e8vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) July 30, 2009
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
|
001-15891
|
|
41-1724239 |
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
211 Carnegie Center
|
|
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
609-524-4500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
On July 30, 2009, NRG Energy, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this
report on Form 8-K and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
99.1
|
|
Press Release, dated July 30, 2009 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael R. Bramnick
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Bramnick |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
General Counsel |
|
|
Dated: July 30, 2009
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
99.1
|
|
Press Release, dated July 30, 2009 |
exv99w1
Exhibit 99.1
NRG Energy, Inc. Reports Record Second Quarter Results
Second Quarter 2009 Financial Highlights
§ |
|
$722 million of cash from operations, a 66% increase compared to the second quarter of 2008 |
§ |
|
$747 million of adjusted EBITDA, excluding mark-to-market (MtM), versus $683 million in the
second quarter of 2008 |
§ |
|
$230 million of adjusted EBITDA produced by Reliant Energy in its first two months of NRG
ownership |
§ |
|
$2,500 million adjusted EBITDA guidance for 2009, up from $2,175 million |
§ |
|
$260 million of net proceeds from MIBRAG sale closed in June |
§ |
|
$4,026 million of liquidity as of June 30, 2009, up $939 million from March 31, 2009 |
PRINCETON, NJ; July 30, 2009NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG) today reported net income for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 of $433 million, or $1.56 per diluted common share, compared to $127
million, or $0.48 per diluted common share, for the second quarter last year. The current quarters
results benefited both from the May 1, 2009 acquisition of Reliant Energy, which contributed $233
million in after tax income in its first two months of NRG ownership, and from a $128 million
after-tax gain on the sale of MIBRAG. Last years second quarter net income included a $168 million
after-tax gain on the sale of Itiquira Energetica S.A., or ITISA. Income from continuing operations
before taxes was $582 million during the second quarter of 2009, a $676 million increase over the
$94 million loss in the second quarter of 2008. The increase in income from continuing operations,
in addition to Reliant Energys contribution, is primarily attributed to $118 million in unrealized
mark-to-market (MtM) gains in the current quarter compared with $533 million in unrealized MtM
losses in the second quarter of 2008. Operating expenses for the second quarter of 2009 included $4
million in Exelon defense costs, $21 million of acquisition costs and $2 million of integration
costs associated with the Companys acquisition and integration of Reliant Energy.
Net income for the first half of 2009 was $631 million or $2.27 per diluted common share, compared
to $176 million or $0.63 per diluted common share, for the same period last year. Income from
continuing operations before taxes was $1,078 million for the first half of 2009, a $1,073 million
increase from $5 million in the first half of 2008. The increase in 2009 reflects the $389 million
of unrealized MtM gains in the first half compared to $693 million of unrealized MtM losses in the
first half of 2008. Operating expenses for the first six months of 2009 included $9 million in
Exelon defense costs, $33 million of acquisition costs and $2 million of integration costs
associated with the Companys acquisition of Reliant Energy.
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM impacts, was $747 million for the second quarter of 2009 compared to
$683 million in the second quarter of 2008. The $64 million quarter-over-quarter increase was
driven by Reliant Energys adjusted EBITDA contribution of $230 million in 2009 offset by a $166
million decrease in the wholesale portfolio, primarily the Texas Region. For the first half of 2009
and 2008, adjusted EBITDA was approximately $1.2 billion for both years as the inclusion of Reliant
Energys results offset lower power prices and generation across the wholesale fleet in 2009.
Cash flow from operations was $722 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a $286 million
increase from the same period in 2008. The return of collateral posted last year due to higher gas
1
and power prices in the first half of 2008 coupled with the normal roll off of existing commercial
trade positions was the primary contributor to the increase. The first half of 2009s strong
operating cash flows added to the Companys record liquidity level providing the foundation for our
recently increased $500 million share buyback program.
Plant operations continued to deliver strong performance during 2009 as baseload equivalent
availability factor (EAF), improved to 90.4% from 89.0% in the second quarter of 2008. Newly
constructed control systems on Huntley 67 & 68 and Dunkirk 3 & 4 are operating as planned. NRGs
baseload operations met the record June power demand in the ERCOT market by achieving an EAF of 99%
and net capacity factor of 96%. Additionally, NRGs Cedar Bayou unit 4 repowering project achieved
commercial operation in June and was immediately available to help meet the increased power demand
in ERCOT by achieving 99% availability and an 82% capacity factor.
Total generation, however, declined 13% and 20% in our baseload and gas fleets respectively, driven
by the economic slowdown, an unseasonably cool start to summer in the Northeast, lower natural gas
prices, and the scheduled outages to install environmental back-end controls at Dunkirk. These
conditions were partially offset by the warm dry weather in Texas which led to the record power
demand in ERCOT.
Exceptional execution across all phases of the Companys business enabled us to overcome economic
headwinds and achieve both record first half financial results and significant enhancements to
NRGs business platform, commented David Crane, NRG President and Chief Executive Officer. We are
now focused intently on achieving an even stronger financial result in the second half of 2009.
Regional Segment Review of Results
Table 1: Three Months Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
Segment |
|
6/30/09 |
|
6/30/08 |
|
6/30/09 |
|
6/30/08 |
|
Reliant Energy |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
South Central |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
West |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
International |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Corporate (1) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals (2) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
Add: Prior period MtM reversals (3) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
Less: Hedge ineffectiveness(4) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
Total, net of MtM Impacts |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes net interest expense of $116 million and $84 million for the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, and $197 million and $178 million for the first six
months 2009 and 2008, respectively; and
Exelon Defense and Reliant Integration costs of $27 million for the second quarter of 2009, and $44 million for the first six months of 2009. |
2
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents net MtM gains/(losses) on economic hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the reversal of MtM gains/(losses) previously recognized on economic hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents ineffectiveness gains/(losses) due to a change in correlation, predominately between natural gas and power prices, on economic hedges that
qualify for hedge accounting treatment. |
Table 2: Adjusted EBITDA, net of MtM impacts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
Segment |
|
6/30/09 |
|
6/30/08 |
|
6/30/09 |
|
6/30/08 |
|
Reliant Energy |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
South Central |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
West |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
International |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, net of MtM(1) |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes net domestic forward MtM gains/(losses), reversal of prior period net MtM
gains/(losses) and hedge ineffectiveness gains/(losses) on economic hedges as shown in Table 1
above. Detailed adjustments by region are shown in Appendix A. |
MtM Impacts of Hedging Activities
The Company, in the normal course of business, enters into contracts to lock in forward prices for
a significant portion of its expected power generation and to fulfill Reliant Energys supply
requirements. Although these transactions are predominantly economic hedges of our generation
portfolio and load requirements, a portion of these forward sales and purchases are not afforded
hedge accounting treatment and the MtM change in value of these transactions is recorded to current
period earnings. For the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a $152 million forward net MtM gain
representing the net difference between the fair value of our economic hedges and the $193 million
reversal of previously recognized unrealized losses on settled positions. In the second quarter of
2008, there were $543 million net domestic MtM losses caused by a period of increasing power and
natural gas prices and $333 million associated with ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges.
During the first half of 2009 we recognized $484 million of MtM gains with $307 million associated
with economic hedges that increased in value due to falling gas and power prices. In contrast, the
first half of 2008 experienced $713 million in net MtM losses of which $378 million was driven by
ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges. The sharp increase in the market price of natural gas caused
the forward MtM losses and ineffectiveness in 2008, primarily during the second quarter. Power
prices rose across all of NRGs regions during the 2008 quarter, but at a slower rate than natural
gas prices, resulting in the hedge ineffectiveness during the period.
Reliant Energy: The results for Reliant Energy include operations for the last two months of the
quarter as NRG closed the acquisition of Reliant Energy on May 1, 2009. During the quarter, Reliant
Energys adjusted EBITDA totaled $230 million driven by strong margins across the retail segment
and accompanied by high customer usage from warmer weather, which was slightly offset by a decrease
in customer count. The solid second quarter margins are a result of the lag between falling energy
supply costs, driven by the significant decline in natural gas prices since mid 2008. Immediately
after closing the transaction, Reliant Energy lowered prices by 10% on select residential
3
customer segments, and in June announced another rate reduction of up to 20% for residential
customers on month-to-month flex plans. Total revenues, excluding contract amortization, for the
quarter were $1,250 million on 10,431 GWh sold to both Commercial and Industrial and to Mass
customers. Cost of energy, excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts for energy
supply, totaled $930 million, resulting in a gross margin of $320 million. Other operating expenses
incurred during the quarter totaled $90 million and included $25 million of expenses associated
with the call center; billing, credit and collections; $40 million of selling, general and
administrative expense; $16 million of gross receipts tax; and $9 million of bad debt expense.
Texas: Texas adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2009 decreased by $169 million to $346
million compared to the second quarter of 2008. During 2008, the region benefited from higher
natural gas prices and heat rates caused by congestion between zones. Further realized power prices
were $17/MWh higher along with 342,000 more MWh sold resulting in $114 million higher energy
margins in the second quarter in 2008 versus 2009. Emission sales allocated to the Texas region
were $10 million higher during the second quarter of 2008 compared to 2009. In addition, during the
second quarter of 2008, CPS reimbursed NRG for $7 million of development costs associated with STP
3&4 that were included in last years EBITDA.
Northeast: The Northeast regions adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2009 was $117 million,
a $4 million increase compared to the same quarter in 2008. Energy margins were $13 million higher
in 2009 as the contributions realized from our hedging program and contract revenue more than
offset lower market prices and reduced generation. Generation in the second quarter of 2009 was 50%
lower compared to 2008 resulting in a $39 million decrease to energy margin. This was offset by an
increase of $24 million in contract revenue due to lower cost to serve load obligations and a $29
million increase in realized margin per MWh due to the portfolio hedging.
South Central: The regions adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2009 was $24 million, a $6
million increase compared to the same quarter in 2008. The gain in EBITDA was driven by decreases
in maintenance costs of $4 million and general and administrative costs of $2 million. Maintenance
expenses were down as the spring outage in 2009 was on Big Cajun unit 3, a jointly owned unit with
Entergy where costs are shared, while the 2008 spring outage was on unit 1. Decreases in
generation, contract revenue, and merchant sales were essentially offset by gains from reduced
purchased power expenses and unrealized MtM gains related to the expected physical merchant sales
in the region.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Table 3: Corporate Liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
($ in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Total Cash |
|
$ |
2,769 |
|
|
$ |
2,480 |
|
|
$ |
2,264 |
|
Letter of credit availability |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
Revolver availability |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Total Liquidity |
|
$ |
4,494 |
|
|
$ |
4,364 |
|
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
Less: Funds deposited as
collateral by hedge
counterparties |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(1,277 |
) |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
Total Current Liquidity |
|
$ |
4,026 |
|
|
$ |
3,087 |
|
|
$ |
3,364 |
|
|
4
Total liquidity, excluding counterparty collateral received, increased $939 million to over $4
billion during the second quarter driven by a $1.1 billion increase in cash and cash equivalents
offset by a $159 million reduction in synthetic and revolver credit facilities. The increase in
cash and cash equivalents during the quarter was principally driven by $678 million in cash
proceeds from the issuance of the Companys 8.5% senior notes due in 2019, $260 million in net
proceeds from the sale of MIBRAG, and a $50 million capital contribution from Toshiba to Nuclear
Innovation North America (NINA). These cash inflows were offset by the $288 million acquisition of
Reliant Energy as well as $63 million for the first reimbursement to RRI Energy for the net working
capital acquired. NRGs synthetic letter of credit facility was lower due to issuing $81 million in
support of the equity bridge loan associated with the GenConn financing. The $59 million letter of
credit posting from the revolver credit facility during the quarter was related to the tax-exempt
bonds issued to help finance the environmental capital expenditures at Dunkirk.
The Merrill Lynch credit sleeve that is used to support Reliants liquidity requirements is
expected to be replaced through the use of existing liquidity in the late third quarter or early
fourth quarter of 2009. At that time NRG anticipates using a portion of the $678 million cash
proceeds from the second quarter senior notes issuance to provide for Reliants liquidity needs.
Funds deposited by counterparties consist of cash received from hedge counterparties in support of
energy risk management activities, and it is the Companys intention to limit the use of these
funds. Depending on market fluctuations and the settlement of the underlying contracts, NRG will
refund these funds to the hedge counterparties as the underlying positions settle. The decrease to
$468 million resulted primarily from the novation of collateral positions to Merrill Lynch shortly
after the Reliant Energy acquisition in order to reduce the collateral support under the Merrill
Lynch amended credit sleeve agreement.
FORNRG Update Accomplishes 2009 Goal Ahead of Schedule
FORNRG 2.0 targets a 100 basis point improvement in the Companys Return on Invested Capital, or
ROIC, by 2012. The improvements are expected to be accomplished by a combination of higher earnings
and efficiencies in invested capital. The 2009 goal is a 20 basis point improvement in ROIC. As of
June 30, 2009, NRG had exceeded its 2009 goal by achieving a 23 basis point improvement through
improved plant operating performance coupled with projects undertaken by corporate functions that
included accelerating the ability to utilize tax loss carry-forwards and the sale of non-strategic
assets.
2009 Share Repurchase Plan
Given the combination of record financial performance and record liquidity level at June 30,
2009, the Board of Directors approved an increase to the Companys previously authorized common
share repurchases under our 2009 Capital Allocation Plan from the existing $330 million to $500
million. The Company intends to complete the common share repurchases over the balance of the
year.
RepoweringNRG
In May 2009, GenConn Energy, a 50-50 joint venture between NRG and The United Illuminating Company,
began construction of a 200 MW peaking power plant at NRGs Devon site in Milford, Connecticut
scheduled to be in operation in the summer of 2010. Previously GenConn Energy announced a $534
million project financing for two 200 MW projects, including the project at the Devon Site. The
second project will be at NRGs Middletown station with construction scheduled
5
to begin in the first quarter of 2010 and commercial operation expected to begin in the summer of
2011.
On June 1, 2009, NRG completed an agreement with eSolar to acquire the development rights for up to
465 MW of solar thermal power plants. On June 11, 2009 NRG announced the execution of a power
purchase agreement for 92 MW with El Paso Electric for a facility in southern New Mexico. This was
followed on June 25, 2009, when NRG entered into a power purchase agreement with PG&E for a 92 MW
project near Lancaster, CA.
On June 24, 2009, NRG and Optim Energy completed construction on budget and on time in less than
24 months and began commercial operation of a new 550 MW natural gas-fueled combined cycle
generation unit at NRGs Cedar Bayou Generating Station in Chambers County, Texas.
Earnings Conference Call
On July 30, 2009, NRG will host a conference call at 9:00 a.m. eastern to discuss these results.
Investors, the news media and others may access the live webcast of the conference call and
accompanying presentation materials by logging on to NRGs website at http://www.nrgenergy.com
and clicking on Investors. The webcast will be archived on the site for those unable to
listen in real time.
About NRG
NRG Energy, Inc., a Fortune 500 company, owns and operates one of the countrys largest and most
diverse power generation portfolios. Headquartered in Princeton, NJ, the Companys power plants
provide more than 24,000 megawatts of generation capacityenough to supply more than 20 million
homes. NRGs retail business, Reliant Energy, serves more than 1.6 million residential, business,
commercial and industrial customers in Texas. A past recipient of the energy industrys highest
honorsPlatts Industry Leadership and Energy Company of the Year awards. NRG is a member of the
U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP), a group of business and environmental organizations
calling for mandatory legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. More information is available
at www.nrgenergy.com.
Safe Harbor Disclosure
This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions and include our adjusted
EBITDA, cash flow from operations guidance and free cash flow, the timing and completion of
RepoweringNRG projects, the 2009 Capital Allocation Plan and expected earnings, future growth and
financial performance, and typically can be identified by the use of words such as will,
expect, estimate, anticipate, forecast, plan, believe and similar terms. Although NRG
believes that its expectations are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these expectations
will prove to have been correct, and actual results may vary materially. Factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those contemplated above include, among others, general
economic conditions, hazards customary in the power industry, weather conditions, competition in
wholesale power markets, the volatility of energy and fuel prices, failure of customers to perform
under contracts, changes in the wholesale power markets, changes in government regulation of
markets and of environmental emissions, the condition of capital markets generally, our ability to
access capital markets, unanticipated outages at our generation facilities, adverse results in
current and future litigation, the inability to implement value enhancing improvements to plant
operations and companywide processes, our ability to achieve the expected benefits and timing of
our RepoweringNRG projects, acquisitions, dispositions and other development projects as well as
the 2009 Capital Allocation Plan, share repurchase under the Capital Allocation Plan may be made
from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors, including as permitted by United
States securities laws.
6
NRG undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. The adjusted EBITDA guidance, cash flow from
operations and free cash flow are estimates as of todays date, July 30, 2009 and are based on
assumptions believed to be reasonable as of this date. NRG expressly disclaims any current
intention to update such guidance. The foregoing review of factors that could cause NRGs actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements included in
this news release should be considered in connection with information regarding risks and
uncertainties that may affect NRGs future results included in NRGs filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
# # #
Contacts:
|
|
|
Media: |
|
Investors: |
|
|
|
Meredith Moore
|
|
Nahla Azmy |
609.524.4522
|
|
609.524.4526 |
|
|
|
Lori Neuman
|
|
David Klein |
609.524.4525
|
|
609.524.4527 |
|
|
|
Dave Knox
|
|
Erin Gilli |
713.824.6445
|
|
609.524.4528 |
7
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
Six months ended June 30 |
(In millions, except for per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,237 |
|
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
3,895 |
|
|
$ |
2,618 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Acquisition related transaction and integration costs |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Development costs |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
Operating Income |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings/(losses) of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (loss)/income, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
Income/(Losses) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Income/(Losses) From Continuing Operations |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
Dividends for preferred shares |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Income Available for NRG Energy, Inc. Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to NRG Energy, Inc. Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Income/(losses) from continuing operations per weighted average common share
basic |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations per weighted average common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Basic |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Income/(losses) from continuing operations per weighted average common share
diluted |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations per weighted average common share
diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Diluted |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to NRG Energy, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(losses) from continuing operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
8
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
(In millions, except shares) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
Funds deposited by counterparties |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $12 and $3, respectively |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
Cash collateral paid in support of energy risk management activities |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
9,332 |
|
|
|
8,492 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,689 and $2,343,
respectively |
|
|
11,609 |
|
|
|
11,545 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in affiliates |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Capital leases and note receivable, less current portion |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $327 and $335, respectively |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
6,364 |
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
27,305 |
|
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Cash collateral received in support of energy risk management activities |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning reserve |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
Out-of-market contracts |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
12,565 |
|
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
19,203 |
|
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
3.625% convertible perpetual preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,561 |
|
|
|
4,350 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost 17,200,777 and 29,242,483 shares, respectively |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
7,855 |
|
|
|
7,123 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
27,305 |
|
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
9
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions and equity in (earnings)/losses of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of nuclear fuel |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Amortization of financing costs and debt discount/premiums |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Amortization of intangibles and out-of-market contracts |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
Changes in deferred income taxes and liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Changes in nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Changes in derivatives |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
669 |
|
Changes in collateral deposits supporting energy risk management activities |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
(Gain)/loss on sale of assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
Gain on sale of emission allowances |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Gain recognized on settlement of pre-existing relationship |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned equity compensation |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Changes in option premiums collected, net of acquisition |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
Cash used by changes in other working capital, net of acquisition |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Reliant Energy, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
(409 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash, net |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
(Increase)/decrease in notes receivable |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Purchases of emission allowances |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of emission allowances |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations and assets, net of cash divested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Proceeds from sale of equity method investment |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Payment of financing element of acquired derivatives |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Payment for treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Payment of deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Payments for short and long-term debt |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by/(Used by) Financing Activities |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
Change in cash from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
2,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,263 |
|
|
10
Appendix Table A-1: Second Quarter 2009 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
233 |
|
99 |
|
42 |
|
(9) |
|
19 |
|
125 |
|
0 |
|
(76) |
|
433 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Emission Allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exelon Defense Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Reliant Energy Transaction and
Integration Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Loss on MIBRAG Sale Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Settlement of Pre-Existing Contract with
Reliant Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
747 |
|
|
11
Appendix Table A-2: Second Quarter 2008 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
13 |
|
(45) |
|
(6) |
|
13 |
|
186 |
|
2 |
|
(36) |
|
127 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Amortization of Emission Allowances |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
(Income)/loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
683 |
|
|
12
Appendix Table A-3: Year-to-date June 30, 2009 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Energy |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
233 |
|
316 |
|
253 |
|
(8) |
|
16 |
|
137 |
|
4 |
|
(320) |
|
631 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Emission Allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exelon Defense Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Reliant Energy Transaction and
Integration Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Loss on MIBRAG Sale Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Settlement of Pre-Existing Contract with
Reliant Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
13
Appendix Table A-4: Year-to-date June 30, 2008 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
50 |
|
14 |
|
33 |
|
25 |
|
210 |
|
7 |
|
(163) |
|
176 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Amortization of Emission Allowances |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
667 |
|
|
(Income)/loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income are non GAAP financial measures. These measurements
are not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP
measures of performance. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income should not be
construed as an inference that NRGs future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring
items.
EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is
presented because NRG considers it an important supplemental measure of its performance and
believes debt-holders frequently use EBITDA to analyze operating performance and debt service
capacity. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in
isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our operating results as reported under GAAP. Some of
these limitations are:
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital
expenditures, or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements
necessary to service interest or principal payments, on debts or the cash income tax
payments; |
|
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated
and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any
cash requirements for such replacements; and |
|
|
|
|
Other companies in this industry may calculate EBITDA differently than NRG does, limiting
its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash
available to use to invest in the growth of NRGs business. NRG compensates for these limitations
by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA only supplementally.
See the statements of cash flow included in the financial statements that are a part of this news
release.
14
Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a further supplemental measure of operating performance. Adjusted
EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted for reorganization, restructuring, impairment and corporate
relocation charges, discontinued operations, write downs and gains or losses on the sales of equity
method investments; Exelon defense costs, and Texas retail acquisition and integration costs; and
factors which we do not consider indicative of future operating performance. The reader is
encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it appropriate for
supplemental analysis. As an analytical tool, adjusted EBITDA is subject to all of the limitations
applicable to EBITDA. In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, the reader should be aware that
in the future NRG may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this news release.
15