8-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of report (Date of earliest
event reported)
August 2, 2007
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
|
001-15891 |
|
41-1724239 |
|
(Commission File Number) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
211 Carnegie Center |
|
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
609-524-4500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
On
August 2, 2007, NRG Energy, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial
results for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit
99.1 to this report on Form 8-K and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
|
99.1 |
|
Press Release, dated August 2, 2007 |
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ J. Andrew Murphy |
|
|
|
J. Andrew Murphy |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel |
|
|
Dated: August 2, 2007
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Document |
|
99.1 |
|
Press Release, dated August 2, 2007 |
|
EX-99.1
Exhibit
99.1
|
|
|
|
|
NEWS
RELEASE |
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NRG Energy, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2007 Results;
RepoweringNRG Advances; and
Guidance Increased for 2007
Second Quarter Financial Highlights:
|
|
$533 million of adjusted EBITDA, excluding
mark-to-market (MtM) adjustments; |
|
|
$459 million of cash flow from operations during the first half of 2007, net of $103 million in posted
cash collateral; |
|
|
Completed the refinancing and repricing of the Companys $4.4 billion Senior Credit Facility; |
|
|
Repurchased 2.7 million common shares (post-split) for $113 million; and |
|
|
Raising adjusted EBITDA guidance to $2.2 billion and cash flow from operations to $1.42 billion. |
RepoweringNRG:
|
|
260 megawatt (MW) Long Beach Emergency Repowering, a
gas-fueled combustion turbine project is completed on time and
commences operation under a 10-year toll with Southern California
Edison; |
|
|
442 MW of wind power projects in Texas and California advance; and |
|
|
550 MW Cedar Bayou Texas, a gas-fueled combined cycle plant,
to be owned jointly with PNM Resources Inc./Cascade Investment, LLC, receives permits. |
Princeton, NJ; (August 2, 2007) NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NRG) today reported income from
continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007 of $149 million or $0.51 per diluted
common share, as compared to $202 million or $0.63 per diluted common share for the same period last
year. These results include a $35 million non-cash, pre-tax charge related to the completion of
the $4.4 billion refinancing of the Companys Senior Credit Facility in conjunction with our
Comprehensive Capital Allocation Plan announced on May 2, 2007, while the 2006 period benefited
from $15 million in pre-tax settlement agreements. Quarterly operating income improved to $436
million from $410 million in 2006. Second quarter 2007 results included $36 million in net
development costs for our RepoweringNRG program. Operating
income for the three months ended June
30, 2007 were favorably impacted by increased gas generation and pricing in the Northeast region.
Net income from continuing operations for the first half of this year was $214 million or $0.71 per
common share, compared to $217 million or $0.72 per diluted common share, for the same period last
year. Operating income for the first six months of 2007 improved to $709 million from $619 million
in 2006. First half results were favorably impacted by the inclusion of an additional month for
NRG Texas as this business was acquired on February 2, 2006 and higher generation and pricing in
the Northeast region. First half results in 2007 included $59 million of development expenses for
our RepoweringNRG program.
Adjusted cash flow from operations through June 30, 2007, exclusive of collateral movements,
increased by $230 million over the first six months of 2006. First half cash flow from operations
in 2007 included NRG Texas for the full six months of 2007. Cash flow from operations also
included a $245 million benefit from higher contract prices that resulted from last Novembers
hedge reset transactions. Partially offsetting these improvements was a $153 million working
capital build that is expected to partially reverse in the second half of this year. Cash flow
from operations for the first
1
six months of 2007 was $459 million, after the posting of $103 million of net collateral outflows,
versus adjusted cash flow from operations of $604 million, including the benefit of $272 million of
net collateral inflows, during the same period last year.
Through
RepoweringNRG and FORNRG we have our business well positioned for the future, while the strong
execution of our commercial and plant operations has put us in a position to exceed the financial
goals we had announced at the beginning of the year, commented David Crane, NRG President and
Chief Executive Officer. The quarter also marked the timely completion of construction at Long
Beach, our first repowering, and demonstrates how quickly and capably we can act upon a type of
project which will become increasingly prevalent as reserve margins tighten in all of our core
markets.
Regional Segment Review of Results
Table 1: Three Months Income from Continuing Operations and Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing |
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Operations before Taxes |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
Three months ending |
|
6/30/07 |
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
6/30/07 |
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
Texas |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
South Central |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
West |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
International |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Corporate and Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals (2) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Add: Prior Period MtM reversals (3) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Less: Hedge ineffectiveness (4) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
Total net of MtM Impacts (5) |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes interest and refinancing expense of $134 million and $58 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
|
(2) Represents a net domestic MtM gain of $100 million in 2007 (primarily in Texas ($76 million), and the Northeast ($24
million) region) and a net domestic MtM loss of $8 million in 2006 (primarily in the Northeast region). |
|
|
(3) Represents the reversal of $35 million ($23 million in Texas and $12 million in the Northeast) in 2007 associated with
the $172 million net domestic MtM gains recognized in 2006 and reversal of $20 million (primarily in the Northeast region) in 2006
associated with the $119 million net domestic MtM losses recognized in 2005. |
|
|
(4) NRG also hedges power prices using natural gas contracts and, to the extent gas and power prices are not correlated,
the ineffective portion is included in our MtM results (mainly in Texas). |
|
|
(5) Total net MtM Impacts associated with asset backed hedges. |
2
Table 1: Six Months Income
from Continuing Operations and Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing |
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Operations before Taxes |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
Six months ending |
|
6/30/07 |
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
6/30/07 |
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
Texas |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
Northeast |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
South Central |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
West |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
International |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Thermal |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Corporate and Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
Less: MtM forward position accruals (2) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Add: Prior Period MtM reversals (3) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Less: Hedge ineffectiveness (4) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Total net of MtM Impacts(5) |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes interest and refinancing
expense of $228 million and $285 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Results in 2006 also included a $67 million gain related to a settlement agreement. |
|
|
(2) Represents a net domestic MtM gain
of $21 million in 2007 (primarily in Texas) and a net domestic MtM gain of $32
million in 2006 (primarily in the Northeast region). |
|
|
(3) Represents the reversal of
$92 million ($54 million in Texas and $38 million in the Northeast region) in 2007 associated with the $172
million net domestic MtM gains recognized in 2006 and reversal of $65 million (mainly Northeast
region) in 2006 associated with the
$119 million net domestic MtM losses recognized in 2005. |
|
|
(4) NRG also hedges
power prices using natural gas contracts and, to the extent gas and power prices are not correlated,
the ineffective portion is included in our MtM results (mainly in Texas). |
|
|
(5) Total net MtM Impacts
associated with asset backed hedges. |
MtM Impacts of Hedging and Trading Activities
The Company, in the normal course of business, enters into contracts to lock in forward prices for
a significant portion of its expected power generation. Although these transactions are
predominantly economic hedges of our baseload portfolio, a portion of these forward sales are not
afforded hedge accounting treatment and the MtM change in value of these transactions is recorded
to current period earnings. For the second quarter 2007, we recorded $100 million of forward
domestic net MtM gain representing the increase in fair value of forward sales contracts of
electricity and fuel, compared to a $8 million net domestic MtM loss recorded in the second quarter
2006. Hedging management activities included a $21 million ineffectiveness loss in the second
quarter of 2007, compared to a $53 million gain in the same period in 2006 due to a change in the
correlation between natural gas and power prices. This is primarily related to natural gas
contracts sold as a hedge for electricity sales in the Companys Texas region.
Texas: First-half operating
results this year benefited from the inclusion of one extra month of
operations when compared to 2006 as NRG Texas operations contributed $51 million of pre-tax
operating income and $100 million of EBITDA in January 2007. Current quarter and year-to-date
EBITDA and cash flow from operations benefited by $156 million and $245 million, respectively, from
the November 2006 hedge reset which increased contracted power prices. Improved operations and
lower forced outage rates for the baseload coal fleet in the first half of 2007, led to a net
increase in gross margin over the same period in 2006. The timing of the spring refueling outage
at the STP nuclear facility contributed to increased STP operating expenses of $16 million,
compared to the first half of 2006.
3
Northeast: Improved results for the Northeast, after adjusting for MtM impacts, were due to higher
generation and improved power and capacity pricing. Increased generation resulted from the return
of normal weather patterns versus the same period last year and transmission constraints around New
York City. Prices improved as a result of increased natural gas prices. Overall this led to a
$105 million, or 25%, increase in energy revenues over the first half of 2006. Gas generation at our
Arthur Kill plant increased 108% over the second quarter of last year
and 52% year-over-year as it
was called upon frequently to reduce transmission constraints around New York City. Quarterly
generation in 2007 at Huntley and Dunkirk increased by 9% due to higher availability. Capacity
revenues for the three and six month periods increased 2%, or
$2 million, and 18%, or $27 million
respectively, reflecting the higher capacity prices in Western New York and new capacity revenue
streams in the Connecticut and PJM markets that did not exist during the first half of 2006.
Emission credit revenues, however, declined in comparison to 2006. Higher levels of generation
combined with 43% decrease in sulfur dioxide emission credit market prices led to a $50 million decline in
revenues from the sale of excess credits this year. Prior year quarterly results also benefited
from the reversal of $15 million reserve.
South Central: Second quarter operating income was $10 million higher than last year as contract,
merchant and capacity revenues were all higher than last year. Contract revenues benefited from
new contracts and capacity payments rose as a new summer peak demand record was set in 2006 which
reset the capacity payments for 2007. Operating income for the first half of 2007 declined by $11
million in comparison to an exceptionally strong first half performance in 2006. Increased
demand from the regions load-serving customers combined with lower planned availability of the Big
Cajun II coal plant reduced MWs available for sale to the merchant energy market. Energy sold
to contract customers through June 30, 2007 increased by $40 million, while merchant revenues
declined by $13 million.
West:
Results for the year-to-date 2007 reflect the increased ownership following our acquisition
of Dynegy Inc.s 50 percent interest in WCP (Generation) Holdings LLC (WCP), which closed March 31,
2006. Second quarter 2007 results are relatively flat as increased capacity revenues were offset by
increased operating expenses, primarily for maintenance work performed at Encina and El Segundo to ensure
availability under the new tolling agreements.
Regional operating results for the first half of the year more than doubled due to a full six
months consolidation in 2007 and favorable capacity revenues from new tolling agreements executed
by our Encina and El Segundo units after the acquisition date.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Table 2: Corporate Liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006(1) |
|
Unrestricted Cash |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Letter of Credit Availability |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Revolver Availability |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
Total Current Liquidity |
|
$ |
1,854 |
|
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
|
$ |
1,977 |
|
|
|
(1) These amounts
have not been restated for discontinued operations |
4
Liquidity
at June 30, 2007 was approximately $1.9 billion, down $373 million since December
31, 2006 and $123 million since June 30, 2006. The reduction in current liquidity is mainly due to
the $200 million reduction in synthetic letter of credit (LC) capacity as part of our recent
restructuring of the first lien credit facility. Operating cash flows for the first six months of
2007 were $459 million inclusive of $103 million in collateral outflows and $192 million used to
fund accounts receivable increases. Operating cash flows plus $29 million in proceeds from the sale
of Red Bluff and Chowchilla were offset by $205 million of capital expenditures, $215 million for
common share buybacks, $48 million in scheduled principal debt repayments and $28 million in
preferred dividend payments.
Capital Allocation Plan Update
On June 8, 2007, NRG completed its $4.4 billion refinancing of the Companys Senior Credit Facility
previously announced on May 2, 2007. The transaction resulted in a 25 basis point reduction in the
pricing grid for the Term B loan and LC facilities. In addition to the pricing reduction, the
Company reduced by $200 million the LC facility to $1.3 billion and made various amendments to the
Senior Credit facility to provide improved liquidity flexibility, the ability to pay common share
dividends, and various amendments to facilitate and support the repowering efforts. The pricing on
the Companys term loan and LC facility is also subject to further reductions upon the achievement
of certain financial ratios. The refinancing resulted in a charge of approximately $35 million to
the current periods results of operations primarily related to the write-off of previously
deferred financing costs.
On
May 2, 2007, the Company announced its intention to form NRG
Holdings, Inc., or Holdco to support
and facilitate its Comprehensive Capital Allocation Plan. The financing on June 8, 2007, provided
the Company with the right to call and convert $1 billion of the Term B loan and place it at
Holdco. Doing so would increase the restricted payments (RP) capacity under the Senior Note
indentures by a like amount and thereby provide sufficient RP capacity for the Company to initiate
a common share annual dividend in the future. The formation of Holdco requires the approval of
three regulatory bodies, two of which have since granted approval, with the final approval expected
during the second half of 2007.
The Companys announced plan was to form and fund Holdco during the fourth quarter of 2007 and
initiate the common dividend in the first quarter of 2008. If Holdco is formed, it will constitute
a change in control under the Senior Note indentures and provide the right for bondholders to put
the bonds back to the Company at 101% of par. If the current weakness in the credit markets
persists into the fourth quarter and NRGs Senior Notes trade at levels below par, the Company will
likely postpone implementation of the Holdco structure or allow the Holdco credit facility to
expire on December 28, 2007. If this occurs, the Company will delay the introduction of an annual
dividend and will in all likelihood increase common share repurchases in 2008 from previously
stated targets.
The Company completed a 2 for 1 stock split by way of a stock dividend for all common stock issued
and outstanding at the close of business on May 22, 2007. The additional shares resulting from the
stock split were distributed by the Companys transfer agent on May 31, 2007. The number of common
shares outstanding as of March 31, 2007 was 121,123,008, before the split, compared to 239,829,787
on June 30, 2007, after the split. NRG retired 14,094,962 treasury shares (post-split) during the
second quarter. The Company also repurchased 2,669,200 common shares for $113 million during the
quarter, bringing the total for 2007 to 5,669,200 shares repurchased for $215 million. These share
repurchase amounts reflect the effect of the stock split. The Company expects to complete Phase II
of the previously announced share repurchase program with the repurchase of an estimated $53
million of NRG stock by the third quarter of 2007.
5
RepoweringNRG Update
Long Beach
On August 1, 2007, the Company successfully completed and commissioned the repowering of 260 MW of
new gas-fueled generating capacity at its Long Beach Generating Station. This new generation will
provide needed support for the summer peak demand on SCE and
California Independent System Operator systems under a 10-year power purchase
agreement executed with SCE in November 2006. Capital spending
for the project totaled
approximately $75 million.
Cedar Bayou Generating Station
NRG and EnergyCo, a joint venture between PNM Resources Inc. (NYSE: PNM) and a subsidiary of
Cascade Investment, LLC, have entered into a joint operating agreement
to form a 50-50 joint venture to
construct, own and operate a new 550 MW natural gas-fueled combined cycle generating plant at NRGs
Cedar Bayou Generating Station in Chambers County, Texas (Cedar
Bayou 4). The air permit was received from the Texas Commission on
Environmental Air Quality last week. Negotiations with an engineering,
procurement, and construction firm are in the advanced stage. Construction should take no more than 24 months and is expected
to create approximately 600 construction jobs at its peak.
Cedar Bayou 4 demonstrates our
substantial competitive advantage in terms of cost, schedule, location, interconnect and access to
a highly skilled work force, said Crane. As a result, the Houston area will get the power it
needs, when it is needed and at a price which people can afford.
Cedar Bayou 4 will be operated by NRG Texas Cedar Bayou operating staff supplemented with 16 new
positions at the plant. NRGs equity contribution will consist of $105 million cash, access to
onsite infrastructure and services, and some of the major equipment which NRG had been holding in
inventory. Plans also call for Cedar Bayou unit 3, which has been inactive for several years, to
be permanently retired.
Wind Power Projects
The Company is working through its subsidiary, Padoma Wind Power, LLC, and has reached a stage of
advanced development with respect to three wind projects, totaling approximately 442 MW (before
partners) and 350 MW (net ownership). Accordingly, the Company has secured wind turbines from
General Electric Company and Siemens Power Generation, Inc. (The planned 50% partner is supplying
the wind turbines for the third project). Two of the projects are
located in Texas one of which
is scheduled to commence construction this fall, while the other is scheduled to commence
construction in the summer of 2008. The remaining project is located in Southern California
with construction planned for the early summer of 2009. The total project cost for all
three projects, net of third party contributions, is estimated at $682 million. Project level
financing is expected to range from approximately 50 80% of
project costs, thereby requiring a
net cash investment by the Company of approximately $252 million. The expected capital cost for
2007 is $177 million of which $47 million is projected to
be funded through non-recourse debt.
6
Outlook
The Company is raising 2007 adjusted EBITDA guidance to $2,200 million from $2,150 million and cash
flow from operations to $1,420 million from $1,398 million to reflect our strong first half
performance, our fully hedged baseload position for the balance of the year and the expected
reduction in second half operating expenses. Cash flow from operations and free cash flow guidance
from the base business (before repowering expenses) also benefit from the higher earnings outlook.
Capital expenditures associated with RepoweringNRG projects
are primarily for the Long Beach Emergency Repowering, Cedar Bayou 4, and
the advances made in the wind power portfolio.
Table 3: 2007 Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA Guidance ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guidance |
|
Guidance |
|
|
8/02/07 |
|
5/02/07 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA Guidance, excluding MtM |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
2,150 |
|
Interest payments |
|
|
(624 |
) |
|
|
(624 |
) |
Income tax |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Collateral payments |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Working capital/other changes |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations |
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
Capital Expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance and environmental |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
Free cash flow before Repowering/Pfd. Div |
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Dividends |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RepoweringNRG |
|
|
(280 |
)(1) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
The increase from prior guidance is attributable to the Cedar Bayou 4 and wind power projects. |
|
|
Earnings Conference Call
On August 2, 2007, NRG will host a conference call at 10:00 a.m. eastern to discuss these results.
Investors, the news media and others may access the live webcast of the conference call and
presentation materials by logging on to NRGs website at http://www.nrgenergy.com and
clicking on Investors. The webcast will be archived on the site for those unable to listen in
real time.
About NRG
NRG Energy, Inc. owns and operates a diverse portfolio of power-generating facilities, primarily in
Texas and the Northeast, South Central and West regions of the United States. Its operations
include baseload, intermediate, peaking, and cogeneration and thermal energy production facilities.
NRG also has ownership interests in generating facilities in Australia, Germany and Brazil.
Safe Harbor Disclosure
This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions and include our adjusted
EBITDA, cash flow from operations, and free cash flow guidance, expected earnings, future growth
and financial performance, the timing, completion and expected benefits of RepoweringNRG and wind
power projects, the formation and funding of Holdco and timing of our Capital Allocation Plan, and
typically can be identified by the use of
7
words such as will, expect,
estimate, anticipate, forecast, plan, believe and similar
terms. Although NRG believes that its expectations are reasonable, it can give no assurance that
these expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual results may vary materially. Factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated above include, among
others, general economic conditions, hazards customary in the power industry, weather conditions,
competition in wholesale power markets, the volatility of energy and fuel prices, failure of
customers to perform under contracts, changes in the wholesale power markets, changes in government
regulation of markets and of environmental emissions, the condition of capital markets generally,
our ability to access capital markets, unanticipated outages at our generation facilities, adverse
results in current and future litigation, the inability to implement value enhancing improvements
to plant operations and companywide processes, and our ability to achieve the expected benefits and
timing of our RepoweringNRG projects, Holdco and Capital Allocation Plan.
NRG undertakes no obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. The adjusted EBITDA guidance, cash flow from
operations and free cash flow are estimates as of todays date, August 2, 2007 and are based on
assumptions believed to be reasonable as of this date. NRG expressly disclaims any current
intention to update such guidance. The foregoing review of factors that could cause NRGs actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements included in
this news release should be considered in connection with information regarding risks and
uncertainties that may affect NRGs future results included in NRGs filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
# # #
More information on NRG is available at www.nrgenergy.com
Contacts:
|
|
|
Media:
Meredith Moore
609.524.4522 |
|
Investors:
Nahla Azmy
609.524.4526 |
|
|
|
Lori Neuman 609.524.4525
|
|
Kevin Kelly 609.524.4527 |
8
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
Six
months ended June 30 |
(In millions, except for per share amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
2,858 |
|
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
1,482 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
Gain/(loss) on sale of assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
Other Income/(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Write downs and gains on sales of equity method investments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Refinancing expense |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Dividends for Preferred Shares |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Income Available for Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Basic |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
Income From Continuing Operations per Weighted Average Common
Share Basic |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Income From Discontinued Operations per Weighted Average
Common Share Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Basic |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Income From Continuing Operations per Weighted Average Common
Share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Income From Discontinued Operations per Weighted Average
Common Share Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
9
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
(In millions, except for share data) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
795 |
|
|
$ |
795 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1 and $1 |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,334 and $984 |
|
|
11,454 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in affiliates |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Notes receivable and capital lease, less current portion |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $319 and $259 |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Intangible assets held-for-sale |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
4,485 |
|
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
18,936 |
|
|
$ |
19,435 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
8,609 |
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning reserve |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Derivative instruments valuation |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
Out-of-market contracts |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
11,497 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
13,529 |
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
3.625% Redeemable perpetual preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (at liquidation value, net of issuance costs) |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,028 |
|
|
|
4,476 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost 21,175,400 and 29,601,162 shares |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(732 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
282 |
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
18,936 |
|
|
$ |
19,435 |
|
|
10
NRG ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions less than equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization of nuclear fuel |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
Amortization and write-off of financing costs and debt discount/premiums |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Amortization of intangibles and out-of-market contracts |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
Amortization of unearned equity compensation |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Changes in deferred income taxes |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Changes in derivatives |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Changes in nuclear decommissioning trust liability |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Changes in collateral deposits supporting energy risk management activities |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
272 |
|
Gain on legal settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Gain on sale of emission allowances |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
(Gain)/loss on sale of assets |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Write down and gains on sale of equity method investments |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Cash provided/(used) by changes in other working capital, net of acquisition and disposition affects |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
114 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Texas Genco LLC, and WCP, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,328 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash, net |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Decrease in notes receivable |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Purchases of emission allowances |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of emission allowances |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Decrease in trust fund balances |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in marketable securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(4,292 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Payment of financing element of acquired derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Payment for treasury stock |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Funded letter of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
986 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
7,175 |
|
Payment of deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
Payments for short and long-term debt |
|
|
(1,459 |
) |
|
|
(4,662 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided/(Used) by Financing Activities |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
4,075 |
|
|
Change in Cash from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
795 |
|
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
11
Appendix Table A-1: Second Quarter
2007 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Refinancing Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
Appendix Table A-2: Second Quarter
2006 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
412 |
|
(Income)/Loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Station Service Reserve Reversal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Acquisition Integration Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Mirant Legal Defense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
12
Appendix Table A-3:
Year-to-date 2007 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes
the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
|
Northeast |
|
|
South Central |
|
|
West |
|
|
International |
|
|
Thermal |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Refinancing Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
ARO Accretion Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
Gain on Sale of Equity Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Gain on Asset Sale of Red Bluff & Chowchilla |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
13
Appendix Table A-4: Year-to-date 2006 Regional EBITDA Reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted EBITDA and provides a reconciliation to
net income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Texas |
|
Northeast |
|
South Central |
|
West |
|
International |
|
Thermal |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Amortization of Finance Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Amortization of Debt (Discount)/Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Refinancing Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Depreciation Expense |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Amortization of Power Contracts |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
Amortization of Fuel Contracts |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Amortization of Emission Credits |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
(Income)/Loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Station Service Reserve Reversal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Acquisition Integration Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Audrain Asset Sale Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Mirant Legal Defense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Legal Settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
Write Down (Gains) on Sale of Equity
Method Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
761 |
|
|
Appendix Table A-5: First Half 2006 Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations reconciliation
The following table summarizes the calculation of adjusted cash flow from operations and provides a
reconciliation to cash flow from (used by) operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Half 2006 |
Cash Flow from Operations |
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of payment of financing element of acquired derivatives |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
|
$ |
604 |
|
14
EBITDA,
adjusted EBITDA, adjusted cash flow from operations and free cash
flow are non-GAAP financial measures. These
measurements are not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative
to GAAP measures of performance. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income should
not be construed as an inference that NRGs future results will be unaffected by unusual or
non-recurring items.
EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is
presented because NRG considers it an important supplemental measure of its performance and
believes debt-holders frequently use EBITDA to analyze operating performance and debt service
capacity. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in
isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our operating results as reported under GAAP. Some of
these limitations are:
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital
expenditures, or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements
necessary to service interest or principal payments, on debts; |
|
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated
and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any
cash requirements for such replacements; and |
|
|
|
|
Other companies in this industry may calculate EBITDA differently than NRG does, limiting
its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash
available to use to invest in the growth of NRGs business. NRG compensates for these limitations
by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA only supplementally.
See the statements of cash flow included in the financial statements that are a part of this news
release.
Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a further supplemental measure of operating performance. Adjusted
EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted for reorganization, restructuring, impairment and corporate
relocation charges, discontinued operations, and write downs and gains or losses on the sales of
equity method investments; factors which we do not consider indicative of future operating
performance. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and the reasons NRG considers it
appropriate for supplemental analysis. As an analytical tool, adjusted EBITDA is subject to all of
the limitations applicable to EBITDA. In addition, in evaluating adjusted EBITDA, the reader should
be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses similar to the adjustments in this news release.
Adjusted
cash flow from operations is a non-GAAP measure NRG provides to show cash from operations exclusive of the
one-time benefit from the financing element of derivatives acquired from Texas Genco. Free cash
flow is cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and preferred stock dividends and is
used by NRG predominantly as a forecasting tool to estimate cash available for debt reduction and
other capital allocation alternatives. The reader is encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and
the reasons NRG considers it appropriate for supplemental analysis. Because we have mandatory debt
service requirements (and other non-discretionary expenditures) investors should not rely on free
cash flow as a measure of cash available for discretionary expenditures. In addition, in
evaluating free cash flow, the reader should be aware that in the future NRG may incur expenses
similar to the adjustments in this new release.
15