to
the Sleeve Provider prior to the Unwind Start Date in accordance with the Existing CSRA.1
After the Unwind Start Date and before the Credit Sleeve Termination Date, the Sleeve
Provider shall adjust the data provided by REPS prior to the Unwind Start Date to reflect the
natural roll-off of the Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions and the return of ML Guarantees to the
Merrill Parties. The Sleeve Providers computation of Current Exposure shall be performed
consistent with the methodology that the Sleeve Provider uses to mark its own positions to market
on a daily basis.
Current Mark-to-Market for any day, shall be expressed in Dollars and shall be equal to the
Mark-to-Market value of all Post-Unwind Start Date Transactions.
The Mark-to-Market value of a transaction, which may be a positive or a negative number, shall be
determined by valuing each transaction (volumes, contract prices, and delivery dates) as of the
Unwind Start Date using the Merrill Market Forward Pricing Curve, Merrill Volatility Curve and
Merrill Correlation Curve, each as determined on the Unwind Start Date, that corresponds to the
pricing terms of such transaction. The Merrill Market Forward Pricing Curves, Merrill
Volatility Curves, and Merrill Correlation Curves are defined as the curves used by the Sleeve
Provider in its U.S. energy and related forwards, futures and options trading operations to mark
its positions to market; and in those situations where discounting is applicable it will perform
such discounting using the Merrill LIBOR Curve.
If at any time, with respect to any Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction, REPS calculation of
Contingent Exposure differs in an amount greater than $50,000,000 from the Sleeve Providers
calculation of Contingent Exposure, REPS may challenge the Sleeve Providers calculation of
Contingent Exposure with respect to such transaction. If the parties cannot reach agreement on the
calculation of Contingent Exposure with respect to such Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction within
ten days after such challenge, then REPS may require that a third party expert be used to choose
between the Sleeve Providers methodology for calculating the Contingent Exposure and a specific
alternative methodology proposed by REPS for use in calculating the Contingent
|
|
|
1 |
|
On or after September 30, 2009, the Sleeve Obligors will not enter into or obtain any
new Accepted Trades supported by the Merrill Parties under the Existing CSRA. |
1
Exposure with respect to such Post-Unwind Start Date Transaction. The third party expert will be
designated by REPS from a list of at least three qualified and impartial experts which list shall
promptly (and in no event more than five Business Days following request therefor), be provided by
the Sleeve Provider to REPS. Such expert shall be required to choose between the calculation of
Contingent Exposure used by the Sleeve Provider and those calculations proposed by REPS and to
identify which it determines is more accurate, and the calculations used to determine Contingent
Exposure thereafter shall be formulated by the Sleeve Provider in a manner consistent with the
calculations so selected and thereafter such Contingent Exposure as so formulated will be the
Contingent Exposure for all purposes hereunder. The expenses of the expert will be paid by the
Party whose calculations are not selected by the expert.
REPS may challenge the Sleeve Providers calculation of Current Exposure. The parties will consult
with each other in an attempt to resolve the dispute and if they fail to resolve the dispute within
five days after such challenge, then the Sleeve Provider will recalculate the Current Exposure by
(A) utilizing any calculations of Current Exposure that the parties have agreed are not in dispute
and (B) calculating the Current Exposure in dispute by seeking four actual quotations at mid-market
from reference market makers for purposes of calculating Current Exposure, and taking the
arithmetic average of those obtained; provided that if four quotations are not available for a
particular calculation, then fewer than four quotations may be used for that calculation; and if no
quotations are available for a particular calculation, then the Sleeve Providers original
calculations will be used for that calculation of Current Exposure. Following a recalculation
pursuant to this paragraph, the Sleeve Provider will notify REPS of such calculation.
2
Schedule 1.01(c).24
Credit Exposure
REPS shall provide the data specified in this Schedule 1.01(c).24 for each Business Day by
no later than 12:00 p.m. Central time on the next succeeding Business Day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
Breakdown |
|
Gross Exposure |
|
Gross Obligation |
Counterparty A
|
|
Time All |
|
|
Counterparty A
|
|
Current Month Delivered All |
|
|
Counterparty A
|
|
Current Month MTM All |
|
|
Counterparty A
|
|
Forward MTM All |
|
|
Counterparty A
|
|
Prior Month All |
|
|
Counterparty B
|
|
Time All |
|
|
Counterparty B
|
|
Current Month Delivered All |
|
|
Counterparty B
|
|
Current Month MTM All |
|
|
Counterparty B
|
|
Forward MTM All |
|
|
Counterparty B
|
|
Prior Month All |
|
|
With respect to any Counterparty that is party to more than one Power and Hedging Contract, REPS
shall separately provide the above data for each such contract.
3
Schedule 3.06(a)
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Merrill Account
JP Morgan Chase ABA
021000021
Account Number 066657474
Schedule 3.06(a) to CSRA
Schedule 5.06
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Litigation
|
a. |
|
Homestead Commercial Group, LLC v. Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC,
Arched Bridge Co. Inc., et al.; Cause No: 2007-65389; 281st Judicial District,
Harris County, Texas. |
|
|
b. |
|
In re: Movie Gallery/Hollywood Video Bankruptcy. |
|
|
c. |
|
534 Las Americas/Hispanic Housing (Bankruptcy); Case No. 07-33778; US
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. |
|
|
d. |
|
In re: Arctic Cold Storage (Bankruptcy); Case No. 07-60254; US Bankruptcy
Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. |
|
|
e. |
|
Houston Council for Health and Education vs. Public Utility Commission of
Texas, CenterPoint Energy, Houston Electric, LLC, Reliant Energy Retail Services,
LLC and Texas Genco, LP; Cause No. GN500160; 3rd Court of Appeals, Travis County,
Texas, pending with Supreme Court of Texas, Case No. 08-0421. |
|
|
f. |
|
Sharon Taylor, et al. vs. Freeman Publishers, Inc., et al. (Reliant Energy, Inc. a/k/a
Reliant Resources); Cause No. 02-07-cv-410; USDC, Western District of Louisiana.
|
|
|
g. |
|
In re: Miracle Candle; Cause No. 07-50227; United States District Court,
Southern District of Texas, Laredo Division. |
|
|
h. |
|
Ray Madrigal v. Reliant Energy, Inc. and AEP Energy Services, Inc.; Cause No.
08-60392- 1; In the County Court at Law No. 1, Nueces County, Texas. |
|
|
i. |
|
Jan Andel, Diana Clarkson, a/n/f of Anthony Douglas Andel, A Minor, Wanda
Andel and Bruno Andel vs. Atlantic Service & Supply, LLC, et al.; Cause No.
2008-17202; In the 164th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas. |
|
|
j. |
|
Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. vs. Public Utility Commission of
Texas; Cause No. D-1-GN-08-001213; in the 98th Judicial District Court, Travis
County, Texas. |
|
|
k. |
|
In re: Calpine Corporation et al., debtors, Ch 11 Case 05-6022; Calpine Energy
Services, L.P. vs. Reliant Energy Electric Solutions, LLC, Adversary Proceeding
No.08-1-01251; in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York. |
|
|
l. |
|
In re: Introgen Therapeutics, et al., debtor, Ch.11 Case 08-12442; Introgen
Therapeutics, Inc. vs. Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC; Adversary Proceeding
No. 09-01071, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas |
Schedule 5.06 to CSRA
-1-
II. |
|
THREATENED LITIGATION |
|
a. |
|
Letter dated January 2, 2009 to Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC from
Cokinos, Bosien & Young |
Schedule 5.06 to CSRA
-2-
Schedule 5.15
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Compliance with Laws
1
Schedule 12.13
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
List of Calculation Agents
Accenture LTD
Contact: Marina Kotovich
Phone: 312-693-8016 or 713-837-1500 or 1-877-889-9009
Address: 2929 Allen Parkway, Suite 2000; Houston, TX 77019
Web: www.accenture.com
Ernst & Young, LLP
Contact: Marcela Donadio
Phone: 713-750-1276 or 713-750-1500
Address: 5 Houston Center, Suite 1200; 1401 McKinney St.; Houston, TX 77010
Web: www.ey.com/global/content.nsf/US/Home
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Contact: Mark Allen Smith
Phone: 713-356-4233 or 713-356-4000
Address: 1201 Louisiana, Suite 2900; Houston, TX 77002-5678
Web: www.pwc.com
Sirius Solutions, LLP
Contact: Brent Price
Phone: 713-888-7116 or 713-888-0488 or 1-800-234-8054
Address: 3700 Buffalo Speedway, 11th Floor; Houston, TX 77098
Web: www.sirsol.com
Schedule 12.13 to CSRA
Schedule 12.17(a)
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Releases of Merrill Collateral
Documents
evidencing return of Merrill Collateral to the Merrill Parties, including ML Guarantees, and legal discharge of the Merrill Parties from obligations under the Existing CSRA
on the Unwind Start Date:
|
1. |
|
Framework Agreement dated as of September 30, 2009, among the Sleeve Provider, REPS and NRG
Power Marketing LLC (PMI) |
|
|
2. |
|
MLCI Prop Trade Novation Agreement dated as of September 30, 2009, among the Sleeve
Provider, REPS and PMI |
|
|
3. |
|
First Novation Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, among REPS, the Sleeve Provider and PMI |
|
|
4. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, between the Sleeve Provider
and RERH |
|
|
5. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, between the ML Guarantee
Provider and REPS |
|
|
6. |
|
Second Novation Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, among REPS, PMI and the Sleeve
Provider |
|
|
7. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, between the ML Guarantee
Provider and PMI |
|
|
8. |
|
REPS/NRG Standard ISDA Master Agreement Amendment and Release Agreement dated as of October
5, 2009, among REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
|
9. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, between PMI and the ML
Guarantee Provider |
|
|
10. |
|
Termination and Release Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, among the Sleeve
Provider, Barclays Bank PLC and REPS |
|
|
11. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between Barclays Bank
PLC and the ML Guarantee Provider |
|
|
12. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 29, 2009, among Morgan Stanley Capital
Group Inc., REPS, the Sleeve Provider and NRG |
|
|
13. |
|
Amendment to ISDA Master Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, among J. Aron &
Company, REPS and the Sleeve Provider |
|
14. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 5, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and J. Aron & Company |
|
|
15. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 30, 2009, among RRI Energy Services, Inc.,
REPS, the Sleeve Provider and PMI |
|
|
16. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 25, 2009, among BP Energy Company,
REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
|
17. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and BP Energy Company |
|
|
18. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 25, 2009, among BP Corporation North
America Inc., REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
|
19. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and BP Corporation North America Inc. |
|
|
20. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 28, 2009, among Calpine Energy Services,
L.P., REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
|
21. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Calpine Energy Services, L.P. |
|
|
22. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 25, 2009, among Citigroup Energy Inc.,
REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
|
23. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Citigroup Energy Inc. |
|
|
24. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 30, 2009, among Constellation Energy
Commodities Group, Inc., REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
|
25. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. |
|
|
26. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 25, 2009, among Credit Suisse Energy LLC,
REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
|
27. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Credit Suisse Energy LLC |
|
|
28. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 25, 2009, among Deutsche Bank AG, REPS,
PMI, DB Energy Trading LLC and the Sleeve Provider |
29. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Deutsche Bank AG |
|
30. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 25, 2009, among DB Energy Trading LLC,
REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
31. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, among the ML
Guarantee Provider and DB Energy Trading LLC |
|
32. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 17, 2009, among Eagle Energy Partners I
L.P., REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
33. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Eagle Energy Partners I L.P. |
|
34. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 24, 2009, among Exelon Generation
Company, LLC, REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
35. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Exelon Generation Company, LLC |
|
36. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 22, 2009, among Luminant Energy Company
LLC, REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
37. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Luminant Energy Company LLC |
|
38. |
|
Novation Agreement dated as of September 28, 2009, among Sempra Energy Trading
LLC, REPS, PMI and the Sleeve Provider |
|
39. |
|
Release and Termination Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2009, between the ML
Guarantee Provider and Sempra Energy Trading LLC |
Schedule 12.18(b)
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Terminated Agreements
1. |
|
Second Amended and Restated Working Capital Facility, originally dated as of September 1,
2006, as amended and restated as of December 1, 2006, and as amended and restated as of May 1,
2009, among Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation (MLCC) and RERH Holdings, LLC (RERH
Holdings), Reliant Energy Retail Holdings, LLC (RERH), Reliant Energy Power Supply, LLC
(REPS), Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC (RERS) and RE Retail Receivables, LLC (RERR
and together with RERH Holdings, RERH, REPS and RERS, the Reliant Retail Obligors). |
|
2. |
|
Irrevocable Transferable Standby Letter of Credit No. 839BGC0900378, dated as of May 1, 2009,
issued by Deutsche Bank AG in favor of MLCC for the account of NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) on
behalf of RERH. |
|
3. |
|
Contingent Contribution Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by and among NRG, NRG Retail LLC,
RERH Holdings, RERH and Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. (MLCI). |
|
4. |
|
NRG Retail LLC Side Letter Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, from NRG Retail LLC and accepted and
agreed to by MLCC. |
|
5. |
|
Master Services Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by and among NRG and the Reliant Retail
Obligors. |
|
6. |
|
Supplement No. 1 to Master Services Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by and among NRG,
Reliant Energy Services Texas, LLC, Reliant Energy Texas Retail, LLC and the Reliant Retail
Obligors. |
|
7. |
|
Parent Consent and Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by NRG for the benefit of U.S. Bank
National Association (the Collateral Trustee) and MLCC, MLCI and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
(ML&Co. and together with MLCC and MLCI, the Secured Counterparties) and acknowledged by
the Reliant Retail Obligors. |
|
8. |
|
Consent and Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, of Reliant Energy, Inc. (REI) for the
benefit of the Collateral Trustee and the Secured Counterparties with respect to the
Transition Services Agreement. |
|
9. |
|
Tax Subordination Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by NRG and the Reliant Retail Obligors
for the benefit of the Secured Counterparties. |
|
10. |
|
Second Amended and Restated Intercompany Cash Management Agreement, dated as of
August 1, 2007, by and among RERH, REPS, RERS and RERR. |
|
11. |
|
Subleasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and
Fixture Filing, dated as of May 1, 2009, by RERR to Stanley Keeton, as trustee, for the |
Schedule 12.18(b) to CSRA
-1-
|
|
benefit of the Collateral Trustee. |
|
12. |
|
Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2006, among the Collateral Trustee and the
Reliant Retail Obligors. |
|
13. |
|
Security Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2006, among the Collateral Trustee and the
Reliant Retail Obligors. |
|
14. |
|
Amendment and Reaffirmation Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, among the Reliant
Retail Obligors and the Collateral Trustee. |
|
15. |
|
Trademark Security Agreement Supplement, dated as of December 1, 2006, by RERH.
|
|
16. |
|
Trademark
Security Agreement Supplement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by RERH.
|
|
17. |
|
Trademark Security Agreement
Supplement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by RERS. |
|
18. |
|
Blocked Account Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2006, among Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., the Collateral Trustee and RERS. |
|
19. |
|
Blocked Account Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2007, among Mellon Bank, N.A., the
Collateral Trustee and the Reliant Retail Obligors. |
|
20. |
|
Blocked Account Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, among The Bank of New York
Mellon, the Collateral Trustee and the Reliant Retail Obligors. |
|
21. |
|
Securities Account Control Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2006, among Mellon
Financial Markets, LLC, the Collateral Trustee and RERH. |
|
22. |
|
Priority Lien ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, between REPS and
NRG Power Marketing LLC; Schedule to the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of May 1,
2009, between REPS and NRG Power Marketing LLC; Paragraph 13 to the Credit Support Annex to
the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, between REPS, NRG Power Marketing
LLC and MLCI; Confirmations, dated as of May 1, 2009, between REPS and NRG Power Marketing
LLC. |
Schedule 12.18(b) to CSRA
-2-
Exhibit A
To Amended and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement
Form of Acceptable Letter of Credit
IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT
|
|
|
Issuing Bank: |
|
DEUTSCHE BANK AG |
|
|
|
Date and Place of Issue: |
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank AG |
|
|
New York Branch |
|
|
60 Wall Street, 25th Floor |
|
|
New York, New York 10005 |
|
|
Trade Risk & Services Department |
|
|
|
Letter of Credit No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated Amount: |
|
US $ (AMOUNT IN WORDS United |
|
|
States Dollars) |
|
|
|
Expiration Date: |
|
__________, 2001 |
|
|
|
Beneficiarys Name and Address: |
|
[Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc.] |
|
|
|
|
|
(Beneficiary) |
|
|
|
Borrowers Name and Address: |
|
NRG Energy Inc. on behalf of NRG
SUB |
|
|
211 Carnegie Center |
|
|
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
|
(Borrower) |
|
|
|
To Beneficiary: |
|
|
We hereby issue this irrevocable letter of credit no. (Letter of Credit) in your
favor for the account of the Borrower for up to the aggregate amount stated above (Stated
Amount). Drawing(s) made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Letter of Credit
will be duly honored. This Letter of Credit is effective immediately.
Funds under this Letter of Credit, in an amount not to exceed the Stated Amount, will be made
available to you upon your presentation of a statement (Beneficiary Statement) purportedly
signed by an authorized officer of Beneficiary stating:
Beneficiary hereby demands payment of $[amount] under Letter of Credit no. ___.
Special Conditions
|
1. |
|
Payment under this Letter of Credit will be effected per your instructions
against a Beneficiary Statement presented at Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, 60
Wall Street, 25 Floor, New York, Trade Services Department, New York 10005 (Place of |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Not less than 20 Business Days (or, if earlier, the date on which the
obligations secured by such Letter of Credit are satisfied) |
1
|
|
|
Presentation). Such presentation may be made (i) in person, (ii) by first class
certified and registered U.S. mail, or (iii) by overnight mail. |
|
|
2. |
|
Partial and/or Multiple drawings are permitted. Such partial drawings shall reduce
the amount thereafter available for drawing under this Letter of Credit. |
|
|
3. |
|
This Letter of Credit shall be deemed automatically extended without amendment for an
additional period of twelve (12) months from the then-current Expiration Date, unless
Issuing Bank notifies Beneficiary in writing that Issuing Bank elects not to extend
the Letter of Credit for an additional period at least one hundred and twenty (120)
days prior to such Expiration Date. In the event such notice is timely delivered by
Issuing Bank to Beneficiary, Beneficiary may draw the full Stated Amount under the
Letter of Credit at any time on or prior to the Expiration Date. |
|
|
4. |
|
This Letter of Credit will terminate at 5:00 PM New York time on the earlier of (i)
the Expiration Date (other than with respect to any outstanding drawing requests made
on or prior to such date), (ii) the date of surrender by you of this Letter of Credit
for cancellation, and (iii) the date of our honoring of drawing(s) under this Letter
of Credit that, in the aggregate, equal the Stated Amount. |
|
|
5. |
|
All Issuing Bank charges are for the account of Borrower. |
|
|
6. |
|
This Letter of Credit shall not be amended except with the written concurrence of
Beneficiary, Borrower, and Issuing Bank. |
|
|
7. |
|
Any communications to us with respect to this Letter of Credit shall be addressed to
the Place of Presentation and refer to Letter of Credit No. . |
|
|
8. |
|
Unless otherwise expressly stated herein, this Letter of Credit is governed by the
Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (2007 Revision), International
Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600 (UCP). As to matters not governed by the
UCP, this Letter of Credit is governed by the laws of the State of New York. |
|
|
9. |
|
The following Articles under UCP are modified as follows: |
|
(i) |
|
Article 14(b) is modified such that five banking days is changed to be three (3) banking
days following the day of receipt of documents; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Article 36 is amended such that if the
Letter of Credit expires while the Place for Presentation is closed due to events described in
said Article, then the Expiration Date of this letter of credit shall be automatically extended
without amendment to a date thirty (30) calendar days after the Place for Presentation reopens
for business. |
Very truly yours,
DEUTSCHE BANK AG
New York Branch
2
EXHIBIT B
GUARANTY OF BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
For value received, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Bank of America Corporation, a
corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (Bank of
America), hereby unconditionally guarantees to NRG Energy, Inc. (the Company) the prompt payment
of any and all obligations and liabilities of each of Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. and Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. (the Merrill Parties), along with any successors and permitted assigns, to the
extent such successors or permitted assigns are direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of
Bank of America, to return Posted Collateral to the Company or transfer Posted Collateral to an
Acceptable Collateral Agent, in each case, as required by the terms of Section 10 of the Amended
and Restated Credit Sleeve and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of September 30, 2009, (the
"Agreement) among, inter alia, Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the
Company and certain of the Companys affiliates (as such Section may be amended, supplemented or
otherwise modified from time to time, the Specified Section), at all times, in accordance with
the terms of the Specified Section. In the event that the Merrill Parties fail to return or
transfer Posted Collateral under the Specified Section when required after giving effect to any
applicable notice requirement and grace period, Bank of America hereby agrees to cause any such
return or transfer to be made, promptly upon receipt of written demand from the Company to Bank of
America; provided, however, that delay by the Company in giving such demand shall in no event
affect Bank of Americas obligations under this Guaranty. This Guaranty shall remain in full force
and effect or shall be reinstated (as the case may be) if at any time the return of any amount of
Posted Collateral guaranteed hereunder, in whole or in part, is rescinded or must otherwise be
returned by the Company upon the insolvency, bankruptcy or reorganization of any Merrill Party or
otherwise, all as though such return or transfer had not been made. Capitalized terms used and not
defined herein have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement.
This Guaranty shall be one of payment and not of collection and shall be irrevocable in respect of
any payment obligations incurred by the Merrill Parties under the Specified Section (and, for all
purposes of this Guaranty, payment obligation will include any obligation of the Merrill Parties
to return or transfer Posted Collateral in accordance with the Specified Section). Bank of America
hereby agrees that its obligations hereunder shall be unconditional, irrespective of (i) the
validity, regularity or enforceability (except as may result from any applicable statute of
limitations) of the Agreement or the Specified Section, (ii) the absence of any action to enforce
the same, (iii) any waiver or consent by the Company concerning any provisions thereof, (iv) the
rendering of any judgment against the Merrill Parties or any action to enforce the same or (v) any
other circumstances that might otherwise constitute a legal or equitable discharge of a guarantor
or a defense of a guarantor, other than defense of payment. Bank of America covenants that this
Guaranty shall not be discharged except by complete return or transfer, as applicable, of all
Posted Collateral in accordance with the Specified Section. This
Guaranty shall continue to be effective if any Merrill Party merges or consolidates with or into
another entity, loses its separate legal identity or ceases to exist.
Bank of America hereby waives diligence, presentment, protest, notice of protest, acceleration,
and dishonor, filing of claims with any court in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy of a
Merrill Party, all demands whatsoever, except as noted in the first paragraph hereof, and any
right to require a proceeding first against the Merrill Parties. Neither Bank of America nor the
Company may assign its rights, interests or obligations hereunder to any other person (except by
operation of law) without the prior written consent of the other party.
Bank of America shall not exercise any right that it may acquire by way of subrogation under this
Guaranty, by payment made hereunder or otherwise, until all Posted Collateral is returned to the
Company or transferred to an Acceptable Collateral Agent, in each case, in accordance with the
Specified Section. Subject to the foregoing, upon performance of all such obligations of the
Merrill Parties, Bank of America shall be subrogated to the rights of the Company against the
Merrill Parties, and the Company agrees to take at Bank of Americas expense such steps as Bank of
America may reasonably request to implement such subrogation.
Bank of America shall reimburse the Company for any reasonable fees and expenses incurred by the
Company in the enforcement of the Companys rights under this Guaranty (including the reasonable
fees and expenses of outside counsel) if Bank of America shall be found liable for any non-payment
hereunder in a final, non-appealable judicial determination of a court of competent jurisdiction.
Bank of America shall not be required to pay, or otherwise be liable to, the Company for any
consequential, indirect or punitive damages (including, but not limited to, opportunity costs or
lost profits).
Bank of America hereby represents and warrants that this Guaranty constitutes the valid and
binding obligation of Bank of America and does not violate or conflict with any applicable law.
This Guaranty shall automatically terminate upon the termination of the Agreement and the
discharge of all of the Merrill Parties obligations to return to the Company all Posted
Collateral in accordance with the Specified Section.
For the avoidance of doubt, the agreements made by Bank of America under this Guaranty will have
no force and effect, unless this Guaranty is executed and delivered by the Company to Bank of
America as contemplated below.
This Guaranty may be executed in multiple counterparts and by each party hereto in separate
counterparts, all of which, taken together, will constitute an original. Delivery of an executed
counterpart of a signature page to this Guaranty by telecopier or e-mail will be effective as
delivery of a manually executed counterpart thereof.
This Guaranty shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State
of New York as applicable to contracts or instruments made and to be performed therein.
[The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BANK OF AMERICA has caused this Guaranty to be executed in its corporate name
by its duly authorized representative.
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
By:
Name:
Title:
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, David W. Crane, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NRG Energy, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID W. CRANE |
|
|
|
|
David W. Crane
|
|
|
Date: November 2, 2009
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert C. Flexon, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NRG Energy, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT C. FLEXON |
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Flexon
|
|
|
Date: November 2, 2009
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
exv31w3
EXHIBIT 31.3
CERTIFICATION
I, James J. Ingoldsby, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NRG Energy, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES J. INGOLDSBY |
|
|
|
|
James J. Ingoldsby
|
|
|
Date: November 2, 2009
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
exv32
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of NRG Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Form 10-Q), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officers knowledge:
(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Form 10-Q.
Date: November 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID W. CRANE
|
|
|
David W. Crane, |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT C. FLEXON
|
|
|
Robert C. Flexon, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES J. INGOLDSBY
|
|
|
James J. Ingoldsby, |
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within
the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NRG
Energy, Inc. and will be retained by NRG Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.