8-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)
|
|
November 2, 2007 |
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
|
001-15891
|
|
41-1724239 |
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
211 Carnegie Center
|
|
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
609-524-4500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
|
|
|
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
|
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
|
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
On November 2, 2007 NRG Energy, Inc. issued a press release announcing its
financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. A copy of the press release is
furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report on Form 8-K and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
99.1
|
|
Press Release, dated November 2, 2007 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ J. Andrew Murphy
|
|
|
|
J. Andrew Murphy |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel |
|
|
Dated: November 2, 2007
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
99.1
|
|
Press Release, dated November 2, 2007 |
EX-99.1
Exhibit 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NRG Energy, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2007 Results;
Accelerates FORNRG Goals; Initiates Next Step in Capital Allocation Plan;
and Increases Guidance for 2007
Third Quarter Highlights:
|
|
$719 million of adjusted EBITDA, excluding mark-to-market impacts; |
|
|
|
$517 million of cash flow from operations; and |
|
|
|
$250 million 2009 goal of recurring pre-tax income improvement from FORNRG accelerated to
2008. |
Capital Allocation:
|
|
First Lien Collateral Program increased liquidity by over $550 million; |
|
|
|
Share Repurchase Programcompleted Phase II with 1,337,500 common shares; and |
|
|
|
Conditional tender offer and concurrent alternative consent solicitation initiated;
beginning next step in the holding company structure implementation. |
RepoweringNRG /ecoNRG:
|
|
260 MW Long Beach Emergency Repowering commences operation on schedule; |
|
|
|
550 MW Cedar Bayou 4 begins construction; |
|
|
|
125 MW carbon capture initiative entered into with Powerspan; and |
|
|
|
CPS (San Antonio) becomes 50% development partner in South Texas Project (STP) 3&4. |
Guidance:
|
|
$100 million increase in adjusted EBITDA guidance to $2.3 billion for 2007; and |
|
|
|
$2.2 billion initial adjusted EBITDA guidance established for 2008. |
PRINCETON, NJ; (November 2, 2007)NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG) today reported income from
continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007 of $268 million, or $0.93 per
diluted common share, as compared to $371 million, or $1.16 per diluted common share, for the same
period last year. Both quarterly and year-to-date comparisons are impacted by mark-to-market (MtM)
movements and expenses incurred to support our RepoweringNRG program. Quarterly operating income
from continuing operations before income taxes, excluding MtM
impacts, increased from $411 million
to $423 million. Third quarter 2007 results include $49 million in RepoweringNRG program net
development costs, an increase of $40 million from last years third quarter.
Income from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $482 million, or
$1.66 per diluted common share, declined from $588 million, or $1.92 per diluted common share, for
the same period last year. Income from continuing operations before income taxes for the first
three quarters of 2007, excluding MtM impacts, increased to $841 million from $602 million in the
same period in 2006. Nine-month operating results in 2007 included $108 million of net development
expenses for our RepoweringNRG program. Year-to-date results were also favorably
affected by higher generation and capacity revenues in the Northeast region, the inclusion of an
additional month for NRG Texas because this business was acquired on February 2, 2006, and were
partially offset by a $35 million non-cash, pre-tax charge related to the completion of the $4.4
billion refinancing of the Companys Senior Credit Facility in conjunction with our Comprehensive
Capital Allocation Plan announced on May 2, 2007.
Cash flow from operations for the first nine months of 2007 was $976 million, after posting $107
million of collateral, as compared to adjusted cash flow from operations of $1,048 million, after
collecting $397 million of collateral during the same period last year. Adjusted cash flow from
operations through September 30, 2007, exclusive of collateral movements, increased by $432 million
or 66% over the comparable period in 2006. Cash flow in 2007 included NRG Texas for the full nine
months of 2007. Cash flow from operations also included $425 million from higher contract prices
resulting from last Novembers hedge reset transactions. Partially offsetting these improvements
was a $115 million seasonal working capital increase that is expected to decline in the fourth
quarter of this year.
The Companys strong financial performance was achieved notwithstanding the mild and wet summer
weather in Texas, our largest market, commented David Crane, NRG President and Chief Executive
Officer. As such, these results speak to the strength of our geographically diversified portfolio
as well as the skill of our operating personnel across the Company.
Regional Segment Review of Results
Table 1: Three Months Income from Continuing Operations and Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Income from Continuing |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
Operations before Taxes |
|
|
Three months ending |
|
9/30/07 |
|
9/30/06 |
|
9/30/07 |
|
9/30/06 |
|
Texas |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
South Central |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
West |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
International |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Corporate and Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals (2) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals (3) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Less: Hedge ineffectiveness (4) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
Total Excluding MtM Impacts (5) |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
(1) Includes interest expense of $100 million and $110 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
(2) Represents a net domestic MtM gain of $1 million in 2007 ($8 million loss in Texas and $9 million gain in the Northeast region) and a net domestic MtM
gain of $83 million in 2006, (primarily in Texas ($49 million gain) and the Northeast region ($36 million gain)).
(3) Represents the reversal of $18 million (primarily in Texas) in 2007 associated with the $172 million net domestic MtM gains recognized in 2006 and
reversal of $37 million (primarily in the Northeast region) in 2006 associated with the $119 million net domestic MtM losses recognized in 2005.
(4) NRG also hedges power prices using natural gas contracts and, to the extent gas and power prices are not correlated, the ineffective portion is
included in our MtM results (mainly in Texas).
(5) Total net MtM impacts associated with asset backed hedges.
2
Table 2: Nine Months Income from Continuing Operations and Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Income from Continuing |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
Operations before Taxes |
|
|
Nine months ending |
|
9/30/07 |
|
9/30/06 |
|
9/30/07 |
|
9/30/06 |
|
Texas |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
South Central |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
West |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
International |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Corporate and Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals (2) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Add: Prior period MtM reversals (3) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
Less: Hedge ineffectiveness (4) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
Total Excluding MtM Impacts(5) |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
(1) Includes interest and refinancing expense of $330 million and $397 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Results in 2006 also included a $67 million gain related to a settlement agreement.
(2) Represents a net domestic MtM gain of $23 million in 2007 (primarily $15 million in Texas and $8 million in the
Northeast region) and a net domestic MtM gain of $87 million in 2006 (primarily $57 million in Texas and $33 million in the
Northeast).
(3) Represents the reversal of $109 million ($69 million in Texas and $40 million in the Northeast region) in 2007
associated with the $172 million net domestic MtM gains recognized in 2006 and reversal of $102 million (mainly in the Northeast
region) in 2006 associated with the $119 million net domestic MtM losses recognized in 2005.
(4) NRG also hedges power prices using natural gas contracts and, to the extent gas and power prices are not correlated,
the ineffective portion is included in our MtM results (mainly in Texas).
(5) Total net MtM impacts associated with asset backed hedges.
MtM Impacts of Hedging and Trading Activities
The Company, in the normal course of business, enters into contracts to lock in forward prices for
a significant portion of its expected power generation. Although these transactions are
predominantly economic hedges of our baseload portfolio, a portion of these forward sales are not
afforded hedge accounting treatment and the MtM change in value of these transactions is recorded
to current period earnings. For the third quarter 2007, we recorded a $10 million forward domestic
net MtM gain representing the increase in fair value of forward sales contracts of electricity and
fuel, compared to $161 million of net domestic MtM gains recorded in the third quarter 2006. Prior
year gains were mainly due to low energy prices and a $78 million ineffectiveness gain in our Texas
region.
Texas: Income from continuing operations before income taxes decreased by $205 million, principally
resulting from a $142 million impact from MtM movements and $34 million of development expenses.
MtM gains recorded in the third quarter of 2006 were $128 million, including the $78 million
ineffectiveness gain, compared to a $14 million net MtM loss experienced this quarter. NRG Texas
incurred $34 million in costs to prepare the STP units 3&4 Combined Construction and Operating
License Application (COLA) submitted in September.
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding MtM impacts, increased $127 million over the third quarter of last year.
Current quarter EBITDA benefited by $180 million from the increase in contract prices from the
November 2006 hedge reset transaction. Offsetting this increase, in addition to higher development
spending, generation at the Texas gas plants declined 1.1 million MWh as mild weather reduced
demand for our peaking units. This decline, combined with marginally lower coal plant
3
availability and lower market prices, partly offset by favorable hedging positions, led to a $31
million energy margin decline versus the same period in 2006.
Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of this year included an additional month of operating
results and the $425 million hedge reset benefit. The financial impact of the year-to-date 2.1
million megawatt-hour (MWh) reduction in output from our gas-fired units was largely offset by the
commercial hedging activities of our Commercial Operations group. Development costs increased $75
million over the comparable period in 2006, primarily for the STP COLA submission.
Northeast: Regional results for the quarter increased as compared to the same quarter last year due
to improved capacity pricing and reduced fuel costs. Capacity revenues increased $28 million over
the third quarter of last year, as plants in the NEPOOL and PJM service areas benefited from new
capacity revenue streams. Northeast generation was slightly lower than the third quarter of last
year, however an increase in natural gas-fueled generation, accompanied by a decline in oil-fueled
generation, led to a $12 million net decrease in fuel expense. Generation at our Arthur Kill plant
increased 31% over the third quarter of last year as the plant responded reliably to frequent
dispatch orders intended to reduce transmission constraints around New York City.
Nine-month adjusted EBITDA, excluding the MtM impact, increased $161 million over the comparable
2006 period. Contributing to the increase was $55 million in higher capacity revenues, $30 million
of which was from the regions NEPOOL assets and $22 million from our PJM assets. Higher generation
in western New York and New York City, accompanied by favorable hedge positions, primarily account
for the remainder of the improved performance versus 2006.
South Central: Third quarter operating income and adjusted EBITDA for 2007 are almost unchanged
from the strong summer performance delivered by this region in 2006. South Central operations
continued to perform well as the regions plants generated 5% more MWh than the third quarter of
last year to meet increased demand from electric cooperative customers. Contract revenues also
benefited from new contracts and increased 2007 capacity payments reflecting a summer peak demand
record set in 2006. Gains in contracts and capacity revenues were offset by a $4 million increase
in transmission costs and a $3 million increase in operating and maintenance expenses, mainly in
preparation for a fall outage. On a year-to-date basis compared to 2006, increased energy revenues
from new contracts and higher capacity payments are more than offset by a $12 million increase in
transmission expenses.
West: Quarter-over-quarter improved results are due to new tolling agreements at Encina and Long
Beach. Recommissioned on August 1, 2007 as part of our RepoweringNRG program, the Long Beach
Generating Station contributed $5 million in capacity revenues. This was partly offset by a
reduction in equity earnings on our Saguaro investment in 2007. Results for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 reflect the increased ownership following our acquisition of Dynegy Inc.s 50
percent interest in WCP (Generation) Holdings LLC (WCP), which closed March 31, 2006. In terms of
post-reporting period events, our California assets sustained no apparent harm during the recent
wildfires in Southern California and, indeed, played an important role in keeping the lights on in
the San Diego area during the crisis.
4
FORNRG
FORNRG is the companywide, multi-year improvement initiative introduced in 2005. Its objective is
to increase the return on invested capital (ROIC) through operational performance improvements to
our generating assets and a range of additional initiatives at plants and across the Company aimed
either at reducing costs or generating additional revenues. The overall program goal is $250
million per year of recurring, cumulative pre-tax earnings improvement by 2009.
FORNRG contributed $39 million to pre-tax earnings in 2005 and $144 million in 2006. For 2007, we
now expect to achieve $220 million, which exceeds by $20 million our previously announced 2007
FORNRG target. The better than expected 2007 results are being driven by:
|
|
|
Exceeding overall plant performance targets, including recapturing plant generating
capacity; |
|
|
|
|
Expanding the FORNRG program further into the Texas region; |
|
|
|
|
Implementing a centralized procurement structure to leverage purchase price power
throughout the Company; and |
|
|
|
|
Higher corporate headquarters contributions to the initiative. |
These results, combined with additional FORNRG opportunities identified this year, particularly in
the procurement area, allow us to accelerate the $250 million overall program target by a full year
to 2008. We have begun a review of the potential to launch a second phase of FORNRG covering 2009
and beyond.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Table 3: Corporate Liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Sept. 30, 2007 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Unrestricted Cash |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
Letter of Credit Availability |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
Revolver Availability |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
Total Current Liquidity |
|
$ |
2,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,854 |
|
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
Liquidity at September 30, 2007 was approximately $2.3 billion, $71 million higher than December
31, 2006. The current quarter total cash increase of $386 million is mainly due to the strong
quarterly cash from operations of $517 million. Capital expenditures of $104 million and common
share purchases of $53 million partially offset the quarters cash flow.
Capital Allocation
In May 2007, NRG announced a Comprehensive Capital Allocation Plan (CCAP) which, among other
things, projected an allocation of the Companys free cash flow over the forward planning period,
reaffirmed NRGs commitment to the regular return of capital to shareholders and contemplated the
introduction of a common share dividend in 2008. The CCAP contemplated several steps to be taken
and approvals to be obtained over the following several months.
5
First Lien Collateral Program and Senior Credit Facility
As part of the Companys $4.4 billion refinancing of its Senior Credit Facility during the second
quarter 2007, NRG received approval from its secured lenders to grant the Companys hedging
counterparties first lien claims against certain NRG assets, which are currently pledged to those
lenders, as collateral for its strategic hedging program. NRG recently reached agreement with
several hedging counterparties to migrate their collateral positions from the existing second lien
collateral program, which includes a combination of letters of credit and second lien claims on the
assets of the Company, to a first lien collateral position. As a result, these counterparties have
returned approximately $557 million in letters of credit previously provided to them under the
Companys $1.3 billion synthetic letter of credit facility.
Prior to year end 2007, the Company intends to use cash on hand to prepay, without penalty, up to
$300 million of its existing first lien Term B loan. Under NRGs existing Senior Credit Facility,
the interest rate applicable to both the $3.1 billion Term B loan and $1.3 billion synthetic letter
of credit facility are reduced by 25 basis points when the Companys corporate Debt/EBITDA ratio,
as defined in the agreement, is below 3.5x. With the anticipated prepayment, NRG expects this ratio
requirement to be met at year-end 2007, resulting in approximately $10 million in pre-tax interest
savings during 2008. Any prepayments made as part of this initiative will be credited against the
mandatory annual Excess Cash Flow offer and mandatory take which is required under the Companys
Credit Agreement in March 2008.
Share Repurchases and Holdco Transaction
During the third quarter, NRG completed Phase II of its previously announced Capital Allocation
Program with the repurchase of 1,337,500 shares of common stock for approximately $53 million.
These purchases, combined with those previously made under both Phase I and Phase II of the
program, bring total repurchases over the past 12 months to 36,607,862 shares for a total of $1
billion (15% of outstanding shares repurchased by the Company at an average cost of $27.31 per
share).
As part of NRGs CCAP, the Company has taken a number of steps to prepare for the creation of a new
holding company (NRG Holdings, Inc. or Holdco) which include:
|
1) |
|
forming the corporate entities required for the Holdco, |
|
|
2) |
|
closing on a $1 billion Holdco delayed draw term loan facility in the 2nd quarter of
2007, and |
|
|
3) |
|
filing for all necessary regulatory approvals to move forward. |
With the recent recovery in financial markets and NRG bond prices, NRG is announcing today its
intention to exercise its right to provide its bondholders with a conditional change of control
notice, and related offer to purchase bonds at 101% of par, prior to the actual consummation of the
intercompany merger which will result in the creation of Holdco. Concurrent with this change of
control offer, NRG will seek consent from the same bondholders to waive the change of control in
exchange for a 12.5 basis points fee. Under the terms of the Companys bond indenture, bondholders
will have thirty (30) calendar days to respond to the change of control offer/consent solicitation.
Based on the outcome of this change of control offer/consent solicitation, NRG will determine
whether or not to move forward with the Holdco formation and draw on the Holdco term loan facility
prior to year end. If the Holdco facility is drawn, the net proceeds will be contributed to NRG
Energy as an equity infusion, and NRG Energy will use these proceeds to repay a portion of its
outstanding Term loans. In this event, the Companys restricted payments capacity, under its bond
indentures, will expand by the amount of the capital contribution, or approximately $1 billion.
6
Additionally, NRG retains the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or all of the bonds
tendered by investors during this process whether or not NRG decides to move forward and form
Holdco.
By using a conditional change of control notice we remain in complete control of our capital
structure throughout the process, commented Robert Flexon, NRGs Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer. Furthermore, with our increased liquidity we expect to have an
opportunity to replace a portion of our non-callable bonds at a cost of 1% above par for bonds
redeemed.
RepoweringNRG
RepoweringNRG is a program launched by NRG in June 2006 to develop, finance, construct and operate
approximately 10,000 MW of new, highly efficient, environmentally responsible capacity over the
next decade, principally through the expansion or repowering of units at our existing sites.
ecoNRG
ecoNRG is a complementary program to RepoweringNRG in that it seeks to reduce the Companys carbon
intensity through the implementation of low and no carbon repowering projects and, through the
investment in and demonstration of carbon capture and other environmentally advanced technologies.
ecoNRG is also focused on increasing environmental awareness, the advocacy of sound environmental
policy and reducing the environmental footprint of the Company, its assets and its employees.
Both RepoweringNRG and ecoNRG consist of numerous individual projects and programs which are being
advanced continuously. Some of the more significant recent advances resulting from these two
initiatives are described in greater detail below.
STP Units 3 & 4
NRG and South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) filed a COLA on September 24, 2007
with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to build and operate two new nuclear units at the
South Texas Project (STP) nuclear power station site. The total rated capacity of the new units,
STP 3 and 4, will equal or exceed 2,700 megawatts using advanced boiler water reactors. This
license submittal continues NRGs leadership role in moving U.S. electrical generation to new,
cost-effective baseload power that does not contribute to global climate change and is the first
license application submitted to the NRC for a new nuclear plant in 29 years. The NRC is in the
process of reviewing our application for completeness. The official COLA review process will begin
when the NRC adds our application to their docket, which is anticipated to occur in 2007.
On October 29, 2007, NRG and the City of San Antonio, acting through the City Public Service Board
of San Antonio, entered into an agreement whereby the parties agreed to be equal partners in the
development of STP 3 and 4 and, in the event either party chooses at any time not to proceed, gives
the other party the right to proceed with the project on its own.
7
Cedar Bayou Generating Station
NRG and EnergyCo, a joint venture between PNM Resources Inc. (NYSE: PNM) and a subsidiary of
Cascade Investment, LLC, announced on August 2, 2007 the formation of a 50-50 partnership to
construct, own and operate a new 550 MW natural gas-fueled combined cycle generating plant at NRGs
Cedar Bayou Generating Station in Chambers County, Texas. Given that the project was permitted by
NRG and is being built at an existing NRG site utilizing certain common facilities, EnergyCo
bought in to the project by making a catch up payment to NRG. Going forward, the parties share
equally the obligations to fund plant construction and purchase additional equipment. NRG will also
provide various ongoing services related to construction management, plant operations and
maintenance and use of NRG facilities in return for a fixed fee plus reimbursement of its costs.
Construction began during the third quarter upon receipt of the air permit and is currently on
schedule. As construction is expected to take no more than 24 months, the new unit is scheduled to
commence operations during summer 2009.
Commercial Scale Carbon Capture and Sequestration at Parish
NRG has signed a memorandum of understanding with Powerspan Corp. to jointly design, construct, and
operate a demonstration facility that will be among the largest carbon capture and sequestration
projects in the world and may be the first to achieve commercial scale from an existing coal-fueled
power plant. The project will be constructed at the Companys WA Parish plant near Sugar Land, Texas,
and is designed to capture and sequester 90% percent of the carbon
dioxide from flue gas equal
in quantity to that from a 125-megawatt unit using Powerspans proprietary
ECO2 technology.
Capital costs for the project, which is expected to be operational in 2012, are estimated to be
between $150 and $200 million. We anticipate that funding for the project will be provided by NRG,
Powerspan, other potential outside investors, along with expected grants from government and
non-governmental entities.
As part of our effort to get the carbon out of coal, it is essential that we develop and deploy
post-combustion carbon capture technologies which can be retrofitted to existing coal plants. This
demonstration project with Powerspan at one of the largest baseload coal facilities in the country
has the potential to be a breakthrough in post-combustion carbon capture, said David Crane.
2007 and 2008 Outlook
The Company is raising 2007 adjusted EBITDA guidance to $2,300 million from $2,200 million and cash
flow from operations to $1,500 million from $1,420 million to reflect our plant and commercial
operations performance year-to-date and our fully hedged baseload position for the balance of the
year. Free cash flow increased $141 million due to the increased EBITDA and a decline in total
projected 2007 capital expenditures from $630 million to $569 million resulting from a deferral of
certain environmental and wind capital expenditures into 2008.
8
Table
4: 2007 Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA Guidance ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Guidance |
|
2007 Guidance |
|
|
|
11/02/07 |
|
8/02/07 |
Adjusted EBITDA guidance, excluding MtM |
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
Interest payments |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(624 |
) |
Income tax |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Collateral payments |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Working capital/other changes |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
Maintenance and capital expenditures |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
Free Cash
Flow before environmental and growth capital expenditures |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
Environmental capital expenditure |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
RepoweringNRG(1) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
|
Free Cash Flow |
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
|
|
(1) Primarily Long Beach emergency repowering, Cedar Bayou 4 and wind power
projects.
Our 2008 adjusted EBITDA and cash flow guidance are $2.2 billion and $1.5 billion,
respectively. The projected gross margin decline as compared to 2007 reflects the impact of forward
hedges at lower prices, offset by increases from capacity payments and repowering projects. The net
development expense decline is due to the reduction in STP development costs. Table 5 reconciles
our 2007 guidance to the 2008 outlook:
Table 5: 2008 Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA Guidance ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Guidance |
|
|
|
11/02/07 |
2007 Adjusted EBITDA guidance, excluding MtM |
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
Gross margin impacts, net |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Development expense reduction |
|
|
75 |
|
Property tax increase in Texas |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Major maintenance (STP dual refueling outage) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Adjusted EBITDA guidance, excluding MtM |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
Interest payments |
|
|
(617 |
) |
Income tax |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Collateral payments |
|
|
3 |
|
Working capital/other changes |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
Maintenance Capital Expenditures |
|
|
(251 |
) |
Preferred Dividends |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash
flow before environmental and growth capital expenditures |
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
Environmental Capital Expenditure |
|
|
(323 |
) |
RepoweringNRG(1) |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Primarily STP Units 3&4, Cedar Bayou 4 and wind power projects prior to project
level financing. Project level financing is expected to be approximately 50% of project costs,
thereby requiring a net cash investment by the Company of approximately $326 million.
9
Earnings Conference Call
On November 2, 2007, NRG will host a conference call at 9:00 a.m. eastern to discuss these results.
Investors, the news media and others may access the live webcast of the conference call and
presentation materials by logging on to NRGs website at http://www.nrgenergy.com and
clicking on Investors. The webcast will be archived on the site for those unable to listen in
real time.
About NRG
A Fortune 500 company, NRG Energy, Inc. owns and operates a diverse portfolio of power-generating
facilities, primarily in Texas and the Northeast, South Central and West regions of the United
States. Its operations include baseload, intermediate, peaking, and cogeneration and thermal energy
production facilities. NRG also has ownership interests in generating facilities in Australia,
Germany and Brazil.
Safe Harbor Disclosure
This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions and include our adjusted
EBITDA, cash flow from operations, and free cash flow guidance, expected earnings, future growth
and financial performance, the timing, completion and expected benefits of RepoweringNRG, the
formation and funding of Holdco the timing of our Capital Allocation Plan, and our carbon capture
and sequestration project, and typically can be identified by the use of words such as will,
expect, estimate, anticipate, forecast, plan, believe and similar terms. Although NRG
believes that its expectations are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these expectations
will prove to have been correct, and actual results may vary materially. Factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those contemplated above include, among others, general
economic conditions, hazards customary in the power industry, weather conditions, competition in
wholesale power markets, the volatility of energy and fuel prices, failure of customers to perform
under contracts, changes in the wholesale power markets, changes in government regulation of
markets and of environmental emissions, the condition of capital markets generally, our ability to
access capital markets, unanticipated outages at our generation facilities, adverse results in
current and future litigation, the inability to implement value enhancing improvements to plant
operations and companywide processes, and our ability to achieve the expected benefits and timing
of our RepoweringNRG projects, Holdco and Capital Allocation Plan.
NRG undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. The adjusted EBITDA guidance, cash flow from
operations and free cash flow are estimates as of todays date, November 2, 2007 and are based on
assumptions believed to be reasonable as of this date. NRG expressly disclaims any current
intention to update such guidance. The foregoing review of factors that could cause NRGs actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements included in
this news release should be considered in connection with information regarding risks and
uncertainties that may affect NRGs future results included in NRGs filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
# # #
More information on NRG is available at www.nrgenergy.com.
|
|
|
|
|
Contacts:
|
|
Media:
|
|
Investors: |
|
|
Meredith Moore
|
|
Nahla Azmy |
|
|
609.524.4522
|
|
609.524.4526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lori Neuman
|
|
Kevin Kelly |
|
|
609.524.4525
|
|
609.524.4527 |
10
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In millions, except for per share amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,786 |
|
|
$ |
1,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,644 |
|
|
$ |
4,479 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
2,478 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
3,397 |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Write downs and gains/(losses) on sales of equity method investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Refinancing expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
Dividends for Preferred Shares |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Income Available for Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Basic |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Income From Continuing Operations per Weighted Average Common Share
Basic |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
Income From Discontinued Operations per Weighted Average Common
Share Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Basic |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Income From Continuing Operations per Weighted Average Common Share
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.92 |
|
Income From Discontinued Operations per Weighted Average Common
Share Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
11
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
(in millions, except for share data) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
795 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1 and $1 |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,515 and $984 |
|
|
11,413 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in affiliates |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Notes receivable and capital lease, less current portion |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $351 and $259 |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Intangible assets held-for-sale |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
4,442 |
|
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
19,204 |
|
|
$ |
19,435 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
8,619 |
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning reserve |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
Out-of-market contracts |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
11,722 |
|
|
|
11,497 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
13,332 |
|
|
|
13,529 |
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
3.625% Redeemable
perpetual preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
4,476 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost 22,512,900 and 29,601,162 shares |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(732 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
19,204 |
|
|
$ |
19,435 |
|
|
12
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Distributions less than equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization of nuclear fuel |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Amortization and write-off of financing costs and debt discount/premiums |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Amortization of intangibles and out-of-market contracts |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
Amortization of stock-based compensation |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Changes in deferred income taxes |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Changes in derivatives |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
Changes in nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Changes in collateral deposits supporting energy risk management activities |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
397 |
|
Gain on legal settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Gain on sale of emission allowances |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
(Gain)/loss on sale of assets |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Write down and gains on sale of equity method investments |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided/(used) by changes in other working capital, net of acquisition and disposition affects |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Texas Genco LLC, WCP and Padoma, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,336 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash, net |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Decrease in notes receivable |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Purchases of emission allowances |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of emission allowances |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Decrease in trust fund balances |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in marketable securities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(232) |
|
|
|
(4,159 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Payment of financing element of acquired derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Payment for treasury stock |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
Funded letter of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
986 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
7,373 |
|
Payment of deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
Payments for short and long-term debt |
|
|
(1,472) |
|
|
|
(4,697 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided/(Used) by Financing Activities |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
Change in Cash from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
1,388 |
|
|
13
Appendix Table A-1: Third Quarter 2007 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
268 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
EBITDA & Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
Appendix Table A-2: Third Quarter 2006 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
422 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
(Income) from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Legal Settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Acquisition Integration Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Audrain Asset Sale Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Write Down on Sale of Equity Method Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
14
Appendix Table A-3: Year-to-date 2007 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
482 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Refinancing Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Gain on Asset Sale of Red Bluff & Chowchilla |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
Appendix Table A-4: Year-to-date 2006 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
651 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Refinancing Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
(Income) from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
In Station Service Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Acquisition Integration Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Mirant Legal Defense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Legal Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
15
Appendix Table A-5: First Nine Months 2006 Free Cash Flow reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted free cash flow and provides a
reconciliation to cash flow from (used by) operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Operations |
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of payment of financing element of acquired derivatives |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are nonGAAP financial measures. These measurements
are not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP
measures of performance. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income should not be
construed as an inference that NRGs future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring
items.
EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is
presented because NRG considers it an important supplemental measure of its performance and
believes debt-holders frequently use EBITDA to analyze operating performance and debt service
capacity. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in
isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our operating results as reported under GAAP. Some of
these limitations are:
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital
expenditures, or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements
necessary to service interest or principal payments, on debts; |
|
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated
and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any
cash requirements for such replacements; and |
|
|
|
|
Other companies in this industry may calculate EBITDA differently than NRG does, limiting
its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash
available to use to invest in the growth of NRGs business. NRG compensates for these limitations
by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA only supplementally.
See the statements of cash flow included in the financial statements that are a part of this news
release.
Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a further supplemental measure of operating performance. Adjusted
EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted for reorganization, restructuring, impairment and corporate
relocation charges, discontinued operations, and write downs and gains or losses on the sales of
equity method investments; factors which we do not consider indicative of future operating
performance. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it
appropriate for supplemental analysis. As an analytical tool, adjusted EBITDA is subject to all of
the limitations applicable to EBITDA. In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, the reader should
be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this news release.
Free cash flow is cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and preferred stock dividends
and is used by NRG predominantly as a forecasting tool to estimate cash available for debt
reduction and other capital allocation alternatives. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each
adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it appropriate for supplemental analysis. Because we have
mandatory debt service requirements (and other non-discretionary expenditures) investors should not
rely on free cash flow as a measure of cash available for discretionary expenditures. In addition,
in evaluating free cash flow, the reader should be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses
similar to the adjustments in this news release.
16