FORM 8-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date
of report (Date of earliest event reported) July 29, 2008
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
|
001-15891
|
|
41-1724239 |
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
211 Carnegie Center
|
|
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
609-524-4500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
o |
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
On July 29, 2008 NRG Energy, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for
the quarter ended June 30, 2008. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this
report on Form 8-K and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
99.1
|
|
Press Release, dated July 29, 2008 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ J. Andrew Murphy
|
|
|
|
J. Andrew Murphy |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel |
|
|
Dated: July 29, 2008
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
99.1
|
|
Press Release, dated July 29, 2008 |
EX-99.1
Exhibit 99.1
NRG Energy, Inc. Reports 2008 Second Quarter and Year-to-Date Results;
Raises 2008 Adjusted EBITDA Guidance
Second Quarter 2008 Highlights:
§ |
|
$683 million of adjusted EBITDA, a 30% increase from 2007 second quarter results |
§ |
|
$554 million of cash flow from operations, excluding collateral deposits, up 65% from
second quarter of previous year |
§ |
|
$2.6 billion of total liquidity, up 12% or $276 million from March 31, 2008 |
§ |
|
$288 million of gross cash proceeds from the sale of ITISA, recognizing a pre-tax gain of
$270 million |
First Half 2008 Highlights:
§ |
|
$1.2 billion of adjusted EBITDA, an 18% increase over the first six months of 2007 |
§ |
|
$764 million of cash flow from operations, excluding collateral deposits, up 36% over the
first six months of 2007 |
§ |
|
Cos Cob repowering project brought on line adding 40 megawatts of generating capacity |
2008 Outlook Improves:
§ |
|
Raising annual adjusted EBITDA guidance to $2.30 billion from $2.16 billion |
§ |
|
Cash generation remains strong with $1.5 billion of projected cash flow from operations
after impact of cash collateral deposits |
PRINCETON, NJ (July 29, 2008)NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG) today reported net income of $129
million, or $0.49 per diluted common share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to $149
million, or $0.51 per diluted common share, for the previous years second quarter as a $270
million pre-tax gain from the previously announced sale of Itiquira Energetica S.A., or ITISA,
partially offset unrealized mark-to-market (MtM) losses during the second quarter 2008. These
results include pre-tax unrealized net MtM losses of $543 million and MtM gains of $44 million in
the second quarter of 2008 and 2007 respectively, as shown in Table 1 below. Excluding these MtM
effects, operating income for the second quarter rose 57% to $600 million compared to $383 million
in the second quarter 2007. This $217 million increase was largely attributable to the strong
performance of the Companys Texas region, including a 24% increase in gas plant generation volume.
Net income for the first half of 2008 was $181 million or $0.65 per diluted common share, compared
to net income of $214 million or $0.71 per diluted common share, for the same period last year.
Operating income for the first half of 2008 was $307 million compared to operating income of $694
million in the first half of 2007. Excluding the year-to-date pre-tax unrealized net MtM effects
shown below, operating income was $1,020 million versus $742 million in the same period in 2007.
This 38% increase was driven primarily by excellent baseload operating performance from our South
Central and Texas regions.
1
Adjusted EBITDA was $683 million for the quarter, up 30% from $524 million reported for the second
quarter 2007. This increase was attributable to a $130 million increase in consolidated gross
margin mainly driven by our Texas and West regions and a $32 million decrease in development
expenses due to the capitalization of STP units 3 & 4 costs and the receipt of development expense
reimbursements from NRGs project partner. For the first half of 2008, adjusted EBITDA was $1.2
billion versus $1.0 billion for the same period in 2007. Commercial and operating performance
across the fleet, contributed to this year over year increase.
Cash flow from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $436 million after posting
$328 million of collateral, as compared to cash flow from operations in 2007 of $459 million after
posting $103 million of collateral. Excluding the impact of cash collateral deposits for both
years, adjusted cash flow from operations increased 36% to $764 million year over year.
Prices for natural gas, oil, coal and power staged an extended rally in the second quarter, in many
cases reaching historical new highs. This broad rally also lifted the out years, and we took this
opportunity to layer in additional power/gas strategic hedges for the 2009-2012 timeframe to better
match power to coal hedged levels.
The Company performed exceptionally well in all regions and all key areas of operation during the
quarter and so far this year, said David Crane, NRG President and Chief Executive Officer. That
we could do so well during such a volatile commodity and Wall Street environment demonstrates the
strength of both our commercial hedging strategy and our prudent balance sheet management.
Regional Segment Review of Results
Table 1: Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
Segment |
|
6/30/08 |
|
6/30/07 |
|
6/30/08 |
|
6/30/07 |
|
Texas |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
South Central |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
West |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
International |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Corporate (1) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals (2) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals (3) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Less: Hedge ineffectiveness(4) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
Less: Net MtM Impacts |
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
Total, net of MtM Impacts |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes net interest expense of $182 million and $203 million for the six months ended 2008
and 2007, respectively, and $85 million and $100 million for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the net domestic mark-to-market (MtM) gains/(losses) on economic hedges that do
not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the reversal of MtM gains/(losses) previously recognized on economic hedges that
do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. |
2
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents the ineffectiveness gains/(losses) due to an increase in natural gas and a
contraction of heat rates on the measurement date for economic hedges that qualify for hedge accounting
treatment. |
Table 2: Adjusted EBITDA from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
Segment |
|
6/30/08 |
|
6/30/07 |
|
6/30/08 |
|
6/30/07 |
|
Texas |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
South Central |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
West |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
International |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, net of MtM(1) |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes net domestic forward MtM gains (losses), reversal of prior period net MtM
gains (losses) and hedge ineffectiveness gains (losses) on economic hedges as shown in Table 1
above. Detailed adjustments by region are shown in Appendix A. |
MtM Impacts of Hedging and Trading Activities
The Company, in the normal course of business, enters into contracts to lock in forward prices for
a significant portion of its expected power generation, fuel and other commodities which impact
financial performance. Although these transactions are predominantly economic hedges of our
portfolio, a portion of these forward sales are not afforded hedge accounting treatment and the MtM
change in value of these transactions is recorded to current period earnings. NRG also uses natural
gas contracts to hedge future power prices, primarily for its baseload generation in Texas, and to
the extent gas and power prices are not 100% correlated on the measurement date, this
ineffectiveness is also reflected in our MtM results. For the second quarter 2008, NRG incurred
$195 million of forward domestic net MtM losses accompanied by a $333 million loss on hedge
ineffectiveness compared to the second quarter 2007, when we recorded a $100 million forward net
MtM gain offset by a $21 million loss on ineffectiveness. For the six months ended June 30, 2008,
we recognized $310 million of net forward MtM losses and a $378 million ineffectiveness loss versus
the six months ended June 30, 2007 when we recorded $21 million of MtM gains along with a $23
million ineffectiveness gain. The sharp increase in the market price of natural gas caused the
forward MtM losses and ineffectiveness in 2008, primarily during the second quarter. Power prices
rose across all of NRGs regions during the quarter but at a slower rate than natural gas prices,
resulting in higher hedge ineffectiveness for the period. The long-term gas and power price
correlation, however, remains effective.
Texas: Adjusted EBITDA for the region was up 54% to $515 million during the second quarter 2008
compared to $334 million in 2007. In addition to a return to normal weather patterns compared to
last year, higher natural gas prices and higher heat rates during May and early June resulted in
higher average power prices during the period. This stronger price environment, coupled with
excellent operating performance from the Texas regions power plants, including a 24% increase in
gas plant generation and advantageous hedge positions, drove second quarter results. Energy margins
increased $139 million due to a $206 million increase in merchant margins, net of settled financial
positions; but this was partially offset by lower contract margins. The increase in merchant energy
margins was driven by a combination of the aforementioned market prices and the roll-off of
contracted generation positions. Contracted energy margins fell due to lower contracted volumes
combined with an estimated $4/MWhr decrease in average
3
contracted prices which reduced margins by $67 million. Results also reflect $9 million in higher
net ancillary revenues and a $12 million allocation from the sale of carbon financial instruments
from corporate sales activities. Development expenses were down $29 million largely due to the
capitalization of STP units 3 & 4 development costs in 2008, and the receipt of a reimbursement
payment during the quarter for such prior spending by our project partner. Operating and general
and administrative expenses increased $13 million mostly due to higher property taxes and increased
maintenance costs at STP due to a longer planned outage on unit one this spring.
Northeast: Second quarter 2008 regional adjusted EBITDA was $113 million, a decrease of $18 million
as compared to the same quarter last year. The benefits of higher average power prices during the
quarter and a 6% increase in generation were offset by the regions hedge position. Contracted net
revenues, however, were lower by $18 million compared to the second quarter of 2007 as the cost to
serve these contracts rose in line with overall price increases in the market. Capacity revenues
were higher by $8 million quarter over quarter as lower New York clearing prices were largely
offset by favorable anticipatory capacity hedges and the benefit of a full quarter of PJM
Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) capacity market results.
South Central: Second quarter 2008 South Central adjusted EBITDA was $18 million, $2 million lower
than the same period in 2007. Continued strong operational performance at the regions coal plant
and higher capacity factors led to a 4% increase in generation. This increase in generation,
coupled with a 3% reduction in contract load volumes due to the expiration of a contract at the end
of 2007, and higher market prices drove a 16% increase in merchant sales as compared to the second
quarter of 2007. The increases in margins were largely offset by unrealized MtM losses related to
the expected forward physical merchant sales in the region.
West: Second quarter 2008 adjusted EBITDA for the West region was $18 million, an increase of $9
million versus the same period in 2007. The increase reflects the benefit of a full quarters
operation of the Long Beach repowering project, which came on line August 1, 2007.
International: With the reclassification of ITISA to discontinued operations and its subsequent
sale, our German and Australian investments comprise this segment. These businesses are largely
contracted and the improvements in second quarter 2008 results were primarily due to weaker U.S.
dollar exchange rates used to translate financial results.
Thermal: The Thermal business is also largely contracted resulting in relatively consistent
performance between the periods presented. However the $4 million decline in adjusted EBITDA to $6
million is largely attributable to the closure of the Rock Tenn thermal facility. This unfavorable
impact is partially offset by a full quarters PJM RPM capacity payments for Thermals Dover
facility. These capacity payments began June 1, 2007.
4
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3: Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Unrestricted Cash |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
Letter of Credit Availability |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Revolver Availability |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
Total Current Liquidity |
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
Liquidity increased $276 million during the second quarter as a $420 million increase in cash
balances was partly offset by a $144 million decrease in letter of credit availability. The $420
million cash increase resulted from another quarter of strong operating cash flows, $554 million
excluding $178 million in net cash collateral outflows, accompanied by a $229 million net pre-tax
cash increase from the April 2008 ITISA sale. These cash inflows provided for increased liquidity
and supported a $245 million cash reinvestment during the second quarter in capital expenditures
for maintenance, environmental compliance and repowering projects. The decrease in letter of credit
availability of $144 million is due to the issuance of letters of credit in support of our
commercial operations hedging program.
Despite posting $328 million of cash collateral during the first half of the year, liquidity at
June 30, 2008 still was strong at approximately $2.6 billion. Cash balances increased $132 million
compared to the end of 2007 primarily as a result of $764 million in operating cash flows,
excluding cash collateral, and proceeds from the sale of ITISA, offset by $188 million in debt
repayments, $55 million in stock repurchases, $28 million for payment of preferred dividends, and
$409 million for cash capital expenditures.
2008 Capital Allocation Plan
NRGs Capital Allocation Plan allocates the Companys free cash flows to reinvesting in the
existing assets of the Company, pursuing growth investments primarily through RepoweringNRG,
managing debt levels, and providing a regular return of capital to shareholders. For the first six
months of 2008, the Company has invested $158 million in the existing asset fleet including $62
million and $97 million in environmental and maintenance spending, respectively. During this same
period, the Company deployed $339 million in capital towards growth investments including $219
million in wind projects, $51 million at our Cedar Bayou project and $31 million at STP units 3 &
4. The Company continued to manage its debt levels within its targeted range by repaying $188
million in consolidated debt during the first half of the year. With respect to our share
repurchase program, we have returned $140 million in capital to our shareholders against our $300
million 2008 program commitment. While we did not buy back any shares during the second quarter,
the Company has a clear focus on completing the remaining $160 million repurchase commitment in
addition to settling out the NRG Common Stock Finance I call options by year end.
5
FORNRG On Target
The Companys Focus on ROIC@NRG (FORNRG) program, a companywide effort introduced in 2005, is
designed to increase the return on invested capital, or ROIC, through operational performance
improvements to the Companys asset fleet, along with a range of initiatives at plants and the
corporate office to reduce costs or, in some cases, increase revenue. The FORNRG accomplishments
include both recurring and one-time cash improvements measured from a 2004 baseline, with the
exception of the Texas region where benefits are measured using 2005 as the base year. Improvements
in reliability throughout the baseload fleet, coupled with higher gross margins, especially in the
Texas region, were key drivers of the year-to-date program performance. Through June 2008, the
Company estimates having reached $241 million towards its fiscal 2008 goal of $250 million under
this program. Once achieved, the Company anticipates launching FORNRG 2.0 during the fourth quarter
2008.
RepoweringNRG Update
RepoweringNRG is a comprehensive portfolio redevelopment program designed to develop, construct and
operate new, multi-fuel, multi-technology, highly efficient, environmentally responsible generation
capacity over the next decade. Recent developments in this program include:
Cos Cob Project Completed
On June 26, 2008, NRG announced the completion of major improvements at its Cos Cob, CT generating
station including the addition of 40 MW of clean, reliable, peaking capacity in the NEPOOL market.
NRG funded and developed this project which added two new gas turbine units, bringing total station
capacity to 100 MW enough to supply power to approximately 80,000 homes and resulted in a 50%
net station reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions, along with a 97% reduction in sulfur emissions.
GenConn Energy LLC Wins CT Bid
On June 25, 2008, GenConn Energy LLC, or GenConn, a 50/50 joint venture between NRG and The United
Illuminating Company, was awarded a contract with the Connecticut Department of Public Utility
Control (DPUC) to build approximately 200 MW of new peaking generation at NRGs existing Devon
plant in Milford, CT. The new Devon generating unit, which will provide power to Connecticut
residents during peak usage periods, is scheduled to be in operation by June 1, 2010.
Plants under Construction
On February 1, 2008, NRG, through its wholly owned subsidiary, NRG Sherbino LLC, entered into a
50/50 joint venture with a subsidiary of BP Alternative Energy North America Inc. to build the
first phase of the Sherbino Wind Farm, a 150 MW wind project located approximately 40 miles east of
Fort Stockton in Pecos County, Texas. Additionally, on March 27, 2008, NRG, through its wholly
owned subsidiary, Padoma Wind Power LLC, began construction of the Elbow Creek project, a wholly
owned 122 MW wind farm in Howard County near Big Spring, Texas. Both projects remain on schedule to
reach commercial operation by the end of 2008.
On August 2, 2007, NRG and EnergyCo, a joint venture between PNM Resources Inc. and a subsidiary of
Cascade Investment, LLC, announced the construction of 550 MW of new gas-fueled combined cycle
generation, at NRGs Cedar Bayou Generating Station in
Chambers County, TX.
6
Outlook for 2008
Stronger first half results, driven by solid operational and commercial performance, were major
contributors to an increase in the Companys 2008 annual adjusted EBITDA guidance from $2.16
billion to $2.3 billion. The second half outlook is essentially unchanged as the baseload portfolio
is largely hedged and we assume normal weather and market conditions in all core markets. NRGs
annual 2008 cash flow from operations guidance of $1.5 billion remains essentially unchanged as the
cash benefits from the increased EBITDA are offset by higher cash collateral requirements and
income tax payments. However, free cash flow guidance after capital expenditures and net portfolio
investments in repowering projects has increased by $71 million as a result of delayed
environmental capital expenditures at the Companys Big Cajun II facilities.
Table 4: 2008 Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA Guidance ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/29/08 |
|
5/01/08 |
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MTM |
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,160 |
|
Interest payments |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
(565 |
) |
Income tax |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Collateral returned/(paid) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Working capital/other changes |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
Cash flow from operations |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
Free cash flow before environmental and repowering |
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
Environmental capital expenditures |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
RepoweringNRG |
|
|
(668 |
)(1) |
|
|
(642 |
)(1) |
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $87 million equity investment in Sherbino Wind Farm net of $50 million capital
contribution to NINA from Toshiba. |
Earnings Conference Call
On July 29, 2008, NRG will host a conference call at 9:00 a.m. eastern to discuss these results.
Investors, the news media and others may access the live webcast and presentation materials by
logging on to NRGs website at http://www.nrgenergy.com and clicking on Investors. Later that
day, the call will be available for replay from the Investors section of the NRG website.
About NRG Energy, Inc.
NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG), a Fortune 500 company, owns and operates one of the countrys largest
and most diverse power generation portfolios. NRGs 48 plants provide approximately 23,000
megawatts of generation capacityenough to power nearly 20 million homes. In November 2007, NRG won
two of the industrys highest honorsPlatts Industry Leadership and Energy Company of the Year
awards.
Headquartered in Princeton, NJ, NRG is a member of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP), a
group of business and environmental organizations calling for mandatory legislation to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions; and a founding member of 3CCombat Climate Change, a global initiative
taking a leadership role in designing the road map to a low carbon society. For more information on
NRG Energy, please visit www.nrgenergy.com.
7
Safe Harbor Disclosure
This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions and include our adjusted
EBITDA, cash flow from operations guidance and free cash flow, the timing and completion of
RepoweringNRG projects, FORNRG targets, and expected earnings, future growth and financial
performance, and typically can be identified by the use of words such as will, expect,
estimate, anticipate, forecast, plan, believe and similar terms. Although NRG believes
that its expectations are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these expectations will prove
to have been correct, and actual results may vary materially. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated above include, among others, general economic
conditions, hazards customary in the power industry, weather conditions, competition in wholesale
power markets, the volatility of energy and fuel prices, failure of customers to perform under
contracts, changes in the wholesale power markets, changes in government regulation of markets and
of environmental emissions, the condition of capital markets generally, our ability to access
capital markets, unanticipated outages at our generation facilities, adverse results in current and
future litigation, the inability to implement value enhancing improvements to plant operations and
companywide processes, our ability to achieve the expected benefits and timing of our RepoweringNRG
projects, FORNRG initiatives and Capital Allocation Plan.
NRG undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. The adjusted EBITDA guidance, cash flow from
operations and free cash flow are estimates as of todays date, July 29, 2008 and are based on
assumptions believed to be reasonable as of this date. NRG expressly disclaims any current
intention to update such guidance. The foregoing review of factors that could cause NRGs actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements included in
this news release should be considered in connection with information regarding risks and
uncertainties that may affect NRGs future results included in NRGs filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
# # #
More information on NRG is available at www.nrgenergy.com
Contacts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media:
|
|
|
Investors:
|
|
|
|
Meredith Moore
|
|
|
Nahla Azmy
|
|
|
|
609.524.4522 |
|
|
|
609.524.4526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lori Neuman
|
|
|
David Klein
|
|
|
|
609.524.4525 |
|
|
|
609.524.4527 |
|
|
|
|
David Knox (Texas and Louisiana) |
|
|
|
713.795.6106 |
|
|
|
|
|
8
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
Six months ended June 30 |
(In millions, except for per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,536 |
|
|
$ |
2,618 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
(Loss)/Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)/Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Refinancing expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
(Losses)/Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
(Losses)/Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Dividends for Preferred Shares |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Income Available for Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Basic |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
(Losses)/Income From Continuing Operations per Weighted Average Common Share Basic |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
Income From Discontinued Operations per Weighted Average Common Share Basic |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Basic |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
(Losses)/Income From Continuing Operations per Weighted Average Common Share Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Income From Discontinued Operations per Weighted Average Common Share Diluted |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
9
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
(In millions, except shares and par value) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1 and $1 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
5,716 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Current assets discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
9,780 |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,025 and $1,695 |
|
|
11,430 |
|
|
|
11,320 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in affiliates |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Notes receivable and capital lease, less current portion |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $411 and $372 |
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Intangible assets held-for-sale |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Non-current assets discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
5,579 |
|
|
|
4,392 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
26,789 |
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
466 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
6,404 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
Current liabilities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
8,068 |
|
|
|
7,895 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning reserve |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
Out-of-market contracts |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Non-current liabilities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
14,305 |
|
|
|
11,246 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
21,837 |
|
|
|
13,523 |
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.625% convertible perpetual preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost 25,832,200 and 24,550,600 shares |
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
(638 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
4,698 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
26,789 |
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
10
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions and equity in loss/(earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Amortization of nuclear fuel |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Amortization and write-off of financing costs and debt discount/premiums |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Amortization of intangibles and out-of-market contracts |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Changes in deferred income taxes and liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Changes in nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Changes in derivatives |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Changes in collateral deposits supporting energy risk management activities |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
Loss/(Gain) on disposals and sales of assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of emission allowances |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Amortization of unearned equity compensation |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Cash used by changes in other working capital |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash, net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Decrease in notes receivable |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Purchases of emission allowances |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of emission allowances |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Decrease in trust fund balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Investment in marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Investment in projects |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Payment of financing element of acquired derivatives |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment for treasury stock |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of minority interest |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
Payment of deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments for short and long-term debt |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(1,459 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
Change in cash from discontinued operations |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
1,263 |
|
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
11
Appendix Table A-1: Second Quarter 2008 Regional Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Interest Expense |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
Loss (Gain) on Sale of Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
140 |
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
683 |
|
|
12
Appendix Table A-2: Second Quarter 2007 Regional Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Refinancing Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Gain on sale of Equity Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
13
Appendix Table A-3: Year-to-date June 30, 2008 Regional Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
|
Northeast |
|
|
Central |
|
|
West |
|
|
International |
|
|
Thermal |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
181 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Accretion of Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
667 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
14
Appendix Table A-4: Year-to-date June 30, 2007 Regional Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
|
Northeast |
|
|
Central |
|
|
West |
|
|
International |
|
|
Thermal |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Refinancing Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Gain on Sale of Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
Less: Hedge Ineffectiveness |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are nonGAAP financial measures. These measurements are
not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures
of performance. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow should not be construed as
an inference that NRGs future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is
presented because NRG considers it an important supplemental measure of its performance and
believes debt-holders frequently use EBITDA to analyze operating performance and debt service
capacity. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in
isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our operating results as reported under GAAP. Some of
these limitations are:
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital
expenditures, or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements
necessary to service interest or principal payments, on debts; |
|
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being
depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not
reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and |
15
|
|
|
Other companies in this industry may calculate EBITDA differently than NRG does,
limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash
available to use to invest in the growth of NRGs business. NRG compensates for these limitations
by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA only supplementally.
See the statements of cash flow included in the financial statements that are a part of this news
release.
Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a further supplemental measure of operating performance. Adjusted
EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted for discontinued operations, gains on sale of equity method
investments and other assets; factors which we do not consider indicative of future operating
performance. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it
appropriate for supplemental analysis. As an analytical tool, adjusted EBITDA is subject to all of
the limitations applicable to EBITDA. In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, the reader should
be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this news release.
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding mark-to-market (MtM) adjustments, is provided to further supplement
adjusted EBITDA by excluding the impact of unrealized MtM adjustments included in EBITDA for hedge
contracts that are economic hedges but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance
with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as well as the
ineffectiveness impact of economic hedge contracts that qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM adjustments, is a supplemental measure provided to illustrate the
impact of MtM movements on adjusted EBITDA resulting from commodity price movements for economic
hedge contracts while the underlying hedged commodity has not been subject to MtM adjustments.
Free cash flow is cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and preferred stock dividends
and is used by NRG predominantly as a forecasting tool to estimate cash available for debt
reduction and other capital allocation alternatives. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each
adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it appropriate for supplemental analysis. In addition, in
evaluating free cash flow, the reader should be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses
similar to the adjustments in this news release.
16